IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Omar Zaki

•

Did you claim any credits like EIC or CTC? That usually triggers more review

0 coins

yeah i claimed EIC. guess thats why im stuck waiting

0 coins

Kylo Ren

•

Same thing happened to me last year with the 570/971 combo! Turns out they just needed to verify my identity since I moved states. Got a CP05A notice in the mail about 10 days after the codes showed up asking me to verify online or call. Did the online verification and my refund released about 3 weeks later. The waiting is the worst part but hang in there! šŸ¤ž

0 coins

Zara Rashid

•

That's really reassuring to hear! 3 weeks isn't too bad after verification. Did you have any other codes show up during that time or just had to wait it out after verifying? I'm crossing my fingers mine is something simple like identity verification too šŸ¤ž

0 coins

I've been following this thread and wanted to add my perspective as someone who went through a very similar situation. The "wait and report after leaving" strategy mentioned by others is actually quite effective, but I'd also suggest documenting everything NOW while you're still there. Start keeping detailed records of: your work schedule, any emails showing you're required to be in the office, descriptions of your ongoing duties vs. project-based work, and any communications about your employment status. Take screenshots of job postings if they advertised your position differently than how you're classified. This documentation will be crucial whether you decide to approach your employer directly, file with the IRS, or report after finding a new job. I made the mistake of not documenting enough in my situation, and it made proving my case much harder later. Also, consider checking if your company has an HR department or if decisions are made by one person. Sometimes the person doing payroll doesn't fully understand classification rules, and bringing it to HR's attention (framed as a compliance question) might resolve it without drama. But definitely have that documentation ready first, just in case.

0 coins

Ravi Gupta

•

This is excellent advice about documentation! I'm actually in a very similar situation to the original poster and had been putting off keeping records because I wasn't sure what would be relevant. Your list is really helpful - I hadn't thought about screenshotting the original job posting, but that's brilliant since mine definitely described the role differently than how I'm being treated. One question though - how detailed should I get with the documentation? Like, should I be tracking every single interaction or just the ones that clearly show control/supervision? And is it better to keep digital copies or physical printouts in case they try to revoke my email access if things go south?

0 coins

Great question about documentation detail! You'll want to focus on quality over quantity - capture the interactions that clearly demonstrate behavioral control, financial control, and relationship factors that the IRS uses for classification. Key things to document: set work schedules/hours, meetings where you receive direct supervision, any training you're required to attend, use of company equipment/software, and communications showing you can't work from other locations. Digital copies are definitely safer since they can't revoke access to your personal devices. Forward important emails to a personal account, take photos of schedules/notices with your phone, and save everything to cloud storage they can't access. Also document the contrast between your treatment and the W-2 employees - like if they get benefits, flexible schedules, or different supervision that you don't receive. The job posting screenshot is crucial because it often shows the employer's own understanding of the role as ongoing employment rather than project-based contractor work. Keep everything organized by date so you can show a clear pattern of employee-like treatment over time.

0 coins

One thing I haven't seen mentioned here is checking if your company has any policies or employee handbook that might inadvertently contradict your contractor classification. Many employers slip up by including 1099 workers in employee-only policies or expecting them to follow the same rules as W-2 staff. Also, since you mentioned the other admin has been there 12 years, that's actually a huge red flag for the IRS. Long-term "contractor" relationships, especially for ongoing administrative work, are classic misclassification cases. The IRS specifically looks for situations where someone performs the same role for years as evidence of an employer-employee relationship rather than true independent contracting. You might want to research what happened to other companies in your industry who got caught doing this. Sometimes showing your employer news articles about similar businesses facing penalties can be more persuasive than citing IRS regulations directly. It makes the risk feel more real and immediate. And honestly, given that you're new and they've been misclassifying the other admin for over a decade, this company is probably sitting on a pretty significant tax liability if the IRS ever investigates. That might actually work in your favor if you do decide to have a direct conversation about reclassification.

0 coins

This is really smart advice about checking company policies! I never would have thought to look for contradictions like that, but it makes total sense that they might accidentally treat contractors like employees in their internal documentation. The point about the 12-year "contractor" is especially eye-opening - I was actually thinking that person's long tenure might work against me, but you're right that it's probably making the company's situation worse from an IRS perspective. If they've been misclassifying someone for over a decade, the back taxes and penalties could be enormous. Do you have any suggestions for how to research penalties other companies faced? I'm not sure what search terms would be most effective, or if there are specific databases or news sources that track these kinds of cases. Having concrete examples of similar businesses getting penalized would definitely strengthen my position if I decide to approach management directly.

0 coins

Owen Jenkins

•

Lucas, I went through a very similar situation when I purchased my tree service business last year, and I want to emphasize one crucial point that could save you significant headaches: make absolutely sure you get a detailed closing statement that clearly breaks down every component of your total consideration. In my case, I had $18,000 in assumed equipment debt, but there were also some unexpected closing costs and prorated expenses that affected my total purchase price calculation for Form 8594. The closing attorney didn't initially itemize these properly, which caused confusion when my CPA was preparing the form. Here's what I recommend: Request a draft closing statement at least a week before your actual closing date. This gives you time to review all the numbers and ensure that both you and the seller will be reporting the same total consideration amount on your respective Form 8594s. The assumed debt should be clearly listed as part of the total consideration, not buried in footnotes or attachments. Also, don't forget that you'll need to report this same total consideration amount on your first-year tax return when you file Form 8594. Keep copies of all loan assumption agreements, the closing statement, and any appraisals or equipment valuations with your permanent tax records. The IRS typically has three years to audit, but having this documentation organized from day one will give you peace of mind. One last tip: if any of the equipment loans you're assuming have different terms than originally disclosed, make sure these changes are reflected in your purchase agreement amendments. This protects you legally and ensures your tax calculations remain accurate.

0 coins

Nia Thompson

•

@Owen Jenkins This is incredibly thorough advice, especially about getting that draft closing statement early! I hadn t'thought about how prorated expenses and closing costs could affect the total consideration calculation, but that makes perfect sense. Having mismatched Form 8594s between buyer and seller would definitely be a red flag for the IRS. Your point about keeping all the documentation with permanent tax records is well taken too. Since this is my first business acquisition, I want to make sure I m'setting up good record-keeping practices from the start. I m'already nervous enough about getting audited without having to scramble to find supporting documents years later. The tip about loan term changes is particularly valuable - I can see how easy it would be for modified loan terms to slip through the cracks during negotiations, only to cause problems later when the numbers don t'match up with what s'in the purchase agreement. Thanks for sharing such detailed insights from your tree service acquisition. It s'really helpful to hear the specific challenges you faced and how you addressed them. This whole thread has been incredibly educational for someone new to business purchases!

0 coins

Miguel Ramos

•

Lucas, as someone who just completed a lawn maintenance business acquisition three months ago, I can definitely relate to your Form 8594 confusion! The assumed debt piece was one of the trickiest parts for me too. Here's what I learned: the $27,500 in equipment loans you're assuming gets added to whatever cash you're paying to determine your total consideration. So if you're paying $40,000 cash plus assuming $27,500 in debt, your total consideration for Form 8594 purposes is $67,500. This total amount is what you'll allocate across the different asset classes in Part III of the form. One thing that really helped me was creating a simple breakdown showing: Cash paid + Assumed debt = Total consideration, then keeping that calculation with my Form 8594 for future reference. Also, make sure you get written confirmation of the exact debt balances as of your closing date, since interest accrual can change these amounts daily. The key is that both you and the seller need to report the same total consideration amount on your respective forms, so coordinate with them to ensure you're both using the same figures. Having everything clearly documented in your purchase agreement prevents confusion later. Best of luck with your lawn care business! Getting the tax side sorted out properly from the start will save you headaches down the road.

0 coins

@Miguel Ramos Thanks for breaking this down so clearly with the actual numbers! Your example of $40K cash + $27.5K assumed debt = $67.5K total consideration really makes it click for me. I ve'been overthinking this whole process, but when you put it that simply, it actually makes perfect sense. The point about getting written confirmation of exact debt balances as of closing date is crucial - I can see how even a few days of interest accrual could throw off the numbers if I m'not careful about timing. I m'definitely going to request those balance confirmations from each lender well in advance of closing. Your suggestion about creating that simple breakdown calculation to keep with the Form 8594 is brilliant too. Having that clear documentation showing how I arrived at the total consideration will be invaluable if I ever need to reference it later or explain it to the IRS. Really appreciate you sharing your recent experience - it s'exactly what I needed to hear as someone going through this for the first time!

0 coins

Jason Brewer

•

I think people sometimes misunderstand these reviews. They're not always bad news! • Many reviews are truly random (part of IRS compliance sampling) • Some are triggered by specific items but don't mean you did anything wrong • Reviews without document requests often resolve faster • The IRS actually does finish many reviews earlier than the timeline they quote My review last year finished in 3.5 weeks even though they quoted me 6 weeks. I was surprised when my deposit just showed up!

0 coins

I'm going through the exact same thing right now! Filed on February 15th and just got the notice yesterday. What's been most frustrating is that the IRS website just says "under review" with no additional details about what specifically they're looking at. From what I've read here and elsewhere, it sounds like the foreign tax credits are probably what flagged your return - they seem to trigger these reviews pretty frequently even when everything is correct. I'm planning for the full 6 weeks but hoping it resolves sooner. Has anyone had luck getting more specific information about what part of their return is being reviewed when they call?

0 coins

Elijah Brown

•

This is absolutely maddening and unfortunately becoming way too common in the ERC space. What you're describing with Adesso Capital sounds like a textbook case of fee harvesting - they collect money upfront with no intention of actually performing the services. The fact that you've caught them in the same lie twice (claiming they "made a mistake" and will resubmit) is a huge red flag. This suggests they have a standard script for when clients discover nothing was actually filed. Here's what I'd do in your situation: **Get official documentation immediately** - Request your business tax account transcripts from the IRS using Form 4506-T. This will give you written proof that no 941X forms were ever submitted, which you'll need for any legal action. **Check your contract terms** - Review what Adesso actually committed to in writing. Many of these companies use vague language that doesn't include specific timelines, which makes it harder to prove breach of contract. **File complaints now** - Report them to your state attorney general, the IRS fraud division, and the FTC. Even if it doesn't immediately help your case, it creates an official record that can help other victims and regulatory investigations. **Consider the statute of limitations** - For ERC claims, you typically have 3 years from the original quarterly return due date to file amended returns. Don't let them run out the clock while stringing you along with more false promises. You might also want to consult with a tax attorney who has experience with ERC fraud cases. Many are seeing patterns like this and may be able to pursue recovery of your fees plus damages. The silver lining is that you can potentially still file the 941X forms yourself or through a reputable tax professional if you're still within the statute of limitations. Don't let their incompetence cost you the credit you're legitimately entitled to.

0 coins

Omar Hassan

•

This is incredibly helpful advice, thank you. I'm in a very similar situation with another ERC company and your point about "fee harvesting" really resonates - that's exactly what it feels like happened to me. One question about the Form 4506-T process: when requesting transcripts to prove nothing was filed, should I be asking for account transcripts or return transcripts? I want to make sure I'm getting the right documentation that will clearly show the absence of any 941X filings. Also, for anyone else dealing with this - I found that keeping a detailed timeline of every interaction with these companies has been invaluable. Screenshot every email, record call dates and what was promised, and note every deadline they miss. It really helps when you're trying to build a case for breach of contract. The statute of limitations point is crucial too. Don't let these companies waste more of your time if you're getting close to those deadlines. Sometimes cutting your losses and filing yourself (or with a legitimate tax pro) is better than hoping they'll eventually follow through.

0 coins

I'm so sorry you're going through this - it sounds absolutely infuriating and unfortunately your experience with Adesso Capital matches what I've been hearing about from other business owners in similar situations. The pattern you're describing (taking money upfront, making promises, then giving rehearsed excuses when confronted about no actual filings) is becoming way too common with these ERC processing companies that popped up quickly after the credit was expanded. What really stands out to me is that they gave you the exact same "we made a mistake" excuse a full year apart. That tells me this isn't actually a mistake - it's their standard operating procedure when clients discover nothing was filed. My advice would be to stop giving them more chances and take action now: 1. **Get official proof** - Request Form 4506-T transcripts from the IRS showing your account history. This gives you written documentation that no 941X was ever filed, contradicting their claims. 2. **Check your timeline** - The ERC has statute of limitations (typically 3 years from the original quarterly return due date). Don't let them run out the clock on you. 3. **File complaints** - Report them to your state attorney general, IRS fraud division, and FTC. Even if it doesn't directly help your case, it creates a paper trail for other victims. 4. **Consider your options** - You may still be able to file the 941X yourself or through a legitimate tax professional if you're within the statute of limitations. Three years with zero actual work done is unacceptable. Don't let them waste any more of your time with empty promises.

0 coins

Prev1...22422243224422452246...5644Next