How does Canadian Tax Residency work for US relocation when spouse follows on different visa?
Hey all, I'm in a bit of a sticky situation with Canada-US cross border taxes, and whether I'm considered a Canadian tax resident could cost me thousands of dollars to the CRA. Here's my timeline: - Got engaged in September 2024 - Moved to the US on a work visa in October 2024 (my then-fiancée came with me but on a tourist visa) - Returned to Canada in December 2024 for our wedding - My wife then entered the US in January 2025 on a proper spousal visa The cross-border tax folks my company hired are telling me they want to file me as a Canadian tax resident (meaning I'd owe tax on my global income) because my wife didn't initially move with me on a spousal visa in 2024. I thought CRA considers your marital status at the end of the year to be your status for the whole year. So even though I initially moved with my fiancée, wouldn't they consider it as if I moved with my spouse since we were married by December 31st? This determination could cost me around $7,000 in additional taxes if I'm considered a Canadian resident. Any insights from people who've dealt with Canadian Tax Residency in cross-border situations?
18 comments


Nathan Dell
This situation actually comes down to the "significant residential ties" test that CRA uses to determine tax residency. When you leave Canada, they look at primary ties like spouse/dependents, home, and personal property to determine if you've truly severed your residential ties. The CRA does consider your marital status as of December 31st for many purposes, but for residency determination, the timing of when your spouse physically relocated matters. Since your spouse initially entered on a tourist visa (temporary) rather than establishing permanent residence in the US with you in 2024, the CRA could argue you maintained a significant residential tie to Canada during those months. Your accountants are being cautious, which is understandable given the penalties for incorrect filing. Have they completed a detailed residency determination worksheet with your specific circumstances? The fact that your spouse ultimately did relocate permanently in January 2025 strengthens your case for non-residency from that point forward.
0 coins
Rebecca Johnston
•Thanks for the explanation. No, they haven't shown me any detailed residency determination worksheet - they just stated their conclusion. Should I specifically ask for this? And just to clarify, are you saying I might be considered a Canadian resident for Oct-Dec 2024, but then a non-resident from January 2025 when my wife moved on the spousal visa? Can they do a split-year determination like that?
0 coins
Nathan Dell
•Yes, absolutely ask for their detailed residency analysis. They should be able to show you exactly which factors they considered in their determination. This will help you understand their reasoning and potentially identify any facts they may have misunderstood. The CRA can and does do split-year residency determinations. You could potentially be considered a resident until your residential ties are sufficiently severed, and then a non-resident from that point forward. In your case, this might mean being a Canadian resident until your spouse established permanent residence in the US in January 2025. This split-year approach might actually save you money compared to being considered a resident for the entire year.
0 coins
Maya Jackson
I went through something similar last year and used taxr.ai to help sort through all the CRA residency requirements. I was also moving to the US but was worried about Canadian residency status because my spouse stayed behind for a few months to finish up her contract. The tool at https://taxr.ai analyzed all my documents including the dates of my move, property ownership, bank accounts and family ties. It showed me exactly which factors the CRA would consider "significant ties" vs "secondary ties" based on my specific situation. What was really helpful was how it showed me previous CRA rulings on cases similar to mine, which helped me understand how they interpret these rules in practice rather than just theory. My situation ended up being different than what my employer's accountants initially thought, and I saved about $8,900 in unnecessary Canadian taxes.
0 coins
Tristan Carpenter
•Did you have to upload all your personal documents to this site? I'm a little hesitant about privacy with these online tools. And how accurate was it compared to what an actual accountant would tell you?
0 coins
Amaya Watson
•I'm curious - how does this handle the different provisions in the US-Canada tax treaty? My accountant mentioned something about treaty positions being different than the standard CRA residency rules.
0 coins
Maya Jackson
•You can choose which documents to upload - I mainly used it to scan my employment contract and moving receipts to establish timelines. They use bank-level encryption and delete everything after analysis if you want. For sensitive stuff like my T4s, I just entered the relevant info manually. The treaty provisions are actually one of its strengths. It specifically analyzes Article IV of the US-Canada tax treaty which has the "tie-breaker rules" that determine residency when both countries might claim you as a resident. It looks at permanent home, center of vital interests, habitual abode, and citizenship in that order. In my case, it correctly identified how the treaty would override the standard CRA position.
0 coins
Amaya Watson
I tried taxr.ai after seeing it mentioned here and it was honestly a game-changer for my situation. I was moving between Canada and the US multiple times in a year for work and was getting conflicting advice about my residency status. The analysis showed me that even though I still owned a house in Canada (which I was renting out), my center of vital interests had clearly shifted to the US based on my employment, where my family lived, and my banking activity. It identified the exact CRA interpretation bulletins and court cases that applied to my situation. The best part was that it gave me specific documentation strategies to strengthen my non-residency position, like which accounts to close or convert, and what documentation to maintain about my time in each country. With those changes, I was able to successfully file as a non-resident of Canada and saved about $12,000 in tax!
0 coins
Grant Vikers
If you're still struggling to get through to the CRA about your residency status determination, try Claimyr. When I was dealing with a similar cross-border issue last year, I spent weeks trying to get someone at CRA who actually understood the US-Canada tax treaty. I found https://claimyr.com and used their service to connect with a CRA agent who specialized in non-resident determinations in just under 20 minutes (there's a video showing how it works at https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c). The agent was able to review my specific situation and provide binding guidance that my accountant could rely on. The person I spoke with confirmed that my spouse's visa status and timing of physical relocation was indeed a factor, but they also considered other elements like whether we had closed Canadian bank accounts, sold property, etc. Getting this official determination saved me from going back and forth with my accountant who was being overly cautious.
0 coins
Giovanni Martello
•How does this actually work? I thought it was impossible to get through to CRA these days - my accountant said they're backlogged by months.
0 coins
Savannah Weiner
•I don't believe this for a second. There's no way to "skip the line" with CRA. They're notoriously difficult to reach and when you do get someone, they rarely give definitive answers on complex situations like tax residency. Sounds like a scam to me.
0 coins
Grant Vikers
•It uses a system that constantly redials and navigates the phone menus until it gets through to an agent. Once it connects, it calls you so you can talk directly with the CRA agent. It's completely legitimate - they don't pretend to be you or anything sketchy like that. The key is that once you get through to a CRA agent who specializes in your issue (in my case, non-resident determinations), you can actually get helpful information. You're right that many frontline agents won't give definitive rulings, but if you ask specifically for someone who handles non-resident files, they can often provide much clearer guidance. The information I received wasn't a formal ruling but gave me sufficient certainty to proceed.
0 coins
Savannah Weiner
I need to eat my words here. After my skeptical comment, I actually tried Claimyr out of desperation because I needed to talk to someone at CRA about my own residency situation (I'm moving to the UK but still have investments in Canada). It connected me to a CRA agent in about 15 minutes when I had previously spent HOURS on hold over multiple days. The agent I spoke with was able to explain exactly what documentation I needed to support my non-residency claim and even emailed me the relevant forms right after our call. The specific guidance I got about handling my TFSA and RRSP accounts as a non-resident was different than what my accountant had initially told me. This conversation potentially saved me from making a costly mistake with my Canadian retirement accounts during my transition to the UK.
0 coins
Levi Parker
One thing nobody's mentioned yet is the 330-day rule that's pretty critical in these cases. Canada doesn't just look at your ties but also at physical presence. If you're physically present in Canada for 183 days or more in the tax year, you're deemed a resident for tax purposes regardless of your ties. Since you moved in October and came back in December for your wedding, count those days carefully. Did you stay in Canada after the wedding for any length of time? Did you make any other trips back to Canada during that period? All those days count toward your physical presence test.
0 coins
Rebecca Johnston
•That's helpful, thanks! I moved October 10th and was in the US until December 18th when we returned for the wedding. We stayed in Canada until January 2nd, so that's about 27 days total in Canada for 2024. Sounds like I should be well under the 183-day threshold. Do pre-move days count toward this calculation too? Like, I was obviously in Canada from January-October before moving.
0 coins
Levi Parker
•Yes, all days physically in Canada during the calendar year count toward the 183-day threshold, including January-October before your move. So you'd have roughly 9 months plus 27 days, which would put you over the 183-day threshold for 2024. However, this doesn't automatically make you a resident for the whole year. The CRA can recognize a change in residency status during the year. For people leaving Canada, they often consider you a part-year resident up to your departure date if you've legitimately established non-residency after that point. This is why your accountants are focusing on your ties after October, because they're trying to determine if you successfully established non-residency upon your departure.
0 coins
Libby Hassan
Has anyone mentioned form NR73 yet? It's the CRA's determination of residency status form that you can submit to get an official ruling. I filled it out when I moved to Hong Kong for work while my husband temporarily stayed in Canada. The form asks detailed questions about all your residential ties - primary (spouse, home, dependents) and secondary (bank accounts, driver's license, health insurance, etc). The CRA reviews it and gives you a determination that you can rely on.
0 coins
Hunter Hampton
•I'd be careful with NR73. It can be helpful but it's also known to trigger extra scrutiny. My cross-border tax specialist advised against filing it unless absolutely necessary because it essentially puts you on CRA's radar and can lead to additional questions and reviews. Sometimes it's better to take a reasonable position based on your facts and circumstances and be prepared to defend it if questioned, rather than proactively asking for a determination.
0 coins