Social Security survivor benefits question - will my wife receive both her SS and mine if I die after we both reach FRA?
I've been trying to plan our finances for when either my wife or I pass away. We're both approaching full retirement age (FRA) next year. I'm 65 and will reach my FRA at 66 and 8 months, and my wife is 64 and will reach her FRA at 66 and 6 months. My projected SS benefit is around $2,750/month and hers will be about $1,850/month. If I die after we're both at FRA, will she be able to collect both her retirement benefit AND my benefit as a survivor? We've been married for 30 years, if that matters. I've heard conflicting information from friends and family, and I want to make sure we understand what to expect. Thanks in advance for any help!
17 comments


Zoe Stavros
No, she won't get both benefits in full. When you pass away, your wife can receive the higher of either her own benefit or your benefit as a survivor, but not both added together. Since your benefit is higher ($2,750 vs her $1,850), she would receive your full benefit amount as a survivor benefit instead of her own. So essentially she would get a "raise" from her benefit to yours, but not both combined. The length of marriage (30 years) definitely qualifies her - the minimum is 9 months in most cases.
0 coins
Andre Moreau
•Thank you for explaining this. So if I understand correctly, she would stop receiving her $1,850 and start receiving my $2,750 instead? Would she get any less than my full amount since she's taking it as a survivor rather than her own earning record?
0 coins
Jamal Harris
My father in law passed last year and my mother in law is only getting his SS now. She had to actually go to the office and switch from hers to his cause his was more. They don't let you double dip unfortunately!
0 coins
Andre Moreau
•I'm sorry about your father-in-law. Thank you for sharing your family's experience - that confirms what the previous commenter said. Seems like the system is designed to provide the higher of the two amounts, not both.
0 coins
Mei Chen
Just to add some important technical details: When a spouse dies, the surviving spouse is entitled to a survivor benefit of up to 100% of the deceased spouse's primary insurance amount (PIA) or actual benefit amount (if they had already started receiving benefits). However, Social Security only pays the higher of the two benefits - either your own retirement benefit OR the survivor benefit, not both combined. In your specific situation, assuming you both wait until FRA to claim your benefits, your wife would receive approximately $2,750/month after your passing (your benefit amount) instead of her $1,850. This represents about a $900 monthly increase, but not a combination of both benefits. One planning consideration: Since survivor benefits are available as early as age 60 (though reduced if claimed before FRA), the timing of when each of you claims your own benefits can significantly impact survivor benefits later. If you were to delay your benefits past FRA up to age 70, your wife's eventual survivor benefit would be even higher.
0 coins
Andre Moreau
•This is extremely helpful, thank you. I hadn't considered delaying my benefits to age 70 to increase her potential survivor benefit. That's something we should definitely discuss as part of our planning.
0 coins
Liam Sullivan
Everyone here is right abt not getting both! BUT make sure when the time comes ur wife APPLIES for survivor benefits!! SSA doesnt automatically switch her over!!! My mom missed out on 3 months of higher payments cause nobody told her she had to apply for survivors after dad died. They dont backpay far either!!!
0 coins
Mei Chen
•This is an excellent point. The Social Security Administration does not automatically convert benefits. Your wife would need to contact Social Security promptly after your passing to apply for survivor benefits. She generally has up to 6 months to file for benefits to receive full retroactive payments, but as the commenter noted, it's best to do this as soon as possible to avoid any gaps in receiving the higher amount.
0 coins
Amara Okafor
When my husband passed away I had to bring his death certificate to the Social Security office and fill out paperwork. They stopped my payment and started giving me his instead since it was higher. The 30 year marriage doesn't really matter for this situation - I think that's more for divorced spouse benefits which is different.
0 coins
Zoe Stavros
•You're absolutely right about the marriage duration - 9 months is the requirement for survivor benefits in most cases (with some exceptions), while the 10-year marriage duration requirement applies to divorced spouse benefits. Thank you for sharing your experience with the process.
0 coins
CosmicCommander
I spent HOURS on the phone trying to reach SSA when my wife passed to sort out similar benefits questions. After being disconnected twice and waiting on hold for over 3 hours, I found a service called Claimyr that got me connected to an agent in less than 10 minutes. Saved me so much frustration! You can see how it works at https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU or just go to claimyr.com. Might be helpful when either of you needs to make changes to benefits or if you have more complicated questions that need an actual agent.
0 coins
Andre Moreau
•Thanks for the tip. I've been dreading having to call them with questions. I'll check out that service - anything that saves hours of hold time sounds worthwhile.
0 coins
Giovanni Colombo
I'm in a similar situation and have been researching this extensively. I think there's a HUGE miss in your planning that nobody has mentioned!!!! If your benefit is substantially higher (which it is), you might want to consider having your wife claim HER benefit at FRA, but YOU delay yours until 70!!! That would increase your benefit by 8% per year from your FRA to 70, making it around $3,600/month instead of $2,750. Then when you pass away (hopefully many years later), your wife would get that HIGHER amount as her survivor benefit. This maximizes your household income while both alive AND gives her the highest possible survivor benefit!!
0 coins
Mei Chen
•This is absolutely correct and an excellent planning strategy. By delaying the higher earner's benefit until age 70, you increase not only your lifetime income but also the survivor benefit. Each year of delay beyond FRA adds approximately 8% to your benefit amount (and consequently to the survivor benefit). This strategy is often recommended by financial planners specifically for couples with significant benefit disparities.
0 coins
Jamal Harris
SSA rules are confusing!!! My aunt thought she would get both benefits too but ended up with just the higher one. Something about "dual entitlement" that the rep explained but I don't really understand all the details.
0 coins
Zoe Stavros
•Dual" entitlement is the technical term for this situation. It means when someone is eligible for both their own retirement benefit and a benefit as a spouse or survivor, SSA'doesn t pay both full amounts. Instead, they pay the'person s own benefit first, and then add only enough of the second benefit to bring the total up to the amount of the higher benefit. This effectively means you receive whichever benefit amount is higher, but not bothcombined.
0 coins
Andre Moreau
Thank you everyone for all the helpful information! I'm going to look into that strategy of delaying my benefits until 70 to maximize what my wife would get as a survivor. I had no idea about these rules, and I'm glad I asked before we made our claiming decisions.
0 coins