Social Security Administration

Can't reach Social Security Administration? Claimyr connects you to a live SSA agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the SSA
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the SSA drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Based on the discussion so far, let me clarify the timing for your husband: - Born November 1958 - FRA = 66 years + 8 months = July 2025 - Apply online 3-4 months before benefits start - If starting at FRA in July 2025, apply in March/April 2025 Since his employer wants him to stay through 2025, he has excellent options: 1. He can reach FRA in July 2025, apply for benefits, AND continue working with no earnings limit penalties. 2. He could delay applying past FRA while working, earning delayed retirement credits of 8% per year (prorated monthly at 2/3% per month) until age 70. Option #2 could significantly increase his lifetime benefit if he has average or above-average life expectancy. Many financial advisors recommend this approach if you don't need the money immediately, especially for the higher-earning spouse.

0 coins

This makes perfect sense now. I thought the earnings limit would still apply even after FRA but I see that's not the case. Since he plans to work through December 2025 anyway, we'll definitely run the numbers to see if delaying makes sense. One final question - does he still need to sign up for Medicare at 65 even if he delays his SS retirement benefit?

0 coins

Yes, Medicare enrollment at 65 is separate from your Social Security retirement benefit decision. He should absolutely sign up for Medicare during his Initial Enrollment Period (3 months before his 65th birthday month, his birthday month, and 3 months after). Failing to enroll in Medicare Part B during this window can result in permanent late enrollment penalties, even if he's still working. However, if he has creditable employer health insurance from a company with 20+ employees, he can delay Medicare Part B enrollment without penalty until that coverage ends. He should still enroll in Medicare Part A at 65 though, as it's premium-free and can serve as secondary insurance to his employer coverage.

0 coins

Thank you so much! That's incredibly helpful. His company has over 500 employees so it sounds like we can safely delay Part B until his employer coverage ends. We'll make sure to enroll in Part A when he turns 65 this year. I really appreciate everyone's help in sorting this out!

0 coins

WEP repeal impact: Should I go back to non-SS teaching job or work somewhere with SS taxes to maximize benefits?

I'm in a weird spot with Social Security after the WEP repeal and need some guidance on maximizing my benefits. My work history is split between SS and non-SS employment. I worked enough in SS-covered jobs when I was younger to earn the required credits. Then I taught for many years in a district that didn't pay into Social Security (fell under Windfall Elimination Provision). I retired at 61 with a defined benefit pension of about $3,750/month. For the past few years, I've been working part-time making around $25,000 annually in a job that DOES pay into SS while collecting my pension. With the WEP repeal, I'll now be eligible for my full SS benefit instead of the reduced amount! But here's my dilemma - I have two potential opportunities: 1. Return to full-time teaching that DOESN'T pay into SS for 3 years. I'd "double-dip" (get pension + salary) without my pension being recalculated. Salary would be about $62,000. 2. Teach full-time for 3 years in a district that DOES pay into SS. Salary around $69,000, which would boost my future SS benefit. According to my calculations, my SS benefit at 65 would be about $713/month if I keep my part-time job. If I work full-time in an SS-covered position for 3 years, it might increase to around $1,001/month. Financially, I'm comfortable - no debt and almost $750,000 in savings (money market/CDs/IRAs). I enjoy semi-retirement but don't mind working a few more years if it makes financial sense long-term. Am I missing anything important in my decision-making process? Which option would you recommend?

One more important consideration: Remember that Social Security benefits are calculated based on your highest 35 years of indexed earnings. If you don't have 35 years of SS-covered employment, the formula fills in zeros for the missing years. If you work 3 more years in SS-covered employment at $69,000, you'd be replacing 3 zeros (or very low earning years) in your calculation. That's why you're seeing such a significant jump in your estimated benefit (from $713 to $1,001). Have you requested your Social Security earnings record? That would show exactly which years would be replaced and might help with your decision. You can view this online if you have a mySocialSecurity account.

0 coins

I do have a mySocialSecurity account but haven't looked at my detailed earnings record recently. I'll definitely check which years would be replaced by the potential new earnings. I'm pretty sure I have several zeros in my calculation since I spent over 20 years in non-SS teaching positions.

0 coins

You're overthinking this way too much. If you don't need the money, do what makes you HAPPY. Period. End of story. No more analysis needed!

0 coins

When you put it that way, it sounds so simple! I'm definitely prone to overanalyzing. Maybe I need to step back and ask myself what I truly want from the next few years rather than just looking at the numbers.

0 coins

your not wasting time i think u should go to appointment because the people in person are nicer then the phone people

0 coins

Thanks, that's reassuring. I'll definitely keep the appointment. From everyone's comments it sounds like I might actually get some useful information.

0 coins

One additional thing to keep in mind - and something that confused me greatly during my own widow planning - is that you'll eventually need to decide between your own retirement benefit and your survivor benefit. You can take one first and switch to the other later if it's higher. This can be a complex but beneficial strategy. For example: 1. Take reduced survivor benefits at 60 2. Switch to your own retirement benefit at 70 (if it's higher by then) OR 1. Take your own retirement benefit at 62 2. Switch to survivors at your FRA for the maximum survivor amount This is exactly why you need those estimates now - to figure out which strategy works best for your situation. Make sure to specifically ask about these switching strategies during your appointment.

0 coins

This is excellent advice about the switching strategy. I'll add that the optimal strategy depends a lot on the relative amounts of your own benefit vs. your survivor benefit, as well as your life expectancy and immediate financial needs. Having these estimates is crucial for making an informed decision.

0 coins

I had no idea about these switching strategies! This makes it even more critical that I get some estimates now. Thank you so much for sharing this information - I'll definitely bring this up at my appointment.

0 coins

One additional consideration for your planning: While your husband's spousal benefit would be reduced if he files early, his survivor benefit (if you were to pass away) would NOT be affected by his decision to take his own benefit early. As a survivor, he could receive up to 100% of whatever benefit amount you were receiving at death (including your delayed retirement credits to age 70). This is an important distinction because it might influence your decision-making. If maximizing his potential survivor benefit is important, your plan to delay until 70 is excellent because it maximizes that potential survivor benefit, regardless of when he takes his own retirement benefit.

0 coins

That's a really important point I hadn't considered. So my decision to delay to 70 protects him in case I pass away first. That definitely makes me feel better about my decision to wait. Thank you for pointing that out!

0 coins

One more thing to think about - how long can you guys go without him filing? If money's tight and you NEED the income at 64, sometmes you just gotta take what you can get. No point suffering for years just to get a bit more later. Gotta balance the math with real life needs.

0 coins

That's very true. We're fortunate that I have a decent pension that covers our basic expenses, but we're hoping to do some traveling while we're still healthy enough to enjoy it. We might need to reassess our budget and see if we can manage with him waiting until his FRA. It's all about trade-offs!

0 coins

my mom got confused about this too ended up leaving like $20k on the table over the yrs cause nobody explaind it right

0 coins

OK, now I think I understand all this correctly. To summarize: 1. I'll get my own benefit ($1,400) plus a top-off to reach half of my husband's FRA benefit ($1,600 total). 2. The $1,911 figure is irrelevant to my situation. 3. My husband must file for his benefits before I can claim any spousal benefits. 4. If I claim before my FRA, both parts of my benefit get reduced. 5. The spousal benefit is based on my husband's FRA amount, not his actual payment if he delays. Did I get all this right? I feel so much more prepared for my SSA appointment now!

0 coins

You've got it exactly right! Print out this summary and take it to your appointment. One last tip: when you do apply, specifically mention that you're applying for "all benefits you're eligible for" including retirement and spousal benefits. Sometimes if you don't explicitly mention both, they might not process the spousal portion right away, which can delay your full payment.

0 coins

Prev1...685686687688689...836Next