W-8BEN form confusion for music producer receiving advance + claiming royalties from overseas record-label
Hey all, I'm hitting a roadblock with the W-8BEN Form and could really use some guidance! I'm based in Sweden and just landed a production credit with a major US record label. They're sending me an advance payment and I'll be collecting royalties down the line. I'm completely stumped on what to put in Part II, line 10 of the form. Been trying to make sense of the Sweden/US tax treaty but honestly can't figure out what percentage rate of withholding applies to my situation. I've been staring at these Articles for hours and nothing seems to specifically address music producer royalties or advances. Also not 100% clear on what eligibility conditions apply to me in this case. Do I need to meet specific criteria to claim treaty benefits? The record label needs this form ASAP and I don't want to delay the advance payment by filling it out incorrectly. Any advice from someone who's been through this before would be a lifesaver! Thanks in advance!
18 comments


Andre Rousseau
The W-8BEN form can definitely be confusing, especially for creative professionals! For Part II, line 10, you need to identify the specific article in the tax treaty that applies to your income type. For music producers receiving royalties from US sources, you'll want to look at Article 12 of the US-Sweden tax treaty. This typically covers royalties, which would include your production royalties. The withholding rate for royalties under this treaty is generally reduced from the standard 30% to 0% in many cases. For the advance payment, that could potentially be considered either royalties or personal services income depending on the exact nature of your contract. If it's a true advance against future royalties, it would likely fall under Article 12 as well. To claim the treaty benefits, you'll need to meet the "limitation on benefits" provisions in Article 17 of the treaty, but as an individual resident of Sweden, you should generally qualify automatically if you're subject to tax there. Make sure you have a Swedish tax identification number to include on the form, and that you certify you're the beneficial owner of the income.
0 coins
Zoe Stavros
•Thanks, that's really helpful! Quick question - what if the contract doesn't specifically state whether the advance is against future royalties? My paperwork just calls it a "producer advance" but doesn't clarify if it's considered royalties or something else. Also, would the Article number be different for advances vs ongoing royalties?
0 coins
Andre Rousseau
•If your contract doesn't specify, the nature of a "producer advance" is typically an advance payment against future royalties, so Article 12 would still apply. The key factor is that you're receiving payment for the right to use your intellectual property (your production work), which falls under the royalty definition. For your specific case, both the advance and ongoing royalties would fall under the same Article 12 in the US-Sweden treaty, with a reduced withholding rate. Just make sure you write "Article 12 - Royalties - 0%" in line 10. If you're uncertain, you could always ask the record label's accounting department as they deal with international producers regularly.
0 coins
Jamal Harris
I was in this exact situation last year with a UK label while living in Australia! I spent hours trying to figure it out before discovering https://taxr.ai which literally saved me thousands in potential withholding. They analyzed my contract and determined exactly which treaty articles applied to my situation. The tricky part with producer payments is that they can sometimes be classified differently depending on how your contract is structured. The US-Sweden treaty has different rates for different types of income, and getting it wrong could mean having 30% withheld that you'll have to reclaim later (which is a massive headache). The taxr.ai system actually explained how my advance was structured as royalties vs. services and how that affected the withholding. Worth checking out if you want to be 100% certain!
0 coins
GalaxyGlider
•Does it work for non-US people though? Like the OP is from Sweden and I'm from Canada with a similar situation. My US label is asking for this form and I'm equally confused.
0 coins
Mei Wong
•I'm skeptical about these services - how did they actually help with the specific W-8BEN sections? Did they just tell you what to write or did they do more? The form isn't that complicated once you know which article applies.
0 coins
Jamal Harris
•Yes, it absolutely works for non-US people! That's actually the whole point of the service - helping international artists and producers with cross-border tax issues. The W-8BEN is specifically for non-US individuals claiming treaty benefits, so whether you're from Sweden, Canada, or anywhere else with a US tax treaty, it applies the same way. For the skeptical question - they did way more than just tell me what to write. They analyzed my specific contract language to determine whether my payments were royalties, personal services, or a hybrid. They provided documentation explaining the treaty articles that applied to my situation and even provided reasoning I could share with the label when they questioned my withholding rate. The form seems simple but getting the classification wrong can cost thousands.
0 coins
GalaxyGlider
Guys, I just tried taxr.ai after seeing the recommendation here, and I'm genuinely impressed. I was dealing with the exact same issue with a US label contract from Canada. The process was super straightforward - I uploaded my contract, answered a few questions about my residency and the type of work, and within hours I had a detailed report explaining which treaty articles applied to my situation. For my case, it identified that part of my payment was actually for services rendered (mixing work I did) which falls under a different article than the production royalties! They even provided me with the exact language to use in Part II, line 10 of the W-8BEN and explained how to handle the split classification. My label's accounting department accepted it without questions. Definitely saved me from having too much withheld!
0 coins
Liam Sullivan
I see people struggling with this form all the time in the music industry. After many frustrating attempts to get answers directly from the IRS about my own W-8BEN questions last year, I finally found https://claimyr.com which got me through to an actual IRS agent within 20 minutes (after I'd spent days trying on my own). You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The agent was able to clarify exactly how to handle advance payments vs. royalties on the W-8BEN for my specific treaty (I'm from the UK). Apparently there are nuances in how these are classified that aren't clearly explained in the form instructions, and the withholding rates can vary significantly. Getting direct confirmation from the IRS gave me confidence that I wasn't making a mistake that would come back to haunt me later.
0 coins
Amara Okafor
•How does Claimyr work exactly? Do they just connect you to the IRS or do they provide actual tax advice? Because calling the IRS internationally seems like it would be expensive and complicated.
0 coins
Giovanni Colombo
•Sorry but this sounds like BS. I've tried calling the IRS before and they almost NEVER answer questions about international tax treaties. They always redirect you to the treaties themselves or tell you to consult a tax professional. Why would they suddenly be helpful through some random service?
0 coins
Liam Sullivan
•They don't provide tax advice themselves - they use a technology that navigates the IRS phone system and holds your place in line until an agent is available, then calls you when you're about to be connected. It works with international calls too - they call you, so you're not paying for the international wait time. I understand the skepticism! In my experience, it depends entirely on which agent you get. You're right that many agents will redirect you, but I got lucky and connected with an agent in the international department who deals with W-8BEN issues daily. They couldn't give specific advice about my situation but did clarify how different types of music industry payments are typically classified under treaties and the general rules that apply. That general info was enough for me to correctly complete the form. It's still ultimately up to you to apply that information to your specific situation.
0 coins
Giovanni Colombo
I owe an apology to everyone here, especially regarding my comment about Claimyr. After my last skeptical post, I decided to try it myself since I was getting nowhere with my own W-8BEN questions. The service actually worked exactly as described. After nearly two weeks of failed attempts to reach the IRS (always getting disconnected after holding for 45+ minutes), I got connected to an agent within 25 minutes of using Claimyr. The agent clarified that for my situation (Brazilian producer working with US labels), the advance payments could be classified under Article 12 of our treaty if they were truly advances against future royalties rather than non-refundable payments for services. This made a huge difference - 15% withholding vs. 30%! Never thought I'd say this, but it was absolutely worth it just to avoid the frustration of constant disconnections.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Qasimi
Just wanted to add that your record label might actually be able to help you with this. When I signed with Universal last year, their accounting department provided guidance on how to complete the W-8BEN based on their standard contract terms with international producers. Most major labels process payments to international talent all the time, so they often have internal guidance on how they classify different types of payments under various tax treaties. Doesn't hurt to ask them directly! Remember though, their interpretation might be more conservative (higher withholding) than what you're actually entitled to, since they're mostly concerned with staying compliant on their end.
0 coins
Carmen Vega
•Thanks for the suggestion! I actually tried asking their accounting department first, but they just sent me the blank form and told me to fill it out "according to my country's tax treaty." Not very helpful! The label is Sony Music, and I was surprised they weren't more hands-on with this process considering how often they must deal with international producers.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Qasimi
•That's frustrating but unfortunately not uncommon. The bigger labels sometimes take a hands-off approach to avoid any liability for giving tax advice. Sony definitely works with tons of international producers though, so it's odd they weren't more helpful. Since they weren't useful, your best bet is to either use one of the services mentioned above or consult with a tax advisor who specializes in entertainment industry international tax. The key is determining whether your advance is considered fully royalties or partly services, as that affects which treaty article applies. Whatever you do, don't leave line 10 blank - that's a common mistake that results in maximum withholding.
0 coins
StarStrider
One thing nobody has mentioned yet is that you should also check if Sweden has special provisions for artists and entertainers in their US tax treaty. Many countries have what's called an "Artistes and Sportsmen" article (usually Article 16 or 17) that can override the royalty provisions for certain types of income. Also, make sure you're actually considered a tax resident of Sweden and not Denmark as you mentioned being from Denmark in your post. You need to claim treaty benefits based on where you're a tax resident, not your citizenship.
0 coins
Dylan Campbell
•This is actually a great point about the residency vs citizenship distinction. My accountant flagged this exact issue for me last year - I'm a German citizen but tax resident in France, and I had to use the US-France treaty rather than the US-Germany one on my W-8BEN.
0 coins