IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Sayid Hassan

•

anyone else notice the processing is slower this year or is it just me?

0 coins

Rachel Tao

•

def slower. blame the budget cuts 🤔

0 coins

CosmicVoyager

•

Filed my NYS return on 2/3, accepted same day. Still showing "processing" status as of today. This is my first time filing in NY so wasn't sure what to expect for timing. Seeing some of you got yours in 10 days while others are waiting weeks - seems pretty inconsistent! Will keep checking and update when I get movement.

0 coins

Hattie Carson

•

Has anyone talked to their CPA about qualified charitable distributions from IRAs? My mother is over 70 and uses this to reduce her taxable income while satisfying her required minimum distributions. Not sure if it would work for capital gains specifically tho.

0 coins

QCDs only work for IRA distributions and only if you're over 70½. They wouldn't help with capital gains from property sales. They're great for reducing income tax on required minimum distributions but wouldn't affect capital gains tax at all.

0 coins

One strategy that hasn't been mentioned yet is donating appreciated property directly to charity instead of cash. If you have other appreciated assets (stocks, bonds, real estate), you can donate those directly and avoid paying capital gains tax on them while still getting the full fair market value deduction. For example, if you have $200,000 worth of stock that you originally bought for $50,000, donating the stock directly saves you capital gains tax on the $150,000 appreciation AND gives you a $200,000 charitable deduction. Then you could use the cash you would have donated to reinvest in similar securities. This doesn't help with your current property sale, but it's a more tax-efficient way to make large charitable donations if you have other appreciated assets in your portfolio. You essentially get to "stack" the tax benefits - avoiding capital gains AND getting the income tax deduction. Just make sure the charity can accept the type of asset you want to donate, and that you've held it for more than one year to qualify for long-term capital gains treatment.

0 coins

Sofia Torres

•

This is really helpful advice! I hadn't thought about donating appreciated assets instead of cash. One question though - if I donate appreciated stock worth $200k that I bought for $50k, and then use that cash to buy similar stock, wouldn't I essentially be in the same position but with a higher cost basis on the new stock? It seems like I'm trading the same economic exposure but getting better tax treatment. Is there any wash sale rule or similar restriction that would prevent this strategy?

0 coins

Josef Tearle

•

For the official IRS guidance you're looking for, check out Publication 925 (Passive Activity and At-Risk Rules) - specifically pages 6-7 which cover the disposition of passive activities. This explains exactly how your $125K in carried forward passive losses become fully deductible when you sell the rental property. Also look at Publication 544 (Sales and Other Dispositions of Assets) which covers the depreciation recapture rules. The key point is that Internal Revenue Code Section 469(g) allows all suspended passive losses to be deducted in the year you completely dispose of your interest in the passive activity. You're right that they're separate calculations - you'll pay up to 25% on the $132K depreciation recapture, but you'll also get to deduct the full $125K in passive losses against your other income. So while you have about $7K in "economic profit," your tax situation will be quite different due to how these items are treated separately on your return. Make sure your tax preparer understands this - I've seen many get confused about how the passive loss suspension rules work upon full disposition of a rental property.

0 coins

Thanks for pointing to the specific publications! I've been struggling to find the exact IRS guidance on this situation. Just to make sure I understand correctly - when you say the passive losses become "fully deductible against other income," does that mean they can offset things like my W-2 wages and other ordinary income? Or are there still limitations on what types of income they can offset? I want to make sure I'm not missing any nuances before I meet with my tax preparer. The $125K deduction would be huge for reducing my overall tax liability this year if it can truly offset all my other income sources.

0 coins

Thais Soares

•

Yes, when you fully dispose of a passive activity (like selling your rental property), the suspended passive losses can offset ALL types of income - including W-2 wages, business income, portfolio income, and other ordinary income. This is the key benefit of IRC Section 469(g). The passive loss limitations that normally restrict these losses to only offsetting passive income are completely suspended in the year of full disposition. So your $125K in accumulated losses can indeed reduce your overall taxable income dollar-for-dollar, potentially saving you significant taxes depending on your marginal tax rate. The only caveat is that if you have other passive activities with income, the losses would first offset that passive income, then any excess can offset your non-passive income. But in most cases, people in your situation see a substantial reduction in their overall tax liability for the year. Make sure your tax preparer files Form 8582 correctly to show the full disposition and the release of all suspended losses. This is where I've seen mistakes happen most often.

0 coins

Keisha Brown

•

I went through this exact scenario two years ago and can confirm what others have shared here. The key thing to understand is that when you sell your rental property, you're "fully disposing" of that passive activity, which triggers IRC Section 469(g) - this allows ALL your suspended passive losses from that property to become deductible against any type of income in the year of sale. Here's what actually happened in my case with similar numbers: - Had $140K in depreciation recapture (taxed at 25% = $35K in taxes) - Had $130K in accumulated passive losses that became fully deductible - The $130K deduction saved me about $45K in taxes at my marginal rate - Net result: despite the depreciation recapture, I actually got a significant tax benefit overall The forms you'll need are Form 4797 for the property sale and depreciation recapture, and Form 8582 to show the disposition of the passive activity and release of suspended losses. Make sure your tax preparer understands the Section 469(g) rules - mine initially missed this and almost cost me thousands. One last tip: if you've been doing your own taxes with software, this is probably the year to use a professional who specializes in real estate transactions. The interaction between these rules can be complex and the stakes are high with the dollar amounts involved.

0 coins

NeonNinja

•

This is incredibly helpful to see a real example with actual numbers! Your situation sounds almost identical to what I'm facing. I'm curious - when you say your tax preparer "initially missed this," what exactly did they get wrong? Did they try to keep the passive losses suspended instead of releasing them, or was there something else? Also, you mentioned using a professional who specializes in real estate transactions. Do you have any recommendations for finding someone with the right expertise? I've been doing my own taxes for years but you're absolutely right that the stakes are too high here to risk getting it wrong. One more question - did you have to amend any prior year returns, or was everything handled correctly just by filing the current year return with the property sale?

0 coins

Great question! My tax preparer initially tried to continue carrying forward the passive losses instead of releasing them in the year of sale. They treated it like any other year where I still owned the property, rather than recognizing that selling the property triggered the full disposition rules under Section 469(g). For finding a specialist, I'd recommend looking for an Enrolled Agent (EA) or CPA who specifically mentions real estate transactions in their practice areas. The AICPA has a directory where you can search by specialty. I found mine through a referral from my real estate agent - they often work with tax professionals who handle these transactions regularly. Everything was handled on the current year return - no amendments needed. The key was properly completing Form 8582 to show the "disposition of entire interest" which releases all the suspended losses from that specific property. Once we corrected the return, the software automatically calculated the tax benefit from deducting the full $130K against my other income. The difference in my tax liability was dramatic - went from owing about $12K to getting a refund of $33K, all because of properly applying the passive loss disposition rules. Definitely worth getting professional help for this one!

0 coins

I've been following this discussion with great interest since I'm dealing with a nearly identical situation. My syndication sold in late 2022, distributed proceeds in early 2023, but I'm still waiting for final dissolution paperwork as we head into 2025. One thing that hasn't been mentioned yet is the potential impact on your state tax returns. While we've covered the federal reporting requirements thoroughly, some states have their own partnership dissolution requirements that can affect your state tax reporting. In my case, the partnership was formed in Delaware but owned property in Texas, and both states had different requirements for the dissolution process. I'd recommend checking with your state tax authority (or a local tax professional familiar with your state's rules) to make sure you're handling the state reporting correctly while waiting for the federal dissolution paperwork. Some states require you to continue filing partnership returns until formal dissolution is complete, regardless of activity level. Also, for those dealing with unresponsive sponsors - I found that mentioning potential regulatory complaints (like with state securities regulators) in written communications often gets faster responses. Most sponsors want to avoid any regulatory scrutiny, so the mere mention of escalating to authorities can motivate better communication. The waiting is frustrating, but as others have noted, it's better to be conservative and wait for proper documentation than to risk having to file amended returns later.

0 coins

This is such an important point about state tax implications that I hadn't considered! I'm dealing with a similar multi-state situation where our syndication was Delaware-formed but held properties in Florida. I just assumed the state reporting would follow the federal timeline, but you're absolutely right that different states can have their own dissolution requirements. Your point about mentioning regulatory complaints is also really insightful. I've been trying to be polite and patient with our sponsor, but after 18+ months of "administrative delays," maybe it's time to be more direct about expectations and potential escalation paths. The threat of regulatory scrutiny could definitely motivate them to prioritize wrapping things up. Do you have any specific recommendations for which state regulators are most effective to mention? I'm thinking securities regulators since these are typically securities offerings, but I'm not sure if there are other regulatory bodies that might have jurisdiction over syndication sponsors who are dragging their feet on dissolution paperwork. Thanks for bringing up these additional considerations - it's helpful to think beyond just the federal tax implications when dealing with these prolonged dissolution situations.

0 coins

Chloe Martin

•

I've been dealing with this exact scenario for the past 18 months, and it's been incredibly frustrating. What helped me finally get clarity was being very persistent with specific documentation requests from the sponsor. I started sending monthly written requests asking for: 1) A detailed breakdown of remaining administrative tasks, 2) Expected completion dates for each task, 3) Confirmation of what reserves (if any) are being held and why, and 4) The specific steps remaining for state dissolution filing. After months of vague responses, this approach finally got them to provide a concrete timeline. Turns out they were waiting for a final tax adjustment from the buyer that was taking forever due to some depreciation recapture calculations, plus they needed to maintain a small reserve for 18 months post-sale due to environmental warranty provisions in the purchase agreement. The key was making it clear I needed specific information for my own tax planning and wouldn't accept "administrative matters" as an adequate explanation. Once they realized I wasn't going away and needed real answers, the communication improved dramatically. For your 2024 taxes, definitely don't mark it as dissolved without that final K-1. But do push your sponsor for a realistic timeline - you deserve to know when this will actually be resolved.

0 coins

Tax implications when LLC partnership changes from 50/50 to single-member - what happens to the money?

Hey tax folks, I need some clarity on a partnership situation that's unfolding (not my partnership, but could affect me). I'm trying to understand the tax implications so I can ask the right questions when talking to the parties involved. Here's the situation: Mark and Sam started 2023 as equal 50/50 partners in an LLC. The business collects customer payments upfront, then uses that money throughout the year to buy services and materials to fulfill orders. They don't keep inventory. On July 1st, Sam resigned from the partnership but stayed on as an employee. Mark took over 100% ownership of the LLC (with approval from other employees who aren't officially on the registration and get 1099s). When Sam left the partnership, there was about $130,000 sitting in the business accounts. Now it's year-end, and the accountant pointed out that from January-July, it was a 50/50 partnership, and when Sam resigned, that $130K was still in the bank. Between July and December, about $65K of that money was spent on business expenses (services and materials), and the other $65K will be distributed as compensation to Mark (now sole owner) and employees. By December 31st, the business accounts will be nearly empty. My question: Are there tax implications for Sam leaving the partnership in July, even though the money wasn't distributed at that time? Since it's a pass-through entity, does Sam technically have any tax liability for that $130K that was in the account when he left, even though it was later used for legitimate business expenses? The parties are still figuring things out, but I want to understand what questions to ask. Any insights would be super helpful!

This has been such an enlightening thread! I'm dealing with a similar situation where my business partner and I are considering restructuring our LLC, and honestly, I had no idea about most of these tax implications until reading through everyone's experiences. The concept that really blew my mind is the "technical termination" under Section 708 - I never realized that a partnership could be considered terminated for tax purposes even when the business continues operating. So if I understand correctly, when Sam left in July, the original partnership was deemed terminated, requiring a short-year return from January-July, and then Mark's single-member LLC started fresh from July onward? What's particularly concerning is how complex this gets when you factor in the upfront payment business model. Between the deemed distribution of cash, potential ordinary income treatment on unrealized receivables, and the need for proper documentation, it sounds like there are so many ways this could go wrong if not handled correctly. I'm definitely taking everyone's advice about getting professional help BEFORE making any changes. Based on what I'm reading here, the planning strategies available beforehand are much better than trying to fix problems after the fact. One question though - for those who've been through this, how do you find a tax professional who actually specializes in partnership taxation? It seems like this is a pretty specialized area that not all CPAs would be familiar with.

0 coins

Taylor To

•

You've got it exactly right about the Section 708 technical termination! It's one of those tax concepts that seems counterintuitive at first - the business keeps operating, but for tax purposes, the partnership "ended" when the ownership structure changed significantly. Finding a tax professional who really understands partnership taxation can be challenging. Here are some approaches that have worked for me and others I know: 1. **Look for CPAs with "partnership specialist" credentials** - The AICPA has specific certifications for partnership taxation 2. **Ask potential CPAs specific questions** - If they can't explain concepts like Section 751 hot assets or deemed distributions without looking them up, keep searching 3. **Check with your state CPA society** - They often have referral services and can point you toward CPAs who specialize in business/partnership taxation 4. **Ask for references from other business owners** - Especially those who've dealt with partnership changes or complex business structures 5. **Consider firms that serve a lot of small businesses** - They're more likely to have experience with LLC partnership issues The key is interviewing them before hiring. A good partnership tax specialist should be able to walk you through the potential issues in your specific situation and explain the planning options available. If they seem uncertain about partnership taxation rules or suggest "we'll figure it out when we file," that's a red flag. Don't be afraid to pay for a consultation upfront - it's much cheaper than dealing with tax problems later!

0 coins

Jamal Harris

•

This thread has been incredibly valuable! I've been following along because we're potentially facing a similar situation next year. One thing I haven't seen discussed much is the state tax implications of partnership changes. While everyone's focused on federal tax issues (which are obviously critical), I'm wondering if different states handle partnership terminations and deemed distributions differently? For example, some states don't recognize federal S-corp elections, so I'm curious if there are similar disconnects with partnership taxation. Could Sam face different tax treatment at the state level even if the federal treatment is clear? Also, for those who mentioned getting IRS guidance directly - did you also check with your state tax authority? It seems like getting both federal and state clarity upfront could save a lot of headaches later, especially since state tax rates and rules can vary significantly. Would love to hear if anyone has experience navigating both federal and state requirements for partnership changes!

0 coins

Debra Bai

•

Great point about state tax implications! You're absolutely right that this adds another layer of complexity that shouldn't be overlooked. From what I've seen, most states do generally follow federal partnership tax rules, but there can definitely be important differences. Some states have their own versions of deemed distribution rules or handle partnership terminations slightly differently. A few states also have different rules around what constitutes "doing business" in the state, which could affect filing requirements when ownership changes. The timing differences can be particularly tricky - if your state has a different tax year or filing deadline than federal, you might need to coordinate the short-year returns differently. Some states also have additional forms or notifications required when partnerships terminate or change ownership structure. I'd definitely recommend checking with both federal and state authorities, especially if you're in a state with significant business taxes like California or New York. The state tax liability on a deemed distribution could be substantial depending on your state's rates. For anyone going through this process, make sure your tax professional is familiar with your specific state's partnership tax rules, not just federal. It's another good screening question when you're interviewing potential CPAs - ask them about state-specific partnership tax issues in your jurisdiction. State tax problems can be just as costly and complicated as federal ones, so it's worth getting clarity on both fronts upfront!

0 coins

Prev1...22422243224422452246...5643Next