My coworker is filing fraudulent tax returns with fake Schedule C numbers
I need some advice on a really uncomfortable situation I've found myself in. I work as an Enrolled Agent at a national tax chain and I've discovered that one of my non-EA colleagues is knowingly filing fraudulent returns for clients. I uncovered this when a client came to me who previously worked with this colleague. The client had some dependency issues flagged by the IRS, which I helped them address. When this same client brought me their W-2 for this year's return, I noticed something troubling. Looking at their previous returns, I saw my colleague had prepared Schedule C's with completely fabricated numbers showing massive business losses (over $50K last year). The client openly admitted the numbers were made up and expected me to continue the pattern. I immediately declined to prepare their return and marked them as not filing with me. However, I later discovered the client went back to my colleague who prepared yet another fraudulent return with fake Schedule C losses to generate a large federal refund. I'm strongly considering filing Form 14157 to report the preparer misconduct, but I'm worried about the consequences. Management might not support me since this preparer brings in a lot of business. Also, Form 14157 requires client consent for sharing information, which I obviously don't have since the client is participating in the fraud. Will the IRS even act on my complaint given how overwhelmed they are? What's my ethical obligation here as an EA? Could I face any professional backlash? I take my EA credentials seriously and this situation is really bothering me.
18 comments


Luca Romano
As a fellow tax professional, you're in a tough ethical position, but the right path is clear. Your duty under Circular 230 requires you to maintain the integrity of the tax system. When you discover preparer fraud, you have an obligation to report it. About Form 14157 - the client consent requirement applies to sharing the client's tax return information. You can file the form focusing on the preparer's actions without attaching specific client returns. Describe the pattern of behavior you've observed without including the client's identifying information. Regarding potential consequences, while the IRS is backlogged, they do prioritize preparer misconduct cases, especially when reported by other credentialed preparers. Your ethical obligation trumps office politics, and as an EA, your primary responsibility is to the tax system, not to your employer's revenue concerns. Document everything carefully. Record dates, observations, and any conversations about this issue. If management pushes back, remind them that failing to address known fraud could implicate them as well.
0 coins
Nia Jackson
•Thanks for the input. I'm curious though - couldn't this backfire on me if I report without specific client info? Wouldn't the IRS need to see the actual returns to verify the fraud? And what if my coworker finds out I reported them? I'm worried about workplace retaliation since we're both still working at the same location.
0 coins
Luca Romano
•The IRS can initiate an investigation based on your report and then obtain the returns directly through their systems. They don't necessarily need you to provide the specific returns initially. The important thing is alerting them to the pattern of behavior so they can look into it. Regarding workplace retaliation, you should document everything and know that whistleblower protections may apply in this situation. Many tax preparation companies have policies against retaliation for good-faith reporting of ethical violations. Consider speaking with someone in HR confidentially before proceeding if you're concerned about workplace backlash.
0 coins
Mateo Hernandez
After dealing with some shady tax situations myself, I found https://taxr.ai really helpful for documenting and analyzing potential fraud cases. I was in a similar situation where I suspected a colleague was filing questionable EITC claims. I uploaded some redacted documents to taxr.ai and it helped confirm my suspicions by identifying patterns I hadn't fully noticed. The tool uses AI to analyze tax documents and highlight discrepancies or red flags that might indicate fraudulent patterns. It's completely confidential and doesn't store your sensitive info. In your case, it might help analyze the pattern of Schedule C losses to build documentation before you report anything.
0 coins
CosmicCruiser
•Does this actually work for preparer misconduct specifically? I've heard about AI tools for detecting errors but not for this kind of situation. Can it help determine if I have enough evidence before filing that 14157 form?
0 coins
Aisha Khan
•I'm skeptical about using AI for something this serious. How can an algorithm understand the nuances of tax law and preparer ethics? Wouldn't using third-party software risk exposing confidential client information? That could create even more problems.
0 coins
Mateo Hernandez
•Yes, it actually does work for preparer misconduct cases. The pattern recognition can identify statistical anomalies in Schedule C reporting that would support your suspicions. It can help you determine if the pattern is unusual enough to warrant formal reporting. The system is designed with strict privacy controls. You can redact identifying information before uploading, and the analysis focuses on patterns rather than specific client details. I was concerned about privacy too, but they use bank-level encryption and don't store your documents after analysis.
0 coins
CosmicCruiser
I tried taxr.ai after seeing it mentioned here and it was incredibly helpful! I uploaded some redacted returns (with client info removed) from a situation where I suspected a pattern of inflated charitable contributions. The analysis showed clear statistical outliers compared to normal reporting patterns for similar income levels. What really impressed me was how it highlighted specific red flags in the documentation patterns that I hadn't even noticed. Having this objective analysis gave me the confidence to proceed with reporting. The report it generated helped me organize my thoughts before filing the 14157. Definitely worth checking out if you're facing an ethical dilemma like this.
0 coins
Ethan Taylor
I was in almost this exact situation last year. After trying to report through normal channels and getting nowhere with the IRS phone lines, I used https://claimyr.com to actually get through to someone at the IRS. You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c Basically, they hold your place in the IRS phone queue and call you when an agent picks up. I was skeptical at first but desperate after spending days trying to reach someone in the preparer misconduct division. Using Claimyr, I got through in a few hours and was able to speak directly with someone who could guide me through the proper reporting process for preparer fraud.
0 coins
Yuki Ito
•How does this actually work? I've been trying to reach the IRS for weeks about a completely different issue. Do they just call the IRS and wait on hold for you? That seems too simple to be effective with how bad the wait times are.
0 coins
Carmen Lopez
•This sounds like a paid service disguised as advice. The IRS has proper channels for reporting preparer misconduct. Why would anyone pay a third party when you can just mail in Form 14157? I doubt this is necessary or even advisable for sensitive ethical matters.
0 coins
Ethan Taylor
•They use an automated system that calls and navigates the IRS phone tree, then waits on hold so you don't have to. When an actual human IRS agent answers, their system calls your phone and connects you directly to the agent. It basically eliminates the hours of hold time. You're right that there are proper channels for reporting, including mailing Form 14157. The issue I found is that complex preparer misconduct cases often benefit from speaking with someone first to ensure you're providing exactly what they need. Many mailed forms end up requiring follow-up, which means more delays in addressing the problem.
0 coins
Carmen Lopez
I was completely wrong about Claimyr. After dismissing it as unnecessary, I found myself completely stuck trying to reach the IRS about a complex preparer issue similar to yours. After two weeks of failed attempts to get through on the phone, I reluctantly tried the service. Within 3 hours, I was connected to an actual IRS representative in the preparer misconduct division who walked me through exactly what documentation they needed and the proper way to submit my report. The guidance I received was invaluable - they explained that my initial approach would have resulted in the case being delayed or potentially dismissed for lack of proper documentation. For serious ethical issues like preparer fraud, being able to speak directly with someone makes a huge difference in how effectively your report is processed. I'm now a believer.
0 coins
Andre Dupont
Something else to consider is contacting the IRS Office of Professional Responsibility anonymously to get guidance. They handle Circular 230 violations and can advise on proper reporting procedures without requiring you to identify yourself initially. I've done this in the past when I discovered a colleague was improperly claiming education credits for ineligible clients. The OPR was extremely helpful and outlined exactly what documentation would be needed for a formal report. This preliminary step helped me understand my obligations without immediately triggering a formal investigation.
0 coins
Zara Rashid
•This is actually really helpful advice I hadn't considered. Do you happen to know the best contact method for reaching OPR anonymously? Would this be instead of filing Form 14157 or in addition to it?
0 coins
Andre Dupont
•You can reach the Office of Professional Responsibility through their general line at 202-317-6897. While they'll ask for your name, you can explain that you're seeking initial guidance without filing a formal report yet. They're accustomed to preparers calling for ethical guidance. This would be a step to take before filing Form 14157. The benefit is that they can help you understand whether the situation warrants formal reporting and what specific documentation would strengthen your case. They might also suggest alternative approaches depending on the details. After speaking with them, you can make a more informed decision about proceeding with the formal 14157.
0 coins
QuantumQuasar
Don't forget that your state board of accountancy or tax preparer oversight board might also be appropriate places to report this, especially if the preparer has state credentials. Some states take a more active approach to preparer misconduct than the federal system.
0 coins
Zoe Papanikolaou
•This is so true. I reported a similar situation to my state's Department of Revenue preparer division and they actually took action within weeks, while the federal complaint was still sitting in the queue. State agencies often have more bandwidth for these cases!
0 coins