Social Security spousal benefits vs. WEP/GPO - should I file now or wait until FRA?
I'm in a real pickle trying to figure out this Social Security spousal benefit situation with WEP/GPO involved. Math has never been my strong suit! I'm a retired teacher with a pension, and I didn't file for spousal benefits at 62 because the GPO would have reduced it to $0 (what a joy that was to discover). My husband started taking his SS at 62, and now I'm trying to determine if I should file for spousal now or wait until my Full Retirement Age which is about 18 months away. I've looked everywhere on the SSA website but can't figure out where to find my husband's PIA (Primary Insurance Amount) which I apparently need for the calculation. The benefit calculators are confusing me even more! Does anyone know the approximate percentage difference in monthly benefits if I wait until FRA versus filing now? Or should I just give up on the DIY approach and call Social Security directly? I feel like I need a math degree to figure this out!
17 comments
Beth Ford
just call them it's eaiser
0 coins
Atticus Domingo
•Thanks, you're probably right. I've been trying to avoid those long hold times, but I might have to bite the bullet.
0 coins
Morita Montoya
Don't give up yet! GPO/WEP calculations are complex even for advisors, but we can break this down. Your husband's PIA isn't directly shown on his statements - it's the amount he would have received at exactly his FRA (before reductions). Since he filed at 62, he's receiving approximately 70-75% of his PIA. For spousal benefits, if you file before your FRA, you'll typically receive a reduced amount - around 70% of what you'd get at FRA. However, the GPO reduction remains the same regardless of when you file - it reduces your spousal benefit by 2/3 of your teacher's pension. To calculate the difference: If your potential spousal benefit (before GPO) at FRA is 50% of your husband's PIA, filing now might reduce it to around 35-37% of his PIA. Then subtract 2/3 of your monthly pension from both scenarios to see if anything remains in either case. Do you know the approximate amount of your potential spousal benefit before the GPO reduction?
0 coins
Atticus Domingo
•Thank you for such a detailed explanation! I think my husband's full benefit would have been around $2,100, but he gets about $1,575 now. My pension is $3,250/month. So if I'm understanding correctly, at my FRA I'd get 50% of $2,100 ($1,050), minus 2/3 of $3,250 (which is about $2,167)... which is still zero? Am I calculating this right? Seems like I'm still getting $0 either way?
0 coins
Kingston Bellamy
You're absolutely correct in your calculation. With a pension of $3,250, the GPO reduction (2/3 of $3,250 = $2,167) exceeds the maximum spousal benefit you could receive at FRA (50% of your husband's PIA of $2,100 = $1,050). This means your spousal benefit would be completely eliminated by GPO whether you file now or at FRA. In cases where the GPO reduction exceeds the potential benefit amount, waiting until FRA doesn't produce an advantage since you'll receive $0 either way. This is a common situation for many former government employees with substantial pensions. The only scenario where this would change is if your pension amount decreases in the future for some reason, or if there's some other benefit you might be eligible for. But based on the numbers you've provided, filing now or later wouldn't make a difference in your benefit amount.
0 coins
Atticus Domingo
•Thank you for confirming! It's simultaneously a relief to know I'm not missing out on anything by waiting, but also disappointing to have it confirmed that I really won't get any spousal benefits. At least now I know I don't need to keep researching this.
0 coins
Joy Olmedo
Ugh, the WEP/GPO rules are SO UNFAIR!!! I'm a retired postal worker and I got hit with the same thing. Worked 30 years, paid into SS from part-time jobs, and still get almost nothing from SS because of my pension. The worst part is that most financial advisors don't even understand these rules! My brother-in-law never worked government jobs and got full benefits plus his private pension. How is that fair?????
0 coins
Isaiah Cross
•I completely understand your frustration. The WEP/GPO provisions affect nearly 2 million public servants nationwide, and many feel it's an unfair penalty for choosing careers in public service. There's been legislation proposed to reform or eliminate these reductions (like the Social Security Fairness Act), but it hasn't passed yet. The original intent was to prevent "double-dipping," but it disproportionately impacts teachers, police officers, and other public employees who often earn modest pensions.
0 coins
Kiara Greene
I tried calling Social Security about a similar GPO question last month and waited 3.5 hours before getting disconnected! I eventually used this service called Claimyr that connected me to an agent in about 20 minutes instead of hours. They have a video showing how it works at https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU. It was such a relief to finally talk to someone who could explain my WEP reduction calculation. The agent I spoke with was actually really knowledgeable about teacher pensions and GPO.
0 coins
Atticus Domingo
•Oh wow, I've never heard of that service. Those wait times are exactly why I've been trying to figure this out myself! I'll check out that video. Did you find the SS agent was able to give you clear answers about your situation?
0 coins
Kiara Greene
•Yes! The agent walked me through my entire calculation and even emailed me a detailed breakdown afterward. She confirmed that my GPO was being correctly applied and helped me understand some exceptions I didn't know about. Worth the call for sure - especially without the typical 3+ hour wait!
0 coins
Evelyn Kelly
This is why I'm terrified of retirement planning! I have 7 years of non-covered teaching earnings and 15 years under Social Security and I have NO IDEA how my benefits will be calculated. Every time I think I understand WEP someone tells me something different. Does anyone know if the WEP reduction is less severe if you have more years of substantial SS earnings? I've heard 20 years is some kind of threshold but I don't know if that's accurate???
0 coins
Kingston Bellamy
•Yes, you're on the right track about the 20-year threshold. The WEP reduction decreases if you have more than 20 years of "substantial earnings" under Social Security. With 30+ years of substantial SS earnings, the WEP reduction is eliminated completely. For 2025, "substantial earnings" means you earned at least $31,575 in SS-covered employment for the year (this amount is adjusted annually). With your 15 years already under SS, if you can accumulate 5 more years of substantial earnings before retiring, your WEP reduction will start decreasing. Each year above 20 reduces the WEP penalty by 5%. Your situation is different from the original poster's though - they're dealing primarily with GPO (affecting spousal/widow benefits) while you're concerned about WEP (affecting your own SS retirement benefits).
0 coins
Beth Ford
my frend worked for school district 26 yrs now gets $0 from husbands SS even tho he paid in 45 yrs! system is rigged against teachers
0 coins
Joy Olmedo
•EXACTLY!!! Meanwhile Congress refuses to fix it but keeps their own special retirement system! My congressman promised he'd vote to repeal GPO/WEP during his campaign but hasn't done ANYTHING since getting elected. What a surprise...
0 coins
Morita Montoya
One final suggestion - even though your calculation shows $0 benefit, it might still be worth calling SSA to verify your specific situation. There are occasionally special circumstances or provisions that might apply in individual cases. For instance, if you had any substantial earnings under Social Security yourself (not just your teacher's pension), the calculation becomes more complex and potentially more favorable. Also, having the calculation officially done can help with future planning, especially regarding survivor benefits should your spouse pass away before you (survivor benefits are also subject to GPO, but the calculation is different). Keep in mind that when you do call, try to speak with someone who specifically understands GPO/WEP provisions, as not all representatives are equally familiar with these complex rules.
0 coins
Atticus Domingo
•That's a really good point about survivor benefits. I did work briefly in the private sector in my 20s, but it wasn't many years. I think I'll take your advice and make that call just to have everything professionally calculated and on record for future planning. Thank you for the thoughtful suggestion!
0 coins