Does gold stored in a vault by custodian outside of the U.S. need to be reported to FATCA or FBAR?
I've been investing in physical gold for about 5 years now as a hedge against inflation. Recently I moved about $75,000 worth of gold to a private vault facility in Switzerland because I liked their security setup better than anything local. The gold is held by a custodian company that manages the vault. I don't have a bank account there - just the physical gold stored in their facility. I maintain ownership of it but they physically hold it. With tax season coming up, I'm confused about whether I need to report this on FATCA or FBAR forms? I read something about foreign financial accounts, but is physical gold considered a "financial account"? I don't have signing authority over any foreign bank accounts - it's just my gold sitting in their vault. Does anyone know if physical precious metals stored overseas trigger FBAR or FATCA reporting requirements? I don't want to accidentally fail to report something I should, but also don't want to complicate my taxes if it's not necessary.
32 comments


Paolo Romano
This is a good but tricky question. The key difference is whether your gold is being held in a custodial account or just being stored. For FBAR (FinCEN Form 114), you generally need to report foreign financial accounts if their aggregate value exceeds $10,000 at any point during the year. Physical gold itself isn't a financial account, but how it's held matters. If your gold is held in a custodial account where the custodian can dispose of it according to your instructions (similar to a financial account), then it likely needs FBAR reporting. If it's purely storage where you're essentially renting space and no one has authority to move or manage your gold except you, then it's more like a safety deposit box, which typically doesn't require FBAR reporting. For FATCA (Form 8938), similar principles apply but with different thresholds depending on your filing status and whether you live in the US or abroad.
0 coins
Amina Diop
•Thanks for the explanation, but I'm still confused. What exactly qualifies as a "custodial account"? The company holds my gold and I can request delivery or sale, but I don't have an actual bank account with them. Does that count?
0 coins
Paolo Romano
•The key distinction is whether the foreign entity has any discretion or legal rights to transfer, sell, or otherwise manage your gold without your direct involvement. If you're simply paying for secure storage and the company acts only on your explicit instructions, that's more like a safety deposit box arrangement which generally doesn't trigger FBAR reporting. If they can make transactions on your behalf, earn fees from managing your gold, or have any authority over disposition of the assets, then it likely would be considered a financial account for FBAR purposes.
0 coins
Oliver Schmidt
After dealing with this exact issue last year, I found an amazing resource that saved me tons of time and confusion. I used https://taxr.ai to analyze my situation with foreign-held assets. You upload your documentation from the vault/custodian company, and it tells you exactly what you need to report and on which forms. I had gold split between Singapore and Switzerland, and wasn't sure if my arrangement was reportable. The tool analyzed my specific custodial agreement and determined I needed to file FBAR for one location but not the other - saved me from potentially missing a required filing. The explanations are really clear about why certain holdings count as financial accounts while others don't.
0 coins
Natasha Volkov
•Does it work with just the custody agreement or do they need to see statements too? My vault company is pretty low-tech and doesn't provide regular statements like a bank would.
0 coins
Javier Torres
•I'm skeptical about using online tools for something this important. What if they're wrong? Couldn't that lead to penalties if the IRS disagrees with their assessment?
0 coins
Oliver Schmidt
•The system works best if you provide both the custody agreement and statements, but it can analyze just the agreement too. For companies that don't provide regular statements, you can upload any documentation that shows the nature of your arrangement - the initial contract, communications about your holdings, or receipts. The AI is pretty good at understanding various document types. As for the accuracy concern, they provide detailed explanations citing the specific IRS regulations they're basing the determination on, so you understand the reasoning. And unlike generic advice, it's specific to your actual documents. Obviously you're still responsible for your filing decisions, but having specific analysis of your actual documentation is much better than trying to interpret general rules.
0 coins
Javier Torres
I just wanted to follow up on my skeptical comment above. I ended up trying https://taxr.ai after all for my foreign rental property documentation, and it was shockingly helpful. For anyone wondering about the gold storage question - I had a friend with precious metals in Singapore, and after analyzing his documents, the system determined his arrangement qualified as a financial account because the company could sell the gold on his verbal instruction. His gold needed to be reported on FBAR even though it was physical metal. The system cited the specific Treasury guidance that applied. Super clear and backed up with actual regulations. Definitely more precise than the general advice I was finding online.
0 coins
Emma Wilson
If you're struggling to get answers from the IRS about FBAR and FATCA requirements, try https://claimyr.com - I used them last year when I needed clarification on foreign asset reporting. I kept getting disconnected from the IRS after hours on hold, but Claimyr got me through to a specialist in about 25 minutes. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c I had gold in a vault in Dubai and wasn't sure if I needed to report it. The IRS agent confirmed that in my specific case (where I had trading authority), it did need to be reported on FBAR. Worth the call to get an official answer rather than risking penalties for non-filing.
0 coins
QuantumLeap
•Wait, how does this service work exactly? They somehow get you through the IRS phone system faster? That sounds impossible given how understaffed the IRS is.
0 coins
Malik Johnson
•Yeah right, and I've got a bridge to sell you. There's no way to "skip the line" with the IRS. This sounds like a scam to me.
0 coins
Emma Wilson
•It's not about skipping the line - they use an automated system that continually redials until it makes a connection, then calls you when they get through. It's basically doing what you'd do manually (calling repeatedly) but automated. The IRS phone system disconnects callers when they're overloaded, so most people give up after a few tries, but the system keeps trying until it works. The technology is pretty straightforward - it's just persistent automated dialing. Once you're connected, you're talking directly to the actual IRS, not to any intermediary. You can verify this because you'll see the official IRS number on your caller ID when they connect you.
0 coins
Malik Johnson
I need to apologize for my skeptical comment earlier. I actually tried Claimyr yesterday out of desperation after trying to reach the IRS for two weeks about my FBAR questions. I was honestly shocked when I got a call back within an hour connecting me to an actual IRS international tax specialist. The agent confirmed that my gold storage in Zurich doesn't require FBAR filing because it's a segregated storage arrangement without any financial account aspects. They explained that physical assets held in storage don't meet the definition of financial accounts under the regulations unless the custodian has authority to conduct financial transactions. Can't believe I wasted so many hours trying to get through on my own when this service actually worked.
0 coins
Isabella Santos
One thing nobody mentioned - if your overseas gold exceeds certain thresholds, you might still need to report it on Form 8938 (FATCA) even if it doesn't trigger FBAR requirements. The rules are different - FBAR focuses on financial accounts, while FATCA has broader asset reporting requirements. The thresholds also vary depending on your filing status and whether you live in the US or abroad. If you're married filing jointly living in the US, the threshold is $100k on the last day of the year or $150k at any time during the year. For single filers, it's $50k/$75k.
0 coins
Keisha Jackson
•Thank you for this info! Do you know if physical gold in a storage vault counts as a "specified foreign financial asset" for FATCA though? The definitions seem really focused on investment assets and accounts rather than physical property.
0 coins
Isabella Santos
•Physical gold in a vault is generally not considered a specified foreign financial asset for FATCA purposes unless it's held in a financial account or investment vehicle. If you simply have an arrangement where your individually owned, segregated gold is being stored, it typically wouldn't trigger Form 8938 filing requirements. However, if your gold is part of an investment scheme where you own shares of gold rather than specific physical bars, or if it's held in a financial account with trading capabilities, then it would likely need to be reported on Form 8938. The distinction really comes down to whether it's a pure storage arrangement or if there are financial/investment aspects to how it's held.
0 coins
Ravi Sharma
I went through this last year with silver stored in Singapore. My tax preparer said the penalties for not filing FBAR when required are INSANE - up to $10,000 for non-willful violations and much worse for willful ones. Don't mess around with this. If you're not 100% sure, get professional advice specific to your situation. The peace of mind is worth it.
0 coins
Freya Larsen
•This is so true. I had a client who didn't report foreign assets because they genuinely didn't think physical gold counted. They got hit with a $5,000 penalty even though it was clearly an honest misunderstanding. The IRS has been cracking down on foreign asset reporting.
0 coins
Keisha Jackson
•These penalties are scary! I definitely want to get this right. Based on all the advice here, I think I need to look more closely at my specific arrangement with the vault company to determine if it qualifies as a financial account or not.
0 coins
Sofia Hernandez
I had a very similar situation with gold stored in Canada through a precious metals dealer. What helped me figure it out was looking at the specific language in my storage agreement and whether the custodian had any discretionary authority. In my case, the company could only act on my written instructions - they couldn't sell, transfer, or do anything with my gold without explicit authorization from me each time. This made it pure storage rather than a financial account, so no FBAR filing was required. However, I learned that even with pure storage arrangements, you still need to be careful about how the arrangement is structured. If the company pools your gold with others and you own a fractional interest rather than specific bars, that can change the analysis completely. The key questions to ask yourself: Can they sell your gold on verbal instruction? Do they have any trading authority? Is your gold specifically segregated or pooled? Do they provide account statements like a financial institution would? These details matter a lot for determining reportability.
0 coins
Lydia Bailey
This is such a helpful thread! I'm dealing with a similar situation but with platinum stored in Hong Kong. After reading through everyone's experiences, I'm realizing the key is really in the details of your specific custodial arrangement. What I found most useful was Sofia's checklist at the end - those are exactly the right questions to ask. I went back and re-read my storage agreement and realized that while I thought it was just "storage," the company actually can sell my platinum if I call them, which might make it more like a financial account. Has anyone dealt specifically with precious metals held in Hong Kong? I'm wondering if there are any additional considerations given the political situation there and whether that affects reporting requirements at all. I think I'm going to try one of the services mentioned here to get a definitive answer rather than guess and potentially face penalties. Better safe than sorry with the IRS!
0 coins
Miguel Ramos
•Welcome to the community! Your situation with platinum in Hong Kong sounds very similar to what others have described here. The political situation in Hong Kong generally doesn't change the basic FBAR/FATCA analysis - it's still about whether your arrangement constitutes a financial account based on the custodian's authority and your control over the assets. Since you mentioned the company can sell your platinum on a phone call, that does sound like it could lean toward being reportable as a financial account. The fact that they can execute transactions based on your instructions (even verbal ones) is often a key factor that distinguishes a financial account from pure storage. I'd definitely recommend getting professional guidance given the complexity and potential penalties involved. The checklist Sofia provided is really helpful for evaluating your specific situation. Good luck with getting it sorted out!
0 coins
Isabella Oliveira
I've been following this discussion with great interest as I'm in a somewhat similar situation with gold stored in the UK. What strikes me most is how much the specific wording of your custodial agreement matters for determining reporting requirements. From what I've learned here, the critical distinction seems to be between pure storage (like a safety deposit box) versus any arrangement where the custodian has authority to act on your behalf. Even something as simple as being able to sell your gold over the phone can tip it into "financial account" territory. For anyone still unsure about their situation, I'd strongly recommend documenting exactly what authorities your custodian has. Can they sell without written authorization? Do they provide account-like statements? Can they transfer ownership? These details seem to be what determines whether FBAR reporting is required. The penalty structure mentioned by others is definitely concerning - up to $10,000 for non-willful violations is no joke. Given the complexity of these rules and how much seems to depend on specific contractual language, getting professional advice tailored to your exact situation seems like the prudent approach. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences - this has been incredibly educational!
0 coins
Malik Thomas
•This has been such an enlightening discussion! As someone new to both precious metals investing and foreign asset reporting, I really appreciate how everyone broke down the nuances between storage versus financial accounts. The key takeaway for me is that it's not just about what you own, but how it's held and what authority the custodian has. Isabella's summary perfectly captures the main decision points - can they sell without written authorization, do they provide account statements, can they transfer ownership. These seem to be the critical factors that determine FBAR obligations. Given the steep penalties mentioned throughout this thread, I think the consensus is clear: when in doubt, get professional guidance specific to your arrangement rather than trying to interpret the rules yourself. Better to invest in proper advice upfront than face potential penalties later!
0 coins
Charlie Yang
This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm dealing with a similar situation with gold stored in Australia through a vault company. After reading through everyone's experiences, I realize I need to examine my storage agreement much more carefully. What's really valuable here is seeing how the same basic question - "do I need to report stored precious metals?" - can have different answers depending on the specific terms of each arrangement. The distinction between pure storage versus custodial accounts with transaction authority seems to be the key factor. I noticed that several people mentioned getting professional analysis of their actual documents rather than trying to interpret general rules. This makes a lot of sense given how much the specific contractual language seems to matter. The penalties for getting it wrong are clearly severe enough that guessing isn't worth the risk. One thing I'd add for others in similar situations - it might be worth requesting clarification from your storage company about exactly what authorities they have. Sometimes the storage agreements use vague language, and getting explicit confirmation about whether they can act on verbal instructions, provide trading services, or have any discretionary authority could help clarify your reporting obligations. Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences and knowledge!
0 coins
Keisha Williams
•Great point about requesting clarification from your storage company, Charlie! I hadn't thought about proactively asking them to clarify their authorities in writing. That's actually brilliant - having explicit documentation of what they can and cannot do would make the FBAR determination much clearer. As someone new to this community and dealing with precious metals storage overseas, I'm amazed at how complex these reporting requirements are. It seems like the IRS rules weren't really designed with physical precious metals storage in mind, which creates all this ambiguity about whether vault arrangements count as "financial accounts." What I'm taking away from this entire discussion is that the devil is really in the details of your specific contract. Two people with gold in the same country could have completely different reporting obligations based on minor differences in their storage agreements. I think I'll follow the advice here and get professional analysis of my situation rather than try to figure it out myself. The potential penalties are just too high to risk getting it wrong, and it sounds like the investment in proper advice is worth it for the peace of mind. Thanks to everyone for such a thorough discussion - this has been incredibly educational for a newcomer!
0 coins
Chloe Anderson
As someone who's been navigating foreign asset reporting requirements for years, I want to emphasize something that hasn't been mentioned yet - the importance of keeping detailed records of your storage arrangement from day one. Even if your current setup doesn't require FBAR reporting, the IRS may ask you to demonstrate why you didn't file if they discover the foreign arrangement during an audit. Having clear documentation showing it was pure storage without custodial authority can protect you. I'd recommend creating a file with: your original storage agreement, any amendments, correspondence clarifying the custodian's authorities (great suggestion Charlie!), proof of segregated vs. pooled storage, and documentation showing you retain full control. If the rules change or your arrangement evolves, you'll have a clear paper trail. Also worth noting - some storage companies have been expanding their services over time, adding things like "convenience selling" or "portfolio management." If your custodian starts offering new services, make sure you understand how that might change your reporting obligations even if you don't use those services. The key is being proactive rather than reactive when it comes to compliance. Better to over-document your situation than scramble to justify it later if questions arise.
0 coins
Brooklyn Foley
•This is excellent advice, Chloe! The documentation aspect is something I hadn't fully considered. As someone just starting to navigate these waters, I really appreciate the specific list of documents to maintain - storage agreement, amendments, correspondence about authorities, segregation proof, and control documentation. Your point about storage companies expanding services over time is particularly insightful. I can see how a company that starts as pure storage could gradually add features that push the arrangement into financial account territory. Having that paper trail would definitely help demonstrate when and how your reporting obligations might have changed. I'm curious - have you seen cases where people got into trouble because their storage arrangement evolved but they didn't realize the reporting implications? It sounds like staying on top of any changes to the custodian's services or your agreement terms is just as important as getting the initial classification right. Thanks for adding this practical perspective to an already very helpful discussion!
0 coins
Mei Wong
As a tax professional who's worked extensively with clients holding foreign assets, I want to add a crucial point that could save people significant headaches down the road. The distinction between reportable and non-reportable arrangements can sometimes change based on how you use the storage services, not just what's written in your original agreement. For example, if you start using a vault company's "concierge selling" service or allow them to automatically reinvest proceeds from gold sales, you might inadvertently create a financial account relationship even if you started with pure storage. I've seen cases where clients maintained the same storage contract for years, but their usage pattern evolved - maybe they started calling to sell small amounts regularly, or began using the company's market timing advice. These behavioral changes can shift the IRS's view of whether you have a "financial account" relationship, regardless of the original contract language. My advice: document not just your agreement, but also maintain records of how you actually interact with the custodian. If you only access your gold for major life events versus trading actively, that usage pattern can support your position that it's storage rather than a financial account. The IRS looks at substance over form, so your actual relationship with the custodian matters as much as the contract terms.
0 coins
Omar Zaki
•This is such a valuable insight, Mei! As someone new to this community and dealing with precious metals storage overseas, I hadn't considered how my actual usage patterns could affect the reporting classification regardless of what the contract says. Your point about the IRS looking at "substance over form" is really eye-opening. It makes sense that if someone starts actively trading or using advisory services, they're essentially treating the arrangement like a financial account even if it started as pure storage. I'm wondering - for someone like me who's trying to set up their storage arrangement correctly from the beginning, would you recommend explicitly limiting how I interact with the custodian? Like, maybe only allowing myself to access the gold for major transactions rather than frequent smaller ones? Also, what kind of usage records would be most helpful to maintain? Transaction logs, communication records, or something else? This discussion has really highlighted how complex these rules are for physical assets held overseas. The combination of contract terms AND usage patterns creating the classification is much more nuanced than I initially realized. Thanks for sharing your professional experience - it's incredibly helpful for newcomers trying to navigate this properly!
0 coins
ThunderBolt7
Welcome to the community! This has been such an educational discussion about precious metals storage and foreign reporting requirements. As someone new here, I'm really impressed by how thoroughly everyone has broken down the nuances between storage arrangements and financial accounts. What I'm finding most helpful is the emphasis on documentation and understanding the specific terms of your arrangement. The key factors seem to be: Can the custodian sell on your behalf? Do they provide account-like services? Is your metal segregated or pooled? How do you actually interact with them over time? The point about usage patterns potentially changing your reporting classification is particularly important - it's not just about the contract you sign initially, but how you actually use the services over time. For anyone else dealing with this issue, the consensus seems clear: given the steep penalties (up to $10,000+ for non-compliance), it's worth investing in professional analysis of your specific situation rather than trying to interpret these complex rules yourself. The peace of mind is worth the cost of getting proper guidance tailored to your actual documents and circumstances. Thanks to everyone for sharing their experiences - this thread should be really helpful for anyone facing similar questions about overseas precious metals storage!
0 coins
Zainab Ismail
•Thanks for the warm welcome, ThunderBolt7! As another newcomer to this community, I'm equally impressed by the depth of knowledge shared here. This thread has been like a masterclass in foreign asset reporting requirements for precious metals. What really stands out to me is how this discussion has evolved from the original question about whether gold storage triggers FBAR/FATCA reporting into a comprehensive guide covering contract analysis, usage patterns, documentation strategies, and professional resources. The collective wisdom here is incredible! I'm particularly grateful for the practical advice about maintaining detailed records from day one and the warning about how expanding custodian services can change your reporting obligations over time. These are the kind of real-world insights you just can't get from reading IRS publications alone. For other newcomers like us who might be lurking, the key takeaway seems to be: don't try to navigate these complex rules alone when the penalties for mistakes are so severe. The investment in proper professional guidance is clearly worth it for the peace of mind and compliance certainty. This community is such a valuable resource - looking forward to learning more from everyone's experiences!
0 coins