Social Security family benefits shock - disabled adult child benefits reduced my spousal SS benefits to zero
I'm still reeling from what happened when I applied for Social Security last month. My wife started collecting her retirement benefits about 6 months ago (she was the higher earner). Our adult son with severe autism was receiving SSI, but as soon as my wife filed, Social Security automatically transferred him to SSDI as a Disabled Adult Child (DAC) under her record. Nobody warned us this would happen! Here's where it gets worse - I worked sporadically over the years as I was our son's primary caregiver. I always thought I'd get my small retirement benefit PLUS a spousal benefit to supplement since my wife earned so much more. Well, guess what? Our son's DAC benefit basically took what would have been my spousal portion. I only qualify for my own tiny benefit ($780/month) and NOTHING from my wife's record. Now we're stuck in this weird situation where our son receives a higher benefit ($1,950/month), but it can ONLY be used for him, and he still has the $2,000 resource limit we have to monitor constantly. We have to spend down his money each month while we're struggling. Our retirement projections are completely destroyed. We assumed we'd have my benefit plus spousal supplement PLUS his SSI. Instead, we have just my small benefit and his DAC money that can't be used for household expenses. I doubt many couples are in this exact situation, but if you have a disabled adult child and are planning retirement, PLEASE look into this before filing! The family maximum is a real thing and Adult Disabled Children can eat up benefits you thought would be yours.
27 comments


Sienna Gomez
This is actually a common situation with the Family Maximum Benefit (FMB) rules. When multiple people draw from one earner's record, there's a cap on the total that can be paid. Your disabled son's benefit as a Disabled Adult Child (DAC) gets priority over your spousal benefit in the FMB calculation. The positive side is that your son's benefit is likely higher than his SSI was, and he now has Medicare after 24 months on SSDI/DAC. But you're right that the resource limits still apply if he wants to keep Medicaid (which many disabled adults need for support services SSI doesn't cover). For others reading: if you're in this situation, consider delaying the higher earner's benefits. This increases their benefit amount AND raises the family maximum, potentially allowing more room for spousal benefits alongside the DAC benefit.
0 coins
Daryl Bright
•Thanks for explaining the Family Maximum. I wish someone at SSA had explained this BEFORE my wife filed! Yes, our son's benefit is about $850 higher than his SSI was, but the issue is we can't use that money for household expenses that would benefit all of us (like mortgage, utilities, etc.) without it counting as income to him. So we're actually worse off financially despite the higher total household income on paper. Is there ANY way to go back and change our filing strategy at this point? My wife has only been collecting for 6 months.
0 coins
Kirsuktow DarkBlade
omg same thing happened to us!!! daughter with downs got switched to SSDI from my husbands record and we got the whole family maximum thing explained AFTER we already filed. no warning at all. now im only getting like $650 and cant get spousal. its so frustrating!!
0 coins
Abigail bergen
•The SSA really needs to improve how they explain these complex family benefit situations. I see this ALL THE TIME in my work with families who have adult disabled children. The system isn't set up for proper advance planning counseling. For the original poster and others: one strategy to consider is having the lower-earning spouse file FIRST if they're eligible, then the disabled adult child gets benefits from that record (likely lower but still something), then when the higher earner files later, the disabled child can switch to the higher record. This sometimes creates room under the family maximum for better overall household income.
0 coins
Ahooker-Equator
Unfortunately, once a beneficiary has been receiving benefits for more than 6 months, they can't withdraw their application. Your wife is just at that cutoff point. You might want to schedule an appointment with SSA to discuss if there are any options available in your specific case. Regarding the resource limits for your son - look into an ABLE account. These special accounts allow disabled individuals to save beyond the $2,000 limit (up to $100,000) without affecting benefits. It might help with managing his funds more effectively.
0 coins
Daryl Bright
•We do have an ABLE account for him, thank you. It helps but doesn't solve the fundamental issue that his money can't be used for general household expenses without counting as income to him. We're basically having to document everything we spend his money on to ensure it's just for him. So frustrating!
0 coins
Anderson Prospero
Have you tried calling SSA directly to discuss your options? They might be able to help.
0 coins
Daryl Bright
•LOL I've tried calling them about 20 times in the past two weeks! Either I get disconnected or told the wait is over 2 hours. I can't sit on hold that long while caring for my son.
0 coins
Tyrone Hill
•I had the same problem trying to reach SSA about my benefits! After weeks of frustration, I found this service called Claimyr that got me through to a real person at SSA in less than 20 minutes. They basically wait on hold for you and call you when an agent is available. It was honestly a game changer for me. Their website is claimyr.com and they have a video demo at https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU showing how it works. Might be worth checking out since you need to speak with someone about something this complicated.
0 coins
Toot-n-Mighty
THIS IS WHY THE SYSTEM IS BROKEN!!! SSA doesn't explain these complicated rules to people before they file, then you're STUCK with bad decisions that affect your whole life! And you can't even get someone on the phone to help fix it. My brother has a similar situation with his disabled daughter and they're struggling to make ends meet because all her money has to be spent just on her expenses with the stupid resource limit. It's like they WANT families to be poor!!
0 coins
Sienna Gomez
•While I understand your frustration, the rules do serve a purpose. The family maximum ensures benefits are distributed fairly across all beneficiaries. The resource limits for disabled individuals receiving SSI-related benefits (like Medicaid) are outdated though - $2,000 hasn't changed since the 1980s despite inflation. The real issue is the lack of benefit planning services. Social Security representatives are prohibited from giving financial advice about when or how to file to maximize benefits. They can only process applications and explain the rules as they apply to your current situation.
0 coins
Abigail bergen
Something that hasn't been mentioned yet - you should look into whether your state has any supplemental programs for caregivers of adult disabled children. Some states offer additional financial support or caregiver stipends that might help offset some of what you've lost in expected Social Security income. These programs vary widely by state though. Also, for your son's funds, consider working with a special needs financial planner who can help maximize how his benefits are used while staying compliant with all the rules. Some expenses that benefit the whole household CAN actually be properly allocated as his share (portion of rent/mortgage, utilities, etc.) with the right documentation.
0 coins
Daryl Bright
•That's really helpful, thank you. We're in Illinois - I'll look into what programs might be available here. And I didn't realize we might be able to allocate some household expenses to him with proper documentation. Do you know any resources for learning how to do this correctly?
0 coins
Abigail bergen
•For Illinois specifically, look into the Community Care Program and the Home Services Program. As for documentation, the key is fair share allocation - if there are 3 people in the household, his DAC funds can cover 1/3 of shared expenses like housing, utilities, food, etc. Keep receipts and maintain a ledger showing these calculations. The Special Needs Alliance website has resources explaining this, and many special needs attorneys offer free initial consultations to explain these concepts.
0 coins
Kirsuktow DarkBlade
anyone know if this affects retirement benefits differently than disability? my husband is on SSDI and we have a disabled son who gets benefits as a minor child dependent right now, but I was planning to apply for my retirement next year and now im worried about how this all works
0 coins
Sienna Gomez
•Yes, this works differently when SSDI is involved versus retirement. The family maximum still applies, but the calculation is different for SSDI. Additionally, when your son turns 18, he'll need to apply for benefits as an adult disabled child if his disability began before age 22. I strongly recommend scheduling a benefit planning session specifically about this transition before you file for retirement. Many Area Agencies on Aging offer free SHIP counseling (State Health Insurance Assistance Program) that includes Social Security benefit planning.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Maktoum
I'm so sorry you're dealing with this situation. As someone new to understanding Social Security benefits, this is incredibly eye-opening and frankly terrifying. The fact that SSA doesn't proactively explain how these family maximum rules work before people file seems like a massive systemic failure. Your story is a perfect example of why we need better benefit counseling services. It's not fair that families have to discover these complex interactions AFTER they've already made irreversible decisions that affect their entire financial future. For what it's worth, your post might save other families from making the same mistake. Have you considered reaching out to your local representatives about this? The lack of proper advance planning guidance from SSA seems like something that needs policy attention, especially given how common these situations are becoming as more families care for adult disabled children. Thank you for sharing your experience - it's helping educate the rest of us about these hidden pitfalls in the system.
0 coins
Ravi Sharma
•Thank you for bringing up the policy angle - that's something I hadn't considered but you're absolutely right. The lack of proactive counseling from SSA about these family benefit interactions is a serious gap that affects thousands of families. I actually have reached out to my congressman's office about this issue. They were helpful in getting me connected with a local SSA supervisor who at least explained the rules more clearly, though unfortunately couldn't change our situation. The supervisor did acknowledge that they see this scenario regularly and that many families are caught off guard. What's particularly frustrating is that SSA has all this information in their systems - they KNOW when someone has a disabled adult child who will be affected by family maximum rules, but there's no systematic way they alert people to these consequences before filing. It really does seem like a policy change is needed to require more comprehensive benefit impact disclosures. I'm definitely going to keep pushing on this through my representatives. Maybe if enough of us speak up, we can get some kind of mandatory pre-filing counseling requirement implemented for complex family situations like ours.
0 coins
PixelPrincess
This is such an important discussion that highlights a major gap in how SSA handles complex family benefit situations. As someone who works with families navigating disability benefits, I see this scenario far too often - families making well-intentioned decisions without understanding the full implications. One thing I'd add to the excellent advice already given: if you're within that 6-month window (which you barely are), it might be worth having a disability attorney or benefits specialist review your case for any possible options. Sometimes there are nuances in how the family maximum was calculated or applied that could be challenged. Also, for future readers in similar situations - consider having the lower-earning spouse delay filing until after age 70 if possible. This can sometimes create a better overall benefit structure for the family, though it requires careful analysis of each family's specific circumstances. The systemic issue here is real - SSA needs better tools and protocols for explaining these complex interactions before people file, not after. Your experience could really help drive that change if shared with the right advocacy organizations.
0 coins
Hunter Edmunds
•As someone completely new to understanding these Social Security complexities, I'm shocked by how many layers of rules and calculations are involved that regular families are expected to navigate without proper guidance. Reading through this entire discussion has been like getting a crash course in benefit planning that apparently should have happened BEFORE any filing decisions were made. What strikes me most is how this affects not just retirement planning, but caregiving families specifically. The original poster sacrificed career opportunities to care for their disabled son, only to find out that very act of caregiving - and their son's needs - would later reduce their own retirement security through these family maximum rules. It seems like there should be some kind of "caregiver protection" built into these calculations, especially when someone has spent years out of the workforce caring for a disabled family member. The current system almost seems to penalize families for keeping their disabled members at home instead of in institutional care. Thank you everyone for sharing your knowledge and experiences - this thread should be required reading for any family with a disabled member who's planning for retirement!
0 coins
Aidan Percy
This thread is absolutely eye-opening and honestly quite concerning. As someone new to this community, I had no idea these family maximum benefit rules could create such devastating financial impacts for caregiving families. What really stands out to me is how the system seems fundamentally broken when it comes to communication and planning. The fact that SSA has all the data they need to warn families about these consequences but doesn't proactively do so feels like a serious failure of public service. People are making irreversible decisions that affect their entire financial future without understanding the full picture. I'm particularly struck by how this disproportionately affects families who have made sacrifices to care for disabled family members at home. The original poster gave up career opportunities to be a caregiver, only to discover that this choice - combined with their son's disability benefits - would eliminate their spousal Social Security benefits entirely. It's like the system is punishing families for doing the right thing. The policy implications here seem huge. If SSA representatives are prohibited from giving strategic filing advice, then there needs to be some other mechanism - maybe mandatory referrals to independent benefit counselors for complex family situations, or at minimum, clear written disclosures about potential family maximum impacts before any applications are processed. Thank you to everyone sharing their knowledge and experiences here. This is exactly the kind of information families need BEFORE they make these critical decisions.
0 coins
AstroAlpha
•You've really captured the core injustice here - families who sacrifice to care for disabled relatives shouldn't be financially penalized for that choice. The system needs fundamental reform to better support caregiving families. One thing that might help in the short term is advocating for legislative change. The ABLE Age Adjustment Act recently raised the age limit for ABLE accounts, showing that disability-related financial rules CAN be updated when enough people speak up. Maybe we need similar advocacy around these family maximum rules and their impact on caregiver families. In the meantime, if you or others reading this are in similar situations, document everything and consider joining caregiver advocacy organizations. The National Alliance for Caregiving and similar groups are pushing for policy changes that could help prevent future families from falling into these traps. Your point about mandatory benefit counseling for complex family situations is spot-on. SSA should be required to flag these scenarios and provide comprehensive impact disclosures before processing applications. No family should discover these consequences after it's too late to change course.
0 coins
Zainab Abdulrahman
As a newcomer to this community, I'm absolutely stunned by what you've shared. This is exactly the kind of critical information that families need to know BEFORE filing for Social Security benefits, not after. What strikes me most is how the system seems designed to trap families in these situations. You spent years as a primary caregiver - sacrificing your own career earnings to care for your son - only to discover that his need for benefits would eliminate your spousal benefits entirely. It's deeply unfair that caregiving families face this additional financial penalty. The fact that SSA doesn't proactively warn families about family maximum impacts when they have all the data needed to predict these outcomes feels like a serious service failure. This should be flagged automatically in the system with mandatory counseling before any applications are processed. Your experience highlights a broader policy problem: SSA representatives can explain rules after you're stuck with them, but they're prohibited from helping families strategically plan to optimize their benefits beforehand. We need independent benefit counseling services or at minimum, comprehensive impact disclosures for complex family situations. Thank you for sharing this - your post could prevent other families from making the same costly mistakes. Have you considered reaching out to disability advocacy organizations? Stories like yours could drive the policy changes needed to protect future caregiving families.
0 coins
Savannah Vin
•Thank you for raising such important points about the systemic failures here. As someone just learning about these complex Social Security rules, I'm genuinely disturbed by how many families are falling into these traps without any warning. What's particularly troubling is that this isn't just a lack of information - it's a structural problem where the very people who sacrificed their careers to provide care are then penalized by the benefit system. The original poster's situation perfectly illustrates this: years of caregiving led to lower personal earnings, and then the family maximum rules eliminated the spousal benefits that should have helped compensate for that sacrifice. Your point about mandatory counseling is crucial. If SSA can automatically transfer someone from SSI to DAC benefits when a parent files (as happened with the original poster's son), surely they can automatically flag these complex family situations for comprehensive benefit planning before any irreversible decisions are made. I think we need a grassroots effort to document these stories and push for policy reform. Every family sharing their experience here is building a case for why the current system is failing the people it's supposed to protect. These aren't edge cases - they're predictable scenarios that happen to thousands of caregiving families every year. The advocacy angle you mentioned is really important. These stories need to reach policymakers who have the power to require better disclosure and planning services from SSA.
0 coins
Levi Parker
As someone completely new to navigating Social Security benefits, this thread has been both incredibly educational and deeply concerning. The complexity of these family maximum rules and their devastating impact on caregiving families like yours is shocking. What really troubles me is how the system seems to punish families for making sacrificial choices to care for disabled loved ones. You gave up career opportunities to be your son's primary caregiver, which already reduced your lifetime earnings, only to discover that his disability benefits would eliminate your expected spousal benefits entirely. It feels fundamentally wrong that caregiving families face this double financial penalty. The lack of proactive counseling from SSA is particularly frustrating. They have all the data needed to predict these family maximum impacts, yet families are left to discover these consequences after it's too late to adjust their filing strategies. This seems like a basic service failure that could be fixed with better systems and policies. I'm curious - have you found any resources or advocacy groups that are pushing for reform of these rules? It seems like stories like yours need to reach policymakers who could require SSA to provide mandatory benefit impact counseling for complex family situations before any applications are processed. Thank you for sharing your experience and educating the rest of us about these hidden pitfalls.
0 coins
Ana Rusula
•You've really hit on something important about how caregiving families get overlooked by these benefit rules. As someone just joining this conversation, I'm struck by how many people here have similar stories of being blindsided by family maximum calculations. What's particularly eye-opening is learning that SSA representatives are actually prohibited from giving strategic planning advice - they can only process applications and explain rules after you're already locked in. That seems like a fundamental flaw in how the system is designed to serve families. The idea of mandatory benefit impact counseling for complex family situations makes so much sense. If the system can automatically detect when someone has a disabled adult child who will be affected by family maximum rules, it should be required to flag that and provide comprehensive planning information before any irreversible filing decisions are made. I'm wondering if there are disability law organizations or caregiver advocacy groups that could help amplify these stories? It seems like we need a coordinated effort to document how these rules are affecting real families and push for systemic reforms. The current approach of leaving families to discover these consequences after the fact is simply unacceptable.
0 coins
Logan Greenburg
As someone new to this community, I'm absolutely appalled by what you've experienced. This is a perfect example of how our Social Security system fails the most vulnerable families - those who have sacrificed to care for disabled loved ones. The fact that you spent years as a primary caregiver, which naturally limited your own earnings, only to then discover that your son's benefits would completely eliminate your spousal benefits feels like a cruel double penalty. You did everything right by caring for your family, and the system punished you for it. What's most frustrating is that SSA had all the information needed to warn you about this outcome before you filed. The automatic transfer of your son from SSI to DAC benefits shows their systems can detect these complex family situations - yet there's no mechanism to alert families about the financial implications beforehand. This thread has been incredibly eye-opening for me about these hidden pitfalls in Social Security planning. Your willingness to share this painful experience could prevent other caregiving families from falling into the same trap. Have you considered reaching out to organizations like the National Alliance for Caregiving or disability advocacy groups? Stories like yours are exactly what's needed to push for policy reforms requiring better disclosure and planning support for families in these situations. Thank you for educating all of us about these issues - no family should have to discover these consequences after it's too late to plan differently.
0 coins