Can I Re-elect for S Corp Status Before 5 Year Waiting Period Ends?
Hey everyone! I need some tax advice on S Corporation elections. I started a home renovation business back in 2021 as an LLC but immediately elected S Corp status. The business was just part-time then, making around $40k annually while I had a full-time engineering job paying $115k. After running the numbers, I realized the S Corp election wasn't saving me anything with the minimal side income, so I revoked it in 2023. Now I've quit my corporate job to focus on my renovation business full-time, and projecting $180k this year. I submitted Form 2553 to elect S Corp status again, but just got rejected because I'm within the 5-year waiting period after revocation. The IRS letter basically said "nope, too soon." What are my options now? Did I completely screw myself with the earlier revocation? Can I appeal this somehow? Should I hire a tax professional to help navigate this mess? I've been relying on random internet advice which clearly hasn't worked out well! Any guidance would be super appreciated - especially if anyone's been through something similar!
23 comments


Samantha Howard
The IRS is pretty strict about that 5-year waiting period after voluntarily revoking an S election. It's in IRC Section 1362(g), and there are very few exceptions. Your primary option would be to request a private letter ruling (PLR) from the IRS arguing that your original revocation was inadvertent or not for a tax avoidance purpose. This requires demonstrating that you had a legitimate business purpose for the revocation and that the current re-election isn't primarily for tax benefits. Getting a PLR isn't simple though - it requires a formal submission process and comes with a user fee (several thousand dollars). The success rate varies depending on your specific circumstances. In the meantime, you're stuck operating as either a regular LLC (with pass-through taxation) or as a C Corporation if you previously converted to corporation status.
0 coins
Megan D'Acosta
•Would it make sense to maybe form a completely new LLC entity instead? Could they start fresh with a new EIN and elect S corp status for that one?
0 coins
Samantha Howard
•That's a good question. The IRS looks at the "substance over form" principle when evaluating new entities. If the new LLC is essentially the same business with the same ownership, they could potentially treat it as a continuation of the old entity and deny the S election. Some taxpayers have succeeded with this approach, but it comes with risks. If the IRS determines the new entity was created primarily to circumvent the 5-year rule, they might disallow the election retroactively, potentially creating tax issues down the road.
0 coins
Sarah Ali
I was in a really similar situation last year with my construction business. After going back and forth with the IRS for months, I tried taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) and it was seriously helpful. They analyzed my situation, reviewed my previous filings, and gave me a detailed report on my options. Their system found a specific provision I qualified for that my previous accountant had missed completely. They also provided templates for the letter ruling request that saved me tons of time. Basically offered expert-level guidance without the crazy hourly rate most tax attorneys charge.
0 coins
Ryan Vasquez
•How long did it take them to give you their analysis? I'm on a bit of a timeline with my quarterly filings coming up.
0 coins
Avery Saint
•Are they actual CPAs? I'm concerned about getting advice from anyone who isn't properly licensed to provide tax guidance, especially for something this technical.
0 coins
Sarah Ali
•The analysis took about 48 hours for my case, but they said complex situations might take a bit longer. Still way faster than scheduling with a traditional CPA. They have tax attorneys and CPAs on staff that review everything, but they use technology to do the initial analysis. That's how they're able to process things faster and cheaper than traditional firms. All their recommendations are reviewed by licensed professionals before they're sent out.
0 coins
Ryan Vasquez
Just wanted to follow up - I decided to try taxr.ai after seeing this thread and I'm blown away. They identified a specific exception to the 5-year rule that might apply in my case (Rev. Proc. 2019-3) and provided detailed guidance on how to structure my request. They also found a couple issues with my original revocation filing that could actually work in my favor now. The documentation they provided made it clear exactly what steps I need to take. Definitely saved me hours of research and probably thousands in professional fees. Worth checking out if you're dealing with S corp election issues!
0 coins
Taylor Chen
If you're still dealing with this S corp issue, just know the IRS phone system is an absolute nightmare right now. Spent 4+ hours on hold last week trying to talk to someone about a similar election issue and eventually got disconnected. I finally got through using Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) - they have this service that basically waits on hold with the IRS for you and then calls you when an agent picks up. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c Got connected to an actual IRS business entity specialist who was able to explain my options. Turns out the rejection letter doesn't tell the full story and there are appeal options for specific situations.
0 coins
Benjamin Kim
•How much did this Claimyr thing cost? Seems like it could be worth it because I've been avoiding calling the IRS.
0 coins
Keith Davidson
•This sounds sketchy. How does it even work? I can't imagine the IRS is cool with some third-party service manipulating their phone system.
0 coins
Taylor Chen
•They have different options depending on which IRS department you need to reach. For business tax issues it was actually very reasonable - less than what I bill for an hour of my own time, and it saved me literally half a day of waiting on hold. It's completely legitimate - they don't "hack" anything. They just use automated technology to stay on hold, and when a real agent answers, they conference you in. The IRS doesn't even know you used the service. You're still the one talking directly to the IRS agent. I was skeptical too but after wasting an entire afternoon on hold, it was absolutely worth it.
0 coins
Keith Davidson
Just wanted to update - I tried Claimyr after posting my skeptical comment, and I'm actually impressed. Got connected to the IRS Business Entity department in about 45 minutes (they handled the waiting, I just got the call when an agent was on the line). The agent walked me through the "reasonable cause" exception for the 5-year rule. Apparently if you can demonstrate that your original revocation was based on misinformation or a significant change in business circumstances, you can request an exception. They're sending me the proper forms now. Honestly didn't think it would work but I'm glad I tried it.
0 coins
Ezra Bates
Have you considered operating as a C corp in the meantime? Might not be ideal, but with the current 21% corporate rate, it's not terrible for some businesses if you can leave profits in the company. If your business needs most of the profit for personal income though, double taxation makes it less appealing. Just something to consider while you explore options for getting your S election back.
0 coins
Benjamin Kim
•I hadn't actually considered that option. How complicated would it be to switch from LLC to C corp? And then eventually to S corp once my waiting period is up?
0 coins
Ezra Bates
•The transition from LLC to C corp is relatively straightforward. You'd file Form 8832 to elect to be treated as a corporation for tax purposes. Your state may have additional requirements for converting an LLC to a corporation. Once the 5-year waiting period is up, you can file Form 2553 again to elect S corporation status. The main considerations during the C corp period would be managing your salary vs. corporate profits to optimize tax treatment. You'd want to avoid accumulating too much cash in the corporation to prevent accumulated earnings tax issues.
0 coins
Ana Erdoğan
Has anyone heard about requesting a letter ruling with "inadvertent termination" as the basis? My accountant mentioned it might be possible if the original revocation was based on misunderstanding the consequences.
0 coins
Sophia Carson
•That's actually a viable approach. The key is demonstrating that your revocation was based on faulty information or misconceptions about how S corp status would affect your tax situation. The IRS has been somewhat receptive to these arguments when there's evidence you weren't primarily seeking tax advantages.
0 coins
AstroAdventurer
Benjamin, I feel your pain on this one! I went through something similar with my consulting business a few years back. The 5-year waiting period is brutal, but you do have some legitimate options beyond just waiting it out. Based on what you've described, I'd focus on the "reasonable cause" exception that others have mentioned. The fact that you revoked the S election when your business income was minimal ($40k) and you had a full-time job suggests you made a reasonable business decision at the time - not a tax avoidance scheme. Now that your circumstances have completely changed (full-time business, $180k projected income), you have a strong case for demonstrating that the original revocation wasn't primarily for tax benefits. The IRS has approved similar requests when taxpayers can show genuine business reasons. I'd recommend documenting everything: your income levels in 2023, your employment status change, projections for this year, and any advice you received that led to the original revocation. This paper trail will be crucial for your letter ruling request. The private letter ruling route isn't cheap (around $3,000-$7,000 in fees), but with your projected income level, the S corp tax savings would likely justify the cost. Just make sure you work with someone experienced in these types of requests - the formatting and arguments matter a lot. Don't give up! The IRS rejection letter is just their standard response, but exceptions do exist for situations like yours.
0 coins
Zane Hernandez
•This is really helpful advice! I'm curious about the documentation piece you mentioned - when you say "any advice you received that led to the original revocation," does that include informal advice from online sources or forums? Or are they looking for more formal documentation like correspondence with tax professionals? I'm asking because honestly, a lot of my decision-making back then was based on articles I found online and general guidance rather than formal professional advice. I'm wondering if that actually hurts or helps my case for the "reasonable cause" exception. Also, do you have any sense of typical timelines for private letter ruling responses? I know the IRS has been backed up with everything lately.
0 coins
Riya Sharma
•Great question about documentation! For the reasonable cause exception, the IRS actually prefers to see evidence of your decision-making process, even if it wasn't from formal professional advice. Online articles, forum discussions, or even notes you made at the time can help establish that you were trying to make an informed business decision rather than engaging in tax avoidance. The key is showing your thought process was legitimate given your circumstances at the time. If you relied on general guidance suggesting S corp elections weren't beneficial for small side businesses, that actually strengthens your case - it demonstrates you were making a reasonable business decision based on available information. As for timelines, private letter rulings are currently taking 6-12 months depending on complexity. The IRS has been slower across the board, but business entity rulings seem to move a bit faster than some other types. You can request expedited processing if you have a compelling reason (like pending quarterly filing deadlines), though that doesn't guarantee faster processing. One tip: if you do pursue the PLR route, consider filing it sooner rather than later. The closer you get to your original revocation date + 5 years, the less compelling your "change in circumstances" argument becomes.
0 coins
Samuel Robinson
Benjamin, I've been following this thread and wanted to add another perspective based on my experience with S corp elections. You mentioned you've been relying on "random internet advice" - that's actually more common than you think, and it might work in your favor for the reasonable cause exception. The IRS recognizes that small business owners often make decisions based on general guidance available at the time. What matters is that you made a rational business decision given your circumstances (part-time business, minimal income, full-time employment). One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is the timing of your quarterly estimated payments. Since you're projecting $180k this year and currently operating as an LLC, you're facing self-employment tax on the full amount. That's roughly $25k+ in SE tax alone that S corp status could help reduce significantly. Given the urgency of your tax situation, I'd actually recommend pursuing multiple approaches simultaneously: 1. File for the private letter ruling as others suggested 2. Consider the new entity approach (with proper legal structure to avoid substance-over-form issues) 3. Document everything about your 2023 decision-making process while it's still fresh The cost of professional help now is likely far less than the tax consequences of staying in LLC status for another 2+ years. Don't let the initial rejection discourage you - the IRS form letters rarely tell the whole story about available options.
0 coins
Hunter Edmunds
•This is really solid advice, Samuel! The point about self-employment tax is huge - I hadn't fully calculated that impact. At $180k, we're talking about a significant difference between LLC and S corp treatment. I'm curious about your suggestion to pursue multiple approaches simultaneously. Wouldn't filing for a new entity while also requesting a private letter ruling for the existing entity potentially conflict with each other? I'm worried the IRS might view that as contradictory or undermining the "reasonable cause" argument. Also, do you have any experience with the documentation process for these situations? I'm trying to piece together what I was thinking back in 2023, but I didn't keep great records of my research process at the time.
0 coins