Partnership Property Distribution Tax Reporting - Need Guidance on K-1 Box 19 Requirements!
I'm trying to figure out the correct tax reporting for a property distribution from a partnership. One of our partners is receiving a distribution of real property from our cash basis partnership. The partner originally contributed cash which was used to purchase this property several years back. The property has been depreciated for a few years already, and the partnership has been collecting rental income on it (keeping the rent cash as its only other asset). The partner's basis is equal to the book value of the real property (specifically their share of the building). The distribution isn't exceeding their basis when looking at book value (not considering the current FMV of the property). I know that when the asset gets distributed to the partner, it will maintain the same basis and holding period in their hands as it had in the partnership. What I'm stuck on is what exactly needs to be reported in box 19 of the K-1 for this distribution. Are footnotes required? If so, what information should they include? I'm assuming we'd need to show the original purchase price, acquisition date, and accumulated depreciation - but I want to make sure I'm handling this correctly.
20 comments


Giovanni Rossi
The property distribution to a partner requires proper disclosure on the K-1. For Box 19 (Distributions), you'll need to show the adjusted basis of the property being distributed. You're correct that footnotes are required for a property distribution. The footnotes should include: - Description of the distributed property - Fair market value of the property at distribution date - Adjusted basis of the property (original cost minus accumulated depreciation) - Acquisition date (to establish holding period) - Distribution date Since the partner's basis equals the book value of the property, there shouldn't be any gain recognition. The partner will continue the same depreciation schedule going forward. The footnotes provide the necessary information for the partner to properly report their ongoing ownership of the property.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Mansour
•Thanks for explaining this. I'm in a similar situation but I think my distribution might exceed my basis. Does that change the requirements for Box 19 reporting? And in that case, would I have to recognize gain?
0 coins
Giovanni Rossi
•If the distribution exceeds your basis, then yes, that changes things. In that case, the excess would be treated as gain from the sale or exchange of a partnership interest, generally capital gain under Section 731(a)(1). For Box 19 reporting, the full fair market value would still be reported, but there would be additional disclosure needed about the gain recognition. The partnership would need to indicate the amount of the distribution that exceeds your basis and specify the character of the gain (usually capital gain, but could be ordinary income if Section 751 "hot assets" are involved).
0 coins
Dylan Evans
Hey there, I went through almost the identical situation last year with my partnership and ended up tearing my hair out trying to figure it all out. After weeks of frustration, I used taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) to analyze our partnership docs and it saved me so much time. I uploaded our previous K-1s, partnership agreement, and property records, and their system analyzed everything and gave me the exact footnote language needed for Box 19, plus clarified the basis calculation. Turns out we were doing it wrong initially for years! The tool showed us exactly what to disclose in the K-1 footnotes - the adjusted basis calculation was trickier than we thought because of some special allocations in our partnership agreement we'd forgotten about. Definitely worth checking out if you have all the documentation and just need clear guidance.
0 coins
Sofia Gomez
•Does this taxr.ai thing actually work? I've had my accountant mess up partnership distributions before and it cost me thousands in unnecessary taxes. How detailed does it get with partnership property distributions specifically?
0 coins
StormChaser
•I'm skeptical about using any AI for complex tax stuff like this. How does it handle Section 751 property or substantially appreciated inventory? Those rules are crazy complicated even for experienced CPAs.
0 coins
Dylan Evans
•It absolutely works - it's not just basic AI, it's specifically designed for tax document analysis. The system correctly identified our Section 704(c) built-in gain that needed special treatment in our distribution, which our previous accountant had missed entirely. For partnership property distributions, it gets extremely detailed - it broke down the original contribution dates, tracked depreciation by year, and even flagged that we had a Section 754 election in place from years ago that affected the basis calculation. It basically laid out exactly what needed to go in each footnote for Box 19.
0 coins
Sofia Gomez
I just wanted to follow up here after trying taxr.ai. I was honestly surprised by how well it worked for my partnership situation. I uploaded our operating agreement, prior year K-1s, and depreciation schedules, and it identified exactly what needed to be disclosed in Box 19 for our property distribution. It even caught that we had some Section 754 basis adjustments from a previous partner buyout that affected the current distribution basis. The footnote templates it provided were exactly what our accountant needed. Saved me at least $2,000 in additional accounting fees since this was going to require special research. Definitely recommend it for partnership distributions if you've got all your documentation ready to upload.
0 coins
Dmitry Petrov
I had a similar partnership distribution issue last year and spent WEEKS trying to get someone at the IRS to clarify the reporting requirements. After 23 attempted calls and hours on hold, I found Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) through a tax forum. They got me connected to an actual IRS agent in about 20 minutes! There's a video showing how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The IRS agent walked me through exactly what needed to be in Box 19 and the required footnotes for a property distribution. Turns out there's an example in Publication 541 I completely missed that applied to my situation. Getting that official guidance directly from the IRS saved us from potential issues with our return. The service is especially helpful for partnership tax questions since those seem to be the hardest to get clear guidance on through normal channels.
0 coins
Ava Williams
•Wait, how does this work? The IRS phone system is impossible to navigate. Are you saying this service somehow gets you past that nightmare phone tree and endless hold times?
0 coins
StormChaser
•Right, because the IRS is known for giving accurate information over the phone. I've been given completely wrong information by IRS agents multiple times. I'd trust a qualified tax professional over random IRS agents any day.
0 coins
Dmitry Petrov
•The service uses technology to navigate the IRS phone system for you. You basically authorize them to place the call on your behalf, and once they get through to an agent, they connect you directly. It bypasses the hold times and busy signals completely. The difference with speaking to an actual IRS agent versus just trying to interpret the publications yourself is you can ask follow-up questions specific to your situation. In my case, I needed clarification on how to handle depreciation recapture disclosure in the footnotes, which wasn't clearly covered in any of the publications I read. Having the conversation documented also provides some penalty protection if you follow their guidance.
0 coins
StormChaser
I was completely wrong about Claimyr. After my skeptical comment, I decided to try it anyway because I was desperate to resolve an issue with a partnership property distribution where we received conflicting advice from two different CPAs. The service got me through to the IRS Partnership Division in about 25 minutes (which is miraculous considering I'd tried for days on my own). The agent confirmed exactly how to handle the Box 19 reporting for our unique situation involving partially depreciated property. She even emailed me specific examples from their internal guidance. This saved our partnership from making a substantial reporting error that could have triggered an audit. For partnership tax issues specifically, being able to get direct IRS guidance quickly is invaluable. Completely changed my mind about this approach.
0 coins
Miguel Castro
Something everyone seems to be missing - you need to be careful about Section 737 here. If the partner previously contributed appreciated property to the partnership (other than the cash contribution you mentioned), receiving this distribution of different property could trigger gain recognition under 737. I'd check if this partner contributed any other property in the past 7 years. The 7-year period for Section 737 can sneak up on you if you're not tracking previous contributions carefully.
0 coins
Amara Adebayo
•Good point about Section 737, but in our case this partner only ever contributed cash to the partnership - no appreciated property. Does Section 737 still apply in a pure cash contribution situation when getting property back?
0 coins
Miguel Castro
•No, if the partner only contributed cash, you don't have to worry about Section 737. That section specifically addresses situations where a partner contributes appreciated property and then receives a distribution of different property within 7 years. Since your partner only contributed cash initially, there's no previously contributed appreciated property to trigger Section 737 gain. You're just dealing with the standard distribution rules under 731, and since the distribution isn't exceeding basis, you're in good shape - no gain recognition required.
0 coins
Zainab Ibrahim
Has anyone mentioned Form 8824? If this distribution is part of a partnership dissolution or restructuring, you might need to report it as a like-kind exchange. I had a similar situation and my CPA insisted we needed this form.
0 coins
Connor O'Neill
•Form 8824 wouldn't apply here. That's for like-kind exchanges under Section 1031. A partnership distribution of property to a partner isn't a like-kind exchange - it's governed by the partnership distribution rules under Sections 731-737. Your CPA might've been confusing this with a different transaction.
0 coins
Reina Salazar
I've been through several partnership property distributions and want to emphasize something that often gets overlooked - make sure you're also considering the impact on the remaining partners' capital accounts and basis adjustments. When property gets distributed, the partnership needs to make corresponding adjustments to all partners' capital accounts under Section 704(b). If you have a Section 754 election in place (which many partnerships forget they have), you'll also need to make basis adjustments to the partnership's remaining assets under Section 734(b). For your Box 19 reporting, beyond what Giovanni mentioned about the basic disclosures, you should also confirm whether the partnership needs to report any Section 734(b) adjustments that affect the other partners. These adjustments can be complex but are crucial for maintaining proper basis tracking going forward. Also double-check your partnership agreement for any special allocation provisions that might affect how this distribution should be treated from a book vs. tax perspective. Sometimes the agreement has specific language about property distributions that can impact the reporting requirements.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Suwaidi
•This is exactly the kind of comprehensive advice I was hoping to find! I'm new to partnership tax issues and honestly didn't even know about Section 754 elections or Section 734(b) adjustments. Quick question - how do I check if our partnership has a Section 754 election in place? Is this something that would be filed separately or would it show up on previous partnership returns? I want to make sure I'm not missing any required basis adjustments that could affect the other partners. Also, when you mention checking the partnership agreement for special allocation provisions, are there specific sections or language I should be looking for? Our agreement is pretty lengthy and I want to make sure I don't overlook anything important for this distribution. Thanks for pointing out these details - it's clear there are a lot more moving parts to partnership distributions than I initially realized!
0 coins