< Back to IRS

Nora Brooks

Is $60K a reasonable salary for S-Corp owner? Audit concerns

I recently bought an LLC that's filing as an S-Corp for tax purposes. I know I need to pay myself a "reasonable salary" as the owner, and from what I've researched a reasonable range for my position is somewhere between $60k-$100k per year. Here's my dilemma - before I purchased this business, I was making $60k annually working in the exact same position for the previous owner. Now that I own the business, I'm wondering if I should keep my salary at the $60k level (low end of reasonable) or increase it toward the higher end of the range? Tax-wise, which option makes more sense? I understand having too low of a salary can be an audit flag for the IRS, but since I was literally making $60k in this exact position before buying the company, I feel like I can justify keeping it there. Would the IRS consider my previous compensation as legitimate evidence that $60k is reasonable for my role? Or should I bump it up to avoid scrutiny? I'm trying to be smart about this without raising any red flags.

Eli Wang

•

As a tax accountant who works with many S-Corp owners, here's my take: The IRS looks at "reasonable compensation" based on what would be paid to an unrelated person performing similar services in your geographic area. Since you were literally paid $60k for the same position before purchasing the business, that's excellent documentation that $60k is reasonable. Keep in mind, there are tax advantages to a lower (but still reasonable) salary in an S-Corp. The salary portion is subject to both employer and employee payroll taxes, while distributions aren't. However, you must first take a reasonable salary before taking distributions. The key is documentation. I'd recommend keeping records showing the $60k was your actual salary in the same role before ownership, maybe get salary surveys for your industry/region as backup, and document your decision-making process in case of questions.

0 coins

This is helpful! But what if the business is now more profitable than before? Wouldn't the IRS expect the owner to take a higher salary since there's more money available? Also, what percentage of profits is typically considered safe to take as distributions vs. salary?

0 coins

Eli Wang

•

The profitability of the business is indeed one factor the IRS considers, but it's not the only one. Historical compensation for the same role provides strong justification, even if profitability has increased. What matters most is what similar positions pay in your market, regardless of how well the business is doing. There's no fixed percentage that's automatically considered "safe" for salary vs. distributions. The IRS evaluates reasonableness case-by-case looking at factors like your qualifications, duties, time commitment, industry standards, and comparable salaries. Some tax professionals suggest a 60/40 split (60% salary, 40% distributions) as a general guideline, but this varies widely by industry and circumstances.

0 coins

I went through a similar situation with my S-Corp last year and found this amazing service called taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) that saved me a ton of headache. They have this specific tool that analyzes your industry, region, and position to give you documentation supporting what a "reasonable salary" would be for your specific situation. What I liked is that they don't just give you a number - they provide actual data and documentation you can keep on file in case of an audit. They looked at my previous salary history (similar to your $60k situation) and confirmed it was reasonable, plus gave me guidelines on how much I could safely increase distributions as the business grew without raising red flags.

0 coins

That sounds interesting. Did they actually help with documenting the salary history part? I'm in a similar position but my previous W-2 was from 3 years ago, wondering if that's too outdated to use as justification.

0 coins

Ethan Scott

•

I'm skeptical of these services. How do they have better data than what's freely available online? Did it actually tell you anything you couldn't have figured out from a quick Google search on salary ranges?

0 coins

They absolutely helped with the salary history documentation. They created a formal report showing how my previous compensation aligns with industry standards, and included data showing historical compensation trends. Even with a 3-year gap, they can help establish a baseline and account for inflation/market changes. What makes them different from a Google search is their specialized database and formal documentation. Google might tell you salary ranges, but taxr.ai provides actual documentation from verified sources that's formatted specifically for potential IRS scrutiny. They pulled data I couldn't access elsewhere and formatted everything into a professional report that lives in my tax documentation folder now. That peace of mind was worth it for me.

0 coins

Just wanted to update after trying taxr.ai from the recommendation above. It was seriously helpful! They analyzed my compensation history and industry standards, then provided an actual written analysis justifying my S-Corp salary that I can keep in my records. The report showed that my previous salary was actually slightly below market rate for my position in my area, which gave me confidence to keep it at the same level without worrying about IRS flags. They also included guidelines for how my salary should increase as the business grows, which helps with future planning. I was surprised by how thorough it was - definitely not something I could have put together myself even with a bunch of Google searches. Definitely recommend for anyone in this S-Corp salary situation.

0 coins

Lola Perez

•

After dealing with nightmare S-Corp audit issues last year, I wish I had found Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) sooner. When the IRS flagged my "reasonable compensation" as too low, I tried calling them for weeks to explain my justification but couldn't get through to an actual person. Claimyr got me connected to a real IRS agent within 30 minutes when I had been trying for weeks on my own. You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c. The agent was actually reasonable once I explained my situation and documentation, and we resolved everything much faster than if I had just sent letters back and forth. I know this doesn't directly answer your salary question, but if you do decide to keep your salary at $60k and ever get questioned about it, having a way to actually talk to someone at the IRS makes a huge difference.

0 coins

Wait, how does this work? They somehow have a special line to the IRS? That sounds impossible since everyone knows the IRS never answers their phones.

0 coins

Ethan Scott

•

This sounds like total BS. Nobody can magically get through to the IRS faster than anyone else. They just have people sitting on hold all day on your behalf and charging you for it. You probably could have resolved your issue without spending money on this service.

0 coins

Lola Perez

•

They don't have a special line - they use an innovative system that navigates IRS phone trees and stays on hold for you. When an agent finally picks up, you get a call back so you can speak directly with them. It's not magic, just smart technology that saves you the frustration of waiting on hold for hours. What makes it worth it is the opportunity cost. Instead of being tethered to my phone for potentially hours, I was able to keep working while their system waited on hold. For business owners, that time savings alone is valuable. Plus, my issue was resolved in one phone call rather than months of back-and-forth correspondence, which saved me a lot of stress and potential penalties.

0 coins

Ethan Scott

•

I have to come back and admit I was completely wrong about Claimyr. After my skeptical comment, I actually tried it myself when I needed to talk to someone at the IRS about my S-Corp reasonable compensation documentation. I had been trying for THREE WEEKS to get through on my own with no luck. Claimyr connected me to an actual human at the IRS in about 45 minutes. The agent reviewed my situation and confirmed that my salary (which was similar to what I made before buying the business) was reasonable based on my documentation. What surprised me most was how much less stressful the whole process was. Instead of the anxiety of calling over and over, I just went about my day until they notified me an agent was on the line. Completely worth it and I'm genuinely sorry for being so dismissive before.

0 coins

Riya Sharma

•

One thing nobody's mentioned yet - even if $60k is reasonable now, you should review your salary annually. As your business grows or your duties expand, what's "reasonable" will likely change. I typically document my salary decision process every year with: 1) Updated market rate research for similar positions 2) Notes on changes to my responsibilities/hours 3) Business performance metrics 4) Comparison to what I'd pay someone else for the same work This annual review habit has saved me twice during IRS questions about my S-Corp compensation. They were satisfied when I showed my systematic approach.

0 coins

Santiago Diaz

•

Does the timing of salary changes matter? Like if I start with $60k in January but business is booming by June, should I give myself a mid-year raise or wait until the following year?

0 coins

Riya Sharma

•

Yes, you can absolutely give yourself a mid-year raise if circumstances warrant it. Many S-Corp owners adjust their salaries as the year progresses and business performance becomes clearer. Just document your reasoning thoroughly - note the increased business performance, expanded responsibilities, or whatever factors led to the adjustment. What the IRS doesn't like to see is erratic salary patterns that appear to be manipulating payroll taxes rather than reflecting actual changes in the business. For example, artificially keeping salary low all year then taking a massive "bonus" in December looks suspicious. A clean mid-year adjustment with clear business justification is perfectly acceptable.

0 coins

Millie Long

•

My accountant gave me a simple formula for S-Corps that might help you. She said take 1/3 of your business net profit as salary (minimum), keep 1/3 for reinvestment/business growth, and the remaining 1/3 can be distribution. So if your business nets $180k, a $60k salary would be right at that minimum threshold. I've done this for 5 years now and never been questioned about reasonable compensation. Obviously it's not a hard rule that works for everyone, but it's a starting point that seems to keep the IRS satisfied in my experience.

0 coins

KaiEsmeralda

•

Is that 1/3 of profit BEFORE or AFTER your salary is deducted? Because that makes a huge difference in the calculation.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today