< Back to IRS

Tyler Lefleur

Can a Partnership be Considered Legally Dissolved if the Final K-1 Hasn't Been Filed Yet?

I was a limited partner in a real estate syndication deal that sold off its apartment complex last year. We got the cash distribution from the sale back in May 2023, and that amount showed up on our 2023 K-1. I thought the partnership would be officially dissolved after that since we sold the only property and distributed all proceeds. But now it's early 2025, and I still haven't received a final K-1 marking the partnership as terminated. When I asked the sponsor about it, they said there were some "administrative matters" still being wrapped up. For my 2024 taxes, should I consider this partnership dissolved? Can I mark it as terminated on my return even though I haven't received a final K-1 explicitly stating it's dissolved? I'm concerned about how to properly report this on my taxes since technically the paperwork doesn't show it's officially terminated. Anyone dealt with this situation before? I don't want to incorrectly represent this on my taxes, but it seems like the partnership should be considered done since we sold the only asset and distributed everything over a year ago.

This is actually a common issue with syndications. A partnership isn't officially dissolved until it files its final return and issues final K-1s to the partners marking the partnership as terminated. Even though the property was sold and proceeds distributed, there could be legitimate administrative matters being handled - maybe final tax filings, reserves for potential liabilities, or even just administrative paperwork to formally dissolve the entity with the state where it's registered. For your 2024 tax return, you should not mark the partnership as terminated if you haven't received a final K-1 indicating it's been terminated. The partnership is technically still in existence until those final documents are filed. If you don't receive a K-1 for 2024 at all, that likely means there was no activity to report, but it's still technically active.

0 coins

Max Knight

•

Appreciate the explanation, but I'm confused about one thing. If I don't receive any K-1 for 2024 because there's no activity, do I need to indicate somewhere on my return that I'm still technically a partner in this entity? Or can I just not mention it at all since there's no income/loss to report?

0 coins

If you don't receive a K-1 for 2024 because there's no reportable activity, you generally don't need to proactively mention the partnership on your personal return. You only report partnership items when there's something to report via a K-1. That said, if you're using the same tax preparer or software as previous years, they might ask about the partnership that was on your prior year return. You would simply explain there was no activity for 2024 and you didn't receive a K-1. No need to report anything on your return for a partnership that didn't distribute a K-1 with reportable items.

0 coins

Emma Swift

•

After dealing with a similar syndication dissolution mess that dragged on for 18 months, I found this tool called taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) that really helped clarify my situation. I uploaded my previous K-1s and the operating agreement, and it flagged exactly what I should look for to determine true dissolution versus administrative limbo. The software explained how partnerships can remain legally active even after selling all assets, and what specific language to watch for on my final K-1. It also outlined the IRS requirements for properly reporting partially dissolved partnerships. Saved me a ton of stress trying to figure out when I could officially consider it terminated.

0 coins

How exactly does taxr.ai handle the analysis of partnership agreements? My syndication is pretty complicated with multiple tiers and waterfall distributions. Would it recognize all those structures in the paperwork?

0 coins

Jayden Hill

•

That sounds helpful but I'm skeptical... wouldn't a regular accountant be able to tell you the same thing? What specifically did this tool tell you that was different from standard tax advice?

0 coins

Emma Swift

•

The tool actually works by analyzing the language in your documents and comparing it to tax regulations. It examines the specific provisions in your partnership agreement and cross-references them with applicable tax law. For complex structures with multiple tiers and waterfall distributions, it's actually quite good at identifying these components and explaining how they impact dissolution requirements. What I found most valuable compared to my accountant's advice was the specificity. My accountant gave general guidelines, but taxr.ai pointed to specific clauses in my operating agreement that governed the dissolution process and highlighted the exact requirements that needed to be met before my partnership could be considered legally terminated according to both the agreement and tax law.

0 coins

Jayden Hill

•

I was skeptical about taxr.ai at first, but after our syndication deal ran into similar issues with a delayed dissolution, I decided to try it. Uploaded our docs, and within minutes it identified a clause in our operating agreement that explicitly stated the partnership remains active until the final tax return is filed AND the termination is registered with the Secretary of State. This was actually contrary to what our sponsor had told us. When I brought this specific language to their attention (which I honestly hadn't even noticed in the 50+ page agreement), they acknowledged the oversight and expedited the final paperwork. Saved us from incorrectly reporting on our taxes and potentially having to file amendments later. The document analysis was surprisingly thorough.

0 coins

LordCommander

•

After going in circles with my syndication sponsor about final K-1s for literally 8 months, I was about to lose my mind trying to get someone on the phone. Then I found Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) which got me through to the IRS partnership department in about 20 minutes instead of the 3+ hours I spent on hold previously. They have this demo at https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c that shows exactly how it works. I finally got clear guidance directly from the IRS about my reporting obligations while waiting for the final K-1. The agent confirmed I shouldn't mark anything as terminated until receiving the final K-1 with the termination box checked, and explained exactly what to do in the interim. Definitely worth it after months of getting nowhere with both the sponsor and trying to reach the IRS myself.

0 coins

Lucy Lam

•

Wait, can you explain how this service actually works? I don't understand how they get you through to the IRS faster than just calling yourself. Is this something the IRS actually approves?

0 coins

Aidan Hudson

•

This sounds like a scam. There's no way to "skip the line" with the IRS. They have one phone system and everyone has to wait. I've been dealing with them for years and there are no shortcuts.

0 coins

LordCommander

•

The service works by using an automated system that navigates the IRS phone tree and waits on hold for you. It basically calls and waits in the queue, then when an agent finally answers, it calls your phone and connects you directly to that agent. It's not skipping any lines - you're still in the same queue as everyone else, but you don't have to personally sit there listening to hold music for hours. It's completely legitimate and doesn't violate any IRS rules. There's nothing that requires you personally to wait on hold - this service just does the waiting for you. It's similar to having an assistant dial and wait on hold, then transfer the call to you when someone answers. The IRS doesn't care who waits on hold as long as the actual taxpayer is the one who speaks with the agent.

0 coins

Aidan Hudson

•

I have to eat my words about Claimyr. After being completely skeptical, I tried it out of desperation when dealing with a similar partnership dissolution issue. Figured I had nothing to lose after spending 4+ hours on hold with the IRS over three separate attempts. The service had an IRS representative calling ME back within 45 minutes. The agent walked me through the exact reporting requirements for partnerships in administrative dissolution. Turns out I was about to make a major mistake on my return by considering the partnership dissolved too early. The agent explained that without the final K-1 showing dissolution, I needed to continue treating it as active, even with zero activity. I honestly can't believe how much time I wasted trying to get through on my own.

0 coins

Zoe Wang

•

Something to consider - have you checked the state business entity registration for your partnership? You can often look up the entity status online through the Secretary of State's website where the partnership was formed. If it shows as "active" there, that's another indication the partnership hasn't been formally dissolved yet, regardless of whether they've sold all assets. Many partnerships forget to file the formal dissolution paperwork with the state even after they've completed their final tax filings.

0 coins

Tyler Lefleur

•

That's a really good point - I just looked it up and it still shows as "active" in the state registry. So I guess that confirms what others are saying about it not being officially dissolved yet. Should I just wait for the 2024 K-1 (or lack thereof) before making any decisions about how to report this?

0 coins

Zoe Wang

•

Yes, waiting for the 2024 K-1 (or lack thereof) is the right approach. The fact it's still active in the state registry confirms they haven't completed the full dissolution process. Even if you don't receive a 2024 K-1 because there's no activity to report, you should still wait for that final K-1 marking the partnership as terminated before you consider it dissolved for tax purposes. Remember, the partnership itself has to file a final return and check the "final return" box, then issue K-1s to partners with the "final K-1" box checked. Until that happens, it's technically still active from the IRS perspective, even if it's just a shell with no assets or activities.

0 coins

Curious about whether anyone else has run into this - my syndication sponsor is charging an ongoing "administrative fee" even after selling the property, claiming it's for the costs of keeping the partnership active until final dissolution. Is this normal or are they just milking us for extra fees?

0 coins

Grace Durand

•

That sounds fishy to me. While there are legitimate costs to formally winding down a partnership (final tax return preparation, state filing fees, etc.), those should be either covered by reserves or a one-time fee. Ongoing monthly/quarterly fees after selling all assets seems excessive unless specifically outlined in your partnership agreement.

0 coins

Carmen Lopez

•

I'd definitely review your partnership agreement carefully regarding those administrative fees. Most well-structured syndications include language about wind-down costs and how they're handled - either through reserves set aside from the sale proceeds or a specific dissolution fee structure. If the agreement is vague about post-sale fees, you might want to request a detailed breakdown of what these "administrative costs" actually cover. Legitimate wind-down expenses typically include final tax return preparation, state dissolution filing fees, and maybe some legal costs to properly close the entity. But these should be finite, not ongoing monthly charges. You could also ask for a timeline of when they expect to complete the dissolution process. If they can't provide a reasonable timeline, that might indicate they're unnecessarily dragging out the process.

0 coins

TommyKapitz

•

This is great advice about reviewing the partnership agreement for fee structures. I'd also suggest documenting all communication with the sponsor about these fees - if they're charging ongoing administrative costs without clear justification in the agreement, you might have grounds to dispute them. Some sponsors do try to extend the wind-down process unnecessarily to collect additional fees, especially if partners aren't paying close attention. If multiple partners are being charged, you might consider coordinating with other limited partners to collectively request transparency on the dissolution timeline and associated costs.

0 coins

Emma Thompson

•

I went through this exact situation with a multifamily syndication that sold in 2022 but didn't officially dissolve until late 2024. Here's what I learned from my tax advisor and the IRS: The partnership remains legally active until they file Form 1065 with the "Final return" box checked AND issue final K-1s to all partners with the "Final K-1" box checked. Even though your property sold and proceeds were distributed, there are often legitimate reasons for delays - final tax adjustments, potential audit reserves, warranty claims from the sale, or simply administrative backlog. For your 2024 return, do NOT mark the partnership as terminated if you haven't received that final K-1. If you receive no K-1 for 2024, that just means no reportable activity occurred, but the partnership is still technically active. One thing that helped me was sending a written request to the sponsor asking for a specific timeline for dissolution and what administrative matters are still pending. Most reputable sponsors will provide this information, and it helped me understand the legitimate reasons for the delay in my case. The good news is that once you do receive that final K-1, any small amounts of income/loss will typically be minimal since the major asset was already sold and distributed.

0 coins

Daniel Rivera

•

This is really helpful, Emma. I'm curious about the "audit reserves" you mentioned - how common is it for syndications to hold back funds for potential audits after the sale? My sponsor mentioned something vague about "potential liabilities" but didn't give specifics. Did your sponsor explain what they were actually reserving for, and how much they typically set aside? I'm wondering if this is a legitimate reason for the delay or if they're being unnecessarily cautious with our money.

0 coins

Peyton Clarke

•

Just wanted to add another perspective here - I've been through this with two different syndications, and the timeline can vary dramatically based on the sponsor's experience and resources. One dissolved within 6 months of the sale (well-organized sponsor with dedicated back-office staff), while another took nearly 2 years because they were a smaller operation handling everything manually. Both were legitimate delays, but the communication was very different. The key thing I learned is to stay engaged and ask specific questions. Don't just accept "administrative matters" as an answer. Ask for details like: Are you waiting for final tax adjustments from the buyer? Are there ongoing warranty or environmental indemnity periods? Do you need to maintain reserves for potential claims? Most legitimate sponsors will explain the specific reasons if you push for clarity. Also worth noting - if this is your first syndication dissolution, the process always feels slower than it should. But rushing it can create tax complications later if they have to issue amended K-1s because something was missed in the wind-down process.

0 coins

LunarEclipse

•

This is really valuable insight about the variability in dissolution timelines between different sponsors. I'm dealing with what sounds like a smaller operation too, and the lack of clear communication has been frustrating. Your point about asking specific questions is spot-on - I've been too passive in accepting vague responses. One follow-up question: when you were dealing with the syndication that took 2 years, did you ever consider escalating the issue or was it just a matter of waiting it out? I'm starting to wonder if there's a point where reasonable administrative delays cross the line into negligence, especially if it's impacting our ability to properly report on our taxes. Also appreciate the reminder about not rushing the process - I hadn't thought about the potential for amended K-1s if they miss something in the wind-down. That would definitely be more of a headache than just waiting for them to do it right the first time.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today