Fed (A/0) showing on wife's W2 instead of M/0 - what does this mean for our taxes?
My husband and I both work for the same company in Georgia, although the parent company that issues our W2s is headquartered in Florida. I noticed something strange when comparing our W2 forms for this year's taxes. On my husband's W2, both state and federal withholding status shows as M/0, which makes sense since we're married. But on mine, while the state shows M/0, the federal section has A/0 listed instead. This seems to have affected my federal tax withholding pretty significantly. I only had about $190 taken out for federal taxes even though I'm working full-time at $16 an hour. Something seems off about this. When I contacted the payroll department at the parent company, their accountant insisted everything is correct, but I'm not convinced. Does anyone know what A/0 actually means on a W2? Is this some kind of error? We file our taxes jointly, so hopefully, my husband's withholding will balance things out, but I'm concerned we might end up owing a lot. Any insights would be really appreciated! (Sorry for any formatting issues, typing this on my phone
25 comments


Ellie Lopez
The "A" on your W2 likely stands for "Allowances" rather than "Married" which would be the "M" designation. The "0" in both cases refers to the number of withholding allowances claimed. This difference in withholding codes explains why you had so little federal tax withheld. The "A" designation essentially treated you as a single filer with zero allowances instead of as married. This would normally result in MORE withholding, not less, which is strange. It's possible there's another factor at play or a payroll system error. I'd recommend checking your actual W-4 form on file with your employer. You or someone in HR might have accidentally selected "Single" or another filing status on your W-4 form, which would explain the discrepancy between your withholding and your husband's.
0 coins
Chad Winthrope
•Wait, I'm confused. If A means "Allowances" and treats her as single, shouldn't she have had MORE tax withheld than her husband, not less? Single people usually have higher withholding rates than married filing jointly people.
0 coins
Ellie Lopez
•You're absolutely right about single status typically resulting in higher withholding - that's why I mentioned it seems strange. The "A" designation should have resulted in more tax being withheld, not less. This suggests there may be additional factors affecting the withholding calculation. There might be another box checked on her W-4 form, additional deductions claimed, or possibly a payroll system error. The extremely low withholding amount ($190 for a full-time employee) indicates something else is happening beyond just the filing status designation.
0 coins
Paige Cantoni
After dealing with a similar issue last year, I found that taxr.ai helped me figure out what was going on with my weird W2 codes. My company had me listed with some strange designation I'd never seen before, and I was panicking about potential tax issues. I uploaded my documents to https://taxr.ai and they explained exactly what the code meant and how it would affect my filing. Saved me so much stress trying to decode tax jargon!
0 coins
Kylo Ren
•How does this actually work? Do real people review your documents or is it just automated? I'm always hesitant to upload my tax docs to random websites.
0 coins
Nina Fitzgerald
•Sounds interesting but I'm skeptical. How quickly did they get back to you? I've tried similar services before and ended up waiting days for a response that wasn't even helpful.
0 coins
Paige Cantoni
•It's a combination of AI analysis and tax expert review. They have encryption and security protocols to keep documents safe - I was nervous about that too but their privacy policy helped reassure me. They got back to me within hours actually, which surprised me. I thought I'd be waiting forever too based on past experiences with other services. The explanation was clear and actionable - they even explained how to approach my HR department about fixing the issue.
0 coins
Nina Fitzgerald
Update on my experience: I decided to try taxr.ai after my skeptical comment. Was genuinely surprised by how helpful it was! Uploaded my W2s with the weird codes, and they explained that my "A/0" designation meant I was being treated as a single filer with zero allowances, but there was also an additional withholding calculation error on my employer's part. That explained the unusually low withholding! Took their explanation to HR and got it fixed immediately. Wish I'd known about this earlier in the year.
0 coins
Jason Brewer
If you're having trouble getting clear answers from your company's accountant, you might want to try Claimyr to speak directly with the IRS about this. I spent weeks trying to get through to the IRS on my own about a similar W2 code issue last year - kept getting busy signals or disconnected. With https://claimyr.com I actually got through to a real person at the IRS who explained exactly what the code meant and what I needed to do. There's a video showing how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c. Totally changed my approach to resolving tax issues.
0 coins
Kiara Fisherman
•How does this actually help? The IRS phone lines are always jammed, so how does this service get you through when nobody else can?
0 coins
Liam Cortez
•This sounds like BS honestly. You expect me to believe some third party service can magically get through to the IRS when millions of people can't? The IRS phone system is fundamentally broken, no way around that.
0 coins
Jason Brewer
•The service uses an automated system that continually redials and navigates the IRS phone tree until it secures a spot in line for you. Then it calls you and connects you directly to the IRS agent. It's not magic - just technology that does the waiting for you. They've figured out the optimal times to call and patterns in the IRS phone system. It's basically doing what you'd do if you had unlimited time and patience to keep redialing for hours.
0 coins
Liam Cortez
I owe everyone an apology and update: I was completely wrong about Claimyr. After my angry comment, I was still desperate for answers about a similar withholding issue, so I reluctantly tried it. Within 40 minutes (while I was working on other things), I got a call connecting me directly to an IRS agent. The agent confirmed that the A/0 code typically means "Single with 0 allowances" and explained how to calculate the potential underpayment. The service actually worked exactly as advertised, and I feel pretty silly about my skeptical comment now.
0 coins
Savannah Vin
I think the "A" might actually stand for "Aggregate" withholding method rather than an indication of filing status. Some companies use this for employees who hold multiple positions or work across different departments. Does your wife work in multiple roles at the company?
0 coins
Lauren Wood
•She doesn't work multiple roles, she's just a standard hourly employee in a single department. We're both in similar positions actually, which is why the difference in our W2 codes is so confusing. The $190 in federal withholding for the entire year seems way too low no matter what the code means.
0 coins
Savannah Vin
•That's definitely unusual then. If she's not in multiple roles, the "A" designation shouldn't apply. The extremely low withholding amount is a major red flag. Based on $16/hour for full-time work (roughly $33,000 annually), federal withholding should be several thousand dollars, not $190. I'd recommend immediately contacting your payroll department again and specifically ask them to verify her W-4 information in their system. Someone may have entered incorrect information or checked the wrong box during data entry. If they insist everything is correct, request a detailed explanation of how they calculated her withholding amount.
0 coins
Mason Stone
When I started a new job last year, I had similar issues with weird withholding codes. Have you checked if the W-4 form your wife submitted has the correct information? My HR department accidentally checked a box for exempt status when processing my paperwork, and I nearly had no federal taxes withheld at all.
0 coins
Makayla Shoemaker
•This happened to me too! My HR person clicked the wrong option in their payroll software. The letter codes on W2s can be super confusing because different payroll systems use different abbreviations. TurboTax couldn't even figure it out for me.
0 coins
Noland Curtis
I work in payroll and have seen this exact issue before. The "A/0" designation on a W2 is definitely not standard federal withholding notation. Most payroll systems use M (Married), S (Single), or H (Head of Household) for federal status. The "A" could indicate several things: some systems use it for "Allowances" method, others for "Adjusted" withholding, or it might even be a data entry error where someone typed "A" instead of "M". The fact that your state withholding shows M/0 correctly suggests this is specifically a federal withholding setup issue. Your suspicion about the low withholding is absolutely correct. At $16/hour full-time, you should have had several thousand dollars in federal withholding, not $190. This is either a major payroll error or someone marked you as exempt from federal withholding. I'd recommend requesting a copy of your actual W-4 form from HR to see what's on file. If they won't provide it, you have the right to review your personnel file. Also, for next year, submit a new W-4 form with the correct information to prevent this from happening again.
0 coins
StarSailor}
•This is exactly the kind of expert insight I was hoping for! Thank you for explaining this so clearly. The fact that my state withholding shows M/0 correctly while federal shows A/0 really does suggest it's a data entry error or system glitch rather than something intentional. I'm definitely going to request a copy of my W-4 from HR first thing Monday morning. If they won't provide it, I'll ask to review my personnel file like you suggested. The $190 withholding on a $33,000+ salary is just way too low to be right. Do you think I should also submit a new W-4 form even if the current one on file looks correct? I'm worried about this happening again next year.
0 coins
Gael Robinson
•Absolutely submit a new W-4 form regardless of what the current one shows. Even if your original W-4 was filled out correctly, there's clearly been some kind of processing error in their payroll system. A fresh W-4 will force them to re-enter your information and hopefully catch whatever mistake was made the first time. When you submit the new W-4, I'd also recommend taking a photo or making a copy for your records before turning it in. That way you have proof of exactly what you submitted if this issue comes up again. Also, given the significant under-withholding, you'll want to consider making estimated tax payments for this year to avoid penalties. The IRS expects you to pay as you go, and $190 on a $33k salary is nowhere near sufficient. Your tax professional can help calculate what you might owe.
0 coins
Jenna Sloan
I had a very similar situation happen to me last year! The "A/0" code is definitely not standard - most systems use M, S, or H for federal withholding status. In my case, it turned out our payroll company had updated their software and some employees got miscoded during the transition. The $190 federal withholding on full-time pay at $16/hour is absolutely wrong. You should have had around $2,000-$3,000 withheld for the year. I'd suggest getting a copy of your actual W-4 form from HR immediately to see what they have on file. When this happened to me, I had to file estimated quarterly payments to avoid underpayment penalties since my withholding was so low. Definitely talk to a tax professional about whether you need to do the same - the IRS doesn't care if it was your employer's mistake, they still expect you to pay what you owe on time. Also, make sure to submit a completely new W-4 form for next year even if the current one looks correct. Sometimes the only way to fix these payroll system errors is to start fresh with new paperwork.
0 coins
AstroExplorer
•This is really helpful to hear from someone who went through the exact same thing! The software update causing miscoding makes a lot of sense - our parent company did mention they switched payroll systems partway through last year, which might explain the timing of when this started. I'm definitely going to request my W-4 from HR on Monday and submit a fresh one regardless of what it shows. The estimated quarterly payments is something I hadn't thought about - do you remember roughly how much you had to pay? I'm trying to figure out if we can cover it or if we need to set up a payment plan with the IRS. Thanks for the heads up about the IRS not caring whose fault it was. That's frustrating but good to know upfront so we can plan accordingly.
0 coins
Freya Christensen
I'm a tax professional and see this issue frequently. The "A/0" code is definitely irregular - standard federal withholding codes are M (Married), S (Single), or H (Head of Household). The "A" designation varies by payroll system but often indicates "Allowances method" or can be a data entry error. Your concern about the $190 withholding is absolutely valid. At $16/hour full-time (approximately $33,280 annually), your federal withholding should be around $2,500-$3,500 depending on your filing status and allowances. This suggests either you were marked as exempt from federal withholding or there's a significant payroll error. I strongly recommend: 1) Request your actual W-4 form from HR to verify what's on file, 2) Submit a new W-4 immediately to correct any errors, 3) Calculate your likely tax liability - you'll probably owe $2,000+ more than withheld, 4) Consider making estimated tax payments to avoid underpayment penalties. The IRS holds taxpayers responsible for underpayment regardless of employer errors, so addressing this quickly is crucial. If your employer won't cooperate, you may need to file Form 4852 (substitute W-2) with your tax return and report the discrepancy to your state's Department of Labor.
0 coins
Maya Lewis
•This is incredibly thorough advice, thank you! As someone new to dealing with tax issues, I really appreciate the step-by-step breakdown. The Form 4852 option is something I'd never heard of before - it's good to know there's a backup plan if our employer continues to insist everything is correct when it clearly isn't. The estimated payment amount you mentioned ($2,000+) is pretty scary but at least now I know what we're potentially looking at. Would you recommend trying to handle the estimated payments ourselves or is this complicated enough that we should work with a tax professional for the whole situation? Also, just to clarify - when you say "allowances method," does that mean the payroll system was treating me as if I claimed allowances on an old W-4 form instead of using the newer step-by-step method? Our company did switch payroll systems mid-year so that could explain the confusion.
0 coins