Back to IRS

Kristin Frank

Is 'Revocation of Election' to Opt-Out of Federal Taxes a Real Thing? Seeing This BS Online Everywhere

I've been seeing this weird tax conspiracy all over my social media lately about something called "Revocation of Election" where people are claiming they can just opt out of paying federal taxes? Supposedly if you were born in one of the 50 states, you can declare yourself a "nonresident American national" who doesn't have to pay federal income tax. The videos claim that you "opt in" to the tax system when you file your first 1040, but can file some special form to "revoke your election" and stop paying taxes altogether. These people swear there's actual case law backing this up, but I've searched and can't find anything legitimate. I'm 100% sure this is complete garbage, but it's driving me crazy seeing people potentially ruining their lives following this advice. Can anyone help me thoroughly debunk this nonsense? What exactly are these tax protestor folks misunderstanding about the tax code? I want to understand the actual legal reality just for my own peace of mind.

This is classic tax protestor nonsense that the IRS calls "frivolous tax arguments." The courts have repeatedly rejected all versions of these arguments for decades. These theories often misinterpret or take out of context sections of the tax code, court rulings, or constitutional provisions. The "Revocation of Election" argument is based on a fundamental misunderstanding of how our tax system works. There is no "election" to pay federal taxes that you can simply revoke. U.S. citizens and resident aliens are subject to federal income tax on their worldwide income by law, not by choice. The IRS actually maintains a list of these debunked arguments called "The Truth About Frivolous Tax Arguments" that you can find on their website. They specifically address the "voluntary compliance" misunderstanding - "voluntary" only means you calculate and pay initially without the IRS doing it for you, not that taxes themselves are optional. People who follow this advice often end up with huge penalties, interest charges, and sometimes even criminal prosecution for tax evasion.

0 coins

But what about the 16th amendment? I've heard people argue it wasn't properly ratified or something? And don't some of these tax protestors cite actual court cases? There's gotta be SOME legal basis they're twisting, right?

0 coins

The 16th Amendment argument has been rejected by every court that has examined it. It was properly ratified in 1913 and gives Congress the power to collect income taxes. The Supreme Court confirmed its validity in numerous cases. These protestors often cite court cases but either misrepresent what the court actually said or cite to cases that have been overturned or are completely unrelated. They'll take phrases out of context or misapply holdings to situations where they don't apply. Many cite to very old cases that predate modern tax law altogether.

0 coins

After struggling with similar tax conspiracy theories being pushed by a family member, I discovered https://taxr.ai which helped me debunk this nonsense with actual legal citations. I uploaded screenshots of the "Revocation of Election" documents my uncle was considering filing, and the AI analyzed them paragraph by paragraph with explanations of what tax law ACTUALLY says. The analysis showed exactly how these scammers twist legitimate tax concepts. For example, there IS a concept called "revocation of election" in tax law, but it applies to very specific situations like revoking an S-corporation election or certain accounting method choices - NOT to "opting out" of the entire federal tax system altogether! The service even provided links to court cases where people who filed these exact documents were hit with massive penalties. Saved my uncle from making a terrible mistake.

0 coins

Does it actually provide the real legal citations? Like can you see the exact court cases where these arguments have been rejected? My brother is deep into this sovereign citizen stuff and I need hardcore proof to show him.

0 coins

Sounds like an ad tbh. Does this actually work or is it just another company trying to profit off tax confusion? Like how exactly does it "analyze" documents?

0 coins

Yes, it provides the actual legal citations and court cases. For example, it showed cases like Cheek v. United States where the Supreme Court explicitly rejected tax protestor arguments, and linked to specific IRS notices that address these exact schemes. It even showed penalties people received - some folks got hit with $5,000+ frivolous filing penalties for submitting these documents. It uses AI to analyze the tax documents by comparing the text against actual tax law, court decisions, and IRS publications. It basically reads the document, identifies the claims being made, and then pulls up the relevant legal information that shows why those claims are wrong. It's not just giving generic advice - it's specifically addressing the exact language in the documents people are considering filing.

0 coins

Okay I was skeptical but I decided to try https://taxr.ai with some screenshots of these "Revocation of Election" forms my coworker was talking about. Holy crap, it actually does exactly what it claims! It pulled up specific court cases where people tried filing these exact documents and got hit with huge penalties. The analysis even explained the origin of this specific tax scam - apparently it started with a misinterpretation of a 1960s tax case and has been morphing ever since. There's a whole section of the tax code (Section 6702) specifically created to penalize people who file these kinds of frivolous documents! I sent the analysis to my coworker and even he admitted it was pretty convincing. The service saved him from potentially making a $5,000 mistake - that's the penalty for filing frivolous tax documents! Definitely worth checking out if you need to convince someone in your life who's falling for tax conspiracy stuff.

0 coins

If you're trying to actually reach someone at the IRS to get official confirmation about these tax protestor schemes, good luck with that. I spent WEEKS trying to get through to a human at the IRS about a similar issue my cousin was considering. I finally used https://claimyr.com and got through to an actual IRS agent in under 45 minutes when I'd been trying for days before that. You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The IRS agent I spoke with confirmed these "Revocation of Election" schemes are 100% on their radar and that they have a special team that handles frivolous filings. They told me people who submit these forms not only get hit with the $5,000 penalty but also end up on a list for potential audit triggers. The agent even emailed me links to official IRS notices warning about these exact schemes.

0 coins

How does this service actually work? Like they just call the IRS for you? Couldn't I just keep calling myself until I get through?

0 coins

Yeah right. No way they're getting through to the IRS that fast when the hold times are literally hours long. This sounds like snake oil. The IRS phone system is completely broken - I refuse to believe any service can magically get through.

0 coins

The service uses technology to navigate the IRS phone system and hold your place in line. When they get close to an agent, they call you and connect you directly. It's not that they have a special "back door" - they're just automating the waiting process so you don't have to sit on hold for hours. Yes, you could theoretically keep calling yourself, but the problem is the unpredictability. Some days the wait is 2+ hours, sometimes the IRS hangs up on you after waiting because they're too busy. This service just handles that painful part for you, and only charges if they actually get you through to an agent.

0 coins

I need to eat my words. After reading about Claimyr here, I tried it as a last resort since I've been trying to reach the IRS for WEEKS about my father's tax situation (he was about to try one of these tax protestor schemes). The service actually got me through to an IRS representative in about 35 minutes when I'd previously waited 3+ hours multiple times only to get disconnected. The agent I spoke with was incredibly helpful and walked through exactly why these "Revocation of Election" schemes are dangerous and illegal. She directed me to IRS Notice 2010-33 which specifically lists the "voluntary taxes" argument as a recognized frivolous position. She also mentioned that people who submit these forms often get flagged in their system for additional scrutiny. I was able to get this information directly from an official source rather than just telling my dad "it's not real." The service literally saved me hours of frustration and potentially saved my father from serious tax problems. Sometimes you have to admit when you're wrong!

0 coins

Former tax preparer here. These tax protestor arguments have been around for decades in different forms - I've seen everything from "income isn't defined in the tax code" (it is) to "only foreign income is taxable" (it's not) to this "revocation of election" nonsense. The people promoting these schemes often sell books, courses, or consulting services "teaching" others how to supposedly avoid taxes. They make money while their followers end up in serious trouble with the IRS. The most famous tax protestor was probably Irwin Schiff who spent years in prison for tax evasion and promoting illegal tax schemes. Many of his followers also ended up with huge penalties and some even went to jail. The IRS has a special program called the "Frivolous Return Program" that specifically deals with these types of filings. In addition to the $5,000 penalty for frivolous submissions, they can also charge penalties for failure to file, failure to pay, plus interest, and in some cases pursue criminal charges for tax evasion.

0 coins

What's the craziest tax protestor argument you've encountered? I saw one where someone claimed that because their name was written in all caps on tax documents, it referred to a "strawman" entity and not their actual person 😂

0 coins

The "strawman" theory is definitely up there! I had a client who insisted that writing "without prejudice, UCC 1-308" on his tax return would somehow make him exempt from taxes. He got hit with a $5,000 frivolous filing penalty. The wildest one was probably a guy who claimed that Federal Reserve notes (i.e., regular US dollars) weren't actual money, so his income paid in dollars wasn't real income. He tried to file a return reporting his income as "zero" while attaching his W-2 showing over $70,000 in wages. He ended up with penalties plus an audit that discovered additional unreported income.

0 coins

I went deep down this rabbit hole a few years ago and almost got caught up in it. What these "gurus" do is take selective quotes from old court cases, often from the 1800s or early 1900s before modern tax law existed, and twist them to support their arguments. For example, they'll cite Supreme Court cases from the 1910s that stated "income" had to be defined a certain way, but ignore all the subsequent legislation and court decisions that expanded and clarified the definition. The "voluntary compliance" thing comes from the IRS using that phrase to describe our self-reporting tax system (where you calculate your own taxes rather than the government doing it for you). They take that phrase completely out of context to suggest the entire tax system is optional. If you want some entertainment, look up court transcripts from tax protestor cases. Judges have heard these arguments so many times they sometimes tear them apart point by point in their rulings.

0 coins

What convinced you it was BS? Were there any resources that helped you see through the misinformation?

0 coins

The thing that really gets me is how these scammers prey on people's legitimate frustration with the tax system. They take that frustration and channel it into these elaborate conspiracy theories that sound just plausible enough to hook desperate people. I've seen family members fall for this stuff, and it's heartbreaking. They genuinely believe they've discovered some "secret" that the government doesn't want you to know, when in reality they're just setting themselves up for financial disaster. The IRS doesn't mess around with this stuff either. I looked up some of the court cases mentioned here and found United States v. Sloan where the court specifically said: "The position that a taxpayer is not required to file a return or pay income taxes is frivolous and lacks merit." The defendant got hit with criminal penalties on top of the civil ones. What's really insidious is how these promoters often disappear when their followers get in trouble. They make their money selling books and seminars, then vanish when the IRS comes knocking on their students' doors.

0 coins

As someone who works in tax compliance, I can confirm everything being said here. The "Revocation of Election" scam has been circulating for years and preys on people's misunderstanding of legitimate tax concepts. The scammers deliberately use real tax terminology to make their schemes sound credible. Yes, there are legitimate "elections" in tax law - like choosing your filing status, electing to itemize deductions, or making certain business tax elections. But there's absolutely no election to "opt out" of the federal income tax system entirely. What's particularly dangerous is that these schemes often come with official-looking forms and cite actual tax code sections, just completely out of context. I've seen people file these documents thinking they're following legitimate legal procedures, only to face massive penalties, interest, and sometimes criminal prosecution. The IRS Publication 526 specifically addresses many of these frivolous arguments, and every single court that has ruled on these theories has rejected them. Don't let anyone you care about fall for this - the consequences are very real and very expensive.

0 coins

Thank you for this detailed explanation! As someone who's been seeing these scams everywhere lately, it's really helpful to hear from someone who works directly in tax compliance. The fact that they deliberately use real tax terminology to make it sound legitimate is so manipulative - no wonder people get confused. I'm curious, when you say the consequences include "sometimes criminal prosecution," what exactly triggers the IRS to pursue criminal charges versus just civil penalties? Is it based on the amount of money involved, or repeat offenses, or something else? I want to make sure I can give people the full picture of what they're risking if they fall for this stuff. Also, do you know if there's a way to report these scammers who are selling the courses and materials? It seems like they should face consequences too, not just the people who get duped into following their advice.

0 coins

Great questions! Criminal prosecution typically happens when there's evidence of willful tax evasion, substantial underreporting (usually $70,000+ in additional tax owed), or when someone repeatedly files frivolous returns despite warnings. The IRS Criminal Investigation division looks for patterns that show deliberate intent to defraud rather than just confusion or bad advice. For reporting the scammers themselves, you can file Form 3949-A (Information Referral) with the IRS to report suspected tax fraud schemes. The IRS also has a "Report Phishing and Online Scams" page on their website. The Department of Justice has been cracking down on tax scheme promoters - many have been prosecuted under conspiracy and fraud statutes. The frustrating thing is these promoters often structure their operations carefully to try to avoid liability, claiming they're just providing "educational materials" rather than tax advice. But when the materials clearly instruct people how to file specific documents claiming tax exemptions, courts have generally found that crosses the line into illegal tax preparation and promotion of fraudulent schemes.

0 coins

Great questions! Criminal prosecution usually happens when there's evidence of willful tax evasion or fraud, not just following bad advice. The IRS looks at factors like the amount of unpaid taxes, whether someone repeatedly filed frivolous returns after being warned, or if they're promoting these schemes to others. For reporting scammers, you can file Form 3949-A with the IRS to report suspected tax fraud. The IRS also has a specific email (phishing@irs.gov) for reporting tax-related scams. The Federal Trade Commission and state attorney general offices also investigate these "tax freedom" seminar promoters. What's particularly frustrating is that many promoters structure their businesses carefully to stay just on the legal side - they sell "educational materials" and claim they're not giving tax advice. But morally, they're absolutely preying on vulnerable people. The more people report them, the better chance law enforcement has of building cases against the worst offenders.

0 coins

Great questions! Criminal prosecution typically gets triggered by several factors: willful tax evasion (intentionally hiding income or filing false returns), promoting tax fraud schemes for profit, or repeat offenses after being warned. The IRS Criminal Investigation division looks for cases involving substantial amounts (usually $70,000+ in tax loss) and clear intent to defraud. For reporting these scammers, you can file Form 3949-A with the IRS to report suspected tax fraud, or contact their fraud hotline at 1-800-829-0433. The IRS takes these promoter investigations seriously because they know one bad actor can mislead hundreds of people. What's frustrating is that many promoters operate in legal gray areas - they're careful to say things like "this is not tax advice" or "consult your own tax professional" to try to avoid liability. But the IRS has been cracking down harder on promoters under IRC Section 6700, which imposes penalties on people who organize or sell abusive tax shelters. The key thing to tell people is that if someone is selling a "secret" way to avoid taxes that the government "doesn't want you to know," it's 100% a scam. Legitimate tax strategies are well-known, documented, and don't require buying special courses or materials.

0 coins

Great questions! Criminal prosecution typically gets triggered by several factors: the dollar amount of tax evaded (usually substantial), willful intent to evade taxes (versus just being misled), repeat offenses, or promoting these schemes to others. The IRS Criminal Investigation division looks for patterns of deliberate fraud rather than just people who got bad advice. As for reporting the scammers, absolutely! You can report tax scheme promoters to the IRS using Form 14242 or by calling the IRS at 1-866-775-7474. The IRS has a "Return Preparer Office" that investigates people who sell fraudulent tax advice. They've successfully prosecuted many of these promoters over the years - some have gotten prison time and been ordered to pay restitution to their victims. The challenge is these promoters often operate across state lines, use shell companies, and sometimes disappear quickly once they make their money. But the IRS does pursue them when they can track them down. I've seen cases where promoters were hit with injunctions preventing them from selling tax advice, plus criminal charges for conspiracy and tax evasion.

0 coins

Great questions! Criminal prosecution typically happens when there's evidence of willful tax evasion - basically when someone knowingly and intentionally tries to avoid paying taxes they owe. The IRS Criminal Investigation division looks at factors like the amount of tax evaded (usually needs to be substantial), evidence of intent to defraud, and whether someone took affirmative steps to conceal income or assets. Simply filing one of these frivolous documents usually results in civil penalties first. But if someone continues filing them repeatedly after being warned, or if they're promoting these schemes to others for profit, that's when criminal charges become more likely. As for reporting the scammers, yes! You can report tax scheme promoters to the IRS using Form 14242 or by calling the IRS at 1-866-775-7474. The IRS has a whole Return Preparer Office that investigates people who sell illegal tax advice. They've shut down many of these operations over the years, though new ones unfortunately keep popping up. The IRS also offers rewards under their whistleblower program for information that leads to collecting taxes from these promoters - sometimes substantial amounts if the case involves significant tax revenue.

0 coins

Great questions! Criminal prosecution typically gets triggered by several factors working together: the dollar amount involved (usually substantial tax deficiency), evidence of willful intent to evade taxes (versus just being misled), pattern of behavior over multiple years, and sometimes the person's role in promoting the scheme to others. The IRS Criminal Investigation division looks for cases that will have deterrent effect. So someone who just filed one frivolous return after being duped might face civil penalties, but someone who repeatedly files these documents year after year, or worse - someone who's teaching others to do it - is much more likely to face criminal charges. As for reporting the promoters, absolutely! You can report tax scheme promoters to the IRS using Form 14242 or by calling the IRS Lead Development Center at 1-866-860-4259. The IRS actively investigates and prosecutes people who sell these schemes. Many promoters have faced injunctions preventing them from preparing returns, and some have gone to prison. The challenge is these promoters often operate in legal gray areas, claiming they're just "educating" people about tax law rather than giving specific advice. But when they cross the line into actively promoting illegal tax positions for profit, the IRS does go after them.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
43,844 users helped today