S-Corp Election Revocation not processed - now what?
I've hit a roadblock with a business client and need some guidance. They sent a letter to the IRS back in June 2023 requesting to revoke their S-Corp election, with the intention of it being effective January 1, 2023. I realize this missed the deadline for making it effective for the 2023 tax year. The IRS finally responded last week (talk about slow turnaround!) and basically just said "the revocation must be filed in a timely manner." That's literally all they said - no other helpful details or next steps. Here's my dilemma - since my client didn't even receive this response until after the 2024 deadline has passed, what does this mean for their status? If we file the revocation today, will they be considered an S-Corp up until today's date? The big issue is they haven't been on payroll or operating as an S-Corp at all during this time, thinking their original request would be processed. I've been researching this situation but can't find much guidance for this specific scenario. Has anyone dealt with something similar or know what the proper next steps would be? I'm worried about the tax implications if they're technically still an S-Corp despite not operating as one.
19 comments

Sasha Ivanov
You're in a tricky situation but there are some options. When the IRS says "filed in a timely manner," they're referring to the rule that S-Corp revocations need to be filed within the first 2 months and 15 days of the tax year they're meant to be effective for. Since that deadline was missed for both 2023 and 2024, you're looking at a few paths forward. The most straightforward approach would be to file the revocation now, which would make it effective for 2025 (the next tax year). However, since your client hasn't been operating as an S-Corp, you might want to consider requesting a late revocation under reasonable cause. The IRS can grant relief in certain circumstances when there's a reasonable explanation for the delay. You'll need to submit a detailed letter explaining why the initial revocation wasn't properly processed and request retroactive application of the revocation. Include documentation of the original June 2023 submission and the recent IRS response.
0 coins
Miguel Hernández
AuthorThanks for this insight! For the reasonable cause request, would it help to include documentation showing they haven't been taking S-Corp distributions or salary during this period? And do you know roughly how long these reasonable cause requests typically take to process?
0 coins
Sasha Ivanov
Yes, definitely include documentation showing they haven't been operating as an S-Corp - no officer salary, no distributions, etc. This helps establish that they were genuinely operating under the belief that their revocation was in effect. These reasonable cause requests usually take 2-3 months to process, but IRS timelines have been unpredictable since the pandemic. I'd recommend filing current year returns as if the S-Corp is still active while waiting for the determination, then amending if necessary once you receive approval.
0 coins
Liam Murphy
I went through something similar with one of my clients and using taxr.ai really helped cut through the confusion. We had submitted revocation paperwork multiple times with no clear response, and I was pulling my hair out trying to figure out what to do. I uploaded all our correspondence with the IRS to https://taxr.ai and it analyzed everything, pointed out that we needed to be more specific about reasonable cause in our request, and even suggested the exact language to use based on previous successful cases. They have a feature that helped draft a proper request letter that covered all the bases. Within 8 weeks, we got confirmation that the revocation was accepted retroactively!
0 coins
Amara Okafor
Did it actually help with the retroactive application? I'm skeptical about tools like this actually knowing the nuances of these complex situations. What specific advice did it offer that wasn't just generic template stuff?
0 coins
CaptainAwesome
I'm curious how much documentation you needed to upload. My situation is similar but spans multiple years of correspondence and I'm worried about the time it would take to organize everything.
0 coins
Liam Murphy
The tool really did help with the retroactive application. It specifically identified relevant IRS revenue procedures (Rev. Proc. 2013-30) that provide relief for late S-Corp revocations and highlighted the specific criteria we needed to address. It wasn't generic at all - it analyzed our specific timeline and circumstances and cited relevant precedent cases. For the documentation question, you don't need to be perfectly organized. I uploaded about 12 documents including our original revocation letter, IRS responses, and business operating documents. The system is actually designed to make sense of messy documentation - that's its strength. It took about 30 minutes to upload everything and get comprehensive analysis back.
0 coins
CaptainAwesome
Just wanted to report back that I tried taxr.ai after seeing the recommendation here. I was really impressed with how it broke down my S-Corp revocation issue! I uploaded our original revocation letter, the IRS's vague response, and some operational docs showing we hadn't been functioning as an S-Corp. The analysis pointed out that our original letter missed some specific language requirements for revocation requests, which probably contributed to the IRS's unhelpful response. It generated a new request letter with proper citations to the tax code and clear reasonable cause arguments. Just got confirmation yesterday that our retroactive revocation was approved back to 1/1/2023! Saved us from having to file amended returns for two years.
0 coins
Yuki Tanaka
If you're still struggling to get a clear answer from the IRS on this S-Corp revocation issue, you might want to try Claimyr. I was stuck in a similar situation last year where I couldn't get any useful information from the IRS website or notices. I used https://claimyr.com to get on the phone with an actual IRS representative within about 15 minutes, instead of the usual 2+ hour wait. They have this special system that navigates the IRS phone tree and holds your place in line, then calls you when an agent is about to pick up. You can see how it works in their demo video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c In my case, the IRS agent was able to look at the history of our revocation submission and explain exactly what we needed to do to have it properly processed with a retroactive effective date. Written notices never gave us this level of clarity.
0 coins
Esmeralda Gómez
How does this actually work? I'm confused about how a third-party service can somehow magically get through to the IRS faster than if I called myself.
0 coins
Klaus Schmidt
Yeah right. If it were that easy to get through to the IRS, everyone would be doing it. I've spent literally days of my life on hold with them and never once gotten through in 15 minutes. Sounds like a scam to me.
0 coins
Yuki Tanaka
It works by using an automated system that dials the IRS and navigates the phone menu for you, then holds your place in the queue. They use technology that maintains your position in line without requiring you to stay on the phone. When their system detects that an agent is about to answer, it calls you and connects you directly. It's not "magical" - it's just clever automation of a tedious process. I was skeptical too, but it's completely legitimate. They don't claim to skip the line - you still have the same wait time as everyone else, but the difference is you don't have to be the one actively sitting on hold. They just hold your place and call you when it's your turn. I've used it three times now for different issues, and while the wait times vary, the system works exactly as advertised.
0 coins
Klaus Schmidt
I need to eat my words and apologize to Profile 12. After my skeptical comment, I was so frustrated with my S-Corp revocation situation that I decided to try Claimyr anyway. I honestly expected it to be a waste of money, but I was desperate. The service actually worked exactly as described. I entered my number, they called me back in about 2 hours (long wait, but I was able to work on other things instead of being stuck on hold), and connected me directly to an IRS agent. The agent was able to see that my revocation letter had been received but was sitting in a processing backlog. She flagged it for priority processing and gave me specific information about what I needed to submit to request retroactive application under reasonable cause. Just got confirmation yesterday that my revocation was approved effective the date we originally requested. Would have been lost without getting that direct guidance from an actual IRS person. Sorry for being so negative before!
0 coins
Aisha Patel
The key issue here is the "reasonable cause" doctrine. I've dealt with several of these cases successfully. The IRS will often grant retroactive relief for late S-Corp revocations if you can demonstrate reasonable cause for the delay. You need to submit Form 1120 (C-Corp return) for the years in question, along with a detailed letter explaining that: 1. The business attempted to revoke S status in a timely manner 2. They reasonably believed the revocation was effective 3. They operated consistently with that belief 4. The IRS's delayed/vague response prevented proper compliance Attach documentation showing they operated as a C-Corp, not an S-Corp (no reasonable compensation to shareholders, no Schedule K-1 distributions, etc).
0 coins
Miguel Hernández
AuthorThis is really helpful, thank you! Would you recommend we file the Form 1120 now for 2023, or wait until we hear back from the IRS on the reasonable cause request? I'm concerned about potentially filing conflicting returns.
0 coins
Aisha Patel
I would file the Form 1120 along with your reasonable cause letter simultaneously. The filing of the C-Corp return itself serves as evidence that you're operating under the belief that the S election was properly revoked. It creates a consistent narrative. If the IRS ultimately rejects your reasonable cause argument, you can always amend and file Form 1120S later. But if you file an 1120S now while arguing for a retroactive revocation, it creates an inconsistency in your position. The IRS looks for consistent behavior that matches your stated intent.
0 coins
LilMama23
Has anyone considered requesting a private letter ruling (PLR) for this situation? It costs a few thousand dollars in user fees, but it gives you a binding decision from the IRS that provides certainty.
0 coins
Dmitri Volkov
PLRs are expensive and take forever - we're talking 6+ months in many cases. Not worth it for most small businesses when there are more practical approaches like the reasonable cause request others mentioned.
0 coins
Oliver Brown
I've been following this thread and wanted to add another perspective based on my experience with similar situations. One thing that hasn't been mentioned yet is the importance of documenting the original mailing method for your June 2023 revocation request. If you used certified mail or have any delivery confirmation, that can strengthen your reasonable cause argument significantly. Also, consider requesting your IRS transcript to see exactly what they have on file regarding your original submission. Sometimes there are processing notes or codes that can give you insight into why the initial request stalled. You can get transcripts online through the IRS website or by calling their automated line. The fact that your client hasn't taken any S-Corp distributions or salary during this period actually works in your favor - it shows consistent behavior with their intent to revoke. Make sure to emphasize this in your reasonable cause letter along with any business decisions they made based on believing the revocation was effective.
0 coins