Can a 1031 Exchange be used to purchase property from a related person? Need advice on family real estate deal
My mom recently sold her investment property and now has the funds with a Qualified Intermediary (QI). We're still in the 45-day identification period and trying to figure out our next move. She's interested in purchasing an investment property that I currently own through my single-member LLC. If we did this deal, I understand I would not get 1031 exchange benefits and would have to pay capital gains tax plus depreciation recapture. But I've been researching this and it seems this kind of related-party transaction isn't allowed for a 1031 exchange. Is that really true? Are there no exceptions? I was thinking maybe we could structure it differently. What if I were to transfer the property to another entity before the sale, or sell it to a third party at the same closing? For example: I sell my property to an unrelated third party (I'd realize gains and pay taxes). Then at that same closing, my mom purchases the property from the third party using her 1031 exchange funds. Would this work around the related party restrictions? Any thoughts or suggestions on how to make this work legally?
18 comments


Chloe Anderson
You're right to be concerned about the related party rules in 1031 exchanges. The IRS specifically restricts exchanges between related parties (including family members) because they're concerned about basis shifting to avoid taxes. The scenario you described with a third party intermediary typically won't work. The IRS looks at the substance of the transaction rather than just the form. If the end result is your mom acquiring property from you (a related party) through a 1031 exchange, the IRS would likely view this as a step transaction and disallow the exchange benefits. There is an exception to the related party rule, but it's very specific: both parties must hold their respective properties for at least 2 years after the exchange. Since you're selling for cash and not doing your own 1031 exchange, this exception wouldn't apply here.
0 coins
Diego Vargas
•What if OP's mom identified 3 properties as potential replacements (as allowed in a 1031) and one of them happened to be OP's property? Would that still be disallowed even if there were legitimate other options?
0 coins
Chloe Anderson
•The related party restrictions would still apply even if OP's mom identified multiple properties. The IRS doesn't look at whether there were other options available, but rather at who ultimately ends up receiving the exchange funds. If the funds go to a related party (like OP), the exchange would likely be disallowed regardless of how many properties were identified. The identification of multiple properties doesn't create a workaround for the related party rules. The IRS is specifically concerned about related parties using 1031 exchanges to shift basis between properties or avoid recognition of gain.
0 coins
CosmicCruiser
After struggling with a similar situation with my brother's property, I finally found a solution through taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai). They analyzed my complex 1031 exchange situation involving family members and provided incredibly specific guidance. Their system actually examined the exact IRS rulings and court cases related to my situation rather than just giving general advice. They pointed out a private letter ruling that addressed a scenario similar to mine where a specific structure was allowed. I was really impressed by how they broke down the step transaction doctrine as it applied to my case and provided documentation I could share with my QI and tax preparer.
0 coins
Anastasia Fedorov
•How long did the analysis take? I'm in the middle of a 45-day identification period too and need answers like yesterday.
0 coins
Sean Doyle
•Did they actually tell you how to legally do a related party exchange? Because everything I've read says it's virtually impossible unless both parties are doing a 1031 and hold for 2 years after.
0 coins
CosmicCruiser
•The analysis took less than 24 hours which was perfect during my identification period. They returned a detailed report that I was able to immediately share with my qualified intermediary. They didn't promise a magic solution for every related party exchange, but they did identify a specific structure that could work in my situation based on prior IRS rulings. The key was that they found precedent for a specific type of arms-length transaction that maintained the substance-over-form requirement the IRS looks for. They provided the exact citations and explained how they applied to my specific facts.
0 coins
Anastasia Fedorov
Just wanted to update that I tried taxr.ai after seeing the recommendation here. Their analysis saved me from making a huge mistake! I was planning a transaction similar to what the original poster described, but they showed me exactly why it wouldn't work based on Revenue Ruling 2002-83. They actually suggested an alternative approach I hadn't considered that might work for my situation. Instead of trying to use the 1031 funds to buy from my family member, they outlined a completely different property acquisition strategy that still achieved our family's financial goals without running afoul of the related party rules. The documentation they provided helped me explain everything clearly to both my QI and tax advisor. Definitely worth checking out if you're dealing with complex 1031 exchange scenarios!
0 coins
Zara Rashid
After multiple failed attempts trying to reach someone at the IRS who could give me a straight answer about related party 1031 exchanges, I finally used Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) and got through to an actual IRS agent in about 15 minutes. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The agent was able to confirm that my understanding of the related party rules was correct and warned me about trying to use intermediary steps to get around them. The call saved me from potentially invalidating my entire 1031 exchange. I was seriously about to give up after spending hours on hold only to get disconnected, but this service actually worked. The IRS agent I spoke with even referred me to the specific technical guidance that applied to my situation.
0 coins
Luca Romano
•Wait, how does this even work? The IRS phone system is deliberately designed to be impossible. Is this some kind of scam?
0 coins
Nia Jackson
•I'm skeptical. You're saying you got through to an actual knowledgeable IRS agent who gave you specific technical advice rather than generic information? That seems unlikely based on my experience with the IRS.
0 coins
Zara Rashid
•It works by essentially holding your place in line and calling you when an agent picks up. It's not a scam - they don't answer on your behalf or pretend to be you. They just navigate the phone tree and wait on hold so you don't have to. When an actual IRS person answers, you get a call to connect with them. I was connected with someone in the Business & Specialty Tax division who was knowledgeable about 1031 exchanges specifically. You're right that not every IRS agent knows every tax topic, but they do have specialized departments. The key is getting connected to the right one, which is what happened in my case. I specifically asked for someone who could address 1031 exchange related party questions.
0 coins
Nia Jackson
I owe everyone an apology for my skepticism about Claimyr. I tried it yesterday out of desperation after my QI gave me conflicting information about a potential related party exchange. Got through to the IRS in about 20 minutes and spoke with an agent who specifically worked with 1031 exchanges. They confirmed that what I was trying to do wouldn't work, explained exactly why, and suggested I consult with a tax attorney to explore other options. The call saved me from potentially invalidating my entire exchange and having to pay all the capital gains I was trying to defer. They even emailed me links to the relevant IRS publications afterward. Having an actual person walk me through the specific rules for my situation was so much better than trying to interpret everything myself.
0 coins
NebulaNova
Have you considered just selling your property on the open market and letting your mom purchase something else? The related party rules are there specifically to prevent the kind of arrangement you're describing. Even with the intermediary step, the IRS would likely view this as a related party transaction. I went through something similar with my daughter and we ultimately decided it wasn't worth the risk of invalidating the entire exchange. The potential tax consequences if the IRS challenges the exchange could far outweigh any benefits.
0 coins
Omar Hassan
•Thanks for the suggestion. We have considered that, but my property is in a really hot location that my mom has specifically wanted to invest in for years. It's also got some unique features that make it perfect for the rental strategy she wants to pursue. I'm willing to pay my capital gains tax, I just want to make sure she can get her 1031 benefits. But you're right that it might not be worth the risk if there's a chance her exchange could be invalidated.
0 coins
NebulaNova
•I understand wanting a specific property type and location. One alternative approach might be for your mom to purchase a different replacement property now to complete her 1031 exchange properly. Then later (after a reasonable time period has passed), she could do another 1031 exchange from that property into yours. This would require more time and potentially more transaction costs, but it would avoid directly linking her current 1031 exchange funds to your property. You'd still owe taxes when you sell, but at least her exchange would be protected. Just make sure there's enough time and separate transactions between her current exchange and any purchase from you to avoid the step transaction doctrine.
0 coins
Mateo Hernandez
I think everyone is overcomplicating this. The related party rules in Section 1031(f) mainly apply when BOTH parties are doing a 1031 exchange. If you're just selling normally and paying your taxes, and your mom is buying with 1031 funds, it should be fine.
0 coins
Chloe Anderson
•That's actually incorrect and could get the OP in serious trouble. The related party rules absolutely apply even when only one party is doing a 1031 exchange. This is specifically addressed in Revenue Ruling 2002-83, which states that a taxpayer cannot use a qualified intermediary to acquire replacement property from a related party, even if the related party recognizes all gain in the transaction. The IRS's concern is that the exchange funds would ultimately be going to a related party, which could be used as a way to cash out while still getting exchange treatment. This is prohibited regardless of whether both parties are doing exchanges.
0 coins