IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Justin Trejo

•

June, I'm so sorry you're experiencing this with MyHealth CCM. Your situation is a perfect example of what happens when these questionable tax shelter schemes prioritize collecting upfront fees over actually delivering legitimate business services. The fact that you can't get basic customer support after paying $75,000 is completely unacceptable and frankly typical of these operations. The broken video platform preventing you from completing the required 100 hours of compliance training sounds like it could be intentionally designed to create barriers - giving them excuses to avoid providing promised services or benefits. Here's what I'd recommend doing immediately: 1. **Document everything** - Screenshot the broken video platform, save all unanswered emails/calls, and create a timeline of your attempts to get help 2. **Contact your credit card company** if you used one - you may have dispute rights for services not provided 3. **File complaints** with your state Attorney General's consumer protection division and the Better Business Bureau 4. **Consult with attorneys** - both a consumer protection lawyer and a tax attorney given the IRS concerns raised throughout this thread Given all the tax shelter red flags discussed here by Miguel and others, you might actually want to proactively contact the IRS about this arrangement. If they determine it's an abusive tax shelter, that could work in your favor for getting out of this investment. Don't give up - there are likely legal remedies available. Your experience serves as a crucial warning for others considering similar schemes. Thank you for sharing this despite what must be a frustrating situation.

0 coins

Yuki Tanaka

•

June, your experience is unfortunately exactly what many of us were worried about when discussing the red flags of MyHealth CCM earlier in this thread. The combination of poor customer service after collecting $75k upfront and technical issues preventing you from completing required training is a classic pattern with these questionable investment schemes. I'm particularly concerned that the broken video platform might be intentionally problematic - it gives them an excuse to claim you haven't met compliance requirements if you later try to demand the promised benefits or seek a refund. Beyond the excellent suggestions from Justin about documenting everything and filing complaints, I'd also recommend checking if your state has specific laws about business opportunity investments. Many states require these types of arrangements to be registered and provide certain disclosures to investors. Also, given that this involves healthcare compliance training and regulations, you might want to contact your state's health department or medical board. If they're making claims about healthcare services without proper licensing or oversight, that could be another avenue for regulatory action. Your willingness to share this experience despite the frustration is incredibly valuable for this community. It provides real-world evidence of what can happen with these schemes beyond just the tax risks we've been discussing.

0 coins

Diego Chavez

•

June, I'm absolutely appalled by what you're going through with MyHealth CCM. Your experience is the perfect real-world validation of every red flag we discussed in this thread. Paying $75k and then being completely ignored by customer service - including the owner just forwarding your complaint to the same person who's been ghosting you - shows these people have zero integrity. The broken video platform preventing you from completing the mandatory 100-hour training sounds deliberately sabotaged. I suspect they make it nearly impossible to actually complete their program so they can later claim you didn't meet requirements if you demand results or try to get your money back. This is classic predatory behavior: collect massive upfront fees, provide terrible service, create impossible compliance requirements, then blame the victim when things don't work out. Beyond the consumer protection and legal remedies others have suggested, I'd also recommend: - Posting detailed reviews on Google, Yelp, and any business rating sites - Checking if there's a class action lawsuit forming (other victims may be organizing) - Contacting local news consumer protection reporters - they love exposing these schemes Your courage in sharing this experience is invaluable. It provides concrete proof of what happens when people fall for these "too good to be true" tax shelter pitches. Thank you for potentially saving others from this same nightmare. Don't let them get away with this. Fight back through every legal avenue available.

0 coins

Yuki Tanaka

•

This thread has been absolutely incredible - I've learned more about W-4s and withholding from reading through everyone's experiences than I ever did from official IRS guidance! I'm in a somewhat similar situation but with a twist - I have one regular W-2 job and also do some freelance 1099 work throughout the year. The 1099 income varies quite a bit month to month, which makes it tricky to know how to adjust my W-4 withholding at my regular job. From what I've gathered here, it sounds like the IRS withholding estimator can handle mixed W-2/1099 situations, but I'm wondering if anyone has specific experience with this scenario? Do you typically update your W-4 every time your 1099 income changes significantly, or do you try to estimate an average and stick with it? Also, I've been making quarterly estimated tax payments for the 1099 work, but I'm wondering if it would be simpler to just increase my W-4 withholding at my regular job to cover both income sources and skip the estimated payments altogether. Has anyone tried this approach? Thanks to everyone for sharing such detailed and practical advice - this community is incredibly helpful for navigating these complex tax situations!

0 coins

I've dealt with a very similar W-2/1099 combination situation! The IRS withholding estimator actually handles this really well - it has specific sections for both types of income and can calculate the optimal approach for your situation. For the varying 1099 income, I found it worked best to estimate conservatively high for the year when using the estimator, then make quarterly adjustments to my W-4 if my 1099 income was tracking significantly different than projected. I usually did this review along with my quarterly estimated tax payment deadlines, so it became part of the same routine. Regarding using W-4 withholding instead of estimated payments - I actually switched to this approach last year and it's been much simpler! I increased my W-4 withholding at my regular job to cover both income sources and stopped making separate estimated payments. The key is making sure your W-2 withholding meets the safe harbor requirements (90% of current year or 100%/110% of prior year depending on your AGI). The main advantage is that W-4 withholding is treated as paid evenly throughout the year for tax purposes, even if you make the adjustment mid-year, whereas estimated payments need to be made quarterly to avoid penalties. Just make sure your regular job has enough pay periods left in the year to withhold the additional amount you need. I'd recommend running your numbers through the estimator with both approaches to see which works better for your specific income pattern!

0 coins

StarSailor

•

I went through this same frustration last year with my small partnership. After trying several options, I ended up going with FreeTaxUSA for around $60. What I liked about it was that it walked me through each section step-by-step and caught a few things I would have missed if I'd tried to do it manually. One thing to consider - if your partnership is really straightforward with just basic income and standard deductions, you might want to check if your state has any free business filing programs. Some states offer free e-filing for small partnerships even when the federal doesn't. It's worth a quick search on your state's tax website. Also, don't forget that the partnership filing fee is a deductible business expense, so factor that into your actual cost calculation. The $50-80 range for software isn't too bad when you consider the time savings and reduced error risk compared to paper filing.

0 coins

Sophia Clark

•

That's a really good point about checking state programs - I hadn't thought of that! Do you know if there's a centralized place to find out about state-specific free filing options for partnerships, or do you just have to check each state's tax website individually? Also, when you say FreeTaxUSA "caught a few things," what kind of issues did it identify? I'm trying to decide if the extra cost over paper filing is worth it for the error-checking alone.

0 coins

Unfortunately there isn't a centralized database for state partnership filing programs - you'll need to check each state individually. I'd recommend searching "[your state] partnership tax filing" or looking for small business resources on your state's Department of Revenue website. As for what FreeTaxUSA caught, the main things were: 1) It reminded me to include our partnership's EIN on the K-1s (seems obvious but easy to miss), 2) It flagged that I needed to complete Schedule L (balance sheet) even though we're small - apparently it's required for all partnerships, and 3) It caught a calculation error where I had incorrectly allocated a deduction between the partners. The software also prompted me for things like whether we had any foreign accounts or transactions that I might not have thought to report otherwise. For $60, having those guardrails was definitely worth it versus risking an IRS notice later.

0 coins

Dyllan Nantx

•

Another option worth considering is TaxSlayer Business - they typically charge around $47 for 1065 filing and K-1 generation. I used them for my small consulting partnership last year and found their interface pretty intuitive for basic returns. One thing that helped me save even more was timing - if you can wait until later in the filing season (like March), many of these services run promotions. TaxAct dropped their price to $35 during a spring promotion, and FreeTaxUSA had a similar deal. Also, since you mentioned you're a simple two-person partnership, make sure you're not overcomplicating things. If you don't have rental properties, multiple business activities, or complex allocations, even the basic versions of these programs should handle everything you need. Sometimes people pay for premium features they don't actually require.

0 coins

That's great advice about timing! I wish I had known about those spring promotions earlier. For someone just starting to research options now, do you think it's worth waiting for potential deals, or is the risk of missing the filing deadline too high if the promotions don't materialize? Also, you mentioned TaxSlayer's interface being intuitive - how did it compare to the free IRS fillable PDFs in terms of guidance? I'm trying to weigh whether the software is worth it just for the user experience, or if the main value is in the error-checking and calculations.

0 coins

Dmitry Volkov

•

As a newcomer to this community, thank you so much for this incredibly detailed breakdown! I just completed my identity verification on March 18th and was feeling pretty overwhelmed by the "up to 9 weeks" timeline they gave me. Reading through everyone's real experiences here is so much more helpful than the vague official IRS information. It's really encouraging to see that most people are getting their refunds in the 4-6 week range rather than the full 9 weeks, and your step-by-step explanation of what actually happens during the process makes the wait feel much more manageable. My verification was for what they called "routine identity verification" - no specific issues mentioned with my return. Based on what others have shared here, I'm optimistic that puts me in the faster processing timeline. I'm definitely going to follow the advice about setting up bank account alerts after week 4 instead of obsessively checking WMR and transcripts. It sounds like those tools aren't very reliable for post-verification tracking anyway, and I love that several people mentioned their refunds just appeared without warning. One thing I'm wondering about - has anyone noticed if the time you call to verify (like morning vs afternoon) makes any difference in how quickly they process your case? I completed mine around 2 PM on a Tuesday and I'm probably overthinking it, but curious if there are any patterns people have noticed. Thanks for creating this thread - it's exactly the kind of real-world information that helps so much during this stressful waiting period!

0 coins

Nora Bennett

•

Welcome to the community! I'm also brand new here and just completed my verification on March 16th, so we're practically verification twins! Your question about timing during the day is interesting - I hadn't thought about that angle. I completed mine around 10 AM on a Monday and I'm probably overthinking it too, but it's natural to wonder if there are any factors that might help! From what I've been reading through all these shared experiences, it seems like the post-verification processing happens in batches regardless of when during the day you actually completed the verification call. The "routine identity verification" reason you got sounds exactly like what most of us newcomers have been told, and based on everyone's timelines here, that definitely seems to put you in the better 4-6 week category. I'm also planning to follow the bank account monitoring strategy after week 4 - it sounds way less stressful than constantly refreshing WMR and transcripts that apparently don't update reliably anyway. This thread has been such a game-changer for managing expectations and reducing anxiety during this process. Hopefully we'll both be posting our success stories here in about a month!

0 coins

Dylan Wright

•

As a newcomer to this community, this breakdown is incredibly helpful! I just completed my identity verification on March 19th and was feeling really anxious about the "up to 9 weeks" timeline they quoted me. What I find most reassuring from reading everyone's experiences is how the actual timelines are so much more reasonable than the worst-case scenario the IRS initially presents. The 4-6 week range that most people are experiencing gives me so much more realistic expectations. My verification was for what they called "standard identity verification" - the agent said it was routine with no specific issues identified on my return. Based on what others have shared here, I'm hoping that puts me in the faster processing category. I'm definitely going to follow the advice about setting up bank account alerts after week 4 instead of constantly checking WMR and transcripts. It sounds like those tracking tools aren't reliable for post-verification monitoring anyway, and I love hearing that refunds often just appear without any advance warning from the system updates. One question I have - has anyone noticed if completing verification later in the tax season (like mid-March) affects processing times compared to those who verified earlier in February? I'm wondering if the IRS might be less backlogged now or if it doesn't really matter. Thanks for creating this thread and to everyone sharing their real experiences - it's exactly the kind of practical information that helps reduce the stress of not knowing what to expect during this waiting period!

0 coins

Nia Harris

•

Welcome to the community! I'm also a newcomer here and just completed my verification on March 20th, so we're practically verification neighbors! Your question about timing during tax season is really thoughtful - I've been wondering about seasonal impacts too. From what I've gathered reading through everyone's experiences in this thread, it seems like the IRS processes these post-verification reviews in fairly consistent batches regardless of when during the season you complete verification, but it would be interesting to hear from someone who has data comparing early vs. late season timelines. The "standard identity verification" reason you got sounds identical to what most of us newcomers have been told, and based on all the shared experiences here, that definitely seems to put you in the favorable 4-6 week range rather than the longer processing times for more complex cases. I'm also planning to follow the bank account alert strategy after week 4 - it sounds so much less stressful than obsessively checking WMR and transcripts that apparently don't update reliably anyway. This thread has been absolutely invaluable for understanding what actually happens during this process and managing expectations instead of just being stuck in complete limbo. Hopefully we'll both be posting our success stories here in about a month!

0 coins

I'm dealing with a similar inherited stock situation and this thread has been incredibly helpful! One thing I'd add from my recent experience is to check if your current UTMA custodian has any historical cost basis records they can provide before you transfer. Even if they don't have complete information for pre-2011 holdings, they might have some documentation that could save you research time. Also, when you're gathering all the spinoff allocation information, make sure to note the exact dates of each distribution. The IRS can be particular about using the correct valuation dates, especially for inherited securities where the stepped-up basis calculation is involved. Having precise dates will help if you need to look up historical stock prices for any manual calculations. Good luck with the transfer process - it sounds like you're getting great advice here about the various resources available to help with these complex basis calculations!

0 coins

Ravi Gupta

•

This is such great advice about checking with the UTMA custodian first! I'm new to dealing with inherited stock issues, but reading through this entire thread has been really educational. It's amazing how complex something that seems straightforward can become when you factor in decades of corporate actions. I'm curious - for those of you who have been through this process, how long did it typically take from start to finish to get all the cost basis information sorted out and complete the transfer? I'm trying to set realistic expectations for myself since it sounds like there might be multiple steps involving different organizations and potentially some waiting for documentation. Also, the point about precise dates is really important. I hadn't thought about how the exact timing could affect valuations, especially for inherited securities. Thanks for sharing your experience!

0 coins

Based on my experience helping clients with similar inherited stock situations, I'd estimate the entire process typically takes 4-8 weeks from start to finish, depending on how responsive the various parties are. Here's what you can generally expect: Week 1-2: Gathering documentation from your current custodian and requesting corporate action information from the companies involved. This is usually the fastest part. Week 2-4: Waiting for historical documents like Form 8937s and allocation statements. Some companies respond quickly, others can take 2-3 weeks. If you need to use services like the ones mentioned earlier in this thread, this is when you'd typically get results. Week 4-6: Calculating cost basis allocations and preparing transfer paperwork. If you're doing manual calculations, this can take longer. If using professional help or automated tools, it's much faster. Week 6-8: Completing the actual transfer to your new brokerage and ensuring all cost basis information transfers correctly. One tip that can speed things up: start gathering documentation even before you decide which brokerage to transfer to. You can request historical corporate action information and Form 8937s while you're still researching brokers. The documentation process is often the biggest bottleneck, so getting that started early can save weeks. Also, consider calling ahead to your target brokerage to discuss their process for handling complex inherited stock transfers. Some have specialized teams that can walk you through exactly what documentation they'll need, which prevents delays from missing paperwork.

0 coins

Prev1...442443444445446...5643Next