< Back to IRS

Eli Wang

Can section 1256 contract losses be carried back to offset 2021 capital gains?

I have a situation with one of my tax clients that I could use some advice on. They had some trading activity in section 1256 contracts this past year and ended up with significant losses. Looking at Form 6781, it appears these losses can be carried back, but I'm not 100% clear on how this works in practice. The client only has capital losses for 2022, but they had substantial capital gains in 2021. I'm trying to figure out if I can carry back these section 1256 contract losses and use them to offset the capital gains from 2021? This could potentially result in a nice refund for them, but I want to make sure I'm interpreting the rules correctly before I get their hopes up. Has anyone handled this type of situation before? Any guidance would be greatly appreciated!

Yes, you absolutely can carry back Section 1256 contract losses to offset capital gains from a prior year. This is one of the unique advantages of these contracts compared to regular capital assets. The process works like this: You'll need to complete Form 6781 for 2022 to establish the Section 1256 loss. Then you'll need to file Form 1040X (amended return) for the 2021 tax year to carry back the loss and apply it against the 2021 capital gains. The IRS allows you to carry back these losses for 3 years, but you must carry them to the earliest year first if you're carrying back to multiple years. One important thing to note: only the net Section 1256 losses can be carried back (after netting against any other Section 1256 gains). And you don't have to carry back the losses if it's not beneficial - you can choose to just carry them forward instead if that makes more sense for your client's situation.

0 coins

Thanks for this explanation! Quick question - if the client doesn't want to amend their 2021 return (maybe they're worried about triggering an audit or something), can they just choose to carry the losses forward instead? Or is the carryback mandatory if they had gains in prior years?

0 coins

The carryback is optional, not mandatory. Your client can elect to carry forward the Section 1256 losses instead of carrying them back if they prefer. They would make this election on their tax return. The decision should be based on what's most financially beneficial. If the tax rate was higher in 2021 than it will be in future years, carrying back might save more money. But if they expect to be in a higher tax bracket in upcoming years, carrying forward could be more advantageous. Other factors like triggering an amended return or potential audit concerns could also influence the decision.

0 coins

I actually used taxr.ai for a similar situation last month with section 1256 contracts. I had a client with mixed trading results and wasn't completely sure how to handle the reporting correctly since they had some futures, options, and other section 1256 contracts. I uploaded their trading documentation to https://taxr.ai and it accurately identified all the section 1256 contracts, calculated the 60/40 split correctly, and showed me exactly how to report it on Form 6781. The system even explained the carryback options and how to calculate the maximum carryback allowed based on their particular situation. What really impressed me was the detailed walkthrough of the amended return process - it showed exactly which lines on Form 1040X needed to be adjusted for the carryback. Saved me hours of research and double-checking calculations.

0 coins

Ethan Scott

•

Does taxr.ai actually prepare the amended return forms for you? Or does it just give you the information and you still have to prepare everything yourself? I'm dealing with a similar situation and wondering if it's worth trying.

0 coins

Lola Perez

•

I'm a bit skeptical about AI tax tools - especially for something as specific as section 1256 contracts. How confident are you that it got everything right? Did you cross-check the results with any other sources?

0 coins

It doesn't prepare the actual amended return for you, but it gives you all the information you need to complete it correctly. It provides a detailed breakdown of which lines need to be adjusted on the 1040X and by how much, which made the process really straightforward. I did cross-check the results against IRS publications and a couple other resources. I was initially skeptical too, but everything aligned perfectly with the official guidance. What impressed me was how it handled the nuances of the 60/40 split for these contracts and calculated the exact carryback amount. It even flagged a couple of transactions that weren't actually section 1256 contracts but had been mistakenly categorized that way in the client's records.

0 coins

Lola Perez

•

Just wanted to follow up about my experience with taxr.ai after my skeptical comment. I decided to give it a try with a particularly complex section 1256 situation I was dealing with, and I have to admit I was really impressed. The system caught several issues I had overlooked, particularly around the proper application of the 60/40 split between long-term and short-term capital treatment. It also guided me through the carryback calculation process step by step, showing exactly how much of the loss could be carried back to each of the previous three years based on the available capital gains in those years. What I found most helpful was the explanation of how to document everything properly for an amended return. This saved me from what would have been hours of research and probably a call to the IRS. Definitely worth checking out if you're dealing with 1256 contracts.

0 coins

If you're planning to file an amended return to carry back those Section 1256 losses, you might want to check out Claimyr first. I tried filing an amended return for a similar situation last year and had tons of questions about how to properly document the carryback, but couldn't get through to anyone at the IRS for weeks. I found https://claimyr.com after searching for solutions and decided to try it. They got me connected to an actual IRS agent in about 20 minutes when I had been trying for days on my own. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The IRS agent I spoke with walked me through exactly how to document the Section 1256 carryback on the amended return, which specific forms to include, and what supporting documentation would prevent any issues. This saved me from potentially doing it wrong and having my client's amended return delayed or questioned.

0 coins

Riya Sharma

•

How does this actually work? I thought it was impossible to get through to the IRS these days. Are they just using some auto-dialer or something? Seems too good to be true.

0 coins

Santiago Diaz

•

I don't buy it. I've been trying to reach the IRS for months about a client issue. There's no way some service can magically get through when millions of calls go unanswered. Sounds like a scam to me.

0 coins

It uses a combination of technology that essentially holds your place in line. Think of it like having someone wait in a physical line for you, then they call you when it's your turn. No auto-dialer spam or anything like that - it's just a system that waits through the hold time so you don't have to. I was totally skeptical too! I had been trying to get through to the IRS for weeks about this Section 1256 carryback issue. I was worried about doing the amended return incorrectly and potentially creating problems for my client. After using Claimyr, I got through to an agent who specializes in investment taxation and got exactly the guidance I needed. The information I got was definitely worth it, especially considering how much time I had already wasted trying to call myself.

0 coins

Santiago Diaz

•

I have to eat my words about Claimyr. After posting that skeptical comment, I was still desperate to talk to someone at the IRS about a complicated amended return issue (not section 1256 related, but similarly complex), so I decided to try it anyway. I was honestly shocked when I got a call back in about 15 minutes telling me I was being connected to an IRS agent. Ended up speaking with someone in their capital gains department who answered all my questions about documentation requirements for amended returns involving complex investments. For section 1256 carrybacks specifically, the agent mentioned they look closely at these because they're uncommon, so having proper documentation is critical. They recommended including a detailed statement explaining the calculation of the carryback amount along with the amended return. This is exactly the kind of specific advice I couldn't find anywhere online.

0 coins

Millie Long

•

One thing to be careful about with Section 1256 contract losses - make sure your client actually has "true" Section 1256 contracts. I had a situation where a client thought they had these contracts but they were actually just regular non-equity options that don't qualify for the special treatment. True Section 1256 contracts include regulated futures contracts, foreign currency contracts, non-equity options (broad-based indices), dealer equity options, and dealer securities futures contracts. If they were trading standard equity options on individual stocks, those wouldn't qualify.

0 coins

Eli Wang

•

Thanks for bringing this up! That's a good point. My client was trading futures contracts through a major brokerage, so they should qualify as true Section 1256 contracts. But I'll double-check their trading records to make sure everything is properly classified before proceeding with any carryback. Do you know if the brokerage typically designates which trades were Section 1256 contracts on their year-end statement? Or is that something I need to determine manually by looking at each transaction?

0 coins

Millie Long

•

Most major brokerages will identify Section 1256 contracts on their year-end tax statements, usually in a separate section specifically for these types of trades. They're reported differently because of the required 60/40 split between long-term and short-term capital gains treatment. If you don't see that clear designation, you might need to go through transaction by transaction. Regulated futures contracts, certain foreign currency contracts, and broad-based index options (like options on the S&P 500 index) are the most common Section 1256 contracts. Individual stock options aren't included, which is where many people get confused.

0 coins

KaiEsmeralda

•

Just to add another wrinkle to this discussion - don't forget about the Section 1256 election under 1256(d) that lets traders avoid the 60/40 split and mark-to-market rules for certain hedging transactions. If your client was using these contracts as hedges for their business rather than for speculation, they might qualify for this election, which would change how the losses are treated.

0 coins

Debra Bai

•

Can you explain what you mean by "hedging transactions" in this context? My husband has a small business importing goods from overseas and uses currency futures to lock in exchange rates. Would those qualify as hedging rather than speculation?

0 coins

Yes, currency futures used to lock in exchange rates for your husband's import business would typically qualify as hedging transactions! These are legitimate business hedges designed to reduce foreign exchange risk rather than speculative trading. For Section 1256 contracts used as hedges, the business can elect under Section 1256(d) to treat these transactions as ordinary business income/loss rather than capital gains/losses subject to the 60/40 split. This election must be made by the due date of the return (including extensions) and applies to all hedging transactions for that year. The key requirements are that the transactions must be: (1) entered into in the normal course of business primarily to manage risk, (2) clearly identified as hedging transactions in the business records before the close of the day they were entered into, and (3) the hedged risk must be with respect to ordinary property or ordinary obligations. Currency futures for import/export businesses are classic examples of qualifying hedges. Your husband should definitely consult with a tax professional about making this election if it would be beneficial.

0 coins

Sasha Ivanov

•

This is a great discussion about Section 1256 contract losses! I wanted to add one more consideration that hasn't been mentioned yet - the timing of when you file the amended return for the carryback. You have up to 3 years from the due date of the original return (or the date it was filed, if later) to file the amended return claiming the carryback. However, if you're also dealing with NOL carrybacks or other loss carrybacks, the interaction between different types of losses can get complex. Also, keep in mind that carrying back the Section 1256 losses might affect other items on the prior year return, like the 3.8% net investment income tax if your client's AGI was high enough. Sometimes the additional tax savings from avoiding NIIT can make the carryback even more valuable than just the regular income tax savings. One last tip - if you do decide to proceed with the carryback, make sure to include a detailed statement with the amended return explaining the calculation and referencing the Section 1256 contracts that generated the loss. This helps prevent any confusion during IRS processing.

0 coins

This is really helpful information about the timing and NIIT considerations! I hadn't thought about how the carryback might affect the 3.8% net investment income tax. For clients with higher AGI, that could definitely make the carryback more attractive than I initially calculated. Do you know if there's a specific threshold where the NIIT savings become significant enough to always recommend the carryback over carrying forward? I'm trying to develop a framework for advising clients on this decision. Also, regarding the detailed statement you mentioned - is there a specific format the IRS prefers, or just a clear explanation of the calculation methodology?

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today