What's the correct Depreciation Life for a Roof on commercial property - 39 or 15 years?
I'm trying to figure out the correct depreciation schedule for a new roof we just put on our commercial strip mall. The total cost was around $87,000 and I'm trying to understand how this should be treated for tax purposes. Would the roof for a nonresidential building be depreciated on a 39 year life as a building improvement or a 15 year life as qualified improvement property? I was looking through an IRS fact sheet and noticed it mentioned that we can expense a roof for section 179 purposes, but I'm not entirely clear if that means it's classified as qualified improvement property. Unfortunately, our business can't take the section 179 deduction this year due to income limitations. From what I understand, the definition of qualified improvement property is an improvement to a building's interior. Since a roof is exterior, I'm thinking it doesn't qualify as qualified improvement property and should be depreciated over 39 years. But I wanted to double-check before filing. Any tax pros have insight on this? Much appreciated!
24 comments


Emma Taylor
The roof on your commercial property would be depreciated over 39 years, not 15 years. You're correct in your understanding - qualified improvement property (QIP) specifically refers to improvements made to the interior portion of a nonresidential building. Since a roof is part of the building's exterior structure, it doesn't meet the QIP definition. While the Section 179 expensing provision does allow for certain roof improvements to be immediately expensed rather than depreciated (which was expanded under the TCJA), this is separate from QIP classification. The fact that a roof can qualify for Section 179 doesn't automatically make it QIP for depreciation purposes. Since you mentioned your business can't utilize Section 179 due to income limitations, you're stuck with the 39-year depreciation schedule as part of the overall building structure.
0 coins
Malik Robinson
•So just to clarify - even though the roof is a major renovation and not part of the original building construction, it still doesn't qualify for the shorter 15-year period? What about bonus depreciation? Could that be an option here?
0 coins
Emma Taylor
•Even though it's a major renovation and not original construction, a roof still doesn't qualify for the 15-year treatment. The key distinction is that QIP must be interior improvements, and a roof is exterior regardless of when it was installed. Regarding bonus depreciation, unfortunately that's not an option either for the same reason. Bonus depreciation applies to qualified property, which includes QIP. Since a roof doesn't qualify as QIP, it wouldn't be eligible for bonus depreciation. You're limited to either Section 179 (which you can't use due to income limitations) or the standard 39-year depreciation.
0 coins
Isabella Silva
I had a similar situation with my dental office building last year and found a great solution through https://taxr.ai - they analyzed all my property improvement documents and helped me correctly classify everything. They identified several components of my roof project that actually could be separated and depreciated differently! The shingles were one thing, but the underlying structure, insulation, and ventilation systems were treated differently. Because of their detailed analysis, I was able to depreciate significant portions over 15 years instead of 39, and even qualify some elements for bonus depreciation. Might be worth checking them out to see if parts of your roof renovation could qualify for better treatment.
0 coins
Ravi Choudhury
•That sounds interesting - did they actually save you money compared to just having your CPA handle it? I thought cost segregation studies were usually only worth it for much bigger projects.
0 coins
CosmosCaptain
•I'm skeptical. How does this work with an IRS audit? Seems like trying to classify a roof as anything other than 39-year property would raise red flags. Did they provide any documentation to back up their approach?
0 coins
Isabella Silva
•They saved me about $18,000 in taxes the first year compared to what my CPA initially calculated. Their analysis showed which specific components could be classified differently, so it wasn't treating the entire roof as one thing. The documentation was incredibly detailed. For the audit question, they provided comprehensive documentation with references to tax court cases and IRS guidance that supported each classification. Everything was properly substantiated, not just arbitrarily assigned to shorter depreciation periods. The report was detailed enough that my CPA was completely comfortable using it.
0 coins
CosmosCaptain
Following up on my skepticism above - I actually tried https://taxr.ai for my warehouse renovations after posting that comment. I was surprised by how thorough they were. Their engineers identified several components of my "roof project" that qualified as separate systems - the HVAC units we installed, the enhanced insulation system, and the safety railings were all classified differently from the actual roofing membrane. Their report broke down each component with proper tax citations. My accountant was initially hesitant but after reviewing their documentation, he agreed with their approach. It saved us approximately $42,000 in year one through accelerated depreciation. Definitely worth checking out if you have a significant renovation like the $87k you mentioned.
0 coins
Freya Johansen
I see a lot of confusion online about depreciation, especially for commercial properties. I've been using a service called Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) that actually got me through to an IRS representative in about 15 minutes to get an official answer on a similar depreciation question. Check out how it works: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c For my situation, I had a mixed-use property with both interior and exterior improvements, and I needed clarification on how to handle the depreciation. The IRS agent I spoke with confirmed exactly how to classify each component and what documentation I'd need if audited. Saved me a ton of guesswork and potential headaches down the road.
0 coins
Omar Fawzi
•How does that service actually work? I've spent HOURS on hold with the IRS and eventually gave up. Are you saying this somehow gets you to the front of the queue?
0 coins
Chloe Wilson
•Yeah right. Nobody gets through to the IRS in 15 minutes. I've been trying for WEEKS to get someone on the phone about my amended return. Sounds like a scam to me. Did you actually reach a real IRS person or just some third-party "tax expert"?
0 coins
Freya Johansen
•The service uses a combination of technology and persistence to navigate the IRS phone system. It keeps dialing and working through the prompts until it gets a place in line, then calls you when an agent is about to be available. It's basically doing the waiting for you. I absolutely did speak with a real IRS representative, not a third-party expert. I confirmed the person's name and badge number, and they had full access to my tax records. The service just handles the frustrating part of getting through their phone system. I was equally skeptical at first, but it actually worked exactly as advertised.
0 coins
Chloe Wilson
I need to publicly eat my words here. After my skeptical comment above, I tried Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) out of desperation because I'd been trying to reach someone at the IRS for 3 weeks about my business depreciation questions. I got connected to an actual IRS representative in about 20 minutes! The agent confirmed exactly how to handle my situation with proper documentation requirements. They even noted my account so if there's any question during an audit, there's a record of the guidance I received. For what it's worth, I asked specifically about roof depreciation (since I saw this thread) and the agent confirmed it's generally 39-year property unless certain components can be separately identified. They also mentioned that solar installations on roofs follow different rules entirely.
0 coins
Diego Mendoza
Just to add my experience - we did a roof replacement on our retail building last year and our accountant classified it as 39-year property. But our situation was complicated because we also added solar panels and improved the HVAC systems during the same project. The solar panels qualified for special energy credits and had different depreciation rules entirely. Our accountant separated the project into multiple components with different tax treatments. The basic roof structure was 39 years, but several other elements had more favorable depreciation schedules.
0 coins
Anastasia Romanov
•How did you handle the solar panels specifically? Were you able to use the renewable energy credits? I'm planning something similar and trying to figure out the tax implications.
0 coins
Diego Mendoza
•The solar panels were treated completely separately from the roof for tax purposes. We received a 30% federal tax credit for the qualified solar expense portion of the project, which significantly offset the cost. For depreciation, the solar panels qualified for 5-year MACRS depreciation, which is much more favorable than the 39-year schedule for the roof itself. We were also able to take bonus depreciation on the solar portion. The key was having very clear documentation separating the costs between the different components of the overall project.
0 coins
StellarSurfer
Has anyone had experience with cost segregation studies for smaller commercial properties like this? I've heard they can reclassify certain building components into shorter depreciation periods, but wasn't sure if it's worth the expense for a single roof project.
0 coins
Sean Kelly
•We did a cost segregation study for our office building renovation (about $350k total). It cost around $8k for the study, but saved us over $40k in taxes the first year through accelerated depreciation. For a single $87k roof, you might not see enough benefit to justify the cost unless there are a lot of components that could be reclassified. Many cost segregation firms have minimum project thresholds before they'll take on the work. That said, the service mentioned above that uses engineers might be more cost-effective for a smaller project.
0 coins
StellarSurfer
•Thanks for the input. That's really helpful perspective. I'll probably wait until we do a larger renovation to look into cost segregation since it sounds like the cost/benefit wouldn't make sense for smaller projects.
0 coins
Tyler Murphy
Based on my experience as a tax professional, your assessment is correct - the roof replacement on your commercial strip mall should be depreciated over 39 years as part of the building structure, not 15 years as qualified improvement property. The key distinction is that QIP specifically applies to interior improvements to nonresidential buildings. Since a roof is an exterior structural component, it doesn't qualify regardless of whether it's new construction or a replacement. One thing to consider though - if your roof project included other components like new HVAC equipment, electrical work, or interior improvements (like updated lighting systems), those might be separable and eligible for different depreciation schedules. The actual roofing materials and structural work would still be 39-year property. Given the $87k cost, it might be worth having your tax preparer review the invoices to see if any components can be separately classified. But for the roof itself, you're looking at 39-year straight-line depreciation under MACRS. Also keep in mind that even though you can't use Section 179 this year due to income limitations, you may be able to carry forward that election to future years when your income situation improves.
0 coins
Malik Davis
•Thanks for the thorough explanation! That's really helpful. I actually hadn't considered the carryforward option for Section 179 - that's something I'll definitely discuss with my accountant. Quick question though - when you mention separating out components like HVAC or electrical work, how detailed do the invoices need to be to support different classifications? Our contractor provided a pretty general breakdown, but I'm wondering if we need more specific documentation for an audit.
0 coins
Romeo Barrett
•For audit purposes, you'll want invoices that clearly separate labor and materials for each component. A line item showing "HVAC ductwork - $8,500" or "Electrical panel upgrade - $3,200" would be much stronger than a general "roof project - $87,000" invoice. If your current invoices are too general, you might want to go back to your contractor and ask for a more detailed breakdown. Most contractors can provide this since they typically track costs by trade anyway. The IRS expects reasonable documentation that supports your classification decisions. For anything you're claiming under a shorter depreciation schedule, you'll want to be able to show it's truly a separate asset from the roof structure itself. Things like standalone HVAC units, electrical panels, or lighting systems are easier to justify than trying to separate out insulation or structural components that are integral to the roof system.
0 coins
Mateo Lopez
Great question! You're absolutely right that a roof replacement should be depreciated over 39 years, not 15. The qualified improvement property (QIP) designation specifically requires interior improvements to nonresidential buildings, and a roof is clearly exterior. However, I'd recommend looking closely at your project details. If you replaced any skylights, those might qualify for different treatment since they could be considered separate from the roof structure. Also, any insulation upgrades or ventilation improvements might be separable components with their own depreciation schedules. Since you can't use Section 179 this year due to income limitations, make sure you understand that this is an annual election. If your income situation improves in future years, you might be able to elect Section 179 for other qualifying property purchases. One more thought - if this roof replacement was due to storm damage or other casualty, there might be additional considerations for how to handle the tax treatment. But for a standard replacement, you're stuck with the 39-year schedule for the actual roofing components.
0 coins
Khalil Urso
•Thanks for bringing up the skylights point - that's something I hadn't considered! Our roof project did include replacing two large skylights that were leaking. Would those really be treated differently from the roof itself for depreciation purposes? I'm curious about the reasoning behind that since they seem pretty integrated into the overall roof system. Also, regarding the storm damage angle you mentioned - this was actually a proactive replacement rather than storm-related, but good to know that could affect the tax treatment in other situations.
0 coins