Real Estate 1031 Exchange Question for S-Corp Selling Business Assets - Possible to Purchase Rental Property?
I'm helping my aunt and uncle who are retiring soon and looking at options for their S-Corp business. They're planning an asset sale (about $1.1M for property and around $320k for other business assets) but want to keep the corporation alive. Their idea is to have the S-Corp buy new property that they'd lease out for retirement income. My main question is: Would this new purchased property qualify for a 1031 exchange to defer taxes? They've already spotted a property they're interested in, but their business asset sale won't happen for at least 4-6 months. They have enough personal money to buy the property right now. Could they create an LLC to purchase the property immediately, and then later have their S-Corp buy it from the LLC once they have the funds from the asset sale? I'm totally out of my league here. I work in data analytics, and somehow my family thinks that means I understand tax law and corporate structures. Any guidance would be super appreciated!
18 comments


GalaxyGlider
This is a tricky situation with several important tax considerations. Let me break this down: For a 1031 exchange, the property being sold and the property being acquired must both be held for productive use in a business or for investment. The challenge here is that they're selling business assets but want to buy property for leasing (investment). These are different uses which could disqualify them from 1031 treatment. The timing issue creates another problem. In a 1031 exchange, you must identify potential replacement properties within 45 days of selling and complete the purchase within 180 days. They can't do a 1031 exchange for a property purchased before selling the original property. As for creating an LLC to buy the property now and having the S-Corp purchase it later - this would likely not qualify for 1031 exchange treatment. The IRS would view this as two separate transactions: 1) the LLC buying property and 2) the S-Corp buying from the LLC, rather than a direct exchange.
0 coins
Jamal Harris
•Thanks for the detailed explanation. So it sounds like a 1031 exchange probably won't work here. Is there any other tax-advantaged way they could structure this? They're really trying to avoid a big tax hit from the sale of their business assets while still generating rental income for retirement. Also, I'm curious - does it matter that part of what they're selling is business equipment (not just real estate)? Can you even do a 1031 exchange on things like equipment and inventory?
0 coins
GalaxyGlider
•For other tax-advantaged structures, they might consider an installment sale which allows them to spread the gain over multiple years, potentially reducing the immediate tax burden. They could also explore opportunity zone investments which offer capital gains tax deferral. Regarding the business equipment - that's an important point. 1031 exchanges are specifically for "like-kind" real property exchanges. Since 2018, personal property (equipment, inventory, etc.) no longer qualifies for 1031 treatment. So even if they structured everything perfectly, only the real estate portion could potentially qualify for 1031 exchange, not the $320k in other assets.
0 coins
Mei Wong
I was in almost this exact situation last year and found using https://taxr.ai incredibly helpful. It's a tax document analysis tool that helped me understand the complex requirements for 1031 exchanges in business transactions. I uploaded my documents, explained my situation (which was also about selling business property and acquiring investment property), and got a detailed analysis showing exactly what would qualify for 1031 and what wouldn't. It saved me from making a costly mistake, as my CPA had initially thought everything would qualify! The tool also outlined multiple structuring options and their tax implications, which made it much easier to make an informed decision. The clarity it provided was worth every penny compared to the tax I could have owed.
0 coins
Liam Sullivan
•How long did it take to get the analysis back? I'm in a time crunch with a similar situation and need answers fast.
0 coins
Amara Okafor
•Did you still need to run everything by a CPA or lawyer afterward? I'm always skeptical of online tools for something this complex. No offense, but tax law is super specific and the IRS doesn't exactly have a sense of humor about mistakes.
0 coins
Mei Wong
•I got my initial analysis within a day, which was surprisingly fast considering how much detail they provided. I did share the analysis with my CPA afterward, but that's what was so valuable - it gave me a solid foundation to have a more productive conversation with my tax professional. My CPA actually said the analysis caught several nuances he hadn't considered, especially around the specific requirements for identifying replacement properties within the 45-day window. Think of it more as a specialized tool that helps both you and your tax advisor make better decisions rather than a replacement for professional advice.
0 coins
Liam Sullivan
I used https://taxr.ai for my own 1031 exchange situation last month after seeing it recommended here. My situation was also complicated - selling a mixed-use property and wanting to exchange into pure investment property. The tool flagged several issues I hadn't considered, particularly around how the depreciation recapture would work for the portion of my property that had been used for business vs. investment. It also pointed out that I needed to use a qualified intermediary and couldn't touch the funds directly. For anyone wondering if it's worth it: I almost made a $40k tax mistake because I misunderstood how boot would be treated in my particular exchange. The analysis caught it and explained exactly why the IRS would have viewed my planned transaction differently than I expected.
0 coins
Giovanni Colombo
After dealing with the IRS for weeks on an audit related to a similar business sale (not a 1031 but a regular asset sale), I finally got desperate and tried https://claimyr.com to actually speak with someone at the IRS about my case. I was shocked it actually worked! Had been trying for literally 2 months to get someone on the phone to clarify why they were questioning certain aspects of my business sale. Claimyr got me through to an actual human at the IRS within 40 minutes! You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The IRS agent was able to explain exactly what documentation they needed to resolve my case. Saved me thousands in potential penalties just by having a 15-minute conversation instead of playing mail tag for months.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Qasimi
•How does this actually work? The IRS phone system is literally designed to prevent people from reaching humans. I've tried every trick in the book.
0 coins
StarStrider
•Yeah right. Nothing gets you through to the IRS. This sounds like a scam to get people's money with false promises of IRS access. The IRS is basically unreachable by design.
0 coins
Giovanni Colombo
•It uses an algorithm that navigates the IRS phone tree automatically and waits on hold for you. When someone at the IRS finally answers, you get a call connecting you directly to that person. I don't know exactly how the technical side works, but it saved me hours of hold time. The reason it actually works is that they're not promising some "secret backdoor" to the IRS - they're just automating the painful waiting process. It's like having someone else sit on hold for you, then they call you once they've got an actual human on the line. I was skeptical too, which is why I shared the video link so you can see exactly what happens.
0 coins
StarStrider
I can't believe I'm saying this, but I tried the Claimyr service after posting my skeptical comment. I had an ongoing dispute about business sale classification that had been unresolved for nearly 3 months despite sending multiple letters and documents to the IRS. Got connected to an IRS representative in about 35 minutes (without me having to actually be on hold). The rep looked at my case and immediately identified that they had misclassified the type of business sale in their system, which was causing all the confusion. One 20-minute conversation fixed what 3 months of correspondence couldn't. I'm usually the last person to recommend a service, but this literally saved me thousands in incorrectly assessed taxes. Sometimes actually talking to a human makes all the difference.
0 coins
Dylan Campbell
Some important nuances your relatives should consider regarding the S-Corp situation: 1. If they keep the S-Corp but change the main business activity from operating a business to holding rental property, they need to be careful about the "passive investment income" rules. S-Corps that previously operated active businesses but switch to primarily generating passive income (like rent) can face additional taxes if they have accumulated earnings and profits from C corporation years. 2. They should also consider whether keeping the S-Corp structure makes sense for rental property. There are often better entities for holding rental real estate, like an LLC taxed as a partnership or even direct ownership, depending on liability concerns and their specific situation. 3. The "step transaction doctrine" would likely apply if they create an LLC, buy property, then have the S-Corp buy it right after the asset sale. The IRS might treat it as a single transaction and disallow 1031 treatment.
0 coins
Jamal Harris
•This is super helpful. They've had the S-Corp for about 20 years, and it was always an S-Corp (never a C-Corp), so maybe the passive income concern isn't an issue? Do you think it would be better for them to just dissolve the S-Corp after the asset sale and create a new LLC specifically for the rental property? Or would that trigger immediate taxation on the asset sale proceeds?
0 coins
Dylan Campbell
•You're right that the passive income concern wouldn't apply if they've always been an S-Corp, so that's good news. That issue primarily affects companies that converted from C to S status. Creating a new LLC after dissolving the S-Corp could be a better long-term solution. However, the dissolution would still trigger taxation on the asset sale proceeds - you can't avoid that tax by changing entities afterward. The tax is due when the sale occurs while still in the S-Corp. If they're set on the rental property approach, they might consider selling the business assets, distributing the after-tax proceeds to themselves personally, and then purchasing the rental property in their own names or through a new LLC. This gives them a clean break from the business entity and often provides better tax treatment for rental properties, especially regarding potential future benefits like step-up in basis for heirs.
0 coins
Sofia Torres
Just to clear up some confusion about 1031 exchanges specifically - there are two key points that would make this challenging: 1. The "held for investment" requirement: The property being sold must be held for investment purposes or used in a trade or business. While their business property likely qualifies, changing the use from business operations to rental income might be problematic. The IRS looks at intent, and they might question whether the original property was truly "held for investment." 2. Timing issues: A 1031 exchange requires you to first sell your property, then acquire the replacement property within specific timeframes. You can't acquire the replacement property first (which is what the LLC scenario would be attempting to do). The reverse 1031 exchange does exist, which allows buying the new property before selling the old one, but it's complex and requires a specialized Exchange Accommodation Titleholder to temporarily hold title to one of the properties.
0 coins
Dmitry Sokolov
•Would the reverse 1031 exchange work in their situation? I'm curious because I'm facing a similar issue where I need to acquire a new property before my current one sells.
0 coins