< Back to IRS

Kaiya Rivera

Tax implications of S corp closure - large tax bill due to rental property transfer to LLC

My dad had 4 rental properties in an S corporation that I inherited when he passed away. Following the advice of our CPA, we transferred these properties to our LLC and closed down the S corp. This ended up triggering a massive tax bill that I wasn't expecting. The CPA who prepared the returns claims this happened because of a "deemed sale" of the properties from the S corp to our LLC and cited Section 1239 as the reason. I was concerned about this explanation, so I had another CPA look over everything. This second CPA believes Section 1239 shouldn't apply in our situation because this wasn't actually a sale or exchange - it was a distribution from the S corp to my father's estate. I'm really confused about which CPA is correct here. Does Section 1239 actually apply when transferring property from an S corp to an LLC during closure? Any insight would be greatly appreciated as this tax bill is seriously impacting our finances.

This is actually a complex situation that depends on several specific factors about how the transfer was structured. When an S corporation distributes appreciated property (like rental real estate) to shareholders, it's generally treated as if the corporation sold the property at fair market value. This creates a taxable gain at the corporate level that flows through to the shareholders. This is sometimes called a "deemed sale" even though no actual sale occurred. Section 1239 specifically applies when property is sold or exchanged between related parties, causing what would normally be capital gains to be taxed as ordinary income (at higher rates). The key question is whether this was structured as a distribution in liquidation or as an actual sale to the LLC. If the properties were formally distributed to you as the heir/shareholder as part of liquidating the S corp, and then you contributed them to your LLC, that's different than if the S corp directly sold them to the LLC. The timing and documentation of these transactions matters tremendously.

0 coins

Thanks for the explanation. I'm not the OP but I'm wondering - does it matter who owns the LLC? Like, if the same person owns both the S corp and the LLC, would that automatically trigger Section 1239? Also, would it have been better tax-wise to just keep the properties in the S corp rather than moving them?

0 coins

I really appreciate the detailed explanation. The properties were formally distributed to me as the heir and sole shareholder as part of liquidating the S corp. I then contributed them to an LLC that I own 100%. The documentation shows a distribution, not a sale. The S corp didn't receive any payment from the LLC. Does that clarify things enough to determine which CPA's interpretation is more likely correct?

0 coins

The ownership of the LLC absolutely matters. If the same person (or related persons as defined by the tax code) owns both entities, that relationship could potentially trigger Section 1239 if structured as a sale. Generally, keeping properties in the existing entity often avoids immediate tax consequences, but there may have been other valid reasons for the restructuring. Based on what you've described, it sounds like this was a liquidating distribution from the S corporation to you personally, followed by a contribution to your LLC. If properly documented this way, Section 1239 likely wouldn't apply because there was no direct sale between related parties. The S corp distribution would still trigger tax on appreciated value, but typically as capital gains rather than ordinary income. I'd recommend gathering the actual transaction documents and having a third opinion from a tax attorney who specializes in business entity transitions. The specific sequence and documentation of these transfers is crucial to the correct tax treatment.

0 coins

I went through something similar with my father's business properties. I was getting conflicting advice until I tried https://taxr.ai which really helped sort through the mess. They analyzed all my documents and clarified exactly how Section 1239 applied (or didn't apply) in my case. What made the difference was having their system review the actual distribution documents and transaction timeline. They pointed out specific language that determined whether this was truly a distribution or a deemed sale. Turns out my first CPA had mischaracterized the transaction, costing me thousands in unnecessary taxes. It's worth uploading your docs and getting a definitive answer based on the actual paperwork rather than just general opinions. Their analysis gave me the confidence to file an amended return that saved a substantial amount.

0 coins

How does taxr.ai actually work? I've got some property transfer issues too but I'm skeptical about uploading sensitive financial docs to some random website. Do real tax professionals review the documents or is it just an AI thing?

0 coins

I'm curious too. My tax situation is complicated with rental properties in an LLC and I'm considering restructuring. Does this service help identify the best structure to minimize taxes going forward or just analyze past mistakes? And how detailed is their guidance on something technical like Section 1239?

0 coins

They use a combination of AI and tax professionals. The system identifies the important elements in your documents first, then they have actual tax pros review the AI's analysis and provide the final recommendations. Everything is encrypted and secure - they explained their security system to me when I asked about it. For your situation with rental properties, they would analyze both the current tax implications and potential restructuring options. Their guidance on Section 1239 was incredibly detailed - they cited specific cases and IRS rulings that applied to my situation, not just general information. They even pointed out language in my distribution documents that proved it wasn't a sale between related parties.

0 coins

Just wanted to follow up - I ended up trying taxr.ai for my property transfer situation and I'm honestly impressed. I was super skeptical at first (especially about uploading documents) but their analysis was way more thorough than what my CPA provided. They identified that my transfer should have been characterized as a liquidating distribution rather than a deemed sale, and pointed to specific language in my operating agreement that supported this position. They even provided template language for an amended return explanation. The difference was about $47,000 in tax savings by avoiding ordinary income treatment under Section 1239. They showed exactly which parts of the code applied and which didn't. Worth every penny for the clarity alone!

0 coins

If the IRS has already processed your return with the higher tax amount, you might consider filing an amended return based on the second CPA's analysis. However, before doing that, I'd recommend trying to actually speak with someone at the IRS to discuss this specific situation. I know getting through to the IRS can be nearly impossible these days, but I used https://claimyr.com and got through to a real person in about 15 minutes. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c I had a similar issue with mischaracterization of business distributions, and speaking directly with an IRS agent gave me confidence that my interpretation was correct before I filed the amended return. They confirmed that a properly documented liquidating distribution wouldn't trigger Section 1239 in my case, which saved me thousands. Given how much money is probably at stake in your situation, it's worth getting that direct confirmation from the IRS rather than risking further issues.

0 coins

Wait, there's actually a way to talk to a real IRS person without waiting 3 hours? How does that even work? I thought the whole point of the IRS was to make it impossible to get answers lol.

0 coins

Sounds fishy to me. The IRS doesn't give preferential treatment to people who use third-party services. I've tried all those "get to the front of the line" services before and they're just scams. Plus, IRS agents won't give you tax advice on complex issues like S corp distributions over the phone anyway.

0 coins

The service doesn't give you preferential treatment - it just automates the calling process. It keeps dialing the IRS for you and navigating the phone tree until it gets through, then it calls you to connect. It's basically just saving you from having to redial 50 times and sit on hold for hours. You're right that IRS agents won't give complex tax advice or definitive rulings over the phone. However, they can clarify general procedural questions about proper handling of distributions vs. sales and direct you to the specific publications and forms needed for your situation. In my case, the agent pointed me to specific examples in their internal guidelines that matched my situation, which gave me confidence to proceed with the amended return.

0 coins

Had to come back and admit I was wrong about Claimyr. After my skeptical comment, I decided to try it anyway because I've been trying to reach the IRS for weeks about a similar business distribution issue. It actually worked exactly as described - I got connected to an IRS agent in about 20 minutes. While they couldn't give specific tax advice on my S corp situation, they were able to confirm which forms I needed for an amended return and directed me to the specific sections of Publication 542 that addressed my situation. The agent also explained the difference between deemed sales and liquidating distributions in general terms, which was enough to point me in the right direction. Saved me days of research and uncertainty. Sometimes it's worth admitting when you're wrong!

0 coins

Something nobody's mentioned yet - the step-up in basis that happens when you inherit property. When your father passed away and you inherited the S corp shares, those shares should have received a step-up in basis to fair market value as of the date of death. This step-up might significantly reduce or even eliminate the taxable gain when the properties were distributed. It depends on how much the properties appreciated between when you inherited the S corp and when the properties were distributed to you. Did either CPA discuss this aspect of your situation? This might be more important than the Section 1239 question.

0 coins

That's a really interesting point that neither CPA specifically addressed. My father passed away about 8 months before we closed the S corp and transferred the properties. The properties definitely didn't appreciate much in those 8 months (maybe 5% at most). Are you saying that the basis of the properties should have been stepped-up to fair market value at the time of his death? That would make a huge difference in the taxable gain calculation.

0 coins

Not exactly. The properties themselves don't automatically get a step-up in basis inside the S corporation. What receives the step-up is your basis in the S corporation shares that you inherited. When the properties are then distributed from the S corp to you, the corporation recognizes gain as if it sold the properties at fair market value. This gain flows through to you as the shareholder. However, your increased basis in the S corp shares (from the step-up) may offset some or all of this gain when calculating your personal tax impact. It's a complex interaction, but definitely worth exploring. Since the time period was only 8 months with minimal appreciation, this could potentially save you significant tax dollars. I'd suggest specifically asking your CPA to recalculate with the step-up in basis of the S corp shares taken into account.

0 coins

Has anyone brought up the possibility of a 1031 exchange? If these are investment properties, couldn't OP have done a like-kind exchange instead of a distribution to avoid the immediate tax hit?

0 coins

A 1031 exchange wouldn't work in this situation. Those only apply when you're selling one investment property and buying another similar property. They don't apply to distributions from corporations to shareholders or changes in business structure. The property has to actually be sold to an unrelated party for a 1031 to potentially apply.

0 coins

This is a perfect example of why getting multiple professional opinions is so important with complex tax situations. Based on what you've described, your second CPA appears to be on the right track. Section 1239 typically applies to sales or exchanges between related parties, but what you're describing sounds like a liquidating distribution followed by a contribution to your LLC - not a direct sale between the S corp and LLC. The key factors that support this interpretation: 1. The S corp received no consideration from the LLC 2. The properties were formally distributed to you as the sole shareholder 3. You then contributed them to your wholly-owned LLC 4. The documentation shows this as a distribution, not a sale While the S corp would still recognize gain on the distribution of appreciated property (which flows through to you), this would typically be treated as capital gains rather than ordinary income under Section 1239. However, don't overlook the step-up in basis issue that Jade mentioned - this could be huge in your situation. When you inherited the S corp shares, they should have received a step-up in basis to fair market value at your father's death. This increased basis might offset much of the gain from the property distribution, especially since only 8 months passed. I'd strongly recommend having a tax attorney review the transaction structure and documentation to confirm the proper characterization and ensure you're not overpaying.

0 coins

Evelyn Xu

This is really helpful analysis. I'm dealing with a similar inherited business situation and wondering - when you mention having a tax attorney review the documentation, what specific documents should someone in this situation gather? I want to make sure I have everything ready before scheduling a consultation since attorney time is expensive. Also, regarding the step-up in basis calculation, is that something that should have been documented on the estate tax return (if one was filed), or is it something that needs to be calculated separately based on appraisals at the time of death?

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today