< Back to Social Security Administration

Social Security spousal benefits question - retire at 60 vs 62 when husband earns more?

I've been trying to wrap my head around Social Security retirement options and just can't figure out the best strategy for our situation. I'm planning to retire at 60 (next year) because my company offers a supplement until I turn 62. My husband (same age as me) wants to keep working until at least 62, maybe longer. Here's what I'm struggling with - he's always earned significantly more than me (like 3x my salary), so I know I'd probably get more from spousal benefits than my own record. But I'm also from a family with poor longevity - nobody has made it past 68 so far. Should I: 1) Stick with retiring at 60 with my company supplement? 2) Work the extra 2 years until 62 even though I'm ready to be done? 3) Take my own benefits at 62 then switch to spousal later? I know there are penalties for taking SS early, but given my family history, waiting until FRA doesn't seem practical. How can I maximize what I'll get without working until I drop? And how exactly would my husband's higher earnings affect what I can collect as a spouse?

Dyllan Nantx

•

First, understand that the earliest you can claim Social Security retirement benefits is age 62, regardless of when you stop working. Your company supplement is separate from Social Security. At 62, you'll face a roughly 30% reduction in benefits versus waiting until your Full Retirement Age (probably 67 for you). As for spousal benefits, you can't claim those until your husband files for his own benefits, and you'd receive up to 50% of his FRA benefit (less if you claim before your own FRA). Given your family longevity concerns, claiming at 62 might make sense, but run the numbers carefully. Use the calculators on ssa.gov to see exact figures for different scenarios.

0 coins

Destiny Bryant

•

Thank you! I didn't realize I couldn't get spousal benefits until he files. That changes things. So if I retire at 60 with my company supplement, then take my own reduced benefits at 62, I'd have to wait until he files at 62+ to possibly switch to spousal? Is there any penalty if I start with my own benefits and switch later?

0 coins

my mom was in kinda similar situation... she took her own benefit at 62 then when dad retired at 66 she switched to spousal. worked out ok for them but mom always complained about how small her check was those first few years!!!

0 coins

Destiny Bryant

•

That's helpful to hear a real example! Was your mom able to just switch to the spousal benefit automatically or did she have to do something special? I'm worried about missing some crucial paperwork and leaving money on the table.

0 coins

Anna Xian

•

This is a complex question and I've been exactly where you are. Given your family longevity history, maximizing benefits in your 60s rather than waiting for larger benefits in your 70s makes mathematical sense. One thing to consider: if you retire at 60 but delay claiming SS until 62, those two years of zero income will be part of your benefit calculation (SSA uses your highest 35 years of earnings). This might lower your own benefit slightly. For spousal benefits, the calculation gets tricky. You'll always get the higher of either your own benefit or up to 50% of your husband's FRA amount (reduced if you claim early). Since he earns significantly more, the spousal route likely gives you more eventually. In your shoes, I'd probably retire at 60 with the supplement, claim my own benefit at 62, then when husband files, automatically get bumped up to the higher spousal amount if applicable.

0 coins

YOU CAN'T GET SS AT 60!!!! Earliest is 62!!! Don't listen to bad advice!!! And they PUNISH you for taking it early - I got 28% LESS than full amount because I couldn't wait. And spousal is COMPLICATED - they don't explain it well and the SSA website is USELESS for figuring this out!!!

0 coins

Dyllan Nantx

•

You're correct that 62 is the earliest age for retirement benefits (though survivors can claim at 60). The poster seems to understand this - she mentioned having a company supplement from 60-62, then Social Security after that.

0 coins

Rajan Walker

•

I had a similar situation where my husband earned way more than me. What nobody told me: when you take spousal benefits, they don't just give you 50% of your husband's benefit. They give you your own benefit PLUS whatever additional amount gets you to the spousal level. Example: If your benefit at 62 is $800 and 50% of your husband's FRA benefit is $1500, you don't get $1500. You get your $800 plus $700 to reach the $1500. Also, once your husband passes away (sorry to be morbid), you'd get his full benefit amount as a survivor benefit (with reductions if you claim before your FRA). Given your family history, I think claiming at 62 makes sense for you.

0 coins

Destiny Bryant

•

Thank you for explaining that! I was definitely confused about whether spousal benefits were instead of or on top of my own benefits. Makes much more sense now.

0 coins

Nadia Zaldivar

•

After spending WEEKS trying to get through to someone at Social Security to ask almost this exact question last year, I finally used a service called Claimyr (claimyr.com) that got me connected to an SSA agent in under 20 minutes instead of waiting on hold for hours. They have a video showing how it works: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU The agent I spoke with was really helpful and ran several calculations for me on the spot comparing early retirement vs waiting. Given your specific situation with the family longevity concerns, I'd definitely recommend talking directly with SSA about exact numbers for your case before deciding.

0 coins

does that actually work?? ive been trying to get thru to ssa for like a month!!

0 coins

Nadia Zaldivar

•

It worked great for me! I was skeptical but after getting disconnected three times trying the regular number, I was desperate. Got through to a rep who actually had time to explain all my options since I wasn't their 50th call of the day.

0 coins

my 2 cents - enjoy life NOW. my sister waited to retire "to get maximum SS" and passed at 67 before ever collecting a dime! with your family history, retiring at 60 sounds smart. the financial difference over time might not be as big as people think when u factor in actually GETTING the money for more years.

0 coins

Dyllan Nantx

•

One more important point: once you reach your Full Retirement Age, the earnings limit no longer applies. Before FRA, if you work and earn above certain limits ($21,240 in 2025), your benefits are reduced by $1 for every $2 you earn above the limit. If your husband plans to continue working while collecting, this could impact his benefits until he reaches FRA. And since spousal benefits are tied to when he files, this becomes part of your calculation too. For the most precise information, create a my Social Security account at ssa.gov to see your exact benefit estimates at various claiming ages.

0 coins

Destiny Bryant

•

Thank you! I do have a my Social Security account but the estimates there seem to assume I'll keep working at my current salary until whatever age I claim benefits. Is there a way to calculate what happens if I stop working at 60 but don't claim until 62? Do those zeroes for 2 years hurt my average a lot?

0 coins

Dyllan Nantx

•

Yes, you can adjust future earnings in your my Social Security account to see how different scenarios affect your benefits. Look for the "Change future earnings" option when viewing your estimated benefits. This will let you model stopping work at 60 while claiming at 62.

0 coins

TaxRefund AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
7,040 users helped today