Can I Re-Elect S Corp Status for LLC Before 5-Year Waiting Period Ends?
Hey everybody! So I've got a bit of a tax situation I'm hoping someone can help with. I started a small business as an LLC about 4 years ago and initially elected S Corp status for tax purposes. At the time, it was just a hobby business bringing in around $22k annually alongside my primary income from a corporate job that paid pretty well. Since the side business wasn't generating much revenue, I decided to revoke the S Corp election approximately 2 years ago as it didn't seem worth the extra paperwork and accounting costs. Well, life took a turn and I recently quit my corporate position to focus on growing my business full-time. Now that it's my primary income source, I wanted to go back to being taxed as an S Corp for the tax advantages. I filed Form 2553 again but just received a rejection letter stating I can't re-elect S Corp status because I'm still within the 5-year waiting period after voluntarily terminating my previous S election. I'm really concerned I've boxed myself into a corner here. What options do I have now? Should I consult with a professional tax advisor or attorney? Is there any exception or waiver process for the 5-year rule? I feel like I made decisions based on internet research that might not have been the best move in retrospect. Any guidance would be incredibly appreciated!
20 comments


Lindsey Fry
The 5-year waiting period after voluntarily revoking S corporation status is pretty strict, unfortunately. It's in Section 1362(g) of the Internal Revenue Code, and the IRS rarely grants exceptions. However, you do have a few options to consider: You could request a private letter ruling from the IRS stating that your original revocation was inadvertent or not properly informed. These requests are handled through the IRS's Private Letter Ruling program, but they cost money (filing fee is several thousand dollars) and take time. Another option is to form a new LLC and elect S corp status for the new entity. This would require transferring your business assets and operations to the new company, which has its own tax implications but might be cleaner than waiting. Or you could continue operating as a single-member LLC (taxed as a sole proprietorship) or partnership (if you have co-owners) and use other tax strategies to minimize self-employment taxes, like maximizing retirement contributions.
0 coins
Saleem Vaziri
•If they form a new LLC, wouldn't the IRS consider that as trying to bypass the 5-year waiting period? I thought they had rules against that sort of thing... like some kind of substance-over-form doctrine? Also, would the private letter ruling really work if they voluntarily revoked it? I thought "inadvertent" usually applies to paperwork mistakes, not changing your mind.
0 coins
Lindsey Fry
•You're right to be cautious about forming a new entity. The IRS could potentially challenge this arrangement under step-transaction or substance-over-form doctrines if the sole purpose appears to be circumventing the 5-year rule. That said, if there are legitimate business reasons for creating a new entity (different business model, adding partners, significant changes in operations), the argument becomes stronger. Regarding private letter rulings, while they typically address inadvertent terminations due to paperwork errors, they sometimes cover situations where taxpayers made decisions without fully understanding the consequences. The key is demonstrating that you lacked proper guidance or information when making the original revocation. Success isn't guaranteed, but I've seen cases where reasonable cause arguments have worked.
0 coins
Kayla Morgan
I actually went through something similar last year. After trying to navigate everything myself, I finally used https://taxr.ai to analyze my LLC and tax election documents. It was super helpful because it showed me exactly where my previous CPA had messed up my S-Corp termination paperwork. Turns out my situation was different from yours because my termination wasn't properly documented, but the system analyzed all my filings and showed me options I didn't know existed. The AI identified that I could argue my termination was invalid because of some procedural errors in how it was filed. I'd definitely recommend running your specific documents through their system because the 5-year rule has some nuances depending on exactly how your revocation was processed and documented.
0 coins
James Maki
•Wait, how does an AI tool actually help with a legal tax situation like this? Does it just read your documents or does it actually provide legitimate tax advice? Because tax laws are super complicated and I'm skeptical about relying on automation for something this important.
0 coins
Jasmine Hancock
•I'm curious too - did you still need to consult with a CPA after using the tool, or were you able to handle everything yourself? My situation is probably less complicated than the original poster's but I'm always worried about messing something up with the IRS.
0 coins
Kayla Morgan
•The tool doesn't replace professional advice - it analyzes your specific tax documents and highlights issues or potential opportunities based on actual IRS regulations. It found language in my termination documents that didn't align with IRS requirements, which gave me leverage when addressing the issue. After getting the analysis, I did consult with a tax professional, but I was much more informed going in. I knew exactly what questions to ask and could focus our time on solutions rather than spending hours (and money) having them review everything from scratch. The report gave me specific tax code sections and precedent cases that applied to my situation.
0 coins
Jasmine Hancock
I just wanted to follow up on my experience with https://taxr.ai since I decided to try it after seeing the recommendation here. I was skeptical at first, but it actually helped me identify a similar issue with my S-Corp election timing. I uploaded my previous tax filings, Articles of Organization, and the rejection letter from the IRS. The analysis showed that my initial S-Corp revocation might qualify for relief under Revenue Procedure 2013-30 because I didn't receive proper notification of the consequences. The report pointed me to specific sections of the tax code and gave me a template for requesting reconsideration from the IRS. My situation wasn't identical to the original poster's, but it gave me a clear path forward that I wouldn't have found on my own.
0 coins
Cole Roush
Have you tried calling the IRS directly? I spent WEEKS trying to get through to someone about my S-Corp issue last year. It was impossible - either busy signals or being on hold for 3+ hours only to get disconnected. Super frustrating! Then I found this service called https://claimyr.com that basically waits on hold with the IRS for you. I was skeptical, but they got me connected to an actual IRS agent within a day. You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c When I finally spoke with the IRS agent, they explained that there's actually a formal process to request a waiver of the 5-year rule in certain hardship situations. The agent walked me through the exact documentation I needed to submit. Not saying you'll get the same answer, but actually talking to someone was WAY more helpful than guessing or reading conflicting info online.
0 coins
Scarlett Forster
•How does this even work? Like, do they just call and wait on hold for you and then call you when they get through? Seems too good to be true honestly.
0 coins
Arnav Bengali
•I dunno man, sounds like a scam to me. Why would the IRS answer their call faster than yours? Plus I bet they charge a fortune and you still have to wait days or weeks. The IRS is basically unreachable no matter what tricks you try.
0 coins
Cole Roush
•They use a system that automatically waits on hold with the IRS, and when an agent picks up, they call you and connect you directly to that agent. It's basically like having someone else sit on hold for you. You get a text when they're about to connect you, so you can be ready. They don't get through any faster than you would - they're just taking over the painful waiting part. For me, it took about 4 hours of hold time, but I wasn't stuck listening to that awful hold music. I just went about my day until I got the text that they were connecting me.
0 coins
Arnav Bengali
Just wanted to follow up on my skeptical comment about Claimyr. I actually broke down and tried the service after another failed attempt to reach the IRS myself (3 hours on hold before I had to leave for a meeting). Color me surprised - it actually worked exactly as advertised. I got a text about 3 hours after signing up saying they were about to connect me with an IRS representative. When I picked up, I was immediately talking to an actual person at the IRS who helped clarify my options regarding the 5-year rule. The agent explained that while the 5-year rule is generally strict, there's a process to request an exception through a private letter ruling if there were substantial changes in your business circumstances. In my case, transitioning from side-gig to full-time business might qualify. They pointed me to the exact forms and procedures. Definitely worth the service after wasting so many hours trying to get through myself.
0 coins
Sayid Hassan
Have you considered operating as a C corp instead? If you're making substantially more money now as a full-time business, the C corp option might actually be better from a tax perspective, especially with the flat 21% corporate tax rate. You could pay yourself a reasonable salary (subject to employment taxes) and potentially take additional money as dividends (subject to the lower qualified dividend tax rate). Plus you can more easily retain earnings in the business for growth. Just throwing it out there as another option to consider while you're waiting out the 5-year period!
0 coins
Leo Simmons
•I hadn't seriously considered a C corp. Wouldn't that create issues with double taxation though? I was under the impression S corps were generally better for small businesses because profits pass through directly to personal taxes. Would the benefits really outweigh that downside for someone grossing around $90k annually?
0 coins
Sayid Hassan
•You're right that C corps face potential double taxation, but it's more nuanced than most people realize. At your income level of $90k, you could take a reasonable salary of say $60-70k, which would be subject to employment taxes just like in an S corp scenario. The remaining $20-30k could either be retained in the business for future growth (avoiding immediate personal taxation) or taken as dividends which are taxed at the qualified dividend rate (generally lower than ordinary income rates). Depending on your specific situation and future growth plans, this structure could actually be advantageous.
0 coins
Rachel Tao
Don't overlook state tax implications in whatever you decide! Some states don't recognize S corps the same way the federal government does, and others have additional fees or taxes for different entity types. California, for example, has an $800 minimum franchise tax for LLCs and S-Corps alike. If you tell us what state you're in, you might get more specific advice. The 5-year waiting period is definitely a federal rule, but your best alternative structure might depend partly on state considerations.
0 coins
Derek Olson
•This is such a good point! I operate in Washington state and was hit with unexpected taxes after my entity change because I didn't consider state-specific implications. Each state has its own quirks with how they treat different business entities.
0 coins
Ethan Clark
This is a tough situation, but you're not completely out of options. The 5-year waiting period is indeed strict, but I've seen a few successful approaches: First, definitely document everything about your business transition from side-gig to full-time. The IRS sometimes considers substantial changes in business circumstances when evaluating private letter ruling requests. Your shift from $22k hobby income to $90k primary income could be compelling evidence. Second, consider whether your original revocation was truly "voluntary" or if you were acting on incomplete information. If you can demonstrate that you didn't fully understand the consequences or didn't receive proper professional guidance, you might have grounds for relief under Revenue Procedure 2013-30. Third, look into whether forming a new entity makes sense for legitimate business reasons beyond just tax elections. If you're adding partners, significantly changing your business model, or expanding into new markets, a new LLC might be defensible. Finally, don't forget about interim tax strategies while you work through this. You can still maximize retirement contributions, consider a solo 401(k), and potentially hire family members to shift some income and reduce self-employment taxes. I'd strongly recommend getting a consultation with a tax attorney or CPA who specializes in entity elections before making any major moves. This situation is complex enough that professional guidance is worth the investment.
0 coins
Omar Farouk
•This is really comprehensive advice! I'm curious about the solo 401(k) option you mentioned - how does that work for LLC owners? I thought retirement contributions were limited when you're self-employed. Also, regarding hiring family members, are there specific rules about how much you can pay them and what kind of work they need to actually do? I don't want to create any red flags with the IRS while I'm already dealing with this S-corp election issue.
0 coins