ESD denied my claim saying I broke a county vaping policy that wasn't enforced - appeal tips?
I'm in a tough spot and need advice on appealing my ESD denial. I was let go from my county job last month and applied for unemployment. My claim was denied because my employer told ESD I was fired for breaking the county vaping policy - which shocked me completely. Here's what I'm dealing with: 1) This vaping policy was NEVER enforced at my workplace 2) I regularly saw administrators vaping in their offices 3) When I asked about vaping before, my department head explicitly told me it was fine 4) I was never warned, written up, or disciplined about vaping 5) No one else has ever been terminated for this supposed "rule" I'm 100% convinced my termination was actually retaliation for filing a union grievance against my supervisor three weeks before I was let go. They're using this obscure policy as an excuse, and I had no idea they would claim this was the reason until I saw my ESD denial. I've already filed my appeal and have a hearing scheduled in two weeks. I can get at least 5-6 coworkers to testify the policy wasn't enforced and that others (including management) vaped regularly. Will testimony about selective enforcement help my case? What else should I focus on in my appeal? Any advice from someone who's won an ESD appeal would be incredibly helpful right now.
23 comments


Keith Davidson
You absolutely have a strong case for your appeal based on inconsistent enforcement of the policy. When a workplace rule isn't regularly enforced, it can be considered an "unreasonable" reason for termination under ESD regulations. A few tips for your hearing: 1. Focus on the selective enforcement angle - bring documentation of dates/times you witnessed others (especially management) vaping without consequences 2. Get written statements from coworkers about the non-enforcement if they can't attend the hearing 3. If you have any emails or texts where management indicated vaping was acceptable, these will be extremely valuable 4. The timing of your grievance filing and subsequent termination is definitely relevant - make sure to mention this clearly 5. Be prepared to explain how you were never given any warnings about this policy I went through a similar appeal last year (different issue but also selective enforcement). What really helped me win was having specific examples with dates and names of others who weren't disciplined for the same behavior.
0 coins
Taylor Chen
•Thank you SO much for this detailed advice! I haven't thought about documenting specific dates/times - I'll start working on that tonight. Should I ask my coworkers to include dates in their statements too? Also, would text messages between me and my former boss where we casually mentioned vaping (not explicitly saying it was allowed but clearly not treating it as forbidden) be helpful?
0 coins
Ezra Bates
I went thru something EXACTLY like this in 2025!!! My employer (not county but state agency) claimed I violated a cyber security policy that literally everyone ignored, including my own supervisor!!! I was denied initially but I WON MY APPEAL. Here's what worked for me: - Had 3 coworkers testify via phone during the hearing - Showed emails where my boss had actually broken the same rule - Pointed out I'd never been disciplined or warned about it before The judge said "selective enforcement" was the key factor - they couldn't suddenly enforce a rule for just me that they'd ignored for everyone else. The judge literally wrote that in his decision! Make sure you're super organized for your hearing and speak clearly. Don't get emotional even if they make you mad. Just stick to the facts about how the rule wasn't enforced for others. Good luck!!!
0 coins
Taylor Chen
•This gives me so much hope! Did your coworkers have to appear at a specific time for the hearing or could they call in whenever was convenient? I'm worried about asking people to take time off work to testify.
0 coins
Ezra Bates
•They had to be available during the hearing time. The judge called them one by one when it was their turn to testify. My hearing was scheduled for 2 hours but only took about 45 min. Make sure your witnesses know to keep their phones on and be ready! The judge was super strict about this.
0 coins
Ana Erdoğan
I've been trying to reach ESD for weeks about a similar situation and can never get through! The phone lines are always busy or they hang up after I've been on hold for an hour. I finally found a service called Claimyr (claimyr.com) that got me through to an ESD agent in less than 10 minutes. They have a video that shows how it works: https://youtu.be/7DieNd3C7zQ?si=26TzE_zGms-DODN3 I'd definitely recommend talking directly with an ESD agent before your hearing to make sure you understand exactly what your employer is claiming and what evidence you'll need to counter it. The agent I spoke with gave me specific advice about what documentation would help my case the most.
0 coins
Sophia Carson
•does this actually work? ive been trying to call esd for 2 weeks straight about my adjudication and cant get anyone
0 coins
Ana Erdoğan
•Yes, it really worked for me! I was skeptical too but was desperate after trying for days. The ESD agent I spoke with was actually super helpful and explained exactly why my claim was being held up. Definitely worth it to get actual answers instead of guessing.
0 coins
Elijah Knight
Your union should be helping you with this appeal! That's literally what your dues pay for. My cousin is a shop steward and he says unions usually have people who specialize in unemployment appeals. Have you talked to your rep about this?
0 coins
Taylor Chen
•Yes, I've contacted my union rep. They're providing some guidance but said since this is an unemployment issue rather than a wrongful termination grievance, their direct involvement is limited. They suggested I gather evidence on my own while they work on a separate wrongful termination grievance. It's frustrating but I understand they have processes they have to follow.
0 coins
Brooklyn Foley
You need to understand the legal standard ESD uses for misconduct cases. They follow what's called the "Dante v. ESD" standard (from a WA Supreme Court case). For misconduct, the employer needs to prove: 1. The rule existed and was reasonable 2. You knew or should have known about the rule 3. The rule was consistently enforced 4. You deliberately violated the rule Your case clearly fails on points #2 and #3. If management was openly vaping and told you it was acceptable, then the rule wasn't consistently enforced AND you had no reason to believe it was prohibited. At your hearing, stay focused on these elements. Don't get sidetracked discussing whether you actually vaped or not - that's not the issue. The issue is whether your employer can prove all four elements of misconduct. I've represented claimants at OAH hearings for years, and inconsistent enforcement is one of the most winnable defense strategies.
0 coins
Jay Lincoln
•this is so smart! never knew they had to prove all those things. i got denied once and just gave up fighting it cause i thought it was hopeless
0 coins
Taylor Chen
•Thank you for breaking this down so clearly! The Dante standard really helps me understand how to frame my argument. When you've represented claimants, did you find that having multiple witnesses testifying to the same inconsistent enforcement was persuasive? I'm trying to decide how many coworkers I should ask to testify.
0 coins
Brooklyn Foley
•Yes, multiple witnesses are definitely helpful, especially if they have different roles or work in different departments. That shows a workplace-wide pattern rather than just one department's practice. I'd recommend 3-4 strong witnesses rather than 6+ saying the same thing. Quality over quantity. Make sure they can speak specifically to seeing management vape without consequences - that's your strongest evidence.
0 coins
Sophia Carson
omg the ESD system is such a joke!!!! they deny people for ANYTHING these days. my brother got denied last month because they said he wasnt looking for work hard enough even tho he applied to like 12 jobs!!! its like they just want excuses to not pay people. good luck with your appeal but dont expect fairness. the system is RIGGED agaist workers
0 coins
Keith Davidson
•While the system can be frustrating, the appeal process is actually quite fair if you're prepared. Administrative Law Judges are independent and not part of ESD. They routinely overturn ESD denials when the facts support it. Your brother should have appealed - the job search requirements have specific guidelines, and if he could document his 12 applications properly, he likely would have won his appeal.
0 coins
Sophia Carson
•maybe ur right idk. he just gave up cuz he got a new job. but still the whole process is confusing and feels like they make it hard on purpose
0 coins
Taylor Chen
I just got off the phone with an ESD agent after using the Claimyr service someone recommended in the comments. The agent was really helpful and told me to focus on three things in my appeal: 1. Evidence that others engaged in the same behavior without consequences 2. Proof I was never warned or disciplined about it 3. Documentation of the timing between my grievance filing and termination They recommended I organize my witnesses in advance and make a timeline showing when I filed the grievance, when I was terminated, and when I found out the alleged reason. This is so helpful - I feel much more prepared now! I'll update this thread after my hearing to let everyone know how it goes.
0 coins
Ezra Bates
•Sounds like you're on the right track! One more tip - when I had my hearing, the judge appreciated that I had a written outline of my main points. It helped me stay organized when I got nervous. Good luck and definitely let us know how it turns out!
0 coins
Ana Erdoğan
I just remembered something important - if you win your appeal, you'll get backpay for all the weeks you were eligible but denied! Make sure you keep filing your weekly claims even while waiting for your appeal hearing. If you stop filing weekly claims, you won't get paid for those weeks even if you win the appeal. I made this mistake and lost out on like $2,600 in benefits.
0 coins
Taylor Chen
•Thank you for this reminder! I've been filing my weekly claims but wasn't sure if I should continue since I was denied. I'll definitely keep doing them while waiting for the appeal decision.
0 coins
CosmicCadet
I'm going through a similar situation right now - was denied for "policy violation" at my workplace where the same policy was completely ignored by everyone including supervisors. Reading through all these responses has been incredibly helpful! A few things I learned from my research that might help you: 1. Document EVERYTHING - I wish I had started keeping a log of policy violations I witnessed much earlier 2. The timing of your union grievance vs termination is huge - that's going to be very compelling evidence of retaliation 3. Get your witnesses to write down specific incidents with dates if possible, even if they can't testify live I'm still early in my appeal process but seeing so many people win these cases gives me hope. The selective enforcement angle seems to be the key factor that wins these hearings. Keep us posted on how your hearing goes - there are clearly a lot of people dealing with similar issues who could benefit from hearing about your experience!
0 coins
Malik Thompson
•Your research points are spot on! I'm also dealing with a similar selective enforcement issue at my workplace and this whole thread has been a goldmine of information. The documentation piece is so important - I started keeping a detailed log after reading these comments and I'm already up to 8 specific incidents where the same "rule" I allegedly broke was ignored for others. The retaliation angle with the union grievance timing really does seem like it could be the smoking gun in your case @Taylor Chen. That's such obvious retaliation that even ESD should see through their excuse. Has anyone here had success getting written statements from coworkers who were too nervous to testify live? Some of my former colleagues are worried about speaking up since they still work there, but they might be willing to provide written testimony.
0 coins