Reporting Guidelines for Real Property Partnership Distribution to Departing Partners
I'm in uncharted territory with this partnership distribution and hoping someone can guide me. I've only handled cash distributions before, but now I've got a more complex situation. We have this rental property that was owned by 4 partners, and 2 of them decided to exit the partnership. Instead of completely severing ties with the property, they chose to continue as tenants in common rather than remaining partners with the other two individuals. So the 2 departing partners are receiving a final distribution that includes both cash and appreciated real estate. I'm trying to figure out what exactly needs to be reported on their K-1s and where this information should go on the form. Specifically, I need to know about reporting the holding period, cost basis, accumulated depreciation, etc., since all of this carries over to the departing partners. Also wondering about the mechanics in tax software - I'm using ProConnect. Does anyone know if the software will automatically link the assets from the asset schedule to the partner K-1 distribution? Or do I need to manually create entries on the K-1 and then delete them from the asset schedule? If you use ProConnect or similar software and have dealt with this type of situation, I'd really appreciate any insights! The procedure is probably similar across comparable programs. Thanks in advance for any help!
23 comments


Andre Dupont
This is a common scenario but does require careful reporting. The departing partners will receive a final K-1 that reports their share of income up to the distribution date, plus the distribution itself. For the property distribution, you'll need to report this on each departing partner's K-1 in the "Property" section of Part II, Box 19 (code A). Include a statement that details the property description, fair market value (FMV), adjusted basis, and any related liabilities. The partners' tax basis in the distributed property will carry over, as will the holding period. Make sure you're calculating the adjusted basis correctly - this includes the partner's outside basis in the partnership, reduced by any cash distributed in the same transaction. The property keeps its character (1231, capital, etc.) when distributed. As for ProConnect, you'll need to go to the partner's K-1 input, find the "Distributions" section, and there should be an option to distribute property. When you select this, it should prompt you to select from the asset list. Once completed, the software should automatically adjust the asset schedule, though I recommend double-checking this.
0 coins
Zoe Papanikolaou
•What about recapture potential? If they've been claiming depreciation on the rental, isn't there some recapture issue to consider when the property is distributed? Also, should the remaining partnership file Form 8825 differently now that ownership structure is changing?
0 coins
Andre Dupont
•The beauty of a partnership distribution of property is that there's generally no immediate recapture. The departing partners take the property with the same depreciation history, so potential recapture remains "attached" to the property and will only trigger when they ultimately sell it. The partnership itself doesn't recognize gain or loss on the distribution of property (unless cash exceeds basis). For the remaining partners, they'll continue filing Form 8825 for their rental activity, but with adjusted ownership percentages. They should show only their share of the rental activity going forward. The departing partners, now as tenants in common rather than partners, will report their rental income directly on Schedule E.
0 coins
Jamal Wilson
I went through a similar headache last year with partnership property distributions and found taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) incredibly helpful for sorting out these complex K-1 reporting requirements. The partnership distribution rules are so nuanced that even experienced preparers often miss details. I uploaded our partnership agreement and some questions about our real property distribution, and their AI analyzed everything and provided a detailed breakdown of exactly what to report where on the K-1. It saved me hours of research and gave me peace of mind that I wasn't missing anything crucial with basis calculations or depreciation carryover. What really helped was their specific guidance on statement attachments required for property distributions, which many preparers overlook. Might be worth checking out for something this complex.
0 coins
Mei Lin
•Does taxr.ai actually handle the specific ProConnect integration the OP is asking about? Or is it just providing the technical guidance that you'd still need to implement yourself? I'm curious because I've got a similar situation coming up with some clients.
0 coins
Liam Fitzgerald
•I'm skeptical about AI tools for complex tax scenarios. How does it handle the Section 751 hot asset rules that might apply here if there's substantial unrealized receivables or inventory items? These partnership distribution rules are extremely nuanced.
0 coins
Jamal Wilson
•It doesn't integrate directly with ProConnect, but it gives you the exact information you need to input correctly. It tells you which boxes to fill, what statements to attach, and the specific calculations needed - then you just follow those instructions in your software. Saved me a lot of time figuring out where everything belongs. Regarding Section 751 hot assets, it actually flagged that for review in my case. The tool prompted me to identify any inventory items or unrealized receivables that would trigger ordinary income, then calculated the potential impact. It's surprisingly thorough on technical partnership tax issues and cites the relevant code sections and regulations.
0 coins
Liam Fitzgerald
I was initially skeptical about using taxr.ai for my complex partnership distribution issues, but after trying it out, I have to admit it's genuinely impressive. I uploaded our operating agreement and asked specific questions about a property distribution scenario similar to the one described here. The analysis correctly identified that we needed to make Section 754 election considerations and provided detailed guidance on preparing the supplemental statements for the K-1s with proper basis allocation. It even flagged a potential issue with disguised sale rules I hadn't considered. What really sold me was how it explained the technical requirements in plain English while still providing citation to the relevant regulations. Saved me from having to dig through multiple technical resources.
0 coins
GalacticGuru
Have you tried getting through to the IRS's Business & Specialty Tax Line for guidance? I spent THREE DAYS trying to reach someone who understood partnership distributions of appreciated property. Each time I called, I'd wait for 2+ hours only to get disconnected or transferred to someone who couldn't help. Finally, I used Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) and got connected to an IRS agent in under 20 minutes who actually specialized in partnership taxation. They walked me through the exact K-1 reporting requirements for property distributions, including what supplemental statements to attach. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c It's ridiculous that we have to use a service just to speak with the IRS, but when you need definitive guidance on something this complex, sometimes you need to hear it directly from them.
0 coins
Amara Nnamani
•How does Claimyr work exactly? Do they just call the IRS for you? Seems like you could just keep calling yourself rather than paying someone else to do it.
0 coins
Giovanni Mancini
•This seems like an unnecessary expense. I can't imagine the IRS agent actually gave advice that would stand up against an audit. They usually just recite general rules and won't give specific guidance on complex situations. Did they actually understand the partnership distribution rules?
0 coins
GalacticGuru
•They don't just call for you - they have a system that navigates the IRS phone tree and waits on hold, then alerts you when an agent is about to come on the line. You take over from there and speak directly with the IRS yourself. Saved me literally hours of my life. The agent I spoke with was from the business specialty group and was surprisingly knowledgeable. She confirmed exactly which codes to use on the K-1, explained the required supplemental statements for property distributions, and clarified that the property's holding period carries over to the distributee partners. She even emailed me the relevant sections from their internal technical guidance.
0 coins
Giovanni Mancini
I have to admit I was completely wrong about Claimyr. After struggling for days to reach someone at the IRS who understood partnership taxation, I decided to try it despite my skepticism. Within 15 minutes, I was speaking with an IRS business tax specialist who had extensive knowledge of partnership distributions. The agent confirmed that for real property distributions, we needed to include a detailed statement with the K-1 showing the property's FMV, adjusted basis, holding period, and accumulated depreciation. She also explained that ProConnect has a specific workflow for property distributions that automatically adjusts the asset schedule when done correctly. The time saved was worth every penny, especially during tax season when my hourly rate makes waiting on hold for hours incredibly expensive. I'm now recommending it to all my colleagues dealing with complex IRS issues.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Suwaidi
For ProConnect specifically, here's what you need to do: 1) Go to the Partnership return, then the K-1 for the departing partner 2) In the K-1 Distribution section, select "Property Distribution" 3) It will prompt you to select assets from your asset list 4) Complete the distribution detail, including FMV and any liabilities assumed 5) The software will automatically adjust your asset schedule AND calculate the partner's remaining basis This should be done after all partner allocations for the year are entered. Make sure you've entered all partnership income/loss up to the distribution date. One thing ProConnect doesn't handle well is the required supplemental statements. You'll need to create these separately and attach them to the return.
0 coins
AstroAdventurer
•Thank you so much for these specific ProConnect steps! When you say it'll "calculate the partner's remaining basis," does it also properly handle the basis adjustment for the continuing partners? And does it correctly allocate the accumulated depreciation?
0 coins
Fatima Al-Suwaidi
•ProConnect handles the departing partner's basis calculations automatically when you set up the property distribution correctly. It reduces their outside basis by the appropriate amount based on the distributed property's adjusted basis. For the continuing partners, you'll need to verify the remaining partnership's basis in the property is correct after the distribution. The software should handle this, but always double-check the asset schedule after processing the distribution to make sure the remaining basis and accumulated depreciation make sense. The depreciation allocation is generally proportionate to the ownership interests in the distributed property. ProConnect carries over the depreciation history to the distributed property items, but you should verify this in the asset details after processing the distribution.
0 coins
Dylan Cooper
Don't forget about the 754 election implications here! If your partnership hasn't made a Section 754 election yet, this might be a good time to consider it, especially if the FMV of the distributed property significantly exceeds its inside basis. A 754 election would allow the remaining partners to step up their basis in the partnership assets, which could be very beneficial for future depreciation deductions. The election would be made with this year's return.
0 coins
Sofia Morales
•But doesn't a 754 election create additional complexity for years to come? You'd have to track the 743(b) adjustments separately for each remaining partner. Is it really worth it for a single property distribution?
0 coins
Dylan Cooper
•You raise a good point about the ongoing complexity. The 754 election is permanent and requires continued tracking of 743(b) adjustments, which can be administratively burdensome. It's definitely a cost-benefit analysis. If the property has significantly appreciated and the remaining partners plan to hold it for many years, the additional depreciation deductions could justify the extra work. But if the appreciation is minimal or they plan to sell soon anyway, it might not be worthwhile. Each situation is unique, so I'd run the numbers both ways before deciding.
0 coins
StarSailor
Just to add one more consideration - make sure you're documenting this transition properly beyond just the tax forms. Since the departing partners are becoming tenants in common rather than partners, you should have: 1. An amendment to the partnership agreement documenting the withdrawal 2. A deed transferring the appropriate property interests 3. A new TIC (tenants in common) agreement for all four owners This helps substantiate the tax treatment and ensures everyone understands their rights and responsibilities going forward. The K-1 reporting is important, but the legal documentation is equally crucial.
0 coins
AstroAdventurer
•That's an excellent point about documentation. We have the amended partnership agreement but hadn't considered a formal TIC agreement. Would a standard real estate attorney be able to draw this up, or should we look for someone who specializes in partnership tax issues?
0 coins
StarSailor
•A real estate attorney should be able to draft a standard TIC agreement, but given the tax implications involved, I'd recommend finding someone with experience in both real estate and partnership taxation. The agreement should clearly address decision-making authority, responsibility for expenses, rights to income, and future sale provisions. Remember that as tenants in common, the former partners will now report their share of rental income directly on Schedule E rather than receiving K-1s. This transition should be explicitly documented so there's no confusion about when the partnership reporting ends and the direct reporting begins.
0 coins
Keisha Jackson
This is a great discussion covering all the key technical aspects! Just wanted to add one practical tip from my experience with similar situations in ProConnect: Before you process the property distribution in the software, make sure to run a detailed partner capital account reconciliation report. This will show each partner's outside basis components before the distribution, which is crucial for calculating the correct basis adjustments. Also, when you're in the K-1 distribution section and selecting the property from the asset list, pay close attention to how ProConnect allocates any accumulated depreciation. I've seen cases where the software doesn't properly split the depreciation between distributed and retained portions, especially when only part of a property's ownership is being distributed. One more thing - after processing everything, generate a detailed K-1 with attachments to review exactly what statements ProConnect is creating. You may need to customize or supplement these to ensure they include all the required details about the property's characteristics, holding period, and any special allocations. The learning curve is steep with these complex distributions, but once you work through one properly, the process becomes much clearer for future cases!
0 coins