< Back to IRS

Lucas Kowalski

Do traditional IRA contributions reduce MAGI if I already contribute to my employer's 401k?

So I've been wrestling with my tax situation for the upcoming year and I'm trying to figure out if I can get some deduction for my traditional IRA. Here's my situation: I'm looking at about $104k in gross earnings for 2025. After I max out my 401k contributions at work (which will be around $11k), my income should be somewhere near $93k. From what I understand, the partial deduction for traditional IRA starts phasing out when your MAGI goes below $86k for single filers. My question is: if I put $6.5k into my traditional IRA (which I've had since before I got my current job with the 401k), will that drop my MAGI enough to qualify for at least a partial deduction? Or does having an employer 401k mean my traditional IRA contributions won't reduce my MAGI for this purpose? And if I do qualify, roughly how much of a deduction would I get? Edit: Thanks for the responses! Looks like I'm out of luck on getting that deduction. Time to explore other options!

Traditional IRA contributions can reduce your MAGI, but there's a catch when you also have a 401k. Since you're covered by a workplace retirement plan, your ability to deduct traditional IRA contributions is limited by your income. For 2025, the deduction for traditional IRA contributions starts phasing out at $76,000 and is completely eliminated at $86,000 for single filers who are covered by a workplace plan. Your 401k contributions do lower your MAGI, bringing you from $104k to around $93k. However, your traditional IRA contribution itself doesn't factor into determining if you're in the phase-out range. At $93k, you're unfortunately above the $86k cutoff, so you wouldn't be eligible for any deduction on your traditional IRA contributions. This is true regardless of how much you contribute to the traditional IRA.

0 coins

Charlie Yang

•

Wait I'm confused - does the traditional IRA contribution itself count toward lowering MAGI before checking against the $86k limit? Or does that not matter because their income is still too high either way?

0 coins

Traditional IRA contributions themselves don't reduce your MAGI for purposes of determining if you're eligible to deduct those same contributions. That would create a circular calculation. Your MAGI is determined first (which includes your 401k deduction but not the traditional IRA contribution), and that figure determines whether you can deduct your traditional IRA contribution. Even if traditional IRA contributions did reduce MAGI for this purpose, at $93k after 401k contributions, a $6.5k IRA contribution would only bring you to $86.5k, which is still above the complete phase-out threshold of $86k.

0 coins

Grace Patel

•

I had this exact problem last year. I tried figuring it out myself and kept going in circles until I used https://taxr.ai to analyze my statements. My situation was similar - making about $100k with a 401k at work but wanting to contribute to my old traditional IRA. The tool analyzed my income sources and retirement contributions, then showed me that my MAGI was still above the threshold for deducting traditional IRA contributions. Instead, it recommended I redirect those funds to a Roth IRA instead (which I qualified for through backdoor conversion) or increase my 401k contributions to lower my overall tax burden. Saved me from making a non-deductible contribution that would've complicated my taxes later.

0 coins

ApolloJackson

•

Is this tool actually helpful for something this specific? I've been trying to figure out if I should do traditional or Roth contributions and keep going back and forth.

0 coins

How exactly does the service work? Do you upload financial docs or just enter numbers manually? I'm paranoid about sharing my actual tax docs online.

0 coins

Grace Patel

•

The tool analyzes your specific tax situation across multiple areas - in my case it looked at my retirement options and showed how different contribution strategies would affect my tax liability. It walks you through specific IRS rules that apply to your situation in plain English. You can manually enter information or upload documents - totally your choice. They use the same encryption that banks use, and you can delete anything you upload afterward. I was hesitant at first but just entered my numbers manually and it still gave me really specific guidance.

0 coins

ApolloJackson

•

Update for anyone interested - I tried out that taxr.ai site mentioned above and it was actually super helpful for my situation! I uploaded my last pay stub and answered a few questions, and it showed me exactly where I stood with my MAGI calculation and retirement options. The tool showed me that I was better off maxing out my 401k first, and then doing a backdoor Roth IRA conversion instead of a traditional IRA contribution. I didn't realize I was in that weird income zone where traditional IRA deductions don't work but backdoor Roth does. Also gave me a nice breakdown of how much I'd save in taxes this year vs. potential tax-free growth later. Definitely worth checking out if you're trying to optimize your retirement tax strategy!

0 coins

Rajiv Kumar

•

I had the same issue trying to figure out my IRA deductions last year. After spending DAYS trying to reach the IRS (literally 7 calls with 2+ hour hold times each), I found https://claimyr.com and watched their demo at https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c They basically call the IRS for you and then connect you once an agent picks up. I was skeptical but I was connected to an actual IRS agent in about 20 minutes. The agent confirmed that since I'm covered by a work plan, my traditional IRA deduction phases out completely at $86k MAGI, and that 401k contributions do lower MAGI but the traditional IRA contributions themselves don't for this specific calculation. The agent also suggested looking into a backdoor Roth conversion since I was outside the deduction limits anyway.

0 coins

Wait how is this even legal? Doesn't sound right that some company can somehow get through the IRS phone system faster than regular people.

0 coins

Liam O'Reilly

•

This sounds like BS honestly. Nobody gets through to the IRS that fast. Last time I called I waited over 3 hours and then got disconnected. If this worked the IRS would shut it down.

0 coins

Rajiv Kumar

•

It's completely legal - they use a system that automatically redials the IRS until they get through, then a representative stays on hold until an agent answers. When the agent picks up, they connect you to the call. They're not doing anything you couldn't do yourself if you had the time and technology. The IRS is actually aware of these services and hasn't shut them down because they're not breaking any rules. They're essentially waiting in the phone queue for you. They don't have any special "backdoor" access - they just handle the frustrating part of waiting and redialing when calls drop.

0 coins

Liam O'Reilly

•

So I need to eat some crow here. After posting my skeptical comment above, I tried the Claimyr service on Monday because I needed to ask about an amended return I filed 6 months ago. I'm shocked to say it actually worked exactly as described. I got a text about 15 mins after signing up saying they'd reached an IRS representative, clicked the link, and was instantly connected to an actual IRS agent. The agent was able to check my amended return status (finally processing!) and also confirmed my question about IRA deductions when you have a 401k. For what it's worth, the agent gave the same answer others here mentioned - once your MAGI is over $86k as a single filer with a workplace plan, you can't deduct traditional IRA contributions at all, regardless of how much you contribute. She suggested either increasing 401k contributions or looking into backdoor Roth conversions instead.

0 coins

Chloe Delgado

•

Consider a backdoor Roth IRA contribution instead. Since your income is above the traditional IRA deduction limit when covered by a workplace plan, you can: 1. Make a non-deductible contribution to your traditional IRA 2. Immediately convert it to a Roth IRA 3. Pay taxes only on any earnings between contribution and conversion (minimal if done quickly) This gives you the benefits of Roth growth without being restricted by Roth income limits. Just be aware of the pro-rata rule if you have existing pre-tax money in any traditional IRAs.

0 coins

Ava Harris

•

Doesn't the pro-rata rule make this complicated though? I've heard horror stories about people getting hit with unexpected taxes doing this.

0 coins

Chloe Delgado

•

The pro-rata rule only becomes an issue if you have existing pre-tax money in any traditional IRAs. If your traditional IRA only contains non-deductible contributions, there's no pro-rata concern. If you do have existing pre-tax money in IRAs, you'll need to calculate what percentage of your conversion is taxable. For example, if you have $20k in pre-tax IRA funds and add $6.5k non-deductible, then convert $6.5k to Roth, about 75% of that conversion would be taxable. Some people work around this by rolling pre-tax IRA funds into their 401k first if their plan allows it.

0 coins

Jacob Lee

•

Another option - see if your employer's 401k plan offers after-tax contributions with in-plan Roth conversions (mega backdoor Roth). My company added this last year and it's been a game changer. I can put way more into retirement accounts than just the standard limits.

0 coins

My company offers this too but I still don't fully understand it. Is it basically just a way to contribute more than the normal 401k limit?

0 coins

Jacob Lee

•

Yes exactly. The regular 401k limit for 2025 is $23,000 for employee contributions, but the total limit including employer match and after-tax contributions is $69,000. The mega backdoor Roth lets you make after-tax contributions to your 401k (beyond the $23k limit) and then immediately convert those to Roth. The key is your plan must allow both after-tax contributions AND in-plan Roth conversions or rollovers. Not all plans offer this, but it's worth checking with your HR department. It's a completely legal way to get a lot more money into tax-advantaged accounts if you have the cash flow to do it.

0 coins

CosmicCruiser

•

This is a really common misconception! I see this question come up a lot. The key thing to understand is that traditional IRA contributions don't reduce your MAGI for the purpose of determining whether you can deduct those same contributions - that would create a circular calculation. Here's how it works: Your MAGI is calculated first (including your 401k deduction), then that number is used to determine if you qualify for the traditional IRA deduction. At $93k after your 401k contributions, you're above the $86k complete phase-out threshold for single filers with workplace plans, so unfortunately no deduction is available. Since you're locked out of the traditional IRA deduction, I'd definitely look into the backdoor Roth strategy others have mentioned. With your income level, it's probably your best bet for getting that $6.5k into tax-advantaged retirement savings.

0 coins

Luca Greco

•

Thanks for breaking this down so clearly! I've been making the same mistake thinking the IRA contribution would count toward lowering my MAGI first. The circular calculation explanation makes total sense - you can't use the deduction to determine if you're eligible for the deduction in the first place. I'm definitely going to look into the backdoor Roth option now. At my income level it sounds like that's really the only way to get tax-advantaged retirement savings beyond my 401k. Appreciate everyone's input on this thread!

0 coins

Just wanted to add some clarification on the MAGI calculation since I see some confusion in the comments. You're absolutely right that traditional IRA contributions don't reduce MAGI for determining deductibility - that would indeed be circular. However, it's worth noting that if you WERE eligible for the deduction (i.e., if your income was lower), THEN the traditional IRA contribution would reduce your MAGI for other tax purposes like determining eligibility for other credits or benefits. In your case at $93k post-401k, you're unfortunately well above the threshold. But here's a potential strategy: if you can increase your 401k contribution by even more (up to the $23,000 limit for 2025), that could potentially get your MAGI low enough to qualify for at least a partial traditional IRA deduction. For example, if you could contribute an additional $7k+ to your 401k, that would bring your MAGI down to around $86k or below, potentially making you eligible for the traditional IRA deduction. Of course, this only works if you have the cash flow to support the higher 401k contributions.

0 coins

Leslie Parker

•

This is a great point about potentially increasing the 401k contribution to get under the threshold! I hadn't considered that angle. So if OP could bump up their 401k from $11k to around $18k, that would bring their MAGI down to about $86k and potentially qualify them for at least a partial traditional IRA deduction. The math works out interesting - contributing an extra $7k to 401k to save maybe $1,300 in taxes on a $6.5k IRA deduction (assuming 20% marginal rate). Obviously depends on their cash flow situation, but it's definitely worth running the numbers to see if the additional 401k contribution makes financial sense.

0 coins

Great discussion here! Just to add one more perspective - I was in almost the exact same situation last year. Making around $105k, maxing out my 401k, and thinking I could squeeze out a traditional IRA deduction. What I learned the hard way is that once you're covered by a workplace plan, those income limits are pretty strict. At $93k MAGI after your 401k contributions, you're definitely above the $86k cutoff for any deduction. I ended up going the backdoor Roth route that several people mentioned. The process was actually simpler than I expected - contributed $6k to a traditional IRA (non-deductible), then immediately converted it to Roth. No taxes on the conversion since there were no earnings, and now that money grows tax-free. One thing to watch out for - make sure you don't have any other traditional IRA balances with pre-tax money, or you'll run into the pro-rata rule complications. If you do, consider rolling those into your current employer's 401k first if they allow it. The backdoor Roth has been a game changer for getting more money into tax-advantaged accounts at our income level. Definitely worth exploring!

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of real-world experience that's so helpful! I'm in a similar boat income-wise and have been putting off dealing with this because it seemed complicated, but your breakdown makes the backdoor Roth sound much more manageable than I thought. Quick question - when you say "immediately converted it to Roth," how immediate are we talking? Like same day, or is there a waiting period you have to observe? I've seen conflicting info online about whether there's a required holding period before conversion. Also really good point about checking for existing pre-tax IRA balances first. I think I might have an old rollover IRA from a previous job that could complicate things. Sounds like I need to get that sorted before attempting any backdoor conversions.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today