


Ask the community...
The appeals language "benefits are allowed beginning September 9, 2024" typically means: 1. The previous denial is reversed as of that date 2. Your husband is eligible for benefits from that date forward IF he meets all other eligibility requirements (which includes being unemployed or partially employed) 3. He's entitled to back benefits for weeks he claimed during the appeal process Since he's currently employed, he wouldn't qualify for full benefits, but might qualify for partial benefits if his current earnings are low enough compared to his previous wages. The formula is fairly complex, but essentially if he's earning significantly less than he would receive on unemployment, he could get a partial payment each week. Something else to consider: if his current job doesn't utilize his union skills, he might be able to continue looking for work in his field while maintaining this job. As long as he's available for full-time work and actively searching, he could potentially still file weekly claims reporting his part-time income.
Thank you for breaking down what that language means! The tricky part is that my husband is working full-time at this lower-paying job, not part-time. But you're right that it's not in his skilled union trade. Does that make a difference for the partial benefits? We're definitely going to call ESD again to ask specifically about partial benefits and the back pay during those 8 weeks.
The fact that ESD initially denied your husband's claim then approved it on appeal is actually fairly common. The first-level adjudicators often side with employers, which is why the appeal process exists. Regarding your specific situation: 1. Your husband should immediately file for the retroactive benefits covering the 8-week appeal period. There's typically a limited window to claim these weeks retrospectively. 2. For his current situation, Washington does have provisions for workers who take "suitable work" at significantly lower wages than their previous employment. However, voluntarily quitting to collect benefits is generally problematic unless specific conditions are met. 3. One potential option: If your husband finds a legitimate union job opportunity that pays significantly better, quitting his current job to accept that offer would not disqualify him from benefits if the new position fell through or wasn't as advertised. Most importantly, I'd recommend having your husband speak with someone from his union. They often have representatives who specialize in unemployment issues specific to union workers and might have more tailored advice for his situation.
Contacting his union rep is a brilliant idea! I can't believe we didn't think of that. They might have dealt with similar situations before. I'm also going to look into that "suitable work" provision you mentioned - is there a specific term or section of the law I should reference when calling ESD about that? Thank you!
im on my 3rd unemployment claim in 5 years (construction work lol) and every single time has been different! first one: 3 weeks. second one: 8 days! current one: 4 weeks and counting... literally seems to depend on who processes your claim and how busy they are that day
One final piece of advice: If your claim isn't processed within 3 weeks, don't just wait. Be proactive by: 1. Using the eServices message center to inquire about your claim status 2. Calling the claims center early in the morning (right when they open) 3. Checking your spam/junk folders daily for ESD communications 4. Continuing to file weekly claims correctly The difference between a 3-week wait and an 8-week wait is often just how quickly you identify and resolve any minor issues that arise. Most delays happen because claimants don't realize action is needed on their part.
my claim was stuck for 2 months but turns out it was because my previous employer contested it saying i quit when i was actually laid off. once i provided the termination letter it got resolved in like 3 days. might wanna check if ur employer is saying something different than u did about why u left
Quick update question - have you been receiving any correspondence by mail? Some adjudication notices are still sent via postal mail rather than electronically, especially if they involve third-party information from your employer.
I've been checking my mail carefully and haven't received anything from ESD except the initial monetary determination letter back in July. Is there something specific I should be looking for?
The most important pieces would be any fact-finding questionnaires or interview notices. They typically come in official ESD envelopes with the department logo. If you haven't received any of these, that's actually good news - it likely means they're just backlogged rather than waiting on information from you. One last suggestion - if you have documentation related to your layoff (termination letter, severance agreement, etc.), go ahead and upload it to your eServices account under the document upload section. Sometimes being proactive with documentation can help move things along.
Quick update to my earlier comment - I checked with a colleague who works with unemployment cases, and the current adjudication time for straightforward cases like yours (with documentation already submitted) is running closer to 2-3 weeks rather than the 3-4 I mentioned earlier. So you might hear back sooner. Regarding the identity verification issue - that's completely separate but equally important to resolve. Unfortunately, having two issues at once is fairly common with ESD. The good news is that once both are resolved, any back payments you're eligible for will be processed at once.
Thank you for checking! That gives me a little hope. I did manage to resolve the ID verification by calling repeatedly yesterday morning. The agent said my account was noted as verified now, but it might take 48 hours to update in their system. Fingers crossed this all gets sorted soon - I've got rent due next week.
i had this happen back in 2023 and heres a tip: if u call right when they open at 8am and keep hitting redial youll eventually get thru. took me 26 tries one morning but i finally got a person! they can sometimes push ur adjudication thru faster if u explain ur situation. good luck!!
StarStrider
Thank you for sharing this success story. I've been guiding people through the ESD system for years, and the Governor's office route is certainly effective, though it should be viewed as a last resort after you've tried the standard channels multiple times. One thing I'd suggest adding to your escalation request (whether to the Governor's office or through other channels) is documentation of financial hardship. If you're facing eviction, utility disconnection, or unable to afford medicine, include those details with documentation. This can trigger a special hardship review process that moves even faster than standard escalations. Also, while waiting for resolution, continue filing your weekly claims without fail. Many people stop filing when stuck in adjudication, which can create even more problems down the road.
0 coins
Diego Flores
•That's a great point about continuing weekly claims! I did keep filing even though it felt pointless at the time. And I actually did mention in my form that I was behind on rent and included the amount - maybe that's why they responded so quickly.
0 coins
Anastasia Ivanova
Has anyone had success going through their state representative instead? My neighbor said her rep's office helped with her claim but I'm not sure if that's better than the governor route or not?
0 coins
Mateo Perez
•Both can be effective. State representatives often have dedicated constituent service staff who handle ESD issues regularly. In some cases, they may even have specific contacts at ESD that the Governor's office uses as well. The key advantage is sometimes your local rep's office has a lower volume of requests, so they might respond faster than the Governor's team.
0 coins