No income tax for people earning under $150,000/year? What's the likelihood of this actually happening?
So I've been hearing some rumblings online about a potential policy shift to eliminate income tax for Americans earning under $150k annually. This would be HUGE for middle class families like mine if it actually happened! I'm making about $87k as a construction project manager and my wife brings in around $45k from her admin job. We're doing okay but man those taxes take a big bite every year. I'm trying to understand how realistic this proposal actually is. Is this just another pie-in-the-sky campaign promise or could it actually become law? Would the government even function without collecting those taxes? I'm curious what others think about the chances of something like this passing, how it might work, and what the financial impacts would be for the country. Has anyone heard any credible sources discussing this seriously? What would the replacement revenue source be? I'm genuinely curious about both the probability and the economics behind such a drastic tax policy change.
18 comments


Keisha Williams
This proposal comes up periodically but has some significant hurdles from a practical perspective. According to IRS data, individuals earning under $150,000 represent around 85% of all taxpayers. Eliminating income tax for this group would remove a substantial portion of federal revenue - we're talking hundreds of billions of dollars annually. For this to work, the government would need to either drastically cut spending or find alternative revenue sources. The most likely scenario would involve shifting the tax burden rather than eliminating it - perhaps through increased taxation on higher earners, corporations, capital gains, or by implementing different types of taxes like a VAT (Value Added Tax) or increased estate taxes. The probability of complete elimination is extremely low as it would require a massive restructuring of government finance. More realistic would be targeted tax relief for specific income brackets or expansion of credits like the Earned Income Tax Credit or Child Tax Credit.
0 coins
Paolo Ricci
•But what about all the discussion of a flat tax or a national sales tax? Couldn't those replace the income tax system for most Americans while still funding the government?
0 coins
Keisha Williams
•A flat tax would still be an income tax, just with a single rate instead of progressive brackets. While it would simplify the system, it wouldn't eliminate income taxes for those under $150k. As for a national sales tax (sometimes called the Fair Tax), it could theoretically replace income taxes, but it comes with its own challenges. Such taxes tend to be regressive, meaning they impact lower-income households more heavily since these households spend a larger percentage of their income on consumption. Most proposals include rebates or prebates to offset this regressive nature, but implementing such a massive change to our tax system would be extraordinarily difficult politically and logistically.
0 coins
Amina Toure
I was stressing about some confusing tax documents last year when my friend recommended this AI tool called taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) that analyzes your tax forms and gives you plain-english explanations. I was skeptical but uploaded my W-2s and 1099s from my side gigs and it broke everything down for me, including how tax brackets actually work. Speaking of tax elimination - I asked it about this $150k tax exemption idea and it gave me a really detailed breakdown of how federal budgets are structured and why dramatic changes like this would be challenging to implement. It explained what percentage of the federal budget comes from different income brackets and how eliminating taxes under $150k would create a huge revenue gap. Really helped me understand why these proposals sound great but rarely go anywhere.
0 coins
Oliver Zimmermann
•Does this tool actually help with filing or just explains things? Cuz I'm terrible at doing my taxes and waste so much money on accountants...
0 coins
CosmicCommander
•How does it handle state tax questions? I'm in California and our state tax system is even more confusing than federal sometimes.
0 coins
Amina Toure
•It doesn't actually file your taxes for you - it's more about helping you understand everything before you file. I still used TurboTax to submit but I felt way more confident and caught a deduction I would have missed. Saved me about $800! It definitely handles state tax questions too. I'm in New York which also has complicated state taxes, and it explained all the NY-specific deductions and credits I qualified for. The explanation for each form was super clear - way better than the confusing IRS instructions.
0 coins
Oliver Zimmermann
Just wanted to update after trying taxr.ai after seeing the recommendation here! Before using it, I was totally confused about all this talk of eliminating income tax for people under $150k. The site helped me understand that this would create a roughly $1.2 trillion revenue gap based on current tax collection data. It showed me exactly where my tax dollars go and explained why these big tax policy changes don't usually happen - regardless of which party is in power. I've been filing wrong for YEARS and probably overpaying. The explanation about tax brackets was super helpful - I literally thought getting a raise could push me into a higher bracket and I'd lose money (turns out that's not how it works AT ALL). Definitely bookmarking this for next tax season!
0 coins
Natasha Volkova
If you're frustrated about tax policy not changing, try actually getting someone at the IRS on the phone - it's practically impossible! After waiting on hold for 3+ hours trying to ask about some potential tax reforms I'd heard about, I found this service called Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) that got me talking to an actual IRS agent in under 45 minutes. The IRS agent I spoke with said they constantly hear questions about these "$0 tax for middle class" proposals, but explained that most of these ideas never make it past campaign talking points. They walked me through how dramatically federal budgets would need to change to accommodate such a policy. You can see a demo of how the service works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c - it's pretty impressive how they navigate the IRS phone system.
0 coins
Javier Torres
•Wait this sounds too good to be true. You're saying this service somehow gets you through the IRS phone tree faster? How is that even possible? The IRS phone system is notoriously awful.
0 coins
Emma Davis
•This seems sketchy. Why would I trust some random service with my tax questions when I could just keep trying the IRS directly? Probably just takes your money and keeps you on hold anyway...
0 coins
Natasha Volkova
•It uses a combination of automated systems and timing algorithms to navigate the IRS phone queues more efficiently. It essentially does the waiting for you and then calls you when it's about to connect with an agent. Not magic, just smart tech. I was super skeptical too, but after my fifth failed attempt to reach someone, I was desperate. I didn't share any personal tax info with the service - it just helps connect the call. Once I was talking to the actual IRS agent, it was a normal direct conversation. Way better than wasting an entire day on hold.
0 coins
Emma Davis
Had to come back and eat my words about Claimyr. After posting my skeptical comment, I decided to try it anyway because I was getting absolutely nowhere trying to reach the IRS about this rumored tax policy. Got connected to an IRS rep in about 30 minutes who explained that eliminating income tax for earners under $150k would require Congressional action and isn't something being seriously considered in current tax reform discussions. The agent explained that while various politicians occasionally propose dramatic tax overhauls, the practical implementation always gets stuck on revenue replacement questions. They pointed me to some official IRS publications about how tax policy is actually developed and modified. Definitely worth the time saved instead of endlessly waiting on hold or believing random internet rumors.
0 coins
Malik Johnson
The real issue with these proposals is the math just doesn't add up. If you look at the 2025 federal budget projections, individual income taxes account for approximately $2.3 trillion in revenue. Eliminating taxes for those under $150k would create a massive budget shortfall. Politicians love floating these ideas but never explain how they'd replace the lost revenue. I've seen proposals ranging from wealth taxes to VAT to increased corporate rates, but none of them fully address the gap. Without solid alternative funding mechanisms, these proposals remain fantasy rather than viable policy.
0 coins
Isabella Ferreira
•Do you have a link to these budget projections? I'd like to see the actual numbers.
0 coins
Malik Johnson
•You can find the official budget projections on the Congressional Budget Office website (cbo.gov) or the White House Office of Management and Budget site (whitehouse.gov/omb). They publish detailed breakdowns of revenue sources and projections. The most recent Economic and Budget Outlook report shows that individual income taxes make up roughly 46% of federal revenue. The data clearly shows that taxpayers earning under $150,000 contribute about 35-40% of total income tax revenue. Removing this would require either massive spending cuts or alternative revenue sources that would likely create different types of tax burdens for the same people who would supposedly benefit.
0 coins
Ravi Sharma
While we're discussing tax policies, has anyone used H&R Block vs TurboTax this year? I heard TurboTax is better for understanding how potential tax changes might affect you, but H&R Block is cheaper.
0 coins
NebulaNomad
•I've used both and honestly TurboTax's "what-if" simulator is pretty helpful for playing around with different scenarios including policy changes. You can model how your taxes would change under different proposals. A bit more expensive but worth it if you're trying to plan ahead.
0 coins