IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Tate Jensen

•

One more tip - if your K-1 values are pretty small (like under $1000 investment), you might be able to use the de minimis rule for certain parts of the form. This can simplify your reporting. Ask your tax software support about this or check with a tax pro. Saved me a ton of headaches with my small Robinhood MLP investments.

0 coins

As someone who's been through the MLP K-1 maze multiple times, I'd strongly recommend keeping detailed records right from the start. Create a simple spreadsheet with columns for: Date of Purchase, Number of Shares, Original Cost Basis, and then add columns for each year's Return of Capital (Box 9a from K-1) to track your adjusted basis. Also, don't panic about the complexity - yes, MLPs are more work than regular stocks, but for small investments the actual tax impact is usually manageable. The key things to remember: 1) Form 1065 K-1 = Partnership/LLC in tax software, 2) Much of the "income" might actually reduce your taxes due to depreciation deductions, and 3) Keep those K-1s and basis records because you'll need them when you sell. One last thing - if this is your first year with MLPs and you're feeling overwhelmed, consider setting aside a small budget for a tax professional consultation just this once. They can walk you through the process and help you set up a good record-keeping system for future years. It's worth the peace of mind!

0 coins

This is excellent advice! I wish I had seen this before I started investing in MLPs. The spreadsheet idea is brilliant - I've been trying to track everything in my head and it's been a disaster. One question though - when you mention the depreciation deductions potentially reducing taxes, does that mean I might actually owe less in taxes this year even though I received distributions? I got about $150 in distributions from my oil MLP but the K-1 shows some depreciation amounts that seem larger than the distributions I received. Also, @Sophia Carson, do you have any recommendations for finding a tax professional who actually knows about MLPs? I called a few local CPAs and they seemed just as confused as I am!

0 coins

Payton Black

•

Just a heads up - if you do need to file an amended return for 2021, you still have time. The deadline is generally within 3 years of the original filing date, so you likely have until April 2025. But I'd get moving on the explanation to the IRS right away to stop any collection actions.

0 coins

Harold Oh

•

Actually, I think the 3-year clock starts from the original due date, not the filing date. So for 2021 taxes, the amended return deadline would be April 15, 2025 regardless of when they actually filed in 2022. But your main point is right - they have time but should address the immediate collection issue first.

0 coins

Paolo Ricci

•

I'm dealing with a very similar situation right now with my 2022 taxes! The IRS is claiming I didn't report about $18k in stock compensation, but like you, it was already included in my W-2. One thing that helped me understand what happened - I called my HR department and they explained that when you have "sell to cover" set up, the company reports the full value of the vested shares as income on your W-2 (which gets taxed as regular income), but then Fidelity also sends a 1099-B to the IRS showing the "sale" of those same shares to cover taxes. The IRS computer systems see both and think you earned the money twice. I'm still working through my response, but my HR rep said this is super common and they deal with it all the time. She recommended I include a letter from HR explaining their stock compensation reporting process along with my W-2 and 1099-B copies. Might be worth reaching out to your HR department too - they probably have template letters for exactly this situation since it happens so frequently with employees who have stock compensation.

0 coins

The 'overtime isn't worth it' myth caused me to turn down shifts for YEARS before I learned better. Here's a simple way to think about it: Let's say you're in the 22% federal bracket plus 7% state taxes. That means you keep 71% of each additional dollar (100% - 22% - 7% = 71%). So: - Regular time at $42.50/hr = about $30.18 after taxes - Time and a half at $63.75/hr = about $45.26 after taxes - Double time at $85.00/hr = about $60.35 after taxes - Triple time at $127.50/hr = about $90.53 after taxes Tell me where in that calculation it's "not worth it" to work more? Even at your lowest overtime rate, you're making more per hour after taxes than your regular rate before taxes!

0 coins

This breakdown is super helpful, thanks! When you put the numbers side by side like that it makes total sense. Triple time at $90+ per hour after taxes is definitely worth it to me. Do these calculations account for FICA/Social Security too? That's automatically taken out of my check as well.

0 coins

Nia Davis

•

Good catch! My quick calculation didn't include FICA taxes. You'll also pay: - Social Security tax: 6.2% on income up to $160,200 (2023 limit) - Medicare tax: 1.45% on all income - Additional Medicare tax: 0.9% on income over $200,000 if single So for most of your income, add another 7.65% in FICA taxes. That would bring your total tax burden to around 29.65% (22% + 7% + 7.65%), meaning you'd keep about 70.35% of each overtime dollar. Using your triple time example: $127.50 Ɨ 0.7035 = about $89.70 per hour after all taxes. Still amazing money compared to your regular rate! The only time FICA gets tricky is if you hit the Social Security wage cap, but at that point you'd only lose the 6.2% Social Security portion while still paying Medicare taxes.

0 coins

Your buddy is spreading one of the most persistent tax myths out there! I used to believe the same thing until I actually did the math. Here's what's really happening: When you work that much overtime, your paycheck withholding might look scary because payroll systems often calculate as if you'll earn that same amount every pay period. But that's just withholding - not your actual tax liability. With your income levels, you're likely in the 22% or 24% federal bracket, plus whatever your state charges. Even if overtime pushes some income into a higher bracket, you're still keeping 70-75% of every overtime dollar you earn. Think about it this way: even your lowest overtime rate (time and a half at $63.75) nets you more after taxes than your regular rate before taxes. Your triple time is basically printing money at nearly $90/hour take-home. The real question isn't whether overtime is "worth it" financially - it always is. The question is whether the extra money is worth the physical and mental toll of working 84-hour weeks. That's a personal decision only you can make, but don't let tax bracket myths be the reason you turn down shifts!

0 coins

Skylar Neal

•

This is exactly what I needed to hear! I've been stressing about this for weeks. When you break it down like that - even my lowest overtime rate giving me more take-home than my regular rate before taxes - it makes the decision pretty obvious. I think my buddy got confused because his paychecks look smaller when he works a ton of overtime, but like you said, that's just the withholding being calculated weird. I never thought about how the payroll system might be treating each big paycheck like that's my new normal salary. The 84-hour weeks are definitely rough on my body, but knowing I'm actually clearing close to $90/hour on that triple time makes it a lot easier to push through. Thanks for helping me see through the tax bracket nonsense!

0 coins

Layla Sanders

•

Check your transcripts every week. Sometimes they update there before the Where's My Amended Return tool shows anything

0 coins

how do u even read those transcripts tho? its like another language fr

0 coins

Chloe Taylor

•

@Nathan Kim mentioned taxr.ai earlier - it actually translates all those confusing transcript codes into plain English! Way easier than trying to decode them yourself

0 coins

Filed my amendment back in September and still waiting too! The uncertainty is the worst part - you never know if they're actually processing it or if it got lost somewhere. I've been checking the IRS tool religiously but it just says "received" with no timeline. Really hoping it doesn't take the full 20+ weeks that others are mentioning šŸ˜…

0 coins

Same here! Filed mine in November and it's been radio silence ever since. The "received" status is so frustrating because you have no idea if that means they're actually working on it or if it's just sitting in a pile somewhere. Really wish the IRS would give us better updates on the process 😤

0 coins

Liam Cortez

•

Just wanted to add some perspective as someone who processes payroll corrections - when you receive a W2C, that becomes your official tax document for the year. You should NOT use the original W2 at all. The W2C will show the corrected amounts and should include both the wrong state correction (likely showing $0 or negative amounts) and your correct state information. For your filing strategy: Use only the W2C for your federal return and both state returns. You'll file a non-resident return in the wrong state to claim back those withheld taxes, and file normally in your actual state. Most tax software can handle this, but double-check that the W2C shows corrections for both states before filing. One tip: Keep copies of both the original W2 and W2C for your records, even though you'll only use the W2C for filing. This documentation might be helpful if either state has questions about the correction later.

0 coins

Mae Bennett

•

This is really helpful clarification! I'm new to dealing with tax issues like this. Quick question - when you say the W2C should show corrections for both states, does that mean it will have entries for both the wrong state (showing the correction/removal) AND the correct state (showing where it should have been reported)? Or might some companies issue separate W2Cs for each state correction? I'm asking because I want to make sure I know what to expect when I get mine, so I can push back if it's incomplete like some others mentioned their HR departments doing.

0 coins

Great question! Ideally, a complete W2C should show both corrections on the same form - it will have negative amounts (or zeros) for the wrong state to reverse those withholdings, and positive amounts for your correct state showing where the taxes should have been reported. This is the cleanest approach. However, some payroll systems are clunky and companies might issue separate W2Cs - one to "undo" the wrong state reporting and another to properly report to the correct state. If you receive separate forms, make sure you have both before filing, and use all the corrected information together. When you get your W2C, look at the state tax sections carefully. If you only see corrections removing the wrong state info but nothing adding your correct state, definitely contact HR immediately and ask for the complete correction. Don't let them tell you "that's how our system works" - they're legally required to provide accurate tax documents, and that includes showing where your state taxes should actually be reported.

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm dealing with a similar situation where my employer reported my state taxes to the wrong state. Based on what everyone's shared, it sounds like the key points are: 1. Use ONLY the W2C for filing (not the original W2) 2. File a non-resident return in the wrong state to get those taxes back 3. File normally in your correct state using the W2C info 4. Make sure the W2C shows corrections for both states before filing One question I haven't seen addressed - does anyone know roughly how long it takes to get the refund from the wrong state? I'm wondering if I should expect it to take longer than a normal state refund since it's essentially correcting an error. Also, has anyone had issues with the wrong state questioning why they're getting a non-resident return when they have withholding records showing you as having worked there? I'm worried they might flag it as suspicious.

0 coins

Great summary of the key points! For your timing question - wrong state refunds can definitely take longer than normal. In my experience, it took about 8-10 weeks to get my refund from the incorrect state versus the usual 4-6 weeks from my home state. The wrong state's system has to process that you're claiming back taxes that were incorrectly withheld, which seems to trigger additional review. As for the second concern about them flagging it - I was worried about the same thing! But it actually wasn't an issue at all. When you file the non-resident return, you're basically telling that state "I never lived or worked here, please refund the taxes that were incorrectly withheld." The W2C documentation supports this claim since it shows your employer's correction. Most states are used to handling these employer payroll error situations. Just make sure to include a brief note with your non-resident return explaining that your employer incorrectly reported your income to their state and has issued a W2C to correct it. That context helps the processors understand why you're filing there despite having withholdings.

0 coins

Prev1...18371838183918401841...5643Next