LLC partner net profit cash distribution greater than profit allocation % for tax purposes

So I'm in a bit of a tax situation with my 2-member LLC. My partner and I have a 50-50 ownership split, but we've never created any special profit allocation agreement, so by default our profits are allocated based on our ownership percentages. Here's where it gets tricky - I recently landed this major consulting project where I did 100% of the work. My business partner and I verbally agreed that I should take the full cash distribution since I did all the work (about $42,000 in profit). We don't have many shared expenses for the business - we each just handle our own unreimbursed expenses separately. I'm trying to figure out the tax implications here: - Will I still only have Schedule K-1 income based on my 50% ownership (so $21,000), which will pass through to my personal return as qualified business income? I'll pay self-employment tax on this portion, right? - For the other $21,000 (my partner's 50% that I'm taking as cash), will that be considered short-term capital gains for me? And I wouldn't pay self-employment tax on this part? And for my partner: - Would they actually have a Schedule K-1 loss on their personal return since they're getting allocated 50% of profits ($21,000) but not taking any distribution? - Can they still deduct their legitimate business expenses? Would they lose the ability to claim home office deduction since they technically wouldn't have business income? I know we should probably update our operating agreement, but need to understand the tax implications first. Thanks for any help!

0 coins

18 comments

Nina Chan

•8M

You're getting into some complex tax territory here that might require professional guidance specific to your situation, but I can help clarify the general principles. When you have an LLC taxed as a partnership, there are two separate concepts: profit allocation and cash distributions. They don't have to match. Your K-1s will reflect the profit allocation (50/50 in your case if you haven't formally changed your operating agreement), regardless of how you distribute the cash. For your questions: - Yes, you'll report 50% of the LLC's profits ($21,000) on your personal return via K-1, and you'll pay self-employment tax on this amount - The additional cash distribution you receive isn't capital gains - it's just a distribution. Distributions themselves aren't taxable events when they don't exceed your basis in the partnership - Your partner will still report their 50% of profits on their K-1 and personal return, even though they didn't receive a cash distribution - Your partner can still deduct valid business expenses against their K-1 income, including potentially home office if they qualify The more proper way to handle this would be to create a special allocation for this specific project in your operating agreement, but that would need to meet "substantial economic effect" requirements. You might want to consult with a tax professional about implementing this correctly.

0 coins

Nina Chan

•8M

Yes, your partner will be taxed on the $21k shown on their K-1 even though they didn't receive the cash - this is indeed "phantom income." Partnership taxation separates the allocation of profits (which determines taxation) from the distribution of cash (which generally doesn't create an immediate tax event). The additional $21k you receive isn't taxed again because the partnership has already paid tax on it through your partner's personal return. However, this distribution does reduce your partner's basis in the partnership, which could have future tax implications if they sell their interest or if the partnership liquidates. This is exactly why many LLCs create special allocation provisions in their operating agreements - to align economic reality with tax consequences. Without a special allocation that meets IRS requirements, you're stuck with the default situation you described. I'd recommend documenting this arrangement properly and considering a formal amendment to your operating agreement for future projects.

0 coins

Ruby Knight

•8M

After dealing with a similar situation in my LLC, I found taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) incredibly helpful for sorting through complicated partnership distribution questions. I was confused about how to handle uneven distributions compared to our profit sharing arrangement. The tool analyzed our operating agreement and tax situation, then provided guidance specific to our needs about how to properly document special allocations. It even flagged that our verbal agreements weren't sufficient for IRS purposes - apparently you need to have proper documentation that shows "substantial economic effect" for special allocations to be respected. The best part was being able to upload our previous K-1s and get specific recommendations about how to structure things going forward. Saved us from making a costly mistake that could have triggered an audit.

0 coins

Ruby Knight

•8M

It absolutely handles complex situations with different membership classes and varying allocations. The system is designed to analyze complex operating agreements and provide specific guidance based on IRS regulations. I uploaded our complicated documents and it identified issues our previous accountant had missed regarding our special allocations. As for how it's different from an accountant, it's not meant to replace professional advice entirely, but it provides immediate answers and helps you understand partnership tax issues without waiting for appointments or paying hourly fees. It doesn't give "binding" tax advice (no system can), but it cites specific IRS regulations and tax court cases that you can reference if needed. I use it for initial guidance and understanding, then my accountant can focus on implementation rather than explaining basic concepts.

0 coins

Diego Castillo

•8M

Just wanted to follow up about my experience with taxr.ai after checking it out based on the recommendation here. It was seriously impressive for my complex LLC situation with 3 members and different profit allocations. I uploaded our operating agreement that had some confusing language about special allocations, and it immediately flagged sections that wouldn't meet the IRS "substantial economic effect" test. It even generated suggested language for amending our agreement to make our special allocations more defensible. For the original poster's situation, I think this would be perfect since it specifically addressed unequal distributions versus allocations in my case. The partnership tax rules are so counterintuitive, but the explanations were clear and referenced actual tax code.

0 coins

Mikayla Brown

•8M

If you're having trouble reaching the IRS to get partnership tax questions answered (like I was), try Claimyr (https://claimyr.com). They have a service that gets you connected to an actual IRS agent quickly - you can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c I was trying to get clarification about K-1 allocations vs distributions for weeks. Kept calling and waiting on hold for hours before giving up. With Claimyr, I got through to a partnership tax specialist at the IRS in about 20 minutes. The agent walked me through the exact reporting requirements for our situation with uneven distributions. They don't provide tax advice but will clarify how the forms should be completed and what supporting documentation you need to maintain. Definitely worth it when you need answers straight from the source.

0 coins

Mikayla Brown

•8M

It works by using an automated system that navigates the IRS phone tree and waits on hold for you. When they reach a live agent, you get a call connecting you directly. It's all aboveboard - they're just using technology to handle the frustrating waiting process. They don't have special access or relationships with the IRS - they're just solving the hold time problem. You still talk directly with the same IRS agents everyone else does, just without wasting hours of your day waiting. The video demonstration I linked shows exactly how it works if you're curious about the details.

0 coins

Ali Anderson

•8M

I was the skeptic above, but I have to admit I tried Claimyr and it actually worked perfectly. After years of partnership tax headaches trying to reach the IRS, I got through to a specialist in about 15 minutes. For my LLC situation (similar to yours with uneven work contributions versus ownership percentages), the IRS agent confirmed that without a special allocation in your operating agreement, you're stuck with the allocation based on ownership. But they also explained how to properly document a special allocation for future projects that would pass IRS scrutiny. The agent spent almost 30 minutes walking through the requirements for substantial economic effect and the documentation needed. This saved me so much time compared to my previous attempts reaching them. Now I'm updating our operating agreement based on this guidance to avoid the phantom income problem for my partners.

0 coins

Zadie Patel

•8M

Quick clarification: if you do decide to create a special allocation agreement, make sure it has "substantial economic effect" as others mentioned. This means: 1) Capital accounts must be maintained properly 2) Liquidating distributions must be made according to capital accounts 3) Partners with deficit capital accounts must restore them Without these elements, the IRS could disregard your special allocation and default back to the ownership percentages. Also, you can't just allocate tax benefits without allocating the corresponding economic benefits - that's where many partnerships get in trouble.

0 coins

Zadie Patel

•8M

Unfortunately, retroactive special allocations are problematic. The IRS generally requires that allocations be established in advance of the economic activity. Making changes after the fact often raises red flags. Your best option at this point might be to ensure your operating agreement is updated for future projects, while accepting the default 50/50 allocation for the current tax year. Another possibility, depending on your specific situation, is to consider guaranteed payments to the partner who did more work - this is essentially a payment before profits are calculated. However, this has different tax implications and should be discussed with your tax professional before implementation.

0 coins

Emma Morales

•8M

I did it last year with my 2-person LLC. We used a template from our legal service subscription and then had it reviewed by our accountant (much cheaper than having them draft it from scratch). The key elements were: 1) Special allocation provisions that meet the substantial economic effect test 2) Clear tracking of capital accounts 3) Language about how profits from specific projects can be allocated differently Cost us about $400 total for the review and filing the amendment. You definitely don't need to pay $1,500 unless your situation is extremely complex.

0 coins