Social Security survivor benefits calculation with delayed retirement - 91.86% of current or FRA benefit?
I'm trying to understand how survivor benefits would work for my wife and I. We're both collecting Social Security now - I started mine about 6 months ago at age 68 (about 2 years after my FRA), and my wife just filed at 63 for her reduced benefit plus the spousal supplement since her work record is smaller than mine. I know this is morbid, but I want to make sure she's taken care of if something happens to me. From what I've read, if she's at her FRA when I pass away, she'd get 100% of my benefit. But since she's claiming early now, I understand there'd be a reduction - something like 91.86% if she's claiming at her current age. My question is: would that 91.86% be calculated based on what I'm CURRENTLY receiving (including the delayed retirement credits I earned by waiting until 68)? Or would it be 91.86% of what I would have received at my FRA (losing the advantage of waiting)? The SSA website explanations make my head spin, and every time I think I understand it, I find something that contradicts what I thought. Thanks for helping sort this out!
18 comments


Eloise Kendrick
The survivor benefit would be based on what your husband is CURRENTLY receiving, including all the delayed retirement credits he earned by waiting until age 68. This is actually one of the major advantages of delaying Social Security - it not only increases your own benefit but potentially provides a larger survivor benefit for your spouse. The 91.86% reduction would apply to that higher amount if your wife claims survivor benefits before her FRA. However, if she waits until her own FRA to claim survivor benefits (should that unfortunate event occur), she would receive 100% of your higher benefit amount. This is why financial advisors often recommend that the higher-earning spouse delay benefits as long as possible, especially if there's a significant age gap or health concern.
0 coins
JaylinCharles
•Thanks for the clear explanation! That's a relief to hear. I was worried all my delayed credits would be lost when calculating her survivor benefit. It makes the decision to wait until 68 feel even better now knowing it protects her too.
0 coins
Lucas Schmidt
I went through this exact situation when my husband passed last year and let me tell you the SSA people gave me THREE different answers!!!!! First they told me I'd get what he was getting, then another person said it would be reduced because of my age, then a third person gave me some complicated formula about "primary insurance amounts" that made NO SENSE. It took 4 visits to the local office to finally get it straightened out. Make sure you document EVERYTHING and get names of who you talk to. The system is HORRIBLE and nobody there seems to know the actual rules!!!
0 coins
Freya Collins
•Omg this is exactly what I'm afraid of! My husband and I have the exact same questions as the original poster and I'm terrified of getting caught in bureaucratic hell when I'm grieving. So sorry you had to deal with that.
0 coins
LongPeri
Just to add some technical clarity to the previous responses: The survivor benefit calculation is based on the higher of: 1. The deceased spouse's actual benefit amount at death (including any delayed retirement credits) 2. 82.5% of the deceased's Primary Insurance Amount (PIA) In your case, since your husband waited past FRA, option #1 would definitely be higher. Your wife would be eligible for up to 100% of that amount if she claims at her FRA or later. If she claims earlier, it would be reduced - approximately 91.86% if claimed at age 63, exactly as you mentioned. One important note: Even though your wife is already claiming benefits, when you pass away, she would have the option to switch to survivor benefits if they're higher than her current combined benefit. The reduction would be based on her age at the time she claims the survivor benefit, not her current age.
0 coins
JaylinCharles
•Thank you for the detailed explanation. I hadn't realized that the reduction would be based on her age when claiming the survivor benefits, not her current claiming age. That's a crucial distinction. And good to know about the 82.5% of PIA alternative calculation - I hadn't seen that mentioned before.
0 coins
Oscar O'Neil
my wife got survivors when i was declared disabled last yr its like 80% of wat i get but shes 59 so mayb thats y
0 coins
Eloise Kendrick
•That's a different situation. What you're describing sounds like auxiliary benefits that some family members can receive when someone is on SSDI (disability), not survivor benefits. Family benefits are typically capped at 150-180% of the disabled worker's benefit through the family maximum provision.
0 coins
Sara Hellquiem
I've been dealing with this exact issue for months and couldn't get through to anyone at Social Security who could give me a straight answer. After getting disconnected 7 times and waiting on hold for over 4 hours total, I tried using Claimyr.com to reach an agent and finally got through in 20 minutes! The agent confirmed that survivor benefits are based on the FULL amount including delayed retirement credits. They also explained that if your spouse is already drawing benefits when you pass, they automatically compare their current benefit to what they'd get as a survivor and give them the higher amount. I'd recommend watching their demo video here: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU - it saved me so much frustration when dealing with this complicated survivor benefit question.
0 coins
Lucas Schmidt
•Does this service actually work? I spent TWO HOURS on hold yesterday trying to ask a similar question and then got disconnected! I'm about ready to drive 45 minutes to the nearest office but they probably won't even let me in without an appointment which takes forever to get!!
0 coins
Sara Hellquiem
•Yes, it definitely worked for me! I was skeptical too, but after my 3rd disconnection I was desperate. The SSA phone system is completely broken. With Claimyr I got through to an actual human who could pull up my record and answer my specific questions about survivor calculations.
0 coins
Charlee Coleman
This stuff is confusing because it depends on so many factors! In addition to what others have said, remember that if your wife is working while collecting SS, she might be subject to the earnings test until she reaches her FRA. This could reduce her current benefits if she earns above the annual limit ($21,240 in 2023, I think it's going up to around $22,000 in 2024). But the good news is that once she reaches FRA, any benefits that were withheld due to working will be recalculated and she'll get a higher monthly amount going forward. So many moving parts!
0 coins
JaylinCharles
•That's a good point about the earnings test. My wife is still working part-time, but she's keeping her income under the annual limit specifically to avoid triggering that reduction. Do you know if the earnings limit applies to survivor benefits too, or just retirement benefits?
0 coins
LongPeri
•Yes, the earnings test applies to survivor benefits as well if received before FRA. Any type of Social Security benefit received before full retirement age is subject to the same earnings limitations. Once your wife reaches her FRA, the earnings test no longer applies regardless of which type of benefit she's receiving.
0 coins
Freya Collins
Has anyone here actually RECEIVED survivor benefits? All this theoretical knowledge is great but I want to hear from someone who's been through the process. My husband is 12 years older than me and I'm worried about navigating this system when I'm grieving someday.
0 coins
Lucas Schmidt
•I have (unfortunately). The process was a nightmare!!! They required his death certificate and our marriage certificate and about a million forms. Then they messed up the calculation TWICE. The first check took almost 3 months to arrive after he passed. Make sure you have at least 6 months of expenses saved because the SSA moves like molasses!!!
0 coins
Eloise Kendrick
One important strategy note: If your wife is still relatively young, you might want to consider whether she should switch her benefit strategy. If she's currently receiving a reduced retirement benefit plus spousal supplement, when you pass away, she would receive the higher of: 1. Her own reduced retirement benefit 2. The reduced survivor benefit (reduced because she's taking it before FRA) Depending on your specific benefit amounts and her life expectancy, it might actually be more advantageous for her to restrict her application to just spousal benefits now (if she was born before January 2, 1954 and is at least at FRA) or consider other strategies to maximize her long-term benefits. This is complex enough that you might want to consult with a financial advisor who specializes in Social Security claiming strategies.
0 coins
JaylinCharles
•I appreciate the suggestion, but unfortunately my wife was born in 1960, so she doesn't qualify for that restricted application option. The SSA representative told us her best option was to take her own reduced benefit with the spousal supplement now, then switch to the survivor benefit if/when I pass away. We didn't even know about the possibility of a restricted application until after she had already filed.
0 coins