Social Security Administration

Can't reach Social Security Administration? Claimyr connects you to a live SSA agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the SSA
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the SSA drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

As a newcomer to this community, I'm struck by how your experience perfectly illustrates the challenges many of us face when trying to navigate Social Security's complex rules. What's most concerning is that you did exactly what you should have done - called SSA for official guidance before making your decision - yet still ended up in this predicament due to conflicting information from their own staff. The July 15th conversation where you were explicitly told that PTO wouldn't count toward your monthly limit is particularly problematic since it directly influenced your decision to start benefits immediately. That kind of specific misinformation from an official source should absolutely be grounds for administrative relief. Based on all the excellent analysis shared here, the Form SSA-521 withdrawal option does seem like your best path forward. The math is compelling: repaying approximately $7,200 in benefits received versus avoiding $9,840 in withheld benefits, plus gaining delayed retirement credits for higher future payments. Starting fresh in 2026 would eliminate all these earnings test complications entirely. I'd encourage you to pursue both routes simultaneously - document that July 15th conversation and request a supervisor review while also exploring the withdrawal option. Having multiple avenues gives you the best chance of a favorable resolution. Thank you for sharing this experience so thoroughly. As someone who will eventually face these same decisions, your detailed account of both the pitfalls and potential solutions is invaluable. Please keep us updated on how this resolves - your experience will undoubtedly help many others navigate similar challenges more effectively.

0 coins

As a newcomer to this community, I wanted to thank everyone for the incredibly detailed and helpful discussion on this complex topic. Reading through this entire thread has been both educational and eye-opening about the real challenges people face with Social Security's earnings test rules. Amelia, your situation is unfortunately a perfect example of how SSA's inconsistent guidance can create serious financial consequences for beneficiaries who are trying to do everything correctly. The fact that you specifically called for guidance about PTO and were given definitive advice that later turned out to be wrong is incredibly frustrating and should absolutely be documented and escalated. From everything I've read here, it seems like you have two strong options moving forward: 1. **Document the misinformation thoroughly** - That July 15th conversation where you were told PTO wouldn't count toward your monthly limit should be reported as a case of SSA misinformation that directly caused financial harm. Request a supervisor review and ask specifically about administrative exceptions. 2. **Seriously consider Form SSA-521 withdrawal** - The math seems to clearly favor this option: repaying ~$7,200 in benefits received to avoid $9,840 in withheld benefits, plus gaining delayed retirement credits for higher future payments. Starting fresh in 2026 would eliminate all these complex earnings test issues. What strikes me most is how this situation could happen to any of us. Your experience serves as a crucial reminder to always request written confirmation of important guidance from SSA representatives, even though we shouldn't have to protect ourselves from their own staff's errors. Thank you for sharing this experience so openly - it will undoubtedly help others facing similar challenges navigate these complex systems more effectively. Please keep us updated on how this resolves!

0 coins

I'm new to this community but found this discussion at exactly the right time! My wife and I have been living separately for about 18 months now (I'm in Ohio, she's in Pennsylvania) but we remain legally married. We're both 50, so we're just starting to think about long-term retirement planning. Reading through all these responses has been incredibly reassuring - I had no idea how common separated-but-married arrangements actually are! I was particularly worried because we made the decision to live apart fairly recently, and I wasn't sure if there might be some "waiting period" or minimum time requirement that could affect our eligibility for survivor benefits. It's such a relief to learn that the length of separation doesn't matter at all - whether it's 18 months like us or 10+ years like some others have shared, the SSA only cares about legal marital status. The fact that we've been married since 1998 (so 25+ years by the time we reach retirement age) seems to put us in a very solid position. I'm definitely going to follow the excellent advice here about getting written confirmation from my local SSA office and organizing our important documents. The suggestion about making sure our adult kids know where everything is stored is particularly relevant since we're now maintaining separate households. Thanks to everyone for sharing such detailed experiences and practical advice. This thread has answered questions I didn't even know I needed to ask!

0 coins

Welcome to the community, Andrew! Your timing with this discussion is perfect, and it's great that you're thinking about these issues early in your separation. The 18-month timeframe you mentioned actually highlights an important point - there really is no "waiting period" or minimum separation time that affects Social Security eligibility. Whether you've been apart for 18 months or 18 years, the rules are exactly the same. Your 25+ year marriage by retirement age definitely puts you in an excellent position for all spousal and survivor benefits. It's way beyond the 9-month minimum requirement SSA has, so you're very well covered there. The Ohio to Pennsylvania arrangement adds another example to our growing collection of interstate separations, and like everyone else has confirmed, the relatively short distance compared to some of the coast-to-coast situations others have shared doesn't change anything about the federal benefit rules. Getting that written SSA confirmation is definitely worthwhile, especially since you have 15+ years to plan ahead. It's also smart that you're thinking about document organization early in your separation - it's much easier to set up good systems now than to try to track everything down later when you actually need it. Thanks for sharing your situation! It's helpful to see that even relatively recent separations fit into the same framework everyone else has been discussing.

0 coins

I'm new to this community and this thread has been incredibly helpful! My spouse and I have been living separately for about 9 years now (different states - I'm in Texas, they're in New York) but we remain legally married. We're both 56, so retirement planning is definitely on our minds. What's been most reassuring from reading through everyone's experiences is learning that the duration and distance of separation truly don't matter to the SSA - only the legal marriage status counts. I was particularly concerned because we've had virtually no contact for the past several years, but it's clear from all these responses that SSA doesn't investigate the nature or quality of the ongoing relationship. I'm absolutely going to follow the advice about getting written confirmation from my local SSA office. Having official documentation would provide tremendous peace of mind, especially since we still have over a decade before we'd need to claim benefits. One practical question I haven't seen addressed: for those of you who have been separated for many years with minimal contact, how do you handle keeping track of your spouse's current address or contact information? I'm wondering if there could be situations where the surviving spouse might have difficulty locating or contacting the deceased spouse's family for things like obtaining death certificates or other necessary documentation. Has anyone thought about or dealt with this kind of logistical challenge? Thanks to everyone for sharing such valuable real-world experiences. This community is providing exactly the kind of practical guidance that's impossible to find in official SSA publications!

0 coins

Welcome to the community, Connor! Your question about keeping track of contact information during long-term separations is really practical and something I hadn't fully considered. The Texas to New York distance definitely adds complexity to staying informed about each other's whereabouts. From what I've seen others mention, one approach might be maintaining contact through mutual adult children or family members who could serve as information bridges if needed. Some separated couples also exchange updated contact info annually (maybe around tax time) just for practical purposes, even if they don't otherwise communicate. For the death certificate issue specifically, I believe the surviving spouse would typically be able to obtain copies directly from the vital records office in the state where the death occurred, using the marriage certificate as proof of relationship. They wouldn't necessarily need to go through the deceased's family, though having that connection certainly makes things easier. The 9-year separation with minimal contact really shows how the SSA's approach makes sense - they can't be expected to evaluate the "quality" of marriages, so they stick to the clear legal standard. Your situation demonstrates that even with very long separations and minimal contact, the fundamental eligibility rules remain the same. Getting that written confirmation from SSA sounds especially valuable in your case, given the length of separation and distance involved!

0 coins

I'm so sorry for your loss, Alexander. This is an incredibly difficult situation to navigate during such a challenging time. I wanted to add one important consideration that might affect your decision: if you're considering the strategy of taking survivor benefits now and switching to your own retirement benefit later, make sure to get a Social Security Statement (available at ssa.gov/myaccount) to see your projected retirement benefits at different ages. Since you're still working part-time at the hospital, those earnings are continuing to build your own Social Security record, which could potentially increase your future retirement benefit. The extra years of earnings might make the "claim survivor benefits now, switch to retirement at 70" strategy even more beneficial in your case. Also, don't forget that as a surviving spouse, you may be eligible for Medicare at 65 even if you're not yet claiming Social Security benefits, which could be important for your healthcare planning. The community here has given you excellent advice about the benefit calculations and strategies. Take your time with the decision, gather all the numbers, and remember that there's no universally "right" choice - only what works best for your specific financial situation and needs.

0 coins

Thank you Omar, that's such a great point about getting my Social Security Statement! I hadn't thought about how my continued part-time work might be improving my own retirement benefit record. Since I've been working at the hospital for the past few years, those earnings could definitely make a difference in the calculation. And the Medicare information is really helpful too - I was wondering about healthcare coverage as I get closer to 65. It sounds like there are actually quite a few moving pieces to consider beyond just the basic survivor benefit decision. I'm feeling much more prepared now to have that conversation with SSA armed with all this knowledge from everyone here. This community has been incredible during such a difficult time.

0 coins

I'm so sorry for your loss, Alexander. Having lost my spouse last year, I understand how overwhelming it can be to make these financial decisions while grieving. One thing that really helped me was creating a simple spreadsheet comparing different claiming scenarios over 5-10 years to see the total benefits received under each option. Since you're 60 now and still working part-time, here's something to consider: even though survivor benefits are reduced if claimed early, the monthly income might provide valuable financial stability while you're transitioning. The "break-even" point where waiting pays off is typically around age 78-80, so your health and family longevity should factor into the decision too. Also, don't overlook that your continued hospital work is still earning you Social Security credits that could boost your own retirement benefit calculation. Make sure SSA runs projections for both your survivor benefit AND your own retirement benefit at age 70 - you might be surprised which one ends up higher. The flexibility everyone mentioned about switching between benefits is a huge advantage that many people don't know about. Take your time, get the numbers, and remember there's no perfect choice - just what works best for your situation.

0 coins

Thank you so much for sharing your experience and for the spreadsheet idea - that's brilliant! I hadn't thought about creating a visual comparison of the different scenarios over time. The break-even analysis around age 78-80 is really helpful perspective too, especially considering my family's health history. You're absolutely right about the financial stability aspect - having some monthly income while I'm still adjusting to this new reality could be invaluable. I'm definitely going to ask SSA to run those projections for both my survivor benefit and my own retirement benefit at 70. It's amazing how many nuances there are to this decision that I never would have considered without everyone's input here. Thank you for taking the time to help during what I know is still a difficult time for you as well.

0 coins

I'm dealing with a very similar situation for my Canadian spouse and can confirm that the agent gave you completely wrong information! We've been living in Toronto for 7 years and my wife receives her spousal benefits with zero issues and no residency requirements whatsoever. The 30% withholding is standard for non-US citizens, but as others have mentioned, the US-Canada tax treaty eliminates this. We filed the W-8BEN form and now she receives her full benefits without any withholding. The process was straightforward once we got connected with someone who actually understood international cases. That "2 months in the US" requirement is absolute nonsense - I've never heard anything so ridiculous! My wife hasn't been to the US in over 3 years and her payments continue without interruption. It sounds like you got an agent who was either completely new or just making things up. Definitely call the Office of International Operations at the number Victoria provided. They sorted everything out for us in one phone call after we wasted weeks getting conflicting information from regular SSA agents. Don't let this bad experience discourage you - your wife is absolutely entitled to those benefits without jumping through imaginary hoops!

0 coins

This is so reassuring to hear from someone who's successfully navigating this with Canada! The consistency of the misinformation being given out is really troubling - it seems like multiple people are getting told the exact same false "residency requirement" story. Your experience with the W-8BEN eliminating the withholding is exactly what I needed to hear. Did you have to provide any additional documentation besides the form itself to prove the tax treaty benefits? And how long did it take for the withholding to stop once you submitted it? I'm definitely going to bypass the regular SSA line entirely and go straight to the Office of International Operations. It's clear that the general agents are either poorly trained on international cases or just guessing. Thank you for the encouragement - it's really helpful to know that this process can actually work smoothly once you get to the right people!

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm a newcomer here dealing with a similar situation for my Australian spouse, and reading through all these experiences has been eye-opening. It's absolutely shocking how much misinformation the regular SSA agents are giving out about international spousal benefits. The fact that multiple people here were told the exact same false "residency requirement" story is really concerning. It makes you wonder how many people have been discouraged from applying for benefits they're rightfully entitled to because of this bad information. @Victoria Brown - thank you so much for sharing your expertise as a former SSA claims specialist. Your detailed explanations about the tax treaty provisions and the correct application process are invaluable. It's clear that having someone with actual inside knowledge makes all the difference. For anyone else dealing with these international cases, it seems like the consensus is crystal clear: 1. Ignore any residency requirements - they don't exist for spousal benefits 2. File Form W-8BEN to claim tax treaty benefits and avoid withholding 3. Go straight to the Office of International Operations (+1-410-965-0160) 4. Don't waste time with regular SSA agents who clearly aren't trained on these cases I'm going to follow this advice and skip the general phone line entirely. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - this community is a lifesaver for navigating these complex situations!

0 coins

As a newcomer to this community, I'm really grateful for all the detailed experiences shared here! I'm in a similar situation - planning to apply for retirement benefits soon and was completely torn between online vs. in-person filing. The hybrid approach that so many of you are recommending makes perfect sense, especially after reading about all the additional benefits and credits people discovered during their follow-up appointments. Those dollar amounts (@Ava Thompson's $300/month discovery and @Oliver Becker's $180/month from delayed retirement credits) really drive home how much money could be left on the table without proper human review. I don't have overseas work history, but I do have a somewhat complex situation with multiple employers and some periods of self-employment, so it sounds like I should definitely plan for that follow-up appointment even after filing online. One question for the group - for those who scheduled phone appointments rather than in-person visits, how was that experience? I'm trying to decide between the two options for my follow-up review. The convenience of a phone call is appealing, but I'm wondering if there are advantages to meeting face-to-face when reviewing complex benefit calculations. Thanks again for all the valuable insights - this thread has been incredibly helpful for someone just starting to navigate this process!

0 coins

Welcome to the community! Your question about phone vs. in-person follow-up appointments is a great one. I did my follow-up via phone and it worked really well - the rep was able to access all my information on their screen and walk through everything step by step. She even emailed me a summary of our conversation afterward with the key points we discussed. The main advantage I found with the phone appointment was convenience (no travel time, could do it from home) and it was actually easier to take notes during the call. However, if you have a lot of physical documents related to your self-employment history that might need review, an in-person visit could be better since you can bring everything with you. Given your multiple employers and self-employment periods, I'd definitely echo the advice about preparing specific questions beforehand. Ask about whether all your self-employment income was properly credited, if there are any gaps in your earnings record, and whether you've maximized your benefit calculation. The phone reps are just as knowledgeable as the in-person staff for these types of reviews. Good luck with your application - the hybrid approach really does seem to be the way to go for anyone with even slightly complex work histories!

0 coins

As someone who recently went through this exact decision process, I'd strongly recommend the hybrid approach that's been mentioned throughout this thread. I filed online last October and then scheduled a follow-up appointment about 2-3 weeks later - it really was the best of both worlds. The online system has definitely improved and is much more user-friendly than it used to be. I was able to complete my application in about 45 minutes from the comfort of my home, and the step-by-step guidance was actually quite clear. However, during my follow-up phone appointment, the representative caught an error in how one of my previous employers had reported my earnings that would have reduced my monthly benefit by about $85. Given that you worked in Germany for 3 years, I'd definitely echo @Natalie Khan's advice about calling the international operations line (410-965-0160) before you start your application. International work credits can be tricky, and you want to make sure everything is properly documented and credited toward your benefit calculation. A few practical tips: Start gathering your documentation now - birth certificate, recent tax returns, bank account info for direct deposit, and any records from your Germany employment. Also, create your my Social Security account at least a week before you plan to apply, as the identity verification process can sometimes take a few days. The March 2025 timing should work fine, just keep in mind that since you'll be claiming at 65 instead of your full retirement age of 67, your benefits will be permanently reduced by about 13.3%. But it sounds like you've already factored that into your planning. Good luck with your application - the peace of mind from having a human review everything is definitely worth the extra step!

0 coins

Thank you for sharing such detailed and practical advice! The $85/month error your representative caught really emphasizes why that follow-up review is so valuable - that adds up to over $1,000 per year. I'm definitely convinced now that the hybrid approach is the way to go. I really appreciate the specific timeline recommendations (creating the online account a week early, scheduling follow-up 2-3 weeks after filing) and the reminder about the 13.3% reduction for claiming at 65. I've run the numbers and decided the earlier start date works better for my situation, but it's good to have that confirmed. The international operations phone number has been mentioned several times in this thread, and I think I'll start there before doing anything else. Better to understand exactly what documentation I need from my Germany work period before I begin the online application. This entire discussion has been incredibly helpful - it's clear that while the online system has improved significantly, having that human oversight can catch important details that make a real financial difference. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences!

0 coins

Prev1...283284285286287...836Next