< Back to Social Security Administration

Confused about Social Security claim order - can I take spousal benefits at 62 while my own SS benefits grow until 70?

I just had an appointment with the Social Security office yesterday about retirement planning, and I'm confused by what they told me. The claims specialist said that I (wife) could file for spousal benefits when I turn 62 next year based on my husband's record (he'll be at his Full Retirement Age of 67 then), and that I could let my own retirement benefits continue growing until I turn 70. This sounds too good to be true, especially with all the rule changes I've heard about. I thought the 'file and restrict' strategy ended years ago? Does anyone know if this advice is accurate for someone turning 62 in 2025? I've searched online and can't find any confirmation that this is still possible. My own retirement benefit at FRA would be about $2,400/month and my husband's is around $3,200/month. Really appreciate any insights from those who understand these claiming strategies better than I do!

Cameron Black

•

That SSA representative gave you incorrect information, unfortunately. The "restricted application" strategy (filing for just spousal benefits while letting your own grow) is only available to people born before January 2, 1954. If you're turning 62 next year, you were born well after that cutoff date. When you file for any benefit now, you're deemed to be filing for ALL benefits you're eligible for. This is called "deemed filing." So if you file at 62, you'll get the higher of either your reduced retirement benefit or your reduced spousal benefit - not both, and not with the ability to switch later. Your best strategy might be to coordinate with your husband on who files when, based on your health, longevity expectations, and relative benefit amounts.

0 coins

Victoria Jones

•

Thank you so much for clarifying! I was so confused because what the rep told me contradicted everything I'd read online. Should I call the SSA back and ask to speak with a different representative? I'm worried they'll give my husband incorrect information when he goes in to file.

0 coins

Jessica Nguyen

•

OMG they told me the EXACT same thing when i went in last month!!! i got all excited and then my financial advisor said NOPE cant do that anymore. these people dont even know their own rules!! so frustrating

0 coins

Victoria Jones

•

That's really concerning that they're giving out the same wrong information to multiple people. Did you end up filing anyway or did you change your strategy after talking to your advisor?

0 coins

Isaiah Thompson

•

The previous comments are correct. The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 eliminated the restricted application strategy for anyone born January 2, 1954 or later. Based on the benefit amounts you shared, it might be worth considering having your husband file at his FRA (67), and you could file for your own benefits at your FRA. Or if longevity runs in your family, waiting until 70 for both of you would maximize your lifetime benefits. With your benefit amounts being relatively high ($2,400 and $3,200 at FRA), the spousal benefit might not even come into play much. The spousal benefit is maximum 50% of your husband's FRA amount, and you only get that if you take it at your FRA. At 62, it would be around 32.5% of his FRA amount.

0 coins

Jessica Nguyen

•

but what if her husband already filed?? does that change anything?? asking for myself too

0 coins

Ruby Garcia

•

This EXACT thing happened to me!!! The SS office gave me COMPLETELY wrong information. I ended up filing early based on their advice and lost THOUSANDS of dollars because I couldn't undo it after more than 12 months. The Social Security system is BROKEN and their employees don't understand their own rules!!!

0 coins

Alexander Evans

•

This is why I always recommend making an appointment with several different SSA representatives and getting everything in writing. I've found it extremely difficult to reach anyone at SSA lately though - wait times of 2+ hours on the phone, and appointments are scheduled months out. I recently discovered a service called Claimyr (claimyr.com) that gets you through to a Social Security agent usually within 15-20 minutes instead of hours. They have a video explaining how it works: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU. It saved me a ton of time when I needed to fix an issue with my husband's benefits. Worth it to avoid the frustration of waiting endlessly on hold.

0 coins

Evelyn Martinez

•

my brother in law works for social security and he says alot of people don't understand that the rules changed in 2015... even some of the workers don't get it right because they've been there for decades and forget about the changes

0 coins

Benjamin Carter

•

You mentioned your FRA benefit would be $2400 and your husband's is $3200. Honestly with those numbers, you probably want to focus on maximizing your own benefit rather than spousal benefits anyway. If you took spousal at your FRA, you'd get $1600 (half of his). If you took it early at 62, you'd get even less - around $1120. That's a lot less than your own benefit even with early filing reductions. Have you considered when you actually need the income? If you can wait until 70, your $2400 FRA benefit becomes around $3000/month. That's the permanent value of delaying.

0 coins

Victoria Jones

•

That's a really good point about the actual numbers. We don't absolutely need the income right away - I'm still working part-time and my husband plans to continue consulting through his 60s. So maybe waiting is better for both of us. I just got excited when they suggested I could get some benefits early while still getting the delayed retirement credits!

0 coins

Cameron Black

•

One more thing to consider: survivor benefits. If either of you passes away, the surviving spouse gets to keep the higher of the two benefit amounts. If you expect your husband to have a longer life expectancy, then maximizing your benefit might not be as important. But if you think you might outlive him, having him maximize his benefit by waiting until 70 could provide you with a larger survivor benefit later. Running the numbers with a financial advisor who specializes in Social Security claiming strategies might be worthwhile given your benefit amounts.

0 coins

Victoria Jones

•

That's excellent advice about survivor benefits. His family tends to have shorter lifespans than mine, so that's definitely something we should consider. I'll look into finding a financial advisor who specializes in Social Security planning. Thanks everyone for saving me from making a potentially costly mistake based on incorrect information!

0 coins

TaxRefund AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
6,882 users helped today