Social Security AI gave me wrong advice about restricted applications - who else is eligible for this strategy?
I just had the strangest experience with an AI chatbot (Meta's) when asking about Social Security filing strategies. I asked about filing for spousal benefits while delaying my own retirement benefits until later, and it gave me completely incorrect information initially! When I pushed back, the AI eventually admitted I was right and that the rules had indeed changed with the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015. This got me thinking - who actually CAN still use the restricted application strategy? I was born in 1953, turned 66 in 2019, and I think I'm still eligible since I was born before January 2, 1954. My wife started her benefits last year when she turned 62. Am I correct that I could file a restricted application for just spousal benefits while letting my own retirement benefit grow until 70? The SSA website is so confusing on this topic and their phone lines are impossible to get through. Has anyone here successfully done this recently? Just want to make sure I understand my options correctly before making any decisions that could cost me thousands.
14 comments


Yara Abboud
You're absolutely correct! You're in that sweet spot of being born before January 2, 1954, which means you're grandfathered into the old rules. You CAN file a restricted application for spousal benefits at your Full Retirement Age (which you've already reached) while letting your own retirement benefits continue to grow until 70. Those delay credits are worth 8% per year, so delaying from 66 to 70 will give you a 32% higher monthly benefit for life. Meanwhile, you collect spousal benefits (typically 50% of your wife's Full Retirement Age benefit amount) for those 4 years. This strategy was eliminated by the 2015 Budget Act for anyone born on or after January 2, 1954, so you're one of the last groups able to use this valuable technique. Just make sure when you file that you specifically tell SSA you want to file a "restricted application for spousal benefits only." Some claims representatives aren't familiar with this option since it's being phased out.
0 coins
Connor Byrne
•Thank you! That's exactly what I thought, but it's reassuring to hear it confirmed. Do you know if I need specific wording when I apply? I've heard horror stories about SSA representatives accidentally filing for both benefits when people meant to file restricted applications.
0 coins
PixelPioneer
my sister tried this last yr and they ended up filing her for EVERYTHING even tho she kept saying restricted application!!! be super careful and make sure they understand exactly what ur asking for!!! get names of who u talk to!!
0 coins
Keisha Williams
•This is exactly why I'm terrified of dealing with SSA. They make these permanent decisions that affect thousands of dollars, and it seems like half the reps don't even know their own rules! Did your sister ever get it fixed?
0 coins
Paolo Rizzo
I successfully filed a restricted application in 2018 (born in 1952). Here's exactly what worked for me: 1. I used the specific phrase "I wish to file a restricted application for spousal benefits only under Section 202(r) of the Social Security Act." 2. I brought a printed copy of POMS section GN 00204.020 which specifically addresses restricted applications. 3. Most importantly, I reviewed the application before signing to verify it ONLY showed spousal benefits. They had initially tried to process both. 4. I got a confirmation in writing that my own retirement benefits were NOT being processed. That strategy has been great - I've been collecting about $1,400/month in spousal benefits while my own benefit has continued growing. I'll switch to my own (much larger) benefit when I turn 70 next month.
0 coins
Amina Sy
•That POMS reference is golden info. I'd add that if you're doing this online, use the "Remarks" section to explicitly state you're filing a restricted application and want ONLY spousal benefits while your retirement benefit continues to earn delayed retirement credits. Screenshot everything!
0 coins
Oliver Fischer
wait i thought they got rid of this filing loophole completely?? my financial advisor told me this was gone and not to even try it
0 coins
Paolo Rizzo
•Your advisor is partially right but missing a crucial detail. The "file and suspend" strategy was completely eliminated for everyone in 2016. The "restricted application" strategy was grandfathered in for people born before January 2, 1954. Since the original poster was born in 1953, they can still use it. Anyone born in 1954 or later cannot use either strategy.
0 coins
Natasha Ivanova
I used Claimyr to get through to SSA when I filed my restricted application last year. The wait times were over 3 hours when I called directly, but with Claimyr I got through in about 15 minutes. Worth it for something this important where you need to talk to an actual person and make sure they understand what you're asking for. You can check them out at claimyr.com - there's a video demo at https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU that shows how it works. It was a lifesaver for me since I needed to get this right the first time.
0 coins
Connor Byrne
•Thanks for the tip! I've been trying to get through to SSA for weeks. I'll definitely check this out since I want to make sure I get this right.
0 coins
Keisha Williams
THE WHOLE SYSTEM IS RIGGED AGAINST US!!! They purposely make these rules complicated so people don't get what they deserve! My husband and I missed out on this strategy by FIVE MONTHS because he was born in May 1954. FIVE MONTHS cost us thousands of dollars!!! And now they're practically impossible to reach by phone when you need help. The whole system needs to be torn down and rebuilt!!
0 coins
PixelPioneer
•I feel ur pain!! my brother missed it by 3 weeks!! born jan 21 1954... so frustrating!!
0 coins
Connor Byrne
Just wanted to update everyone - I successfully filed my restricted application yesterday! I used some of the advice here (especially bringing a printout of the POMS section) and was very explicit about wanting ONLY spousal benefits while my own continue to grow until 70. The representative initially seemed confused but after I showed the documentation, they understood. I double-checked the application before signing to make sure it only showed spousal benefits. It'll mean about $1,250/month for the next four years while my own benefit grows to about $3,400/month at age 70. Thanks everyone for your help! Hopefully this thread helps others in my generation who still qualify for this strategy.
0 coins
Yara Abboud
•Fantastic news! You just secured yourself potentially tens of thousands in additional lifetime benefits by handling this correctly. Congratulations on navigating the system successfully!
0 coins