< Back to Social Security Administration

Amara Okafor

Will SS reduce benefits for Real Estate Professionals when filing early? Confused about substantial services rule

I'm turning 62 next month and planning to file for Social Security early, but I'm really confused about how my work as a real estate agent might affect my benefits. I qualify as a 'Real Estate Professional' for tax purposes (spend 750+ hours annually in real estate activities). From what I understand, the 'substantial services' rule can reduce SS benefits if you earn too much before FRA, but I've heard conflicting information about how this applies to real estate professionals specifically. Does anyone know if being classified as a Real Estate Professional for taxes means SS will treat my income differently for the earnings test? My projected commission income for 2025 will be around $24,000 - will that trigger benefit reductions? I can't seem to get a straight answer from the SSA representatives I've spoken with.

The substantial services rule and Real Estate Professional status are actually two separate things that impact you differently. For Social Security, what matters is your earnings, not your tax classification. In 2025, if you're under Full Retirement Age and earn more than $22,320 (the annual earnings limit), Social Security will deduct $1 for every $2 you earn above that limit. So yes, with $24,000 in commission income, you would have $1,680 above the limit, resulting in approximately $840 reduction in annual benefits. Being classified as a Real Estate Professional for tax purposes doesn't exempt you from the Social Security earnings test. The substantial services rule you mentioned typically applies to self-employed individuals where SSA examines whether you're performing significant services in your business, but the earnings test is still the primary factor.

0 coins

Thank you for explaining! So even though my tax filing status as a Real Estate Professional gives me certain tax advantages, it doesn't help with the SS earnings test? That's disappointing but good to know. Is there any way to structure my real estate work to minimize the impact on my benefits?

0 coins

i went through this last year. the real estate professional status is just a tax thing, doesn't matter to SS at all. they ONLY care about your earnings. if u make over the limit, they take some of your ss money back. simple as that. don't overthink it!

0 coins

Thanks for sharing your experience. Did you end up reducing your work hours to stay under the limit, or did you just accept the reduction?

0 coins

The SSA will absolutely reduce your benefits if you make over the earnings limit! I lost almost $4,000 in benefits last year because I didn't understand this properly. My accountant kept telling me about special rules for self-employed people and

0 coins

Oh no, that sounds rough! I didn't realize they might take it all from a few checks rather than spreading it out. That could really mess up my monthly budget. Thanks for the warning.

0 coins

My sister is in real estate too and she decided to wait until her FRA to claim instead of dealing with all this earnings test nonsense. Sometimes the simplest solution is the best one!

0 coins

I've considered waiting, but I really need the income now, even if it's reduced. Ideally I'd like to find a way to balance my work and benefits.

0 coins

There's a lot of confusion around this topic, so let me clarify how the substantial services rule works for self-employed individuals like real estate professionals:1. The earnings test applies first - $22,320 is the 2025 limit for those under FRA2. But for self-employed people, SSA may also apply the substantial services test, which looks at whether you're working more than 45 hours per month in your business. This is separate from the Real Estate Professional classification for taxes (which requires 750+ hours annually).3. If you work less than 15 hours per month, you're exempt from the substantial services test. Between 15-45 hours is a gray area where other factors matter.Since you're working enough hours to qualify as a Real Estate Professional for taxes, you're almost certainly providing substantial services in SSA's view, so the earnings test will definitely apply to you.Your best options are to either:1. Reduce work to stay under the earnings limit2. Accept the benefit reduction knowing you'll get it back later (they recalculate your benefits at FRA)3. Delay claiming until you reach your FRA when the earnings test no longer applies

0 coins

This is extremely helpful! I didn't realize there were hour thresholds for the substantial services test that are different from the Real Estate Professional classification. I might be able to stay under 45 hours some months. Would that help at all, or does exceeding it in even one month trigger the test for the whole year?

0 coins

I had the exact same question when I filed for SS last year while still working in real estate. I kept getting disconnected and waiting forever on hold with Social Security. Finally found this service called Claimyr that got me through to an SSA rep in about 20 minutes. They have a video that shows how it works: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU. The SSA rep I talked to explained that your tax status as a Real Estate Professional doesn't matter for the earnings test - they just look at your actual income. For self-employed people though, they might consider the services you perform in your business in addition to your income. Worth calling to get clarification specific to your situation at claimyr.com.

0 coins

That service sounds helpful! I've been trying to get through to a knowledgeable SSA rep for weeks with no luck. I'll check out their video - might be worth it just to get a definitive answer about my specific situation. Thanks for sharing!

0 coins

Why not just setup an S-Corp for your real estate business and pay yourself a salary under the earnings limit? Then take the rest as distributions which don't count toward the earnings test. Thats what my friend did. Talk to your CPA tho, Im not a tax professional.

0 coins

This is actually incorrect advice. The Social Security Administration looks at both wages AND self-employment income (including most business profits) when applying the earnings test. Setting up an S-Corp and taking distributions instead of salary is a common tax strategy, but SSA specifically looks at your earnings from significant services in self-employment, regardless of how they're classified for tax purposes. They can and do examine business arrangements to determine if they're legitimate or just attempts to avoid the earnings test.

0 coins

My neighbor is a realtor and she just does fewer listings during the year to keep her income under the limit. Says it's not worth losing the SS money.

0 coins

thats what i ended up doing too. i take fewer clients and only the higher commission ones. work smarter not harder lol

0 coins

Thanks everyone for all the great information! I think I'm going to call SSA using that Claimyr service to get answers specific to my situation, then talk to my financial advisor about whether I should reduce my hours/income or just accept the benefit reduction. At least now I understand that my Real Estate Professional status for taxes won't help me avoid the earnings test. Really appreciate all your insights!

0 coins

Good plan. One more thing to consider - any benefits withheld due to excess earnings aren't truly

0 coins

As someone who went through this exact situation two years ago, I can share what I learned. The key thing to understand is that SSA applies both the earnings test AND potentially the substantial services test for self-employed individuals. Since you're earning $24,000 and clearly working substantial hours (750+ for REP status), you'll definitely be subject to benefit reductions. However, don't despair - those withheld benefits aren't lost forever. At your Full Retirement Age, SSA will recalculate your benefit amount to give you credit for the months when benefits were reduced or withheld. This actually increases your monthly benefit going forward. I found it helpful to think of it as a forced delay rather than a true loss. The math worked out better for me in the long run, especially since I'm still earning good income. Just make sure to report your earnings accurately to avoid overpayment issues later!

0 coins

This is really reassuring to hear from someone who's been through it! I didn't realize they actually recalculate your benefits at FRA to account for the withheld amounts - that makes the temporary reduction feel much more manageable. Can I ask how much your monthly benefit increased after the recalculation? I'm trying to figure out if it's worth continuing to work at my current level or if I should reduce my hours to stay under the limit.

0 coins

I'm so glad someone else asked this question! @JaylinCharles, your experience gives me hope that the benefit reduction isn't as scary as it seemed. I'm in a similar boat - about to turn 62 and wondering if I should take the early filing hit or wait. The idea that it's more like a "forced delay" really helps me think about it differently. Did you find that the recalculated benefit at FRA made up for the years of reduced payments, or was it just a partial offset? I'm trying to run the numbers to see what makes the most sense for my situation.

0 coins

@JaylinCharles Thank you for sharing your real-world experience! This is exactly the kind of insight I needed to hear. The idea that it's a "forced delay" rather than a loss really changes my perspective. I've been so focused on the immediate reduction that I hadn't fully considered the long-term recalculation benefit. Can you give me a rough idea of how much your monthly benefit increased after FRA? I'm trying to decide whether to continue working at my current pace (knowing I'll face reductions) or scale back to stay under the earnings limit. Your experience suggests that continuing to work might actually be the better long-term strategy, especially since I'm still relatively young and healthy.

0 coins

@JaylinCharles This is incredibly helpful to hear from someone who's actually lived through this! I've been agonizing over this decision for weeks. The "forced delay" perspective really reframes the whole situation - I was thinking of it as throwing money away, but if SSA actually gives you credit later, that's a game changer. I'm curious about the timing though - do they automatically recalculate at your FRA, or do you need to request it? And did you notice a significant bump in your monthly payments after the recalculation? I'm leaning toward just accepting the temporary reduction now, especially since I love my work and wasn't really ready to scale back anyway. Thanks for sharing your experience - it's exactly what I needed to hear!

0 coins

@JaylinCharles This is exactly what I needed to hear! I've been so stressed about the earnings test potentially "taking away" my benefits, but knowing that SSA actually gives you credit for those withheld months at FRA makes all the difference. As a newcomer to this whole process, I was getting overwhelmed by all the conflicting information. Your real-world experience really helps put things in perspective. I'm curious - when they did the recalculation at your FRA, was it automatic or did you have to contact them? And roughly how long did it take for the adjusted payments to start? I think I'm going to follow your approach and just accept the temporary reductions rather than trying to artificially limit my income. Thanks for sharing such practical insights from someone who's actually been through this!

0 coins

@JaylinCharles This is such valuable insight! As someone just starting to navigate this process, I really appreciate hearing from someone who's actually been through it. The "forced delay" concept makes so much sense - I was getting caught up in thinking about the immediate reduction as money lost forever. Can I ask how the recalculation process worked for you? Did SSA automatically adjust your benefits at FRA, or did you need to contact them? I'm trying to plan ahead so I know what to expect. Also, did the recalculated monthly amount end up being significantly higher than what you would have received if you had waited until FRA to file in the first place? I'm leaning toward taking benefits early and just accepting the temporary hit, especially since I genuinely enjoy my work and wasn't planning to reduce my hours anyway.

0 coins

@JaylinCharles Thank you so much for this perspective! As someone new to this community and just starting to figure out Social Security, your real-world experience is invaluable. I've been reading through all these posts and getting more confused, but your explanation about the "forced delay" really clarifies things. I'm 61 and will be in a similar situation soon - working as a consultant with variable income that will likely exceed the earnings limit. Knowing that SSA actually recalculates and gives you credit for those withheld benefits at FRA takes away so much of my anxiety about this decision. Can I ask - was the recalculation automatic when you reached FRA, or did you need to contact them to request it? I want to make sure I don't miss anything important in the process. Your experience gives me confidence that continuing to work and accepting the temporary reduction might actually be the smarter long-term choice.

0 coins

@JaylinCharles This is so helpful to hear from someone who's actually navigated this situation! As a newcomer to this whole Social Security maze, I was getting really anxious about the earnings test "penalizing" me for continuing to work. Your explanation about it being more like a "forced delay" with eventual recalculation really shifts my perspective. I'm curious about the practical side - when you reached FRA and they recalculated, did you see a noticeable increase in your monthly benefit amount? I'm trying to figure out whether it makes more sense to keep working at my current level or artificially reduce my income to stay under the limit. Also, did the recalculation happen automatically or did you need to follow up with SSA? I want to make sure I understand the full process before making my decision. Thanks for sharing your experience - it's exactly the kind of real-world insight I needed!

0 coins

@JaylinCharles This is incredibly reassuring! As someone brand new to this community and just trying to understand how Social Security works with continued employment, your experience really helps clarify what felt like a confusing penalty system. I'm 62 and work in consulting with income that fluctuates but will likely exceed the limit most years. The way you frame it as a "forced delay" rather than lost money makes so much more sense - I was getting discouraged thinking I'd be permanently penalized for wanting to keep working. Can I ask about the timing of the recalculation? Did SSA automatically adjust your benefits when you hit FRA, or was there paperwork you needed to file? Also, roughly how much did your monthly benefit increase after the recalculation? I'm trying to run some numbers to see if it makes sense to continue working at my current pace versus trying to limit my income. Your real-world perspective is exactly what I needed to hear - thank you for sharing!

0 coins

@JaylinCharles This is exactly the kind of firsthand experience I was hoping to find! As someone new to both this community and the Social Security process, I've been feeling overwhelmed by all the conflicting information about earnings tests and benefit reductions. Your "forced delay" perspective completely changes how I think about this situation - I was viewing the withheld benefits as a permanent loss rather than a temporary deferral with future compensation. I'm 62 and work as a freelance consultant, so my income will definitely exceed the earnings limit. Can I ask how long it took after reaching your FRA for the recalculated benefits to kick in? Was it automatic or did you need to contact SSA? Also, was the monthly increase after recalculation substantial enough to make the years of reduced benefits feel worthwhile? I'm trying to decide whether to artificially limit my work to stay under the earnings threshold or just accept the temporary reduction and keep working at my current pace. Your experience suggests the latter might actually be the smarter financial choice in the long run. Thanks for sharing such practical, real-world insights!

0 coins

As a newcomer to this community, I'm finding this discussion incredibly valuable! I'm in a similar situation - approaching 62 and working as a freelance consultant with income that will likely exceed the earnings limit. The confusion around how different employment classifications affect Social Security benefits is real - I've gotten different answers from multiple sources. What strikes me most about this thread is how @JaylinCharles reframed the earnings test as a "forced delay" rather than a permanent loss. That perspective shift is huge for someone like me who was viewing the benefit reductions as throwing money away. I'm curious though - for those who've gone through this, how predictable is the income from month to month? In consulting, I sometimes have big months followed by slower ones. Does SSA look at annual earnings or do monthly fluctuations matter for the substantial services test? Also, has anyone here tried the Claimyr service that @Dmitry mentioned? Getting consistent, knowledgeable answers from SSA has been challenging, and if there's a way to actually speak with someone who understands these nuances, that would be worth exploring. Thanks to everyone sharing their real experiences - it's so much more helpful than the generic information you find elsewhere!

0 coins

@Diego, welcome to the community! Your question about monthly vs. annual earnings is really important. SSA typically looks at your total annual earnings for the earnings test, but they can also examine monthly earnings in certain situations. For self-employed individuals like consultants, they may apply both the annual earnings test AND look at substantial services on a month-by-month basis. So those big months you mentioned could potentially trigger closer scrutiny even if your annual total is manageable. I haven't personally used Claimyr, but several people here have mentioned good experiences with it. Given how complex these rules are for self-employed folks, getting direct clarification from SSA through a service that can actually get you connected might be worth the cost. One tip from my own experience - keep detailed records of both your income and hours worked each month. SSA can ask for this information if they're evaluating whether you're providing substantial services in your business.

0 coins

As someone new to this community and facing a similar situation, this entire discussion has been incredibly enlightening! I'm 61 and work as a financial consultant, so I'll likely face the same earnings test challenges when I file early next year. What I find most valuable here is the distinction everyone's made between tax classifications (like Real Estate Professional status) and Social Security rules - they really are separate systems with different criteria. @JaylinCharles, your perspective about the "forced delay" rather than permanent loss is a game-changer for how I'm thinking about this decision. I was getting caught up in viewing any benefit reduction as money down the drain. @Sofia, your breakdown of the substantial services test with the hour thresholds was particularly helpful - I had no idea there were specific monthly hour limits that SSA considers. For those considering the Claimyr service, I actually used them last month for a different SS question and found them very helpful. The wait time was much shorter than calling SSA directly, and the representative was knowledgeable about self-employment issues. One thing I'm still unclear on - does anyone know if SSA counts hours differently for different types of self-employment? For example, would hours spent on administrative tasks (like bookkeeping, marketing) count the same as direct client work for the substantial services test? Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences - this is exactly the kind of practical insight that's impossible to find in official SSA publications!

0 coins

@Zoe, welcome to the community! Your question about how SSA counts different types of work hours is really insightful. From what I understand, SSA generally looks at all hours you spend on activities that are integral to your business operations when evaluating substantial services. So yes, administrative tasks like bookkeeping, marketing, client prospecting, and business development would typically count toward your total monthly hours, not just direct client-facing work. The key is whether the activity is necessary for your business to function and generate income. I learned this the hard way when I first started navigating the substantial services test - I was only counting my direct client hours and got a reality check when SSA asked for a detailed breakdown of ALL my business activities. It's frustrating because it means you can't just reduce client work to stay under the 45-hour threshold if you're still doing significant behind-the-scenes work to maintain your business. This is another reason why the "forced delay" approach that @JaylinCharles mentioned makes sense for many of us - trying to artificially limit business activities to game the system often isn't practical or sustainable. Keep detailed time records of everything you do for your business - it'll be invaluable if SSA ever asks for documentation.

0 coins

As someone completely new to this community and just starting to understand Social Security rules, I'm amazed by how helpful this discussion has been! I'm 62 and work as an independent contractor in marketing consulting, and I've been putting off filing for SS because I couldn't get clear answers about how my work income would affect benefits. The distinction everyone's made between tax classifications and SS rules is so important - I was also confused thinking my business structure might somehow help with the earnings test. @JaylinCharles, your "forced delay" perspective is brilliant and really changes how I view this whole situation. Instead of seeing benefit reductions as punishment for working, it's more like SSA holding onto money that I'll get back later with interest through higher monthly payments. @Sofia, thank you for breaking down the substantial services test - I had no idea about those hour thresholds! For someone like me who works irregularly (some months 60+ hours, others maybe 10), understanding that monthly variation matters is crucial. I'm definitely going to look into the Claimyr service that several people mentioned - getting knowledgeable help navigating these complex rules seems worth the investment. One question for the group: has anyone found a good way to track business hours for SSA purposes? I'm wondering if there's a simple system that captures both direct work and administrative time that would satisfy their requirements if they ever audit substantial services. Thanks to everyone for sharing real experiences instead of just regurgitating official policy language!

0 coins

@Keisha, welcome! I'm also new here and your question about tracking hours is spot on - I've been wondering the same thing. From reading through this thread, it seems like detailed record-keeping is crucial for anyone who might face the substantial services test. I started using a simple spreadsheet with columns for date, activity type (client work, admin, marketing, etc.), and hours spent. Nothing fancy, but it helps me see patterns in my work schedule. What's been eye-opening is realizing how many "business hours" I actually work beyond direct client time - stuff like networking, proposal writing, invoicing, and even continuing education. @Zara made a great point that SSA counts all activities integral to business operations, not just billable hours. I'm leaning toward @JaylinCharles's approach of accepting the temporary benefit reduction rather than trying to artificially limit my work. As an independent contractor, it's nearly impossible to predict income and hours month to month anyway. Plus, knowing that SSA recalculates benefits at FRA makes the early reduction feel much more manageable. Has anyone found a good mobile app for time tracking? Something that could capture both work types and make reporting easier if SSA ever requests documentation?

0 coins

As a newcomer to this community, I'm incredibly grateful for all the detailed insights shared here! I'm 63 and work as a freelance graphic designer, facing the same earnings test dilemma. What really resonates with me is @JaylinCharles's "forced delay" perspective - I was also viewing the benefit reductions as permanent losses rather than deferred payments with future compensation. The clarification about Real Estate Professional tax status being completely separate from Social Security rules is crucial - I had similar confusion about whether my LLC structure might help (spoiler: it doesn't!). @Sofia's breakdown of the substantial services test hour thresholds was particularly enlightening. As someone who sometimes works 50+ hours in busy months and maybe 20 in slower ones, understanding that SSA looks at this monthly is important for planning. I'm curious about one thing though - for those who've been through the FRA recalculation process, roughly how long after reaching FRA did you see the adjusted payments kick in? Was it immediate or did it take several months? I'm leaning toward filing early and accepting the temporary reductions, especially after reading about the eventual benefit increase. The Claimyr service mentioned by several people sounds worth investigating too - getting clear, consistent information about these complex rules seems challenging through regular SSA channels. Thanks everyone for sharing real experiences instead of just policy jargon!

0 coins

@Ravi, welcome to the community! Your question about timing is really important for planning purposes. From what I've seen discussed here and my own research, the FRA recalculation typically happens automatically within a few months of reaching your Full Retirement Age, but it can sometimes take up to 6 months for the increased payments to show up. SSA has to review all the months where benefits were withheld due to excess earnings and recalculate your benefit amount accordingly. I'd recommend keeping detailed records of any benefit reductions you experience so you can verify the recalculation is correct when it happens. Like you, I'm leaning toward the early filing approach after reading @JaylinCharles's perspective - the idea that it's deferred rather than lost money makes the temporary hit much more palatable. For freelancers like us with variable income, trying to artificially stay under the earnings limit often isn't practical anyway. The key insight from this thread seems to be that continuing to work and accepting the temporary reduction might actually be the smarter long-term financial strategy, especially since we get credit for those withheld benefits later. Thanks for asking great questions that help clarify the process for all of us newcomers!

0 coins

Social Security Administration AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,892 users helped today