< Back to Social Security Administration

Can I claim Social Security benefits on ex-spouse's record with under 10-year marriage but have children together?

I'm really confused about Social Security ex-spouse benefits and how children factor in. My marriage lasted 9 years and 8 months before we divorced in 2018 (just shy of that 10-year requirement). We have two children together (now 12 and 14). I remarried in 2021 at age 48 but I'm wondering about my future options. I've heard conflicting information - my friend mentioned the 10-year marriage rule can be waived if you have children with your ex. Then my sister told me she was able to claim on her children's father's record despite remarrying and divorcing another man before age 60. Is there some exception to both the 10-year marriage rule AND the remarriage restriction if you have children together? I'm trying to understand my options when I eventually reach retirement age. My ex has a much higher earnings history than me. Thanks for any clarity!

I work with Social Security claims regularly, and I need to clarify some misconceptions here. There is NO exception to the 10-year marriage rule for ex-spouse benefits just because you have children together. The requirement is very strict - your marriage must have lasted at least 10 years to qualify for divorced spouse benefits. What your sister might be referring to is something different - she may have been receiving benefits as a parent caring for the children of her ex (when they were under 16), not retirement benefits based on her ex's record. Those are completely different benefits with different rules. Your current situation: 1. Your marriage was under 10 years, so you cannot receive ex-spouse retirement benefits 2. Your remarriage further disqualifies you from any potential ex-spouse benefits 3. The only time children matter is when you're caring for them while they're under 16, which no longer applies to your situation

0 coins

Bruno Simmons

•

Thank you for explaining! That makes sense about my sister - her kids were much younger when she was claiming benefits, so it must have been the parent-with-child-in-care benefit, not retirement benefits. So just to be 100% clear - there is absolutely no way around that 10-year rule? Even if we were just 4 months short? That seems so frustrating to miss it by such a small margin.

0 coins

Zane Gray

•

I went through EXACTLY this with SSA last year. Was married for 9 years 7 months and thought having kids would help, but NOPE! The 10-year rule is ABSOLUTE with no exceptions!!! I argued with multiple SSA reps but they all said the same thing - even ONE DAY short of 10 years means ZERO benefits. It's completely unfair and I'm still bitter about it. And yes, your remarriage absolutely blocks you from ex-spouse benefits anyway. The system is designed to hurt women who spent years raising kids while their ex-spouse built up higher earnings. I tried everything to get around it.

0 coins

Maggie Martinez

•

same happened to my cousin she was like 3 months short of 10 years and they wouldnt budge at all. she was so mad because she gave up her career to raise there kids while he kept working. now shes struggling on her own record.

0 coins

Your sister's situation sounds like she was receiving mother's/father's benefits, which you can get when caring for a child under 16 who receives benefits on a parent's record. These are different from spousal or divorced spouse retirement benefits. With regards to your situation, here are the facts: 1) For divorced spouse retirement benefits, the 10-year marriage duration is absolute. There are no exceptions for having children together. 2) Remarriage generally prevents you from collecting on an ex-spouse's record (with rare exceptions for widow(er)s over 60). 3) Having children together doesn't override either of these rules for retirement benefits. Your best option now is to maximize your own work record. Make sure you work at least 35 years (to avoid zeros in your calculation) and consider delaying your own benefits until age 70 if possible to maximize your monthly amount.

0 coins

Bruno Simmons

•

Thank you for the detailed explanation. I appreciate the advice to focus on my own work record now. I was out of the workforce for about 6 years when the kids were young, so I'll definitely need to work longer to make up for those zeros in my record. It's disappointing that being 4 months short of the 10-year mark makes such a huge difference in benefits eligibility.

0 coins

Monique Byrd

•

I think everyone's forgetting you can still get survivors benefits for you ex even if you were married less than 10 years as long as you have his child under 16! My friend got these after her ex died even tho they were only married 5 years. So maybe thats what your sister meant?

0 coins

You're confusing two different benefits. The benefit you're describing is called "mother's/father's benefits" - it's available when you're caring for the deceased person's child who is under 16 and receiving benefits. This is different from divorced spouse retirement benefits, which is what the original poster is asking about. Mother's/father's benefits don't have a 10-year marriage requirement, but they only last until the child turns 16. They're not retirement benefits and won't help the original poster when she reaches retirement age.

0 coins

Jackie Martinez

•

Have you actually tried calling Social Security directly about your specific situation? I spent THREE WEEKS trying to get through to them about my own benefits question. The wait times are insane and I kept getting disconnected. I finally used a service called Claimyr (claimyr.com) that got me connected to a real person at SSA in about 15 minutes. They have a video showing how it works: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU It was definitely worth it because I got different information from the actual SSA agent than what I was reading online. Some of these rules have exceptions based on individual circumstances, so you really need to speak directly with SSA about your specific situation.

0 coins

Bruno Simmons

•

I've been avoiding calling because I heard the wait times are terrible! I'll check out that service - thanks for the recommendation. You're right that I should get the official word from SSA directly since there's so much conflicting information online.

0 coins

Lia Quinn

•

my aunt had similar situation but she waited till 62 to apply for benefits and ssa told her even tho she remarried since she was divorced from that second husband before reaching 60 she could still claim on her first husband who had the higher benefit. but they definitely said the marriage had to be 10 years minimum, no exceptions for kids.

0 coins

Your aunt's situation meets the requirements because: 1) Her first marriage lasted at least 10 years 2) She was unmarried at the time she applied (or her second marriage had ended) The original poster doesn't meet the first requirement (marriage lasted less than 10 years), so even if she divorces her current spouse before age 60, she still wouldn't qualify for ex-spouse benefits from her first marriage.

0 coins

Maggie Martinez

•

the whole social security system is just so confusing! i never know what benefits im eligible for. i think most people dont realize how different the rules are for survivor benefits vs divorced spouse benefits vs disability benefits etc. and then theres all these weird exceptions and special rules. no wonder everyone gets confused!

0 coins

Zane Gray

•

I KNOW RIGHT? And the worst part is when you try to get clear information directly from SSA, you can't even get through to them! I spent HOURS on hold just to speak to someone who seemed just as confused as I was. The whole system needs an overhaul. There shouldn't be these arbitrary cutoffs like the 10-year rule that can devastate someone's financial future over a matter of MONTHS.

0 coins

To summarize what everyone has said regarding your situation: 1) For divorced spouse retirement benefits, you must have been married at least 10 years - being 4 months short means you don't qualify, regardless of having children together. 2) Your current marriage would disqualify you anyway (unless it ends before you apply). 3) The benefit your sister likely received was either: - Mother's benefits while caring for young children - Survivor benefits if her ex died (which have different rules) To maximize your retirement income now: - Ensure you work long enough to replace those zero years in your earnings record - Consider maximizing retirement account contributions - Look into whether your current marriage (if it lasts 10+ years) might provide spousal benefits - Consider delaying your own retirement benefits to increase your monthly amount

0 coins

Bruno Simmons

•

Thank you for this clear summary! It's disappointing about the 10-year rule being so strict, but at least now I understand what happened with my sister and what my own options are. I appreciate everyone taking the time to explain the different types of benefits - it makes so much more sense now. I'll focus on building up my own record and saving more aggressively for retirement.

0 coins

TaxRefund AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
6,882 users helped today