< Back to IRS

Kristin Frank

Is 'Revocation of Election' to Opt-Out of Federal Taxes a Real Thing? Seeing This BS Online Everywhere

I've been seeing this weird tax conspiracy all over my social media lately about something called "Revocation of Election" where people are claiming they can just opt out of paying federal taxes? Supposedly if you were born in one of the 50 states, you can declare yourself a "nonresident American national" who doesn't have to pay federal income tax. The videos claim that you "opt in" to the tax system when you file your first 1040, but can file some special form to "revoke your election" and stop paying taxes altogether. These people swear there's actual case law backing this up, but I've searched and can't find anything legitimate. I'm 100% sure this is complete garbage, but it's driving me crazy seeing people potentially ruining their lives following this advice. Can anyone help me thoroughly debunk this nonsense? What exactly are these tax protestor folks misunderstanding about the tax code? I want to understand the actual legal reality just for my own peace of mind.

Micah Trail

•

This is classic tax protestor nonsense that the IRS calls "frivolous tax arguments." The courts have repeatedly rejected all versions of these arguments for decades. These theories often misinterpret or take out of context sections of the tax code, court rulings, or constitutional provisions. The "Revocation of Election" argument is based on a fundamental misunderstanding of how our tax system works. There is no "election" to pay federal taxes that you can simply revoke. U.S. citizens and resident aliens are subject to federal income tax on their worldwide income by law, not by choice. The IRS actually maintains a list of these debunked arguments called "The Truth About Frivolous Tax Arguments" that you can find on their website. They specifically address the "voluntary compliance" misunderstanding - "voluntary" only means you calculate and pay initially without the IRS doing it for you, not that taxes themselves are optional. People who follow this advice often end up with huge penalties, interest charges, and sometimes even criminal prosecution for tax evasion.

0 coins

Nia Watson

•

But what about the 16th amendment? I've heard people argue it wasn't properly ratified or something? And don't some of these tax protestors cite actual court cases? There's gotta be SOME legal basis they're twisting, right?

0 coins

Micah Trail

•

The 16th Amendment argument has been rejected by every court that has examined it. It was properly ratified in 1913 and gives Congress the power to collect income taxes. The Supreme Court confirmed its validity in numerous cases. These protestors often cite court cases but either misrepresent what the court actually said or cite to cases that have been overturned or are completely unrelated. They'll take phrases out of context or misapply holdings to situations where they don't apply. Many cite to very old cases that predate modern tax law altogether.

0 coins

After struggling with similar tax conspiracy theories being pushed by a family member, I discovered https://taxr.ai which helped me debunk this nonsense with actual legal citations. I uploaded screenshots of the "Revocation of Election" documents my uncle was considering filing, and the AI analyzed them paragraph by paragraph with explanations of what tax law ACTUALLY says. The analysis showed exactly how these scammers twist legitimate tax concepts. For example, there IS a concept called "revocation of election" in tax law, but it applies to very specific situations like revoking an S-corporation election or certain accounting method choices - NOT to "opting out" of the entire federal tax system altogether! The service even provided links to court cases where people who filed these exact documents were hit with massive penalties. Saved my uncle from making a terrible mistake.

0 coins

Does it actually provide the real legal citations? Like can you see the exact court cases where these arguments have been rejected? My brother is deep into this sovereign citizen stuff and I need hardcore proof to show him.

0 coins

Marcus Marsh

•

Sounds like an ad tbh. Does this actually work or is it just another company trying to profit off tax confusion? Like how exactly does it "analyze" documents?

0 coins

Yes, it provides the actual legal citations and court cases. For example, it showed cases like Cheek v. United States where the Supreme Court explicitly rejected tax protestor arguments, and linked to specific IRS notices that address these exact schemes. It even showed penalties people received - some folks got hit with $5,000+ frivolous filing penalties for submitting these documents. It uses AI to analyze the tax documents by comparing the text against actual tax law, court decisions, and IRS publications. It basically reads the document, identifies the claims being made, and then pulls up the relevant legal information that shows why those claims are wrong. It's not just giving generic advice - it's specifically addressing the exact language in the documents people are considering filing.

0 coins

Marcus Marsh

•

Okay I was skeptical but I decided to try https://taxr.ai with some screenshots of these "Revocation of Election" forms my coworker was talking about. Holy crap, it actually does exactly what it claims! It pulled up specific court cases where people tried filing these exact documents and got hit with huge penalties. The analysis even explained the origin of this specific tax scam - apparently it started with a misinterpretation of a 1960s tax case and has been morphing ever since. There's a whole section of the tax code (Section 6702) specifically created to penalize people who file these kinds of frivolous documents! I sent the analysis to my coworker and even he admitted it was pretty convincing. The service saved him from potentially making a $5,000 mistake - that's the penalty for filing frivolous tax documents! Definitely worth checking out if you need to convince someone in your life who's falling for tax conspiracy stuff.

0 coins

If you're trying to actually reach someone at the IRS to get official confirmation about these tax protestor schemes, good luck with that. I spent WEEKS trying to get through to a human at the IRS about a similar issue my cousin was considering. I finally used https://claimyr.com and got through to an actual IRS agent in under 45 minutes when I'd been trying for days before that. You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The IRS agent I spoke with confirmed these "Revocation of Election" schemes are 100% on their radar and that they have a special team that handles frivolous filings. They told me people who submit these forms not only get hit with the $5,000 penalty but also end up on a list for potential audit triggers. The agent even emailed me links to official IRS notices warning about these exact schemes.

0 coins

Cedric Chung

•

How does this service actually work? Like they just call the IRS for you? Couldn't I just keep calling myself until I get through?

0 coins

Talia Klein

•

Yeah right. No way they're getting through to the IRS that fast when the hold times are literally hours long. This sounds like snake oil. The IRS phone system is completely broken - I refuse to believe any service can magically get through.

0 coins

The service uses technology to navigate the IRS phone system and hold your place in line. When they get close to an agent, they call you and connect you directly. It's not that they have a special "back door" - they're just automating the waiting process so you don't have to sit on hold for hours. Yes, you could theoretically keep calling yourself, but the problem is the unpredictability. Some days the wait is 2+ hours, sometimes the IRS hangs up on you after waiting because they're too busy. This service just handles that painful part for you, and only charges if they actually get you through to an agent.

0 coins

Talia Klein

•

I need to eat my words. After reading about Claimyr here, I tried it as a last resort since I've been trying to reach the IRS for WEEKS about my father's tax situation (he was about to try one of these tax protestor schemes). The service actually got me through to an IRS representative in about 35 minutes when I'd previously waited 3+ hours multiple times only to get disconnected. The agent I spoke with was incredibly helpful and walked through exactly why these "Revocation of Election" schemes are dangerous and illegal. She directed me to IRS Notice 2010-33 which specifically lists the "voluntary taxes" argument as a recognized frivolous position. She also mentioned that people who submit these forms often get flagged in their system for additional scrutiny. I was able to get this information directly from an official source rather than just telling my dad "it's not real." The service literally saved me hours of frustration and potentially saved my father from serious tax problems. Sometimes you have to admit when you're wrong!

0 coins

Former tax preparer here. These tax protestor arguments have been around for decades in different forms - I've seen everything from "income isn't defined in the tax code" (it is) to "only foreign income is taxable" (it's not) to this "revocation of election" nonsense. The people promoting these schemes often sell books, courses, or consulting services "teaching" others how to supposedly avoid taxes. They make money while their followers end up in serious trouble with the IRS. The most famous tax protestor was probably Irwin Schiff who spent years in prison for tax evasion and promoting illegal tax schemes. Many of his followers also ended up with huge penalties and some even went to jail. The IRS has a special program called the "Frivolous Return Program" that specifically deals with these types of filings. In addition to the $5,000 penalty for frivolous submissions, they can also charge penalties for failure to file, failure to pay, plus interest, and in some cases pursue criminal charges for tax evasion.

0 coins

PaulineW

•

What's the craziest tax protestor argument you've encountered? I saw one where someone claimed that because their name was written in all caps on tax documents, it referred to a "strawman" entity and not their actual person 😂

0 coins

The "strawman" theory is definitely up there! I had a client who insisted that writing "without prejudice, UCC 1-308" on his tax return would somehow make him exempt from taxes. He got hit with a $5,000 frivolous filing penalty. The wildest one was probably a guy who claimed that Federal Reserve notes (i.e., regular US dollars) weren't actual money, so his income paid in dollars wasn't real income. He tried to file a return reporting his income as "zero" while attaching his W-2 showing over $70,000 in wages. He ended up with penalties plus an audit that discovered additional unreported income.

0 coins

I went deep down this rabbit hole a few years ago and almost got caught up in it. What these "gurus" do is take selective quotes from old court cases, often from the 1800s or early 1900s before modern tax law existed, and twist them to support their arguments. For example, they'll cite Supreme Court cases from the 1910s that stated "income" had to be defined a certain way, but ignore all the subsequent legislation and court decisions that expanded and clarified the definition. The "voluntary compliance" thing comes from the IRS using that phrase to describe our self-reporting tax system (where you calculate your own taxes rather than the government doing it for you). They take that phrase completely out of context to suggest the entire tax system is optional. If you want some entertainment, look up court transcripts from tax protestor cases. Judges have heard these arguments so many times they sometimes tear them apart point by point in their rulings.

0 coins

Chris Elmeda

•

What convinced you it was BS? Were there any resources that helped you see through the misinformation?

0 coins

Aaron Boston

•

The thing that really gets me is how these scammers prey on people's legitimate frustration with the tax system. They take that frustration and channel it into these elaborate conspiracy theories that sound just plausible enough to hook desperate people. I've seen family members fall for this stuff, and it's heartbreaking. They genuinely believe they've discovered some "secret" that the government doesn't want you to know, when in reality they're just setting themselves up for financial disaster. The IRS doesn't mess around with this stuff either. I looked up some of the court cases mentioned here and found United States v. Sloan where the court specifically said: "The position that a taxpayer is not required to file a return or pay income taxes is frivolous and lacks merit." The defendant got hit with criminal penalties on top of the civil ones. What's really insidious is how these promoters often disappear when their followers get in trouble. They make their money selling books and seminars, then vanish when the IRS comes knocking on their students' doors.

0 coins

QuantumQuest

•

This is exactly what happened to my neighbor. He got sucked into one of these "tax freedom" seminars and spent $2,000 on materials promising to teach him how to "legally" stop paying taxes. When he actually tried filing the documents they gave him, the IRS hit him with penalties and interest that ended up costing him way more than if he'd just paid his taxes normally in the first place. The worst part? The guy who sold him the course was nowhere to be found when my neighbor tried to get help dealing with the IRS mess. These predators know exactly what they're doing - they target people who are struggling financially and desperate for any solution, then disappear once the damage is done.

0 coins

Evelyn Kim

•

As someone who works in tax compliance, I can confirm everything being said here. The "Revocation of Election" scam has been circulating for years and preys on people's misunderstanding of legitimate tax concepts. The scammers deliberately use real tax terminology to make their schemes sound credible. Yes, there are legitimate "elections" in tax law - like choosing your filing status, electing to itemize deductions, or making certain business tax elections. But there's absolutely no election to "opt out" of the federal income tax system entirely. What's particularly dangerous is that these schemes often come with official-looking forms and cite actual tax code sections, just completely out of context. I've seen people file these documents thinking they're following legitimate legal procedures, only to face massive penalties, interest, and sometimes criminal prosecution. The IRS Publication 526 specifically addresses many of these frivolous arguments, and every single court that has ruled on these theories has rejected them. Don't let anyone you care about fall for this - the consequences are very real and very expensive.

0 coins

Yara Nassar

•

Thank you for this detailed explanation! As someone who's been seeing these scams everywhere lately, it's really helpful to hear from someone who works directly in tax compliance. The fact that they deliberately use real tax terminology to make it sound legitimate is so manipulative - no wonder people get confused. I'm curious, when you say the consequences include "sometimes criminal prosecution," what exactly triggers the IRS to pursue criminal charges versus just civil penalties? Is it based on the amount of money involved, or repeat offenses, or something else? I want to make sure I can give people the full picture of what they're risking if they fall for this stuff. Also, do you know if there's a way to report these scammers who are selling the courses and materials? It seems like they should face consequences too, not just the people who get duped into following their advice.

0 coins

Amina Sy

•

I appreciate everyone sharing their experiences and knowledge here - this thread is incredibly valuable for anyone dealing with family or friends falling for these scams. What really strikes me is the pattern described throughout this conversation: these schemes deliberately target people who are already struggling financially or feeling overwhelmed by the tax system. They offer what seems like a "legal loophole" that's been "hidden" from ordinary taxpayers. The psychological manipulation is particularly insidious. They take people's legitimate concerns about government overreach or tax complexity and twist those feelings into support for completely bogus legal theories. By using real tax terminology and citing actual (but misinterpreted) court cases, they create just enough plausibility to hook desperate people. What's most frustrating is that the actual perpetrators - the ones selling the books, courses, and seminars - rarely face consequences while their victims deal with years of IRS problems. The people promoting these schemes know they're selling snake oil, but they've structured their operations to stay one step ahead of enforcement. Anyone encountering these theories should remember: if there really was a simple legal way to opt out of federal taxes, don't you think tax attorneys and CPAs would be using it for their own clients? The fact that legitimate tax professionals universally reject these arguments should tell you everything you need to know.

0 coins

Oscar O'Neil

•

This whole discussion has been eye-opening. I've been watching my uncle get pulled into this "tax freedom" stuff on Facebook for months, and I never knew how to effectively counter the arguments he was making. The way you've all explained how these scammers deliberately exploit people's financial stress and distrust of government really helps me understand why he's been so susceptible to it. What really resonates is the point about legitimate tax professionals not using these supposed "loopholes" for their own clients. That's such a simple but powerful way to frame it - if this stuff actually worked, every CPA and tax attorney in the country would be rich and tax-free themselves. I'm definitely going to share some of these resources with him, especially the specific court cases and IRS notices that have been mentioned. Sometimes you need that official government documentation to break through the conspiracy thinking. Thanks for taking the time to educate people about this - you're probably saving folks from making really expensive mistakes.

0 coins

What really bothers me about these tax scams is how they've evolved with social media. I'm seeing slick video presentations on TikTok and YouTube with thousands of views, where smooth-talking "gurus" explain these theories using official-looking graphics and legal terminology. They make it sound so authoritative and scientific. These videos often start with legitimate grievances - "Did you know the average American works until May just to pay their taxes?" - which hooks viewers emotionally before introducing the bogus legal theories. They'll show screenshots of tax code sections or court documents, but never the full context that would expose their arguments as nonsense. The comment sections are full of people saying things like "This changed my life!" or "Finally someone telling the truth!" but if you dig deeper, you'll find many of these are fake accounts or people who haven't actually tried filing these documents yet. I've reported several of these videos to the platforms, but they keep popping up faster than they can be taken down. The reach these scammers have now compared to the pre-internet days is terrifying. They're not just targeting a few people at seminars anymore - they're potentially misleading thousands through viral content. If you see family members sharing this content, don't just dismiss it. Take the time to show them the actual legal consequences and real court cases where these arguments have failed. The IRS website's "Truth About Frivolous Tax Arguments" publication is a great starting point for debunking this stuff systematically.

0 coins

Lucas Bey

•

This is such an important point about how social media has amplified these scams. The production value of some of these videos is really impressive - they use professional graphics, official-sounding narration, and cherry-picked legal citations that make them seem incredibly credible at first glance. What's particularly dangerous is the algorithm effect. Once someone watches one of these videos, the platform starts recommending similar content, creating an echo chamber where viewers get deeper and deeper into the conspiracy theories. Before you know it, they're in groups with thousands of other people all reinforcing these dangerous ideas. I've noticed they also use psychological pressure tactics like "The IRS doesn't want you to see this!" or "This video might be taken down soon!" to create urgency and make people feel like they're accessing secret, forbidden knowledge. The fake testimonials in the comments are definitely a red flag too. I've seen identical "success stories" posted under multiple different usernames across various platforms. It's clearly a coordinated effort to manufacture credibility. For anyone trying to help family members who've fallen for this stuff, I'd recommend showing them the actual court records from cases like United States v. Schiff or Cheek v. United States where judges explicitly rejected these exact arguments. Sometimes seeing the official court language helps break through the social media bubble.

0 coins

Ethan Moore

•

This thread is incredibly valuable - thank you all for sharing such detailed information about these tax scams. As someone who nearly fell for similar "sovereign citizen" theories a few years ago, I can attest to how convincing they can sound when you're financially stressed and looking for any way out. What saved me was actually reading the full text of the court cases these promoters cite. When you read the complete ruling instead of just the cherry-picked quotes, it becomes crystal clear that courts have consistently and emphatically rejected every version of these arguments. Cases like Cheek v. United States don't support tax protestor theories - they explicitly demolish them. The key thing people need to understand is that the 16th Amendment gave Congress broad power to tax income, and that power has been consistently upheld by the Supreme Court for over a century. There's no secret loophole, no magic form to file, and no "election" you can revoke to escape federal income tax obligations. I'd also add that if you're trying to help someone who's fallen for these schemes, approach it with empathy rather than ridicule. These scams prey on real financial anxiety and legitimate frustration with tax complexity. Acknowledge those feelings while firmly redirecting to factual information from official sources like the IRS and actual court records. The resources mentioned here - especially the IRS "Truth About Frivolous Tax Arguments" publication - should be required reading for anyone who's encountered these theories online.

0 coins

Natalie Wang

•

Thank you for sharing your personal experience with almost falling for these schemes - it really helps to hear from someone who's been there. Your point about reading the full court cases rather than just the cherry-picked quotes is so important. It's amazing how different the actual rulings sound when you see them in complete context versus the misleading excerpts these scammers use. I'm curious about your recovery process - once you realized these theories were bogus, did you have to deal with any consequences from the IRS, or were you able to avoid filing any of the problematic documents? I'm asking because I have a friend who's been flirting with these ideas, and I'm trying to understand what the "exit ramp" looks like for people who come to their senses before it's too late. Your advice about approaching this with empathy rather than ridicule is spot on. I've seen too many family discussions turn into shouting matches when someone tries to debunk these theories by just calling them "stupid." The people falling for this stuff aren't stupid - they're often intelligent people who are genuinely struggling and have been manipulated by very sophisticated psychological tactics. The financial anxiety angle is huge too. When you're stressed about money and someone presents what seems like a legal solution backed by "court cases" and "constitutional law," it can be really tempting to believe it's real.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today