Understanding Qualified Leasehold Improvements for tax deductions - section 179 vs bonus depreciation?
So I'm trying to figure out the tax implications of some renovations we did at our retail space last year. We're tenants in a shopping complex and spent about $128,000 upgrading the interior of our space (new flooring, built-in shelving, lighting fixtures, etc). My accountant mentioned something about Qualified Leasehold Improvements and how we might be able to deduct these costs rather than depreciating them over many years. But I'm getting confused about the rules. Are Qualified Leasehold Improvements allowable for section 179 or 100% bonus depreciation? Who gets the deduction, tenant or landlord? Our lease is pretty complex and I'm not sure if we can take the deduction or if it goes to the property owner. What about owner-occupied commercial properties? My business partner is thinking about buying our own building next year instead of renting, so I'm curious how that would change things. Thanks tax experts! I need to figure this out before our Q1 estimated taxes are due.
36 comments


Miguel Diaz
The rules around Qualified Leasehold Improvements (QLI) can definitely be confusing! For tax purposes, these improvements are generally eligible for both Section 179 expensing and bonus depreciation, but there are some important differences. Under Section 179, you can elect to immediately expense the cost rather than depreciating it over time, up to certain limits. Bonus depreciation currently allows for 100% deduction of eligible improvement costs in the year they're placed in service. As for who gets the deduction - typically the party who pays for the improvements gets the deduction. So if you as the tenant paid for these renovations, you would generally be the one eligible to take the deduction, not the landlord. Just make sure your lease doesn't specify that improvements become the property of the landlord immediately (check your lease terms). For owner-occupied commercial properties, the rules are a bit different. In that case, you'd be looking at Qualified Improvement Property (QIP) rather than Qualified Leasehold Improvements. The good news is that QIP is also eligible for bonus depreciation and Section 179 expensing.
0 coins
Zainab Ahmed
•Wait so is there a limit to how much we can deduct in a year? And are all interior improvements considered "qualified" or are there specific types that don't count?
0 coins
Miguel Diaz
•Yes, there are limits to Section 179 expensing. For 2025, the limit is $1,160,000, but this begins to phase out when total qualifying property placed in service exceeds $2,890,000. However, these limits apply to all Section 179 property, not just improvements. Regarding what qualifies, not all interior improvements count as Qualified Leasehold Improvements. Generally, improvements must be made to the interior portion of a nonresidential building, made by the tenant, and placed in service more than 3 years after the building was first placed in service. Improvements for elevators, escalators, building enlargements, or internal structural framework don't qualify.
0 coins
Connor Byrne
I ran into this exact issue last year with my dental practice renovation! I spent weeks trying to figure out the depreciation rules before I found taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) which made things so much clearer. I uploaded my lease agreement and renovation costs, and their system automatically identified which improvements qualified for Section 179 vs. bonus depreciation. The software also flagged potential audit risks in how I was classifying some of the built-in cabinetry. Turns out I was about to incorrectly classify about $32,000 worth of improvements that wouldn't have qualified! Saved me a potential headache with the IRS later.
0 coins
Yara Abboud
•How does taxr.ai handle the technical aspects of classifying improvement types? My CPA seems really confused about the difference between qualified improvement property and qualified leasehold improvements since the tax law changes.
0 coins
PixelPioneer
•Does it work for analyzing whether the tenant or landlord should take the deduction? My landlord is trying to claim they should get the benefit even though I paid for everything!
0 coins
Connor Byrne
•The system uses IRS guidelines and tax court precedents to classify each improvement type correctly. It understands the technical distinctions between QIP, QLI, and other improvement categories based on the TCJA changes and subsequent corrections. It basically walks you through a decision tree based on when improvements were made, who made them, and the specific nature of each improvement. For tenant vs landlord disputes, it analyzes your lease agreement language to determine who has the tax basis in the improvements. It highlights specific lease clauses that determine whether improvements are tenant property or become landlord property immediately. In my case, it flagged a problematic clause that would have given my landlord grounds to claim some of my improvements despite me paying for them.
0 coins
PixelPioneer
Just wanted to follow up about my situation with taxr.ai. I uploaded my lease agreement and it actually highlighted the exact clause (9.3b) that stated improvements "permanently attached to the structure" immediately become landlord property! But it also pointed out another clause that said "tenant's trade fixtures" remain my property. Using their classification system, we were able to document which improvements were "trade fixtures" vs "permanent improvements" with photos and descriptions. Ended up being able to claim about 70% of my improvements under Section 179 while avoiding claiming things that technically belonged to the landlord. My accountant was super impressed with how detailed the analysis was.
0 coins
Keisha Williams
All of this is helpful, but I'm still confused about some aspects of qualified leasehold improvements. I spent 3 weeks trying to get through to the IRS for clarification and kept getting disconnected. Finally tried https://claimyr.com and watched their demo at https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c - they got me through to an actual IRS agent in about 20 minutes! The agent explained that there are important distinctions between Qualified Leasehold Improvements (pre-2018 tax law), Qualified Improvement Property (current law), and how these interact with Section 179. Apparently a lot of accountants are still confused about this. The call clarity saved me from making an expensive mistake on my business taxes.
0 coins
Paolo Rizzo
•How does Claimyr actually work? Do they just call the IRS for you or what? I'm confused about how they're getting through when no one else can.
0 coins
Amina Sy
•Yeah right. No way they're getting through to the IRS in 20 minutes when I've been trying for weeks. Sounds like a scam to me. If it was that easy, everyone would be doing it.
0 coins
Keisha Williams
•They don't call for you - they reserve a spot in the IRS phone queue and then call you when they're about to connect with an agent. You're the one who actually talks to the IRS. It's basically like having someone wait on hold for you, and then they bridge you in when an agent picks up. I was skeptical too - I've wasted hours on hold with the IRS myself only to get disconnected. But they use some kind of system that keeps the connection active and navigates the IRS phone tree automatically. I'm guessing they have multiple lines going at once. Whatever they're doing, it worked when nothing else did for me.
0 coins
Amina Sy
I have to admit I was completely wrong about Claimyr. After posting my skeptical comment, I decided to try it anyway since I was desperate for answers about my leasehold improvement deductions. Not only did I get through to an IRS agent in about 15 minutes, but the agent was actually knowledgeable about the qualified improvement property rules! She walked me through exactly how to document my improvements to support taking bonus depreciation instead of the longer 15-year depreciation period. Turns out I was mixing up the old rules (pre-2018) with the current ones. The agent explained that the "retail glitch" from the TCJA was fixed retroactively, and qualified improvements are now eligible for 100% bonus depreciation. That clarification alone could save my business thousands in taxes this year.
0 coins
Oliver Fischer
Has anyone here dealt with improvements that involve both the structure and separate personal property? We renovated our restaurant and spent about $215,000 total, but I'm trying to figure out what portion can be section 179 vs. bonus depreciation vs. regular depreciation. Things like kitchen equipment seem straightforward, but what about built-in seating, decorative lighting that's hardwired, or custom millwork? There are so many gray areas!
0 coins
Natasha Ivanova
•Have your contractor provide an itemized statement breaking out costs for different components. Items that can be removed without damage (like appliances) are generally 5-year property eligible for 179. Built-ins are usually considered improvements subject to longer depreciation unless they qualify for bonus. We did something similar and saved about $18,000 in taxes by properly segregating costs. Our POS system, tables, and non-built-in fixtures were all 179 eligible, while the structural improvements qualified for bonus depreciation as QIP.
0 coins
Oliver Fischer
•Thanks for the advice! I'll contact our contractor to see if they can provide that kind of breakdown. We've been treating everything as one big renovation cost, but separating the removable equipment from the actual improvements makes a lot of sense. I totally forgot that our POS system would be treated differently from something like the built-in bar. This could make a big difference in our cash flow if we can accelerate some of the deductions.
0 coins
NebulaNomad
I'm so confused by all the different terms... Qualified Leasehold Improvements, Qualified Improvement Property, Qualified Restaurant Property... how do I know which one applies to my situation? I own a building where I operate my accounting firm on the first floor and rent out the second floor to a law firm. We both did renovations last year.
0 coins
Miguel Diaz
•This is a common point of confusion! Since the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the terminology has changed. Now "Qualified Improvement Property" (QIP) is the main category you need to focus on. It replaces the older categories like Qualified Leasehold Improvements. For your specific situation, the improvements to your accounting firm space would be considered QIP for an owner-occupied property. The improvements to the law firm's rented space would also be QIP, but who gets the deduction depends on who paid for them. If the law firm (tenant) paid, they get the deduction. If you (landlord) paid, you get the deduction.
0 coins
NebulaNomad
•That makes more sense! So even though I'm both a business owner and a landlord, the tax treatment is based on the specific space and who paid for what. I paid for some common area improvements (hallway, entrance) while my tenant paid for their office renovations. So I should be able to take the deduction for the common areas under QIP rules, and they would claim their own improvements? And both would potentially qualify for bonus depreciation?
0 coins
Dmitry Popov
Yes, exactly! You've got it right. Since you paid for the common area improvements (hallway, entrance), you would claim those deductions under QIP rules. Your tenant would claim their office renovations since they paid for those. Both types of improvements would potentially qualify for bonus depreciation, assuming they meet the QIP requirements (interior improvements to nonresidential buildings, placed in service after the building was first used, etc.). Just make sure to keep detailed records of who paid for what, especially if you have any shared costs or reimbursements. The IRS will want clear documentation showing the basis for each party's deductions. One thing to watch out for - if any of the common area improvements benefit the structural framework of the building (like major HVAC or electrical work), those might not qualify as QIP. But things like flooring, lighting, and cosmetic updates should be fine. It's great that you're thinking through this systematically! Many mixed-use property owners miss out on deductions because they don't properly segregate the costs between owner-occupied and rental portions.
0 coins
Yuki Ito
•This is really helpful! I'm new to dealing with commercial property tax deductions and this thread has been incredibly informative. One question - when you mention keeping detailed records of who paid for what, what specific documentation should I be maintaining? I'm assuming receipts and invoices are obvious, but are there other types of records that would be important for an IRS audit? Like photos of the improvements, or specific language in contracts with tenants about who's responsible for what types of improvements? Also, is there a time limit on when these improvements need to be placed in service to qualify for the current bonus depreciation rules? I want to make sure I'm not missing any deadlines for this tax year.
0 coins
Alina Rosenthal
•Great questions! For documentation, you'll definitely want to keep receipts, invoices, and contracts, but also consider maintaining a renovation log with photos before/during/after the work. This helps establish exactly what improvements were made and when they were placed in service. For tenant relationships, keep copies of lease agreements that specify who's responsible for improvements, any tenant improvement allowances, and written agreements about who owns what after installation. Email correspondence about improvement decisions can also be valuable documentation. Regarding timing for bonus depreciation - the current 100% bonus depreciation is available for qualified property placed in service through 2025, but it phases down after that (80% in 2026, 60% in 2027, etc.). So you're still in the sweet spot for maximum benefits this year. The key date is when the improvements are "placed in service" - meaning when they're completed and ready for their intended use, not necessarily when you paid for them. So if you finished renovations in 2024, you can claim the full bonus depreciation on your 2024 return even if some payments happened in 2025. Just make sure to maintain separate records for each property/space since the tax treatment can differ based on use and ownership!
0 coins
Ravi Kapoor
This is such a timely discussion! I'm dealing with a similar situation with my retail storefront. We're tenants and just completed about $85,000 in improvements last month - new flooring, custom display cases, and LED lighting throughout. From what I'm reading here, it sounds like we should be able to take advantage of the 100% bonus depreciation for qualified improvement property since we paid for everything ourselves. But I'm wondering about the timing aspect - since we just finished the work in January 2025, can we still claim this on our 2024 taxes if we started the project last year, or does it have to go on our 2025 return? Also, for the custom display cases - these are built-in units that are bolted to the floor but could theoretically be removed. Would these be treated as removable personal property eligible for Section 179, or as qualified improvement property? The distinction seems important for maximizing our deductions. Our accountant isn't super familiar with the recent changes to these rules, so I'm trying to get educated before our next meeting. This thread has been incredibly helpful - thanks everyone for sharing your experiences!
0 coins
Amara Oluwaseyi
•Welcome to the community! Great questions about timing and classification. For the timing issue, the key is when the improvements were "placed in service" - meaning when they were completed and ready for use. Since you finished in January 2025, these would go on your 2025 tax return, not 2024, regardless of when you started or made payments. Regarding your custom display cases, this is where proper documentation becomes crucial. Since they're bolted down but removable, they could potentially qualify as either personal property (Section 179 eligible) or qualified improvement property (bonus depreciation eligible). The determining factors are usually: how easily removable they are, whether they're considered part of the building structure, and how they're classified in your lease agreement. I'd suggest taking detailed photos showing how they're installed and getting documentation from your contractor about whether they're considered fixtures or personal property. Both Section 179 and 100% bonus depreciation give you the same immediate deduction result, but the classification affects other aspects like depreciation recapture if you sell. Given your accountant's unfamiliarity with the recent rule changes, you might want to consider getting a second opinion or using some of the resources others have mentioned in this thread. The distinction between old QLI rules and current QIP rules has tripped up many tax professionals!
0 coins
Freya Collins
Thanks for starting this discussion, Ava! I went through something very similar with my consulting firm last year. We spent about $95,000 on interior improvements as tenants, and navigating the QIP vs QLI rules was definitely confusing at first. One thing I learned that might help - since the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, most of what used to be called "Qualified Leasehold Improvements" now falls under "Qualified Improvement Property" (QIP). The good news is that QIP is eligible for 100% bonus depreciation through 2025, which means you can potentially deduct the full $128,000 in the year the improvements were placed in service. For your specific situation, since you're the tenant who paid for the improvements, you should generally be able to claim the deduction (assuming your lease doesn't have unusual clauses transferring ownership immediately to the landlord). The key things to verify: the building was placed in service more than 3 years ago, the improvements are to interior portions only, and they don't involve elevators, escalators, or structural framework. Regarding your partner's question about owner-occupied properties - yes, the treatment would be similar but you'd be dealing with QIP as the building owner rather than as a tenant. The bonus depreciation benefits would still apply. I'd definitely recommend getting your lease reviewed carefully to confirm who has the tax basis in these improvements. That's usually the biggest stumbling block for tenant improvements.
0 coins
GalaxyGazer
•This is exactly the kind of real-world insight I was hoping to find! Thank you for breaking down the QIP vs QLI distinction - I've been seeing both terms used interchangeably and getting confused about which rules actually apply now. Your point about the 3-year building age requirement is really important. Our shopping complex was built in 2018, so we should be good there. And you're right about reviewing the lease carefully - I need to dig into those clauses about improvement ownership before we make any tax elections. One follow-up question: when you say the improvements can't involve "structural framework," does that include things like partition walls or built-in cabinetry that's attached to walls? We did some space reconfiguration that involved adding a few non-load-bearing partition walls, and I'm wondering if that would disqualify those specific costs from QIP treatment. Also, did you end up taking the full bonus depreciation in year one, or did you split between Section 179 and bonus depreciation for any strategic reason? I'm trying to understand if there are any advantages to one approach over the other for our situation.
0 coins
Camila Castillo
•Great questions! For the structural framework issue, non-load-bearing partition walls are generally okay and shouldn't disqualify those costs from QIP treatment. The "structural framework" exclusion typically refers to major structural elements like load-bearing walls, columns, and the building's core support systems. Interior partitions that just divide space are usually considered part of the qualified improvements. Built-in cabinetry attached to walls is also generally fine for QIP purposes, as long as it's not part of the building's permanent structure. The key test is whether the improvements are to the "interior portion" of the building rather than the building's structural integrity. Regarding Section 179 vs bonus depreciation - I went with 100% bonus depreciation for the full amount because it was simpler administratively and there weren't any income limitations like there are with Section 179. Plus, bonus depreciation doesn't have the same phase-out thresholds that Section 179 has when you place a lot of property in service in one year. The main advantage of Section 179 would be if you had net operating losses that you wanted to preserve, since Section 179 can create NOLs while bonus depreciation generally can't take you below zero for the year. But for most profitable businesses, bonus depreciation is the cleaner approach for QIP. Just make sure to keep detailed records of each improvement type in case the IRS ever asks for cost segregation documentation!
0 coins
Mei Liu
This has been such a helpful discussion! I'm dealing with a similar situation and have learned so much from everyone's experiences. One thing I wanted to add for future readers - make sure to coordinate with your accountant early in the year about these elections. I almost missed the deadline for making the Section 179 election because I didn't realize it had to be made on the original return (including extensions), not an amended return. Also, for anyone still confused about the terminology changes since 2018, I found the IRS Publication 946 really helpful for understanding how the old Qualified Leasehold Improvement rules transitioned to the current Qualified Improvement Property rules. The publication has examples that show exactly how different types of improvements are classified. @Ava Johnson - for your $128,000 renovation, you'll definitely want to get that lease language reviewed before filing. Even if 90% of your improvements qualify for immediate deduction, getting it wrong could trigger an expensive audit adjustment later. The upfront cost of proper tax planning is always worth it compared to dealing with IRS disputes after the fact. Thanks everyone for sharing your real-world experiences - it's so much more valuable than just reading the technical rules!
0 coins
Alberto Souchard
•Thank you so much for mentioning the election deadline - that's exactly the kind of detail that could save someone a lot of money! I had no idea about the original return requirement for Section 179 elections. I'm definitely going to prioritize getting our lease reviewed before we file. Based on everyone's advice here, it sounds like the lease language could make or break our ability to claim these deductions, even though we paid for everything ourselves. The IRS Publication 946 recommendation is really helpful too. I've been trying to piece together information from various sources, but having one comprehensive resource that explains the transition from old to new rules sounds like exactly what I need. One last question for the group - has anyone dealt with mixed-use improvements where part of the renovation serves both business and personal use? We added a small office area that I sometimes use for personal paperwork, and I'm wondering if that affects the deductibility of the entire improvement or just that portion. @Mei Liu Thanks again for the practical timeline advice - you probably just saved me from making a costly mistake!
0 coins
Giovanni Rossi
•For mixed-use improvements, you'll need to allocate the costs based on business vs personal use percentage. The IRS generally requires "reasonable allocation" - so if that office area is 10% of the total renovation cost and you use it personally 30% of the time, you'd only be able to deduct 70% of that 10% portion for business purposes. The rest of your renovation that's purely business use should be fully deductible. The key is being able to document your allocation method. Keep records of square footage, time usage, or other objective measures that support your business use percentage. Some taxpayers use time logs or maintain separate records for business vs personal use of mixed areas. One tip - if the personal use is minimal (like occasional personal paperwork), you might be able to argue the space is primarily business use under the "primary use" test. But be conservative and well-documented since mixed-use deductions are often scrutinized in audits. @Mei Liu is absolutely right about the election deadlines - I ve'seen too many businesses lose out on thousands in deductions just because they missed the filing deadline for these elections!
0 coins
Nalani Liu
This thread has been incredibly informative! As someone new to commercial property tax deductions, I'm amazed by how complex these rules are. I'm currently renovating a small office space that I lease for my marketing consultancy - about $45,000 in improvements including new flooring, built-in desks, and upgraded electrical for all our tech equipment. Based on what everyone's shared here, it sounds like I should be able to take advantage of the QIP rules for 100% bonus depreciation since I'm the tenant paying for everything. A few quick questions: Does the electrical work (adding new outlets and upgrading the panel) still qualify as QIP, or would that fall under the "structural framework" exclusion that was mentioned? Also, should I be concerned about any state tax differences, or do most states follow the federal QIP rules? I really appreciate everyone sharing their real-world experiences - it's so much more helpful than trying to parse through IRS publications alone! Planning to get my lease reviewed based on all the advice here before making any tax elections.
0 coins
Sofia Morales
•Welcome to the community @Nalani Liu! Great questions about the electrical work and state tax implications. For the electrical upgrades (new outlets, panel upgrades), this can be a bit of a gray area. Generally, electrical work that's part of interior improvements to support your business operations would qualify as QIP. However, if the panel upgrade involves major building infrastructure changes that affect the entire building (not just your leased space), that portion might fall under structural framework exclusions. The key distinction is whether the electrical work serves your specific tenant space versus the building's core systems. Adding outlets and circuits within your space should be fine, but a main panel upgrade might need closer scrutiny. I'd recommend having your electrician provide an itemized breakdown separating tenant-specific work from any building-wide improvements. Regarding state taxes - this is really important to consider! Not all states conform to federal bonus depreciation rules. Some states have their own depreciation schedules or don't allow the accelerated deductions. You'll definitely want to check with a local tax professional about your specific state's rules, as this could significantly impact your overall tax savings. The $45,000 amount is perfect for these deductions - well within all the limits and thresholds people have mentioned. Just make sure to document everything well!
0 coins
Ruby Garcia
This is such a valuable discussion! As a new business owner who just signed a lease for my first retail location, I'm bookmarking this entire thread for when we start our renovations next month. One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is the importance of timing your improvements strategically. Since the 100% bonus depreciation phases down after 2025 (80% in 2026, 60% in 2027, etc.), there's real value in accelerating improvement projects into 2025 if possible. For businesses planning multiple phases of renovations, it might make sense to front-load the work while the full deduction is available. Of course, this needs to be balanced against cash flow and business operational needs, but the tax savings could be substantial. @Ava Johnson - given your $128,000 renovation amount, the difference between 100% bonus depreciation this year versus 80% next year could be worth $25,600 in additional deductions (assuming your tax rate makes that meaningful). Definitely worth prioritizing the lease review and tax planning sooner rather than later! Also want to echo what others have said about documentation - I'm already planning to have our contractor provide detailed cost breakdowns and take before/during/after photos of everything. The time invested in proper record-keeping upfront seems minimal compared to the potential headaches of an IRS audit later.
0 coins
Nia Davis
•This is excellent strategic thinking about the timing! I hadn't fully considered how the phase-down of bonus depreciation could impact multi-year renovation plans. That $25,600 difference you calculated for @Ava Johnson really puts it in perspective - that s'significant money that could be reinvested back into the business. Your point about front-loading renovations while the full 100% deduction is available makes a lot of sense, especially for businesses that were already planning improvements over the next few years anyway. It s'essentially a government incentive to accelerate capital investments, which could help with both tax savings and improving business operations sooner. I m'also glad you mentioned the documentation strategy with detailed contractor breakdowns and photos. As someone completely new to this, I was wondering what level of detail would be sufficient for IRS purposes. It sounds like over-documenting is much better than under-documenting when it comes to these substantial deductions. One question - do you know if there are any restrictions on how quickly you can complete and place improvements in service within a tax year? Like if someone wanted to rush multiple renovation phases into 2025 to capture the full bonus depreciation, are there any timing rules that might limit that strategy?
0 coins
Isabella Silva
•Great question about timing restrictions! There generally aren't specific IRS rules limiting how quickly you can complete multiple renovation phases within a tax year, as long as each improvement is legitimately "placed in service" when it's completed and ready for business use. The key is that each improvement must actually be finished and operational - you can't just rush to start projects and claim deductions before they're truly complete. But if you can legitimately complete multiple phases of renovations within 2025, you should be able to claim the full 100% bonus depreciation on all of them. One thing to watch out for is the "related party" and "disguised sale" rules if you're doing anything unusual with timing or payments, but for straightforward tenant improvements completed in normal business operations, the IRS generally respects the actual completion dates. @Ruby Garcia s'strategic thinking is spot-on - businesses with flexibility in their renovation timeline could see substantial tax benefits by accelerating work into 2025. Just make sure not to sacrifice quality or operational efficiency for tax timing, since a poorly executed rushed renovation could cost more than the tax savings! The documentation approach you both mentioned is definitely the way to go. In my experience, the IRS appreciates taxpayers who clearly document their basis for significant deductions, and it makes any potential audit much smoother.
0 coins
Giovanni Mancini
This has been such an educational thread! I'm a newcomer to both this community and commercial real estate tax issues, and I'm amazed by the depth of knowledge everyone has shared here. I'm in the early stages of planning renovations for a small office space I'll be leasing for my consulting business (around $60,000 budget), and this discussion has already helped me avoid several potential mistakes. The distinction between the old QLI rules and current QIP rules was completely unclear to me before reading through everyone's experiences. A few things I'm taking away as action items based on this thread: 1. Get the lease agreement reviewed carefully for improvement ownership clauses before starting any work 2. Have contractors provide detailed cost breakdowns separating different types of improvements 3. Document everything with photos and maintain records of who paid for what 4. Consider timing strategically while 100% bonus depreciation is still available through 2025 5. Check state tax conformity since not all states follow federal rules One question I haven't seen addressed - for those who have used the various software tools mentioned (like taxr.ai) or services like Claimyr to get IRS clarification, do you typically use these before starting renovations for planning purposes, or after completion when preparing taxes? I'm wondering if getting professional guidance upfront could help with making smarter decisions about which improvements to prioritize. Thanks to everyone who has shared their real-world experiences - this is exactly the kind of practical advice that's impossible to get from just reading IRS publications!
0 coins