


Ask the community...
Remember - the central issue in your case is whether you had "good cause" to leave. In Washington, a substantial reduction in hours can qualify as good cause if it creates significant financial hardship. Make sure to explicitly tell the judge: "I had good cause to leave because my employer reduced my hours to the point I couldn't pay my bills, effectively forcing me out." Also, Washington considers "constructive discharge" (when an employer makes conditions so intolerable that a reasonable person would feel forced to quit) to be good cause. Focus your evidence on proving these specific legal standards.
Thank you! I'll definitely use that exact phrasing about "good cause" and "constructive discharge." Does it matter that I didn't specifically say those words when I quit? I basically just told my manager I couldn't survive on the hours they were giving me and they said "that's all we can offer.
No, you don't need to have used those exact legal terms when you quit. What matters is that the circumstances of your separation meet the legal definition, not what words you used at the time. Your statement that you "couldn't survive on the hours" is actually perfect evidence that the reduction created financial hardship, which supports your good cause argument. Bring documentation of your bills/expenses if possible to show the impact of the reduced hours on your ability to meet basic needs.
One last important tip: during the hearing, you'll have a chance to cross-examine your former employer. Prepare specific questions that help your case, such as: 1. "Why were my hours reduced from 38 to 12?" 2. "Was I informed this reduction would be permanent?" 3. "Were other employees' hours reduced similarly?" 4. "What was my work performance like before the reduction?" These questions can help establish that the reduction wasn't due to misconduct and was targeted specifically at you, supporting your constructive discharge claim.
This is gold! I hadn't even thought about preparing questions for them. I know for a fact that I was the only one who had such a dramatic cut in hours. And I had received a positive performance review just two months before they started reducing my hours. Should I bring that review as evidence too?
Absolutely bring that positive performance review! That's excellent evidence that contradicts any claim they might make about performance issues. It shows the reduction wasn't justified based on your work quality. Also, if you have any documentation showing you were the only one with reduced hours, bring that too. This helps establish that you were being singled out, which strengthens your constructive discharge argument substantially.
ugh, the esd struggle is real. i've been trying to get my claim sorted for WEEKS. feels like im screaming into the void. anyone else feel like the system is designed to make us give up? 😫
Hey OP, have you considered reaching out to a local non-profit that helps with unemployment issues? They might have some insider knowledge or connections to help speed things up.
The system is so broken. How are people supposed to survive while waiting months for benefits? It's ridiculous! 😡
Have you checked if theres a way to do this online? Sometimes the websites have options for special circumstances that arent obvious at first
Carmen Diaz
Anyone else feel like were living in a kafka novel? This whole unemployment system is a maze with no exit 😵💫
0 coins
Andre Laurent
I heard they're updating the system next month. Hopefully that'll speed things up 🤞
0 coins
AstroAce
•LOL sure, and I'm the queen of England 👑 They've been saying that for years!
0 coins