IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

This thread has been incredibly helpful! As someone relatively new to multi-state compliance, I'm overwhelmed by all the different tools and resources mentioned. For those just starting out with multi-state clients, what would you recommend as the absolute minimum toolkit? I'm thinking we need at least one comprehensive compliance calendar system, but I'm not sure if we should start with a free solution like Noah's spreadsheet or invest in something like taxr.ai right away. Also, how do you handle the client education piece? I find that many business owners don't realize the scope of compliance requirements when they expand to new states, and then they're shocked by all the ongoing filing obligations. Any tips for setting proper expectations upfront?

0 coins

Great question! As someone who's been through this learning curve, I'd recommend starting with a hybrid approach. Begin with Noah's spreadsheet template to understand the scope of requirements without a big upfront investment, then upgrade to a paid solution like taxr.ai once you have 5-10 multi-state clients where the time savings justify the cost. For client education, I've found success with creating a simple one-page "Multi-State Expansion Checklist" that outlines the most common compliance obligations they'll face. I walk through this during our initial consultation and emphasize that state compliance is an ongoing commitment, not a one-time setup. I also include estimated annual compliance costs in my engagement letters so there are no surprises later. The key is being upfront that multi-state operations significantly increase complexity and ongoing obligations. Most clients appreciate the transparency, and it positions you as the expert who can guide them through it properly.

0 coins

Liv Park

•

As someone who's been managing multi-state compliance for about 8 years now, I completely feel your pain! One resource that hasn't been mentioned yet is the Multistate Tax Commission's uniformity resources - they maintain excellent comparison charts for various state requirements that can help you quickly identify differences between jurisdictions. I'd also strongly recommend setting up Google Alerts for phrases like "[state name] tax law changes" and "business compliance updates" for each state where you have significant client activity. It's not perfect, but it's caught several important changes that might have otherwise slipped through the cracks. One practical tip: I maintain a simple "red flag states" list for new client consultations. States like California, New York, and Illinois tend to have more complex ongoing requirements, so when a client mentions expansion into these jurisdictions, I know to budget extra time for the compliance setup process. This has helped me avoid underbidding on projects and ensures clients understand the complexity upfront. The learning curve is steep, but once you develop systematic processes, it becomes much more manageable!

0 coins

Ava Thompson

•

This is incredibly helpful advice, especially the Google Alerts tip! I'm definitely going to set those up. Quick question about your "red flag states" approach - do you find clients are generally receptive when you explain that certain states will require more time and higher fees for compliance setup? I'm worried about scaring away potential clients, but I also don't want to get stuck eating hours on complex state registrations. Also, have you found the Multistate Tax Commission resources stay current? I've been burned before by outdated compliance information, so I'm always cautious about free resources even from official sources.

0 coins

Paolo Marino

•

This is such a relief to read! I'm dealing with the exact same thing right now - verified through ID.me about a week ago and went from seeing my refund amount to getting that dreaded "refund status unavailable" message. It's honestly been keeping me up at night wondering if I did something wrong during verification or if my return got flagged for some reason. But reading everyone's experiences here makes it clear this is just how the IRS system works after identity verification - terribly designed but apparently normal. The part about checking transcripts instead of obsessively refreshing WMR is great advice. I've been guilty of checking multiple times a day and driving myself crazy. Going to try the transcript route and maybe download that IRS2Go app someone mentioned. Thanks to everyone who shared their timelines and experiences - it's so helpful to know this disappearing act typically resolves in 1-3 weeks. Definitely going to try to be more patient (easier said than done!). Will update if I see any movement on my end!

0 coins

Yuki Sato

•

I'm in the exact same boat! Just went through ID.me verification last week and now stuck with that awful "unavailable" message after seeing my refund amount initially. The anxiety is real - I keep wondering if I messed something up during verification or if there's an issue with my return. But reading through all these experiences is so reassuring that this is just the IRS being the IRS after verification. Definitely going to stop the obsessive WMR checking (so hard though!) and try the transcript method instead. Thanks for sharing - it helps knowing we're all in this together! šŸ¤ž

0 coins

I just went through this exact scenario about 6 weeks ago! The "refund status unavailable" message after ID.me verification is honestly one of the most anxiety-inducing parts of the whole tax process, but I can confirm it's completely normal. What helped me during the wait was understanding that when you see your refund amount initially (like your $3,456), that means the IRS has already calculated and essentially approved your refund. The verification step is just confirming you are who you say you are - it's not re-reviewing your entire return. After verification, your return gets moved from the automated processing system to a manual review queue, which is why WMR can't display anything. Think of it like your file being physically moved from one department to another - during the transfer, nobody can access it to give you status updates. In my case, it took about 2.5 weeks after verification for WMR to suddenly update with a direct deposit date. No gradual progress bars or status changes - just went straight from "unavailable" to "your refund was sent on [date]." The hardest part is the waiting, but you're definitely in the final stretch. Since you verified on April 10th, I'd expect to see movement within the next week or two. Your refund is still coming - it's just taking the scenic route through manual processing!

0 coins

Liam Brown

•

This is such a helpful explanation, thank you! The analogy about files being physically moved between departments really helps me understand what's happening behind the scenes. I've been so worried that something went wrong, but knowing that seeing the $3,456 amount means it's already approved makes me feel so much better. The waiting is definitely the hardest part - I keep oscillating between checking WMR obsessively and trying to forget about it entirely. Really appreciate you sharing your timeline too, gives me hope that I should see movement soon! šŸ¤ž

0 coins

One crucial aspect that hasn't been fully addressed is the potential impact of France's CFC (Controlled Foreign Corporation) rules on your US LLC. Even if you're not currently a French tax resident, if you return to France in the future, the French tax authorities could potentially look back at your LLC structure and apply CFC rules retroactively. Under French CFC rules, if you control more than 50% of a foreign entity (which you would with a single-member LLC) and that entity is subject to a tax rate below 50% of what French corporate tax would be, France may tax the LLC's profits directly. This could create complications even years down the road. Additionally, be aware that France has been increasingly aggressive about digital nomads and crypto/online entrepreneurs. They've been pushing for EU-wide coordination on taxing digital nomads, and there's ongoing discussion about creating a "digital nomad tax" framework. My recommendation would be to document everything meticulously - where you are physically located each day, what work you're doing, client locations, etc. This paper trail will be invaluable if any tax authority challenges your residency status or LLC structure later.

0 coins

Zoe Gonzalez

•

This is exactly the kind of detailed analysis I was hoping to find! The CFC rules concern is something I hadn't considered at all. Do you know if there's a specific threshold for how long I'd need to be back in France before these retroactive CFC rules could kick in? And would maintaining clear documentation of being a non-resident (like tax certificates from other countries) help protect against this? Also, regarding the digital nomad tax framework discussions - do you have any sources where I can follow these developments? It sounds like this could significantly impact how I structure things going forward.

0 coins

Jacob Lewis

•

The CFC rules don't have a specific "grace period" - they can potentially apply as soon as you become a French tax resident again, even for a single tax year. However, the practical enforcement depends on several factors. French tax authorities typically look at substance over form, so if you can demonstrate genuine business reasons for the US LLC structure (like having US clients, US banking needs, etc.) rather than pure tax avoidance, you're in a stronger position. For documentation, yes - maintaining clear evidence of non-residency is crucial. This includes tax certificates from other countries where you've established residency, utility bills, lease agreements, and especially the detailed location/work logs that Saanvi mentioned. The key is proving you weren't a French resident during the periods when the LLC was operating. Regarding the digital nomad tax developments, keep an eye on the OECD's Pillar One discussions and the EU's DEBRA directive. The European Parliament has also been discussing a "Digital Nomad Tax Card" concept. I'd recommend following the International Tax Review and checking the French DGFiP (tax administration) website regularly for updates on their position regarding digital nomads. The landscape is definitely shifting rapidly, so what works today might not work in 2-3 years!

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly helpful! As someone who's been navigating similar international tax complexities, I wanted to add a few practical considerations that might help. First, regarding the "zero tax" scenario you're hoping for - be very careful about this assumption. Even if you avoid French taxation due to non-residency and US taxation due to foreign ownership, you might still trigger tax obligations in countries where you're physically present while working. Many countries have "source rules" that can create tax liability based on where services are actually performed, regardless of where your business is incorporated. Second, consider the compliance burden even if your tax liability is minimal. Between US Form 5472 filings, potential FBAR requirements if your LLC accounts exceed $10K, and various foreign business reporting requirements in countries where you establish temporary residence, the administrative overhead can be significant. I'd also suggest looking into the Malta or Cyprus tax residency programs if you want a more structured approach to European tax planning. Both offer attractive tax regimes for non-domiciled residents and have clear rules that could provide more certainty than the nomad lifestyle. Finally, given the rapid changes in international tax law (especially around digital services), consider building flexibility into your structure from day one. What works today might need adjustment as regulations evolve.

0 coins

Oliver Wagner

•

This is such valuable practical advice, especially the point about source rules creating tax liability where you're physically working! I've been so focused on the LLC structure and citizenship/residency issues that I completely overlooked the "where services are performed" angle. The compliance burden concern really resonates too - even if I end up with minimal actual tax liability, the administrative costs and time investment could easily outweigh the benefits. Form 5472 alone seems like a significant annual requirement, and I hadn't even considered FBAR implications. Your suggestion about Malta/Cyprus residency programs is intriguing. Would these provide clearer tax treatment for US LLC income compared to the nomad approach? I'm starting to think that having a clear, stable tax residency might be worth more than the flexibility of constant movement, especially given how complex the international rules are becoming. Do you have any specific recommendations for resources to research these European residency programs, particularly regarding how they interact with US business structures?

0 coins

Julian Paolo

•

This is such a timely question! I'm in a similar boat where my company just rolled out the Roth match option this year. From what I've learned talking to our plan administrator, the key thing to understand is that if you do end up leaving before fully vested, you won't lose the taxes you paid on the Roth match contributions. The IRS treats this as establishing "basis" in your retirement account - basically a record that you already paid taxes on that money. If the unvested portion gets forfeited, you can recover those taxes through a basis adjustment on future returns. That said, I ended up going with traditional matching for now because I'm not 100% sure I'll stay the full 3 years for vesting. The immediate tax savings from traditional matching gives me more flexibility, and I can always do Roth conversions later when I have more job security. Just my two cents!

0 coins

That's really smart thinking about the flexibility aspect! I hadn't considered that the traditional match gives you more options down the road. The basis adjustment for unvested Roth matches is reassuring to know about, but you're right that avoiding the immediate tax hit probably makes sense if there's any uncertainty about staying long enough to vest. Plus doing Roth conversions later when you have more control over the timing and amounts seems like a more strategic approach. Thanks for sharing your decision-making process - it's helping me think through my own situation!

0 coins

Mason Stone

•

I just went through this exact situation last year and wanted to share what I learned. The key thing to understand is that when you pay taxes on Roth employer matches, you're essentially creating "basis" in your retirement account - meaning you've already paid taxes on that money. If you leave before vesting and forfeit those contributions, you don't just lose the taxes you paid. You can recover them through what's called a "basis adjustment" on your tax return. Essentially, you report that you paid taxes on retirement contributions that were later forfeited. That said, I'd recommend talking to your plan administrator about how they handle this specific situation, since the Roth match provision is still pretty new and not all companies have clear processes yet. In my case, they provided documentation showing the amounts I had paid taxes on but never actually received, which made the tax recovery process much smoother. The Roth match can still be worth it if you're confident about staying long enough to vest, but the traditional match definitely gives you more flexibility if there's any uncertainty about your job tenure.

0 coins

This is really helpful context, thanks for sharing your experience! The "basis adjustment" concept makes a lot of sense - essentially you're just documenting that you already paid taxes on money you never actually got to keep. Did your plan administrator automatically provide that documentation when you left, or did you have to request it specifically? I'm wondering if I should proactively ask about their process now before making my decision, just so I know what to expect if I do end up leaving before the 3-year mark. Also, do you remember roughly how long the tax recovery process took? I'm trying to weigh whether the potential hassle is worth it compared to just going with the traditional match for simplicity.

0 coins

Sofia Morales

•

I'm really sorry you're going through this stress! As someone who's dealt with similar banking issues, I can confirm what everyone else is saying - Chime will almost certainly reject your boyfriend's refund due to the name mismatch. Their fraud prevention system is completely automated with no human override option. Here's what you should realistically expect: The rejection will happen within 1-2 business days of the attempted deposit. After that, you're looking at 4-6 weeks for the IRS to process and mail a paper check to your boyfriend's address on file. My recommendations for right now: - Have your boyfriend immediately verify his current mailing address is updated with the IRS through his online account - Sign up for USPS Informed Delivery to track when the paper check is coming - Start working on backup plans for rent TODAY - don't wait to see what happens - Consider reaching out to family for a short-term loan or look into local rental assistance programs I know the timing is terrible, but the refund money will eventually come. The key is accepting this delay and planning accordingly rather than hoping for a miracle. For next year, definitely use an account that matches the name on the tax return - lesson learned the hard way! You've got this, just focus on your backup options now.

0 coins

I hate to pile on with more bad news, but I can confirm from personal experience that Chime absolutely will reject this deposit. I went through the exact same thing with my sister's refund two years ago - the name mismatch triggers an automatic rejection within 24-48 hours, no exceptions. The most frustrating part is that the IRS "Where's My Refund" tool won't update right away to show the rejection. You might see it still showing as "approved" for up to 2 weeks after Chime has already bounced it back. This creates a lot of false hope and anxiety while you're waiting. Once the rejection is processed, you're looking at about 4-6 weeks for the paper check to arrive. Since you mentioned needing this for rent next month, I'd strongly recommend having a backup plan ready now rather than waiting to see what happens. Quick action items: - Have your boyfriend log into his IRS online account TODAY to verify his mailing address is current - Sign up for USPS Informed Delivery so you can track the paper check when it's mailed - Start exploring short-term loan options from family/friends or local assistance programs I know this isn't what you wanted to hear, but at least now you can plan accordingly. The money will eventually come, just not on the timeline you were hoping for. Definitely use matching names next year - learned that lesson the expensive way!

0 coins

Prev1...440441442443444...5643Next