Social Security spousal benefits with non-covered worker - can my husband claim on my record before I file at age 70?
I'm trying to figure out the rules for my husband who never paid into Social Security (he worked for a state government with their own pension system for 35 years). I've worked and paid into SS my whole life and I'm planning to delay claiming until I turn 70 to maximize my benefits. My questions are: 1) Can my husband qualify for spousal benefits based on my work record even though he has a non-covered pension? 2) Does he have to wait until I actually file for my benefits at 70, or can he start collecting spousal benefits earlier? 3) Will his spousal benefits reduce my retirement benefit amount? We're both 66 now, and I'm trying to plan our income for the next few years. The SSA website is confusing me with all this talk about WEP and GPO reductions. Any help sorting this out would be greatly appreciated!
16 comments
Molly Hansen
Your husband probably qualifies for spousal benefits on your record, but there are three important things you need to understand: 1) Since your husband receives a pension from work not covered by Social Security, his spousal benefits will almost certainly be reduced by two-thirds of his government pension amount due to the Government Pension Offset (GPO). This could potentially eliminate his spousal benefit entirely if his pension is large enough. 2) He cannot receive spousal benefits until you file for your own retirement benefits. So if you're waiting until 70, he cannot receive spousal benefits before then. 3) Him receiving spousal benefits will NOT reduce your retirement benefits in any way. Your benefit amount is based solely on your own work record. I'd recommend making an appointment with SSA to get a precise calculation of how the GPO would affect his potential spousal benefit.
0 coins
Connor Rupert
•Thank you so much for explaining! I wasn't aware of the GPO reduction being 2/3 of his pension - that's going to take a big chunk out of any potential spousal benefit. His pension is about $4,200/month, so does that mean they'd reduce his spousal benefit by $2,800? If my benefit at 70 would be around $3,500, wouldn't his spousal benefit only be half of that ($1,750)? Seems like he might not get anything at all then.
0 coins
Brady Clean
my mom was in SAME situation!!! husband worked for city government, never paid SS taxes. she waited till 70 to file and he got NOTHING from her record because of GPO. they take 2/3 of his pension away from whatever spousal benefit he would get, and in most cases that means zero $$$. sorry to be bearer of bad news but its how the system works. super unfair imo
0 coins
Skylar Neal
•While the outcome might be the same in this case, it's not entirely accurate to say they "take 2/3 of his pension away." The Government Pension Offset (GPO) reduces the Social Security spousal/survivor benefit by 2/3 of the non-covered pension amount. The pension itself isn't reduced - it's the potential Social Security benefit that gets reduced. The distinction matters because the pension continues unchanged.
0 coins
Vincent Bimbach
You're dealing with the Government Pension Offset (GPO), not the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP). These are commonly confused. WEP affects your OWN benefits if you have a non-covered pension. GPO affects SPOUSAL benefits if you have a non-covered pension. For your specific questions: 1) Yes, your husband technically qualifies for spousal benefits, but after GPO reduction, it might be zero 2) He MUST wait until you file at 70 3) His benefits will NOT reduce yours Here's what to do: Calculate 50% of your age 70 benefit. Then subtract 2/3 of his monthly pension. If the result is negative, he'll get nothing. If positive, that's his spousal benefit. Example: If your age 70 benefit will be $3,600/month, his spousal benefit would start at $1,800. If his pension is $3,000/month, the GPO reduction would be $2,000. Since $1,800 - $2,000 = -$200, he would receive no spousal benefit.
0 coins
Connor Rupert
•Thanks for the clear explanation and example. Based on your formula, I think he'll end up with $0 in spousal benefits since his pension is substantial. So it sounds like there's no advantage for him whether I claim at 66 or 70 - he won't get spousal benefits either way because of the GPO. Is that right?
0 coins
Kelsey Chin
I went thru same thing last year!! So frustrating!!! Husband worked for railroad and i worked normal job. When we went to SS office they made us wait 3 HOURS and then told us nothing!!!! Had to come back next day with more papers. Complete waste of time.
0 coins
Norah Quay
The SS offices are terrible to deal with. My husband and I were in a similar situation (he had a state pension). After weeks of trying to get through on the phone and getting disconnected repeatedly, I finally found Claimyr (claimyr.com) and they got me connected to a real SSA agent in under 10 minutes. Their system calls SSA for you and when they reach an agent, they call you to connect. Saved me so much frustration! They have a demo video at https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU if you want to see how it works. So much better than waiting on hold for hours or trying to get an in-person appointment.
0 coins
Connor Rupert
•Thanks for the tip! I've been dreading calling them because everyone says the wait times are horrible. I'll check out that service if I need to call them.
0 coins
Skylar Neal
One important point that hasn't been mentioned yet: The GPO only affects spousal benefits while both spouses are alive. If you pass away before your husband, survivor benefits work differently. While the GPO still applies to survivor benefits (reduced by 2/3 of his pension), the base amount would be 100% of your benefit instead of 50%. So if you're receiving $3,500 at age 70 and pass away, his starting point would be $3,500 before the GPO reduction, not $1,750. This means he might actually receive some survivor benefits even if he doesn't qualify for spousal benefits while you're both alive. This is one more reason to maximize your benefit by waiting until 70 - it could help him later through higher survivor benefits.
0 coins
Connor Rupert
•Oh! That's really valuable information I hadn't considered. So by maximizing my benefit to $3,500 at age 70, if I pass away first, his survivor benefit starting point would be the full $3,500. Then they'd subtract 2/3 of his $4,200 pension ($2,800), potentially leaving him with $700/month in survivor benefits. That adds another good reason to wait until 70. Thank you!
0 coins
Leo McDonald
I don't know why they punish people like this!!! My friend's husband worked for 35 years but because it was for a state government that didn't participate in SS, he gets PENALIZED and can't get the same benefits as everyone else? The whole system is rigged. They take our money but don't want to pay it back. They should abolish GPO and WEP - there are bills in Congress to do this but they never pass them!!! Call your representatives!!
0 coins
Skylar Neal
•While I understand your frustration, there's an actual reason for the GPO. Social Security spousal benefits were designed to help financially dependent spouses who didn't work or had low earnings. Without the GPO, government employees who didn't pay into Social Security would get full pensions AND full spousal benefits, essentially double-dipping in a way that wasn't intended. The GPO tries to treat government pensions similar to how Social Security treats its own benefits (you generally can't get both full retirement and full spousal benefits). That said, many people believe the 2/3 reduction is too severe and should be reformed.
0 coins
Brady Clean
doesn't matter when you file, your husband probably gets $0 either way because of GPO. my dad's friend went through this and got nothing from his wife's SS.
0 coins
Connor Rupert
Thank you all for the helpful information! I've decided to stick with my plan to file at 70 to maximize my benefit. Even though my husband probably won't get spousal benefits due to GPO, the survivor benefit possibility makes it worthwhile. Going to schedule an appointment with SSA to get exact calculations for our situation. Appreciate all the responses!
0 coins
Molly Hansen
•That's a wise decision. Maximizing your benefit to $3,500 at age 70 (instead of taking roughly $2,500 at your current age) gives you an extra $1,000/month for life, and potentially provides your husband some survivor benefits if you predecease him. The GPO can be frustrating, but understanding it helps you make the best decision for your circumstances.
0 coins