Tax Implications When Selling S-Corp Using F Reorganization Structure to PE Firm
Hey everyone, I've got a potential deal on the table where I can sell my small manufacturing business (S-Corp) to a private equity group. The thing is, they're specifically requesting what they call an "F Reorganization" structure for the transaction. As far as I understand, they want me to create an LLC holding company so they can treat the purchase as an asset acquisition rather than a stock purchase. This seems to have something to do with tax basis step-up benefits for them. My concern is how this might affect my capital gains taxes. I've built this business over the last 12 years, and while the offer is decent (around $3.2M), I'm worried that this F Reorganization structure might lead to higher taxes than a straight stock sale. Does anyone have experience with selling an S-Corp through an F Reorganization? How did it impact your capital gains taxes? Any insight would be super appreciated!
39 comments


Ava Hernandez
This is actually a common request from PE firms, and understanding the tax implications is crucial. An F Reorganization is essentially a "reorganization" of a corporation that results in a mere change in identity, form, or place of organization. When done properly, you're converting your S-Corp into an LLC structure without triggering immediate tax consequences. The key tax advantage for you is that this should still be treated as a stock sale for your tax purposes (resulting in capital gains treatment), while giving the buyers the tax benefits of an asset purchase (allowing them to step up the basis in the assets). Without this structure, the buyer would either need to buy your stock (good for you, bad for them tax-wise) or buy the assets (good for them, bad for you because of double taxation). The F Reorganization is attempting to give both parties their preferred tax treatment. Make sure you're working with a tax attorney who specializes in these transactions. The specific implementation details matter tremendously, and small mistakes can lead to very different tax consequences.
0 coins
Isabella Martin
•Wait, so does this mean the seller can avoid paying taxes on depreciation recapture? That seems too good to be true. And what about the step-up in basis for the buyer—doesn't the IRS consider that when determining the seller's tax liability?
0 coins
Ava Hernandez
•The seller won't avoid depreciation recapture entirely. When structured properly, the F Reorganization allows the transaction to be treated as a stock sale for the seller, which means they'll pay capital gains rates on the sale proceeds. However, any depreciation recapture is still handled according to normal tax rules. Regarding the step-up in basis, this is one of the beautiful aspects of this structure. It creates a situation where the seller gets capital gains treatment while the buyer gets a stepped-up basis in the assets. The IRS has acknowledged this structure through various rulings, so it's not a loophole but rather an intentional use of the tax code. That said, the proper execution is extremely important, as missteps can invalidate the intended tax treatment.
0 coins
Elijah Jackson
I've actually used https://taxr.ai for a similar situation when selling my small tech S-Corp last year. The PE firm also wanted an F Reorg, and I was totally confused about the tax implications. I uploaded the Letter of Intent and some other docs to taxr.ai, and their AI analyzed everything and explained the capital gains implications. It showed me that properly structuring the F Reorg would actually save me about $180k in taxes compared to a straight asset sale. The best part was that it identified a specific clause in the LOI that would have subjected more of the sale proceeds to ordinary income tax rates instead of the lower capital gains rate. My attorney was able to get that fixed before signing.
0 coins
Sophia Miller
•Interesting. How detailed was the analysis? Like did it break down exactly how much of the sale would be taxed at capital gains rates vs ordinary income? My CPA charges me $400/hr for this stuff so I'm skeptical of AI tools for complex transactions.
0 coins
Mason Davis
•I'm curious too. Did it help with the actual structuring of the F Reorg or just analyze the tax implications? I'm looking at a similar situation and my lawyer says the sequence of transactions matters a lot for tax purposes.
0 coins
Elijah Jackson
•The analysis was surprisingly detailed. It broke down the expected tax treatment of different components of the deal, including what would be considered capital gains vs ordinary income. It estimated my effective tax rate would be around 23.8% for most of the proceeds as long-term capital gains, compared to 37%+ if structured poorly. As for the structuring, it didn't create the legal documents, but it did outline the proper sequence of transactions needed for a valid F Reorganization. It explained that I needed to form the holding company first, then contribute my S-Corp shares to it in exchange for the holding company's shares, then convert the original S-Corp to an LLC, and only then complete the sale. The order apparently matters a lot for maintaining the tax benefits.
0 coins
Mason Davis
After seeing the recommendation, I decided to try https://taxr.ai for my own S-Corp sale. I was honestly blown away by how helpful it was. I was looking at a $2.8M sale with an F Reorganization structure similar to what you're describing. The tool analyzed my specific situation and showed that by making sure the transaction was structured as a §368(a)(1)(F) reorganization followed by a sale, I could save over $200K in taxes compared to a direct asset sale. It also flagged that some of my self-created goodwill would be treated as ordinary income under §1250, which nobody had mentioned to me before. My tax advisor confirmed this was correct and we adjusted our approach. Best decision I made in the whole sale process. I spent hours trying to understand the tax implications before finding this tool.
0 coins
Mia Rodriguez
When I was selling my S-Corp, contacting the IRS for clarification about F Reorganization capital gains treatment was almost impossible. I spent days on hold and couldn't get through. Then someone recommended https://claimyr.com and shared this demo video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c They basically call the IRS for you and when an agent is on the line, they connect you immediately. I had very specific questions about how the IRS would view certain aspects of our F Reorganization for a small business sale, and getting an official answer was crucial. I ended up speaking with an IRS business tax specialist who confirmed that our planned structure would maintain capital gains treatment for the sale proceeds. That confirmation alone saved me potentially thousands in taxes by giving me confidence to proceed with the structure.
0 coins
Jacob Lewis
•How does this actually work though? I thought the IRS doesn't give binding tax advice over the phone. Did they just give general information or something specific to your situation?
0 coins
Amelia Martinez
•This sounds like BS honestly. I've never heard of the IRS giving confirmation about tax treatment for complex transactions over the phone. They usually tell you to consult a tax professional or submit a request for a private letter ruling, which costs thousands and takes months.
0 coins
Mia Rodriguez
•They don't give binding tax advice, you're right about that. What I got was general information about how F Reorganizations are typically treated, which requirements must be met for the IRS to recognize it as a valid F Reorg, and confirmation about which code sections would apply. The IRS agent explained what they typically look for when reviewing these transactions and clarified some ambiguities in the guidance. It wasn't specific tax advice for my exact situation, but it gave me enough information to discuss with my tax attorney and confirm we were on the right track. I never claimed they gave me binding tax advice - just valuable clarification on how they interpret the relevant tax code sections. And yes, for the most definitive answer, a private letter ruling would be the way to go, but that wasn't practical given our timeline.
0 coins
Amelia Martinez
After being pretty skeptical about Claimyr, I decided to try it anyway because I was desperate for answers about my S-Corp sale's F Reorganization structure. Man, I have to eat my words. I got through to the IRS Business Tax line in about 45 minutes (compared to my previous 3 failed attempts where I hung up after 2+ hours on hold). The IRS agent I spoke with walked me through the general requirements for a valid F Reorganization and pointed me to specific IRS rulings that addressed situations similar to mine. While they couldn't give specific advice on my transaction, they provided enough general guidance that my tax attorney was able to structure the deal with much more confidence. The information directly influenced how we handled the sequence of transactions, potentially saving me from having the reorganization disqualified and losing capital gains treatment.
0 coins
Ethan Clark
I sold my healthcare S-Corp last year using an F Reorganization and ended up with substantially lower taxes than expected. The key is making sure you have the right sequencing of the transaction. We created a new holding company, had it elect S-Corp status, then contributed my original S-Corp shares to the holding company in exchange for its shares. Then we converted the original S-Corp to an LLC. The beautiful part is that with proper structuring, I got capital gains treatment (20% plus 3.8% NIIT) while the buyers got their desired step-up in basis. My effective tax rate on the transaction ended up around 25% instead of potentially 37%+ if it had been treated as ordinary income. One thing to watch out for: make sure any earnout or seller financing is properly structured, as those can sometimes be recharacterized as ordinary income if not done correctly.
0 coins
Noah Lee
•This is super helpful, thanks! Did you have to maintain the holding company structure for any particular length of time before selling? And did you have to get a new EIN for the LLC conversion?
0 coins
Ethan Clark
•There's no specific time requirement for how long the holding company needs to be in place before selling, but you want to avoid having it look like a transitory step with no substance. We had our structure in place for about 8 weeks before closing, which was considered adequate. Yes, you'll need a new EIN for the LLC conversion. The original S-Corp gets converted to an LLC (keeping its original EIN), but now it's a disregarded entity owned by the holding company. The holding company will have its own EIN. The sequencing matters tremendously because it needs to qualify as a "mere change in identity or form" under Section 368(a)(1)(F) to maintain the tax benefits. I'd strongly recommend working with a tax attorney who specializes in these transactions. The couple thousand in legal fees saved me hundreds of thousands in taxes.
0 coins
Mila Walker
Has anyone actually gone through an audit after doing one of these F Reorganizations for an S-Corp sale? I'm curious how aggressively the IRS reviews these structures given that they seem to give buyers tax benefits without the seller paying corresponding higher taxes.
0 coins
Logan Scott
•I went through a field audit 2 years after selling my manufacturing S-Corp through an F Reorganization. The IRS specifically looked at the reorganization and subsequent sale. They verified that we followed the proper steps and maintained the required continuity of interest and business enterprise. The audit concluded with no changes to my reported tax treatment. The agent mentioned that these structures aren't uncommon and are generally respected if done correctly. The main things they scrutinized were the timing between steps and whether there was a legitimate business purpose beyond tax benefits.
0 coins
Evelyn Kelly
Noah, I just went through something very similar with my software consulting S-Corp earlier this year. The PE firm also insisted on the F Reorganization structure, and I was initially nervous about the complexity. Here's what I learned: the F Reorg can actually be quite favorable for sellers when done correctly. You're essentially getting the best of both worlds - capital gains treatment for yourself while giving the buyer their desired asset purchase benefits. A few key points from my experience: - Make sure your tax attorney specializes in these transactions. The sequencing is critical and small mistakes can blow up the entire tax benefit. - The $3.2M sale price should qualify nicely for long-term capital gains treatment (assuming you've held the stock for over a year). - Budget for higher legal fees upfront - I spent about $15K on tax attorneys but it saved me over $250K in taxes compared to an asset sale. One thing to watch: if you have any debt forgiveness or seller financing components, make sure those are structured properly to maintain capital gains treatment. Also, any Section 1202 qualified small business stock benefits you might have should be preserved through the reorganization. The structure is legitimate and well-established - don't let the complexity scare you away from what could be significant tax savings. Just make sure you have the right professionals guiding you through it.
0 coins
Aaliyah Reed
This is exactly the kind of situation where getting proper guidance upfront can save you hundreds of thousands in taxes. I went through a similar F Reorganization when selling my consulting S-Corp to a PE firm last year. The structure worked beautifully - I ended up paying capital gains rates on the $2.1M sale instead of ordinary income rates. The key was making sure we followed the exact sequence: form holding company, contribute S-Corp shares, convert to LLC, then complete the sale. One thing I'd strongly recommend is getting a detailed tax analysis before you commit to the structure. I used a combination of specialized tax software and consultations with a tax attorney who focuses on these transactions. The upfront cost was about $12K but it saved me over $180K in taxes. Also, make sure the PE firm's purchase agreement doesn't include any provisions that could jeopardize the reorganization status. Sometimes buyers will include terms that seem minor but can actually disqualify the entire structure for tax purposes. The F Reorg is a legitimate strategy that's been blessed by the IRS through various rulings, but execution is everything. Don't try to cut corners on the legal and tax advice - it's worth every penny when you're dealing with a $3.2M transaction.
0 coins
NebulaNinja
•This is really helpful to hear from someone who's actually been through the process! I'm curious about the timeline - how long did the entire F Reorganization process take from start to finish? And did you run into any issues with the IRS questioning the business purpose of the reorganization, or was it pretty straightforward since the PE firm was driving the structure requirement? Also, when you mention the purchase agreement provisions that could jeopardize the reorganization status, could you give an example of what to watch out for? I want to make sure I'm asking the right questions when we get to the detailed negotiations. The $12K in upfront costs seems very reasonable given the tax savings you achieved. Did you work with a Big 4 firm or a boutique tax attorney? I'm trying to figure out what level of expertise I really need for this.
0 coins
Yara Campbell
•Great questions! The timeline was about 10-12 weeks from start to finish. The longest part was actually getting all the corporate documentation in order and making sure we had clean records going back several years - the IRS wants to see that this isn't just a last-minute tax dodge. Regarding business purpose, it was actually pretty straightforward because the PE firm's requirement for the structure provided clear business justification beyond just tax benefits. They needed it for their own tax planning and investor requirements, which gave us solid footing. For purchase agreement provisions to watch out for: things like contingent payments tied to future performance that could be recharacterized as compensation, or clauses that give the buyer too much control over the reorganization steps. Also watch for any "clawback" provisions that could unwind parts of the transaction if certain conditions aren't met. I worked with a boutique firm that specializes in M&A tax work rather than Big 4. Honestly, I think the specialized focus was better than a generalist at a larger firm. The partner I worked with had done dozens of these F Reorg structures and knew exactly what to look for. If you want a referral, I'd be happy to share their contact info - just let me know!
0 coins
Sophie Hernandez
This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm actually in a very similar situation with my manufacturing S-Corp - got an offer from a PE firm for $4.1M and they're also requesting the F Reorganization structure. Reading through everyone's experiences, it sounds like the tax benefits are real but the execution has to be perfect. The potential savings of $200K+ that people are mentioning definitely makes it worth the extra complexity and legal costs. A couple of follow-up questions for those who've been through this: 1. Did any of you have existing debt on your S-Corp books, and if so, how did that impact the reorganization? My company has about $800K in bank debt that I'm wondering about. 2. For the holding company formation, did you need to capitalize it with cash or other assets, or was the S-Corp stock contribution sufficient? 3. How did you handle employee stock ownership plans (if any) during the reorganization? We have a small ESOP that covers about 15% of the company. The timeline of 10-12 weeks that @Yara mentioned seems reasonable for our situation. I'm definitely going to look into getting specialized tax counsel rather than relying on my regular CPA for something this complex. Thanks to everyone who shared their real-world experiences - this is exactly the kind of practical insight you can't find in generic tax guides!
0 coins
Ellie Kim
•Great questions, Sophie! I actually had a similar debt situation when I went through my F Reorg last year. Regarding the $800K bank debt - this actually worked in our favor. The debt stays with the original S-Corp when it converts to the LLC, so it doesn't complicate the holding company structure. Just make sure your lender is aware of the reorganization and that you get any necessary consents. Most banks are fine with F Reorgs since the underlying business and guarantees typically remain the same. For the holding company capitalization, we only contributed the S-Corp stock - no additional cash was needed. The holding company was essentially a shell entity created solely to facilitate the reorganization. Your tax attorney will make sure it has sufficient substance to avoid being treated as a sham entity. I can't speak to the ESOP question since we didn't have one, but that's definitely something that will need special attention. ESOPs add complexity to any M&A transaction, and I'd imagine the F Reorg structure might require some specific steps to handle the ESOP participants properly. You'll definitely want an attorney who has experience with both F Reorgs and ESOP transactions. The specialized counsel route is absolutely the right call. My regular CPA was great for day-to-day stuff but admitted this was way outside his wheelhouse. The boutique M&A tax firm I used had seen every variation of these structures and caught several potential issues my CPA would have missed.
0 coins
Rhett Bowman
This thread has been incredibly valuable! I'm currently evaluating a similar F Reorganization structure for my S-Corp sale to a PE firm. One aspect I haven't seen discussed much is the impact on state taxes. While everyone's focused on federal capital gains treatment, some states don't recognize F Reorganizations the same way the IRS does. I'm in a state with high income taxes, so this could significantly impact my overall tax burden. Has anyone dealt with state tax complications during their F Reorg? My concern is that even if I get federal capital gains treatment, my state might treat portions of the transaction as ordinary income. Also, for those who mentioned using specialized tax attorneys - did they also handle the state tax analysis, or did you need separate state tax counsel? I want to make sure I'm not missing any state-specific issues that could undermine the federal tax benefits. The $3.2M sale amount mentioned by the original poster is similar to my situation, so understanding the full tax picture (federal + state) is crucial for making the right decision.
0 coins
Rajiv Kumar
•Great point about state taxes, Rhett! This is definitely something that can trip people up if not handled properly. I went through a similar F Reorg situation in California (high tax state), and you're absolutely right that state conformity can be an issue. California generally follows federal tax treatment for reorganizations, but some states have their own rules that might not recognize the F Reorg structure. My tax attorney handled both federal and state analysis as part of their service - they had to research my specific state's treatment of F Reorganizations and confirmed that my state would follow the federal characterization. But I know some states like New York have been more aggressive in challenging certain reorganization structures. The key is making sure your tax counsel does a comprehensive analysis of your state's specific rules. Some states might require additional filings or have different timing requirements that could affect the tax treatment. In my case, we had to file some additional state forms to ensure the reorganization was properly documented at the state level. Given that you're dealing with a substantial transaction amount, I'd definitely recommend finding an attorney who has experience with F Reorgs in your specific state. The federal savings don't help much if you get hit with unexpected state tax consequences. What state are you in? Some states are definitely more taxpayer-friendly for these structures than others.
0 coins
Connor Byrne
This has been an incredibly informative thread! I'm currently in preliminary discussions with a PE firm about selling my logistics S-Corp (valued around $2.8M), and they've also mentioned wanting an F Reorganization structure. Reading through everyone's experiences, it's clear that the tax benefits are substantial but the execution needs to be flawless. The potential savings of $180K-$250K that several people mentioned definitely justifies the complexity and additional legal costs. I'm particularly interested in the timeline aspect - it sounds like 10-12 weeks is typical, which fits well with our proposed closing schedule. The emphasis on specialized tax counsel rather than relying on a general CPA also makes sense given the stakes involved. One question I have is about the business purpose requirement. Since the PE firm is driving the F Reorg structure for their own tax benefits, does that provide sufficient business purpose to satisfy IRS scrutiny? Or do I need to document additional business reasons for the reorganization from my perspective as the seller? Also, for those who mentioned getting detailed tax analyses upfront - did this help you negotiate better terms with the PE firm? I'm wondering if understanding the exact tax implications gives sellers more leverage in the deal structure negotiations. Thanks to everyone who shared their real-world experiences. This practical insight is invaluable for navigating what seems like a complex but potentially very beneficial transaction structure.
0 coins
Kiara Greene
•Connor, great questions! I'm actually going through a similar situation right now with my own S-Corp sale. Regarding business purpose - the PE firm's requirement for the F Reorg structure absolutely provides sufficient business purpose. The IRS recognizes that buyers often have legitimate tax and structuring reasons for requesting specific transaction forms. You don't need to manufacture additional business purposes beyond what the buyer is driving. Just make sure your attorney documents this clearly in the transaction files. On the negotiation leverage point - absolutely! Understanding the exact tax implications helped me significantly in deal negotiations. When I knew that the F Reorg would save me around $200K in taxes compared to an asset sale, I was able to be more flexible on other deal terms like earnout structures and representations/warranties periods. It essentially gave me more "room" in the overall economics to accommodate the buyer's other requests. I also used the tax analysis to push back on some of the buyer's initial proposals that would have jeopardized the reorganization status. Having concrete numbers on what I'd lose if the structure didn't work made those conversations much more productive. The 10-12 week timeline should work well for you. Just make sure you start the legal work early - forming the holding company and getting all the corporate documentation in order takes longer than you'd expect. Good luck with your transaction!
0 coins
Ellie Lopez
This thread has been incredibly helpful! As someone who's currently evaluating a similar F Reorganization for my small tech S-Corp sale (around $2.9M to a PE firm), I really appreciate everyone sharing their real-world experiences. The consistent theme I'm seeing is that while the F Reorg structure can provide substantial tax savings ($180K-$250K+ mentioned by several people), the execution has to be absolutely perfect. The 10-12 week timeline and emphasis on specialized tax counsel (rather than general CPAs) seems to be the consensus best practice. A few specific takeaways that are particularly valuable: - The business purpose requirement is satisfied by the PE firm's structuring needs - State tax conformity needs to be analyzed separately and can vary significantly - Upfront legal costs of $12K-$15K are typical but can save hundreds of thousands in taxes - The sequence of transactions (holding company formation → stock contribution → S-Corp to LLC conversion → sale) is critical One question I haven't seen addressed: Has anyone dealt with installment sale treatment in combination with an F Reorg? Our deal includes a significant earnout component (about 30% of total consideration), and I'm wondering if this affects the reorganization qualification or the capital gains treatment of the deferred payments. Thanks again to everyone for sharing such detailed experiences. This kind of practical insight is exactly what you need when navigating complex M&A tax structures!
0 coins
Zoe Alexopoulos
•Ellie, great question about installment sale treatment with F Reorgs! I actually dealt with this exact situation in my S-Corp sale last year. The good news is that installment sale treatment can definitely work with F Reorganizations, but you need to be careful about how the earnout is structured. The key is making sure the deferred payments are still treated as proceeds from the stock sale rather than being recharacterized as something else (like consulting payments or non-compete compensation). In my case, we had about 25% of the purchase price as an earnout tied to EBITDA performance over 24 months. My tax attorney structured it so the earnout payments would qualify for installment treatment under Section 453, which meant I could spread the capital gains recognition over the payment periods rather than recognizing everything upfront. A few important points: - The earnout needs to be clearly tied to the business performance/value, not your personal services post-closing - Make sure the purchase agreement language doesn't accidentally characterize any deferred payments as compensation - You'll need to be careful about the installment sale election and how it interacts with the F Reorg mechanics The 30% earnout component you mentioned is definitely manageable - just make sure your tax counsel reviews the earnout terms carefully to preserve both the F Reorg benefits and installment sale treatment. The combination can be really powerful for managing your overall tax burden across multiple years.
0 coins
Hugh Intensity
This is such a valuable discussion! I'm currently going through due diligence on a potential S-Corp sale to a PE firm (manufacturing business, around $3.8M valuation), and they've also requested an F Reorganization structure. Reading through everyone's experiences here has been incredibly enlightening. The consistent message seems to be that while the tax savings can be substantial (multiple people mentioning $180K-$250K+ savings), getting the structure and timing exactly right is absolutely critical. I'm particularly struck by the emphasis on specialized tax counsel versus general CPAs. My regular CPA has been great for routine business taxes, but after reading these experiences, it's clear I need someone who specifically handles M&A tax work and F Reorganizations. The 10-12 week timeline mentioned by several people actually works well for our proposed closing schedule. And the upfront legal costs of $12K-$15K seem very reasonable given the potential tax savings involved. One question for the group: Has anyone dealt with situations where the S-Corp had significant built-in gains from asset appreciation? My manufacturing business has some real estate and equipment that has appreciated considerably since purchase, and I'm wondering if this affects the F Reorg structure or the capital gains treatment. Thanks to everyone for sharing such detailed real-world experiences - this thread has been more helpful than hours of research on generic tax websites!
0 coins
Samantha Hall
•Hugh, great question about built-in gains! I actually had a similar situation with my manufacturing S-Corp that included significant real estate appreciation. The F Reorganization structure actually handles built-in gains quite well. Since the reorganization maintains the tax attributes of the original S-Corp, any built-in gains from appreciated assets get "stepped up" for the buyer while you still get capital gains treatment on the sale proceeds. This is one of the key benefits of the F Reorg - it essentially allows both parties to get their preferred tax treatment. In my case, we had about $1.2M in appreciated real estate and equipment. The F Reorg allowed the PE firm to get a stepped-up basis in these assets (which was actually one of their main motivations for requiring this structure), while I was able to treat the entire sale as capital gains rather than having to deal with depreciation recapture at ordinary income rates. Your tax attorney will need to do a detailed analysis of the built-in gains and how they'll be treated, but generally speaking, this is exactly the type of situation where F Reorgs provide the most benefit. The appreciation in your assets actually makes the structure even more attractive from a tax perspective. Just make sure your attorney documents everything properly and follows the exact sequencing requirements. With $3.8M at stake and significant built-in gains, getting specialized counsel is definitely the right move. The potential tax savings in your situation could be even higher than the $200K+ range others have mentioned.
0 coins
Danielle Mays
This thread has been absolutely incredible - thank you to everyone who shared their real-world experiences with F Reorganizations! As someone new to this community but currently evaluating a very similar situation, the practical insights here are invaluable. I'm looking at selling my small consulting S-Corp (valued around $2.2M) to a PE firm that's also requesting an F Reorg structure. Reading through all these experiences, a few key themes are crystal clear: 1. The tax savings can be massive ($180K-$250K+ mentioned repeatedly) but execution has to be perfect 2. Specialized M&A tax counsel is absolutely essential - general CPAs aren't equipped for this complexity 3. The 10-12 week timeline seems standard and the $12K-$15K in legal costs are well worth it 4. State tax conformity analysis is crucial and often overlooked What's particularly encouraging is hearing from multiple people who've actually been through IRS audits of these structures with no issues. That gives me confidence this isn't some aggressive tax strategy but rather a well-established, IRS-recognized approach. The business purpose requirement being satisfied by the PE firm's needs is also reassuring - I was worried I'd need to manufacture additional justifications for the reorganization. One quick question: For those who mentioned getting detailed tax analyses upfront, did you find this helped with deal negotiations beyond just understanding your own tax position? I'm wondering if showing the PE firm that I understand the mutual tax benefits gives me any leverage in other aspects of the deal structure. Thanks again for such a thorough and helpful discussion!
0 coins
Adrian Connor
•Welcome to the community, Danielle! This has really been an amazing thread - so much practical wisdom from people who've actually walked this path. To answer your question about leveraging the tax analysis in negotiations: absolutely! When I went through my F Reorg sale last year, having a detailed understanding of the tax implications gave me significant negotiating power in several ways. First, it allowed me to be more flexible on the purchase price since I knew exactly how much I'd save in taxes compared to other structures. When you know the F Reorg is saving you $200K+, you can potentially accept a slightly lower headline number if needed. Second, I was able to push back intelligently on deal terms that could jeopardize the reorganization. When the PE firm proposed certain earnout structures that my tax attorney flagged as potentially problematic, I could explain specifically why those terms would cost me hundreds of thousands in additional taxes. That made them much more willing to find alternative approaches. Third, demonstrating that I understood the mutual benefits actually improved the overall relationship with the buyers. They appreciated working with someone who "got it" rather than having to explain why they needed the F Reorg structure. Your $2.2M transaction should work perfectly with this structure, and it sounds like you're asking all the right questions upfront. The fact that you're prioritizing specialized counsel shows you understand what's at stake. Best of luck with your deal!
0 coins
Malik Johnson
Welcome to the community! This thread has been incredibly helpful - I'm actually in a very similar situation with my retail S-Corp and considering an F Reorganization structure for a potential sale. What strikes me most from reading through everyone's experiences is how consistently the tax savings are mentioned in that $180K-$250K+ range, yet the upfront legal costs are relatively modest at $12K-$15K. That's an incredible ROI if executed properly. I'm particularly interested in the timeline aspects mentioned by several people. The 10-12 week process seems very manageable for most M&A transactions, and it's reassuring to hear from people who've actually been through IRS audits of these structures without issues. One thing I'm curious about - for those who worked with specialized M&A tax attorneys, how did you find the right firm? I'm realizing my regular CPA definitely isn't equipped for this level of complexity, but I want to make sure I'm working with someone who has extensive experience specifically with F Reorgs rather than just general business tax work. Also, the state tax conformity issue raised by a few people is something I hadn't considered. I'm in Texas (no state income tax), so that might actually simplify things compared to those in high-tax states like California or New York. Thanks to everyone for sharing such detailed real-world experiences - this is exactly the kind of practical insight you can't find in generic tax guides!
0 coins
Sofia Peña
•Hey Malik! Great to see another business owner navigating this complex but potentially very rewarding process. For finding the right M&A tax attorney, I'd suggest starting with referrals from other business owners who've been through similar transactions. Several people in this thread mentioned working with boutique firms that specialize in M&A tax work rather than Big 4 generalists. You might also check with your local M&A attorney or investment banker - they typically have relationships with tax specialists who focus on these structures. When interviewing potential counsel, ask specifically about their experience with F Reorganizations and request references from recent clients who've done similar deals. You want someone who's done dozens of these, not someone learning on your dime. Being in Texas is definitely an advantage! No state income tax means you won't have to worry about state conformity issues that have tripped up some folks in high-tax states. That should simplify your analysis and potentially increase your overall tax savings. The ROI on specialized legal counsel really is remarkable when you consider the potential savings. In your situation, even if legal costs run slightly higher than the $12K-$15K range others mentioned, you're still looking at potentially massive tax benefits if the structure works as intended. Have you started preliminary discussions with the potential buyer about their specific requirements for the F Reorg structure? Understanding their exact needs can help guide the legal structuring process.
0 coins
Jackson Carter
This has been an absolutely fantastic thread! As someone new to this community, I'm amazed by the depth of real-world experience being shared here. I'm currently in early discussions about selling my distribution S-Corp (valued around $2.6M) to a PE firm, and like many others here, they've mentioned wanting an F Reorganization structure. Reading through everyone's experiences has been incredibly valuable - much more so than the generic tax articles I've been finding online. The consistency in the feedback is really striking: - Tax savings in the $180K-$250K+ range seem achievable with proper execution - Specialized M&A tax counsel is absolutely critical (not general CPAs) - 10-12 week timeline is typical and manageable - Upfront legal costs of $12K-$15K provide incredible ROI - The structure is well-established and IRS-recognized when done correctly What gives me the most confidence is hearing from multiple people who've actually been audited by the IRS on these structures with successful outcomes. That tells me this isn't some aggressive tax scheme but rather a legitimate, well-recognized approach. I'm particularly grateful for the practical details shared - things like the exact sequencing of transactions, the importance of state tax analysis, and how the business purpose requirement is satisfied by the buyer's structuring needs. One question for the group: For those who mentioned the PE firms specifically requesting F Reorg structures, did you find that this gave you any indication of their sophistication and experience level? I'm wondering if buyers who proactively suggest this structure are generally more knowledgeable and easier to work with overall. Thanks to everyone for creating such an informative discussion! This community is incredibly valuable for navigating complex business transactions.
0 coins
Harold Oh
•Jackson, welcome to the community! Your question about PE firm sophistication is actually really insightful. In my experience, when PE firms proactively suggest F Reorganization structures, it definitely indicates they have sophisticated tax advisors and have done these deals before. The firms that immediately know to ask for F Reorgs tend to be more experienced with S-Corp acquisitions and understand the mutual benefits. This generally makes the entire process smoother because: - Their legal team already knows the required sequencing and documentation - They're less likely to propose deal terms that could jeopardize the reorganization - They understand why certain timing requirements matter - They typically have established relationships with tax counsel who specialize in these structures The PE firm that acquired my consulting business was exactly like this - they suggested the F Reorg on our first call and had clearly done many similar deals. The transaction went very smoothly because everyone understood the process and requirements. Contrast that with less experienced buyers who might resist the structure or not understand why certain steps are necessary. You definitely want to work with a buyer who "gets it" when you're dealing with something this complex. Your $2.6M distribution business should be perfect for this structure. The fact that they're already suggesting it is actually a really good sign about their experience level and the likelihood of a successful transaction. Just make sure you get that specialized tax counsel lined up early - the 10-12 week timeline goes by faster than you'd expect!
0 coins
Dylan Wright
This thread has been incredibly valuable! I'm currently exploring a similar F Reorganization for my manufacturing S-Corp sale (around $3.5M valuation) and the insights shared here are exactly what I needed. The consistent pattern of $180K-$250K+ tax savings with relatively modest upfront costs ($12K-$15K in specialized legal fees) makes this structure very compelling. What really gives me confidence is hearing from multiple people who've successfully navigated IRS audits of these transactions. I'm particularly interested in the timeline discussions - the 10-12 week process seems very manageable for our projected closing schedule. The emphasis on specialized M&A tax counsel versus general CPAs is also clear from everyone's experiences. One specific question: Has anyone dealt with situations where the S-Corp had significant accumulated adjustments account (AAA) balances? My company has built up substantial AAA over the years, and I'm wondering if this affects the F Reorganization mechanics or provides any additional tax benefits during the sale process. Also, for those who mentioned using the tax analysis as negotiating leverage - did you find that demonstrating your understanding of the mutual benefits helped build trust with the PE buyers throughout the broader deal process? The practical details shared here - from sequencing requirements to state tax considerations - have been far more helpful than generic tax guidance. Thanks to everyone for such thorough real-world insights!
0 coins