< Back to IRS

Lilah Brooks

S Corp owner with partner - when can we pay W2 wages from the LLC vs S Corp?

Hey tax folks, I've got a question about our business structure. My business partner and I each own our respective S Corps, and together our S Corps jointly own an LLC. I'm trying to understand when it's appropriate to pay ourselves W2 wages directly from the LLC versus from our individual S Corps. Currently, we're both taking wages from our S Corps, but it seems like there might be situations where we could pay wages from the LLC level instead. If we did this, would our S Corps need to be strictly holding companies where no actual work is being performed? And if no work is happening at the S Corp level (meaning no wages coming from there), what actually makes the S Corp... well, an S Corp? Thanks in advance for any guidance on this! Just want to make sure we're staying compliant while also being smart about our structure.

You've got a pretty common S Corp/LLC arrangement, but the wage question is important to get right to avoid IRS issues. Generally, wages should come from the entity where you're actually performing the work. If you're doing the work at the LLC level, then technically that's where the wages should come from. However, since your S Corps are the owners of the LLC, the typical structure is that the LLC distributes money to the S Corps, and then the S Corps pay you as employees. If you want to pay wages directly from the LLC, you'd essentially need the LLC to hire you directly as employees (not as owners/members). This gets tricky because the IRS might question why you're employed by both your S Corp and the LLC. For your S Corps to remain valid, they need to have economic substance and business purpose beyond just being holding companies. This typically means some actual business activity needs to happen at the S Corp level - management, strategic decisions, etc.

0 coins

Kolton Murphy

•

Wait, but if the LLC is a pass-through entity anyway, isn't the income flowing up to the S Corps regardless? Why does it matter which entity cuts the actual paycheck? Also, wouldn't this create a weird situation where you're basically your own employee twice?

0 coins

The LLC is indeed a pass-through, so the income does flow to the S Corps. That's actually why the typical structure has the S Corps paying the wages - because that's where the income ultimately lands for tax purposes. Having the LLC pay wages directly can create exactly the situation you described - potentially being considered an employee of both entities, which can complicate things unnecessarily. It can also raise questions about whether you're trying to avoid payroll taxes or other obligations by splitting employment between entities.

0 coins

Evelyn Rivera

•

I was dealing with almost the exact same setup last year and found a tool that really helped me figure out the proper structure. I was so confused about where to pay myself from and kept getting different answers from different tax people. I eventually used https://taxr.ai to analyze my operating agreements and corporate docs. They have this document analyzer that looks at your specific business structure and tax situation. I uploaded my LLC agreement, S Corp docs, and some other financial info and it gave me a really clear breakdown of how the compensation should flow through the entities. The thing I liked was that it specifically showed me how my particular structure should be handled rather than just general rules. Saved me from making a mistake that could have triggered an audit.

0 coins

Julia Hall

•

Does it just analyze docs or does it also help with the actual tax filing process? I've got a similar arrangement but with three partners and it's a nightmare every tax season.

0 coins

Arjun Patel

•

I'm a bit skeptical of these AI tax tools. How does it handle state-specific issues? My S Corp is registered in Nevada but our LLC operates in California, which creates its own complications.

0 coins

Evelyn Rivera

•

It's primarily a document and tax situation analyzer, not a full tax filing service. It helps interpret your specific scenario based on your corporate documents, operating agreements, and financial information. I still used my regular accountant for the actual filing, but having that clarity first made everything much smoother. For state-specific issues, it actually does pretty well. When I uploaded my documents, it identified that I had multi-state operations and highlighted the specific state tax considerations. It flagged my Wisconsin/Illinois situation and pointed out some nexus issues I hadn't considered. You can specifically note your Nevada/California situation when uploading your documents.

0 coins

Julia Hall

•

Just wanted to update after checking out taxr.ai based on the recommendation above. I uploaded our multi-member LLC agreement and the S Corp formation documents, and it was pretty eye-opening. For our specific situation, it showed that we were supposed to be handling compensation completely differently than we had been. The tool generated a detailed report showing the correct flow of funds and compensation based on our actual operating agreements (not just generic advice), and identified that we were at risk for "reasonable compensation" issues with the IRS. Instead of trying to have the LLC pay wages directly like we were planning, we restructured following the recommendations. Each S Corp now receives distributions from the LLC, then pays reasonable W2 wages to its respective owner based on actual services performed at the S Corp level. Completely cleared up our confusion.

0 coins

Jade Lopez

•

I had a somewhat similar setup with an operating business LLC owned by two S Corps. We kept going back and forth with our accountant about the proper way to pay ourselves, and ended up with a mess of misallocated payments and potential payroll tax issues. Tried calling the IRS for clarity but literally could not get through after DAYS of trying. Finally used https://claimyr.com to get through to an actual IRS agent who specializes in business structures. If you haven't seen how it works, there's a demo at https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c that shows the process. Basically they hold your place in the IRS phone queue so you don't have to wait on hold for hours. The agent I spoke with confirmed that in our case, wages needed to come from the S Corps, not the LLC, and explained exactly why our structure required this approach. She also helped us understand how to properly document management services performed at the S Corp level to justify the wages.

0 coins

Tony Brooks

•

How long did it take to actually reach someone at the IRS using this? And did they actually give you specific advice about your business or just generic information?

0 coins

Arjun Patel

•

This sounds too good to be true. The IRS barely answers their phones, and when they do, the agents rarely give definitive guidance on complex business structures. I find it hard to believe you got someone who actually understood S Corp/LLC arrangements well enough to give actionable advice.

0 coins

Jade Lopez

•

From the time I submitted my request on Claimyr to when I got the call back that an IRS agent was on the line was about 3 hours. Way better than the multiple days I spent trying on my own and never getting through. I was connected with someone in the business tax department who absolutely understood S Corp/LLC structures. I had my specific questions prepared and explained our exact arrangement. She gave detailed, specific guidance about our situation, not just generic advice. She even referred me to specific sections of the tax code and IRS guidance documents that addressed entity structures like ours.

0 coins

Arjun Patel

•

I need to follow up on my skeptical comment above. I decided to try Claimyr after continuing to get nowhere with the IRS on my own. I was genuinely surprised - it actually worked. Got a call back within a couple hours and spoke with an IRS representative who was knowledgeable about S Corp/LLC tiered structures. They confirmed that in most cases, the S Corps should be paying the wages, not the LLC, and explained the "reasonable compensation" requirements that apply at the S Corp level. They also pointed out that if our S Corps were truly just holding companies with no actual business purpose or activities, the IRS could potentially disregard them altogether and treat the arrangement as just an LLC - which would defeat the whole purpose of our structure. This was exactly the clarification I needed on what makes the S Corps valid entities beyond just being holding companies.

0 coins

Former tax advisor here. One thing not mentioned yet is the concept of "substance over form" that the IRS loves to apply in these situations. If your S Corps are just shells with no real business purpose other than tax avoidance, the IRS might disregard them regardless of where you're paying wages from. Each S Corp needs to have legitimate business activities, proper documentation, separate bank accounts, regular board meetings, etc. For the wage question specifically, you need to think about which entity is actually contracting with clients, performing services, and generating income. Typically in a structure like yours, the LLC is the operating company and the S Corps are providing management services to the LLC. So the S Corps pay you wages for your management work, and the LLC distributes profits to the S Corps.

0 coins

Yara Campbell

•

Does this mean each S Corp should have its own separate contracts with the LLC for management services? Or can it be more informal than that?

0 coins

Absolutely, you should have formal management services agreements between each S Corp and the LLC. These should be written contracts that clearly outline the specific management services provided, compensation terms, and responsibilities. Documentation is extremely important if you're ever questioned by the IRS. You want clear evidence that the S Corps are legitimate businesses providing actual services, not just pass-through shells. This includes maintaining separate books, holding regular meetings with minutes, maintaining proper corporate records, and having business substance beyond just tax benefits.

0 coins

Isaac Wright

•

Has anyone actually set up payroll for an LLC that's owned by S Corps? Our accountant is saying we should just stick with S Corp payroll because it's simpler, but our lawyer is suggesting LLC payroll might make more sense for us. Just wondering about practical experiences.

0 coins

Maya Diaz

•

In my experience, keeping payroll at the S Corp level is much cleaner. We tried doing LLC payroll for a while and it created a mess of complicated allocations and questions about whether we were employees of both entities. Switched back to S Corp payroll and everything's been smoother with our accountants and for tax filing.

0 coins

This is a great discussion and I'm learning a lot from everyone's experiences. I'm in a similar situation with my partner - we each have S Corps that jointly own an LLC, and we've been going back and forth on the wage structure. Based on what I'm reading here, it sounds like the key factors are: 1) where the actual work is being performed, 2) maintaining legitimate business substance at the S Corp level, and 3) proper documentation of the arrangement. For those who've restructured to pay wages from the S Corps instead of the LLC - did you find that your overall tax burden changed significantly? I'm wondering if there are any practical differences in terms of payroll taxes or other costs when wages flow through the S Corps versus directly from the LLC. Also, for the management services agreements that were mentioned - are these typically percentage-based fees or fixed amounts? Trying to figure out how to structure reasonable compensation for management services provided by our S Corps to the LLC.

0 coins

AstroAce

•

Great questions! I went through this exact restructuring last year and can share some practical insights. On the tax burden question - we actually found minimal difference in overall taxes, but the payroll tax handling was cleaner with S Corp wages. The main benefit was avoiding potential IRS scrutiny about dual employment. Our CPA said having wages come from the S Corps where we're already established employees just makes more sense from an audit perspective. For management services agreements, we went with percentage-based fees tied to LLC profits (around 15% each). Our attorney structured it so the fees are "reasonable compensation" for actual management work - strategic planning, client relationships, operational oversight, etc. We document monthly management activities to support the fees. One thing I learned: make sure your S Corp management fees don't exceed what you'd pay an outside management company. The IRS looks at comparability, so we researched what similar businesses pay for management services and structured our agreements within that range. The key is having real substance behind the arrangement - regular S Corp board meetings, documented management decisions, separate business activities. It's more paperwork but much cleaner for tax compliance.

0 coins

NebulaNomad

•

This thread has been incredibly helpful - I'm dealing with the exact same structure and have been getting conflicting advice from different professionals. One thing I wanted to add based on my recent experience: make sure you're also considering state-level implications. We're incorporated in Delaware but operate primarily in Texas, and the state tax treatment of our S Corp/LLC arrangement is different than the federal treatment. Texas doesn't recognize S Corp elections, so we had to structure things differently at the state level. Also, regarding the reasonable compensation discussion - we found that documenting actual hours spent on management activities was crucial. Our CPA recommended keeping detailed logs of strategic meetings, client relationship management, operational decisions, etc. It sounds like overkill, but if the IRS ever questions whether your S Corp is providing legitimate management services worth the compensation, having contemporaneous records of actual work performed makes all the difference. For anyone considering this structure, I'd strongly recommend getting both legal and tax advice before implementing. The setup costs are worth it to avoid potential compliance issues down the road.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of detail I was hoping to find! The state-level complications you mentioned are something I hadn't fully considered. We're looking at a similar multi-state situation with our S Corps in Wyoming and LLC operations in Colorado and Utah. The documentation point about keeping detailed logs of management activities is really valuable too. I've been pretty informal about tracking the strategic work we do for the LLC, but it sounds like having contemporaneous records could be critical if we're ever audited. Do you use any specific software or system for tracking these management activities, or is it just manual logs? Also curious about your Delaware/Texas situation - did you end up needing separate state-level operating agreements or entity structures to handle the different tax treatments? I'm wondering if we'll need to do something similar with our multi-state setup.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today