Can S Corporation Receive Bank Board Member Compensation Instead of 1099-NEC?
I was recently invited to join the board of directors at a small community bank in our area. It's a family-owned institution, and they currently pay me as an independent contractor with a 1099-NEC for my board service. Here's my situation - as of a few months ago, I no longer have any regular W-2 employment income. Everything I earn now comes through as 1099 contractor payments. My accountant has been pushing me pretty hard to set up an S Corporation to help reduce my self-employment tax burden. On paper, this seems like an absolute no-brainer for my tax situation. The problem is, when I mentioned this plan to the bank's CEO, she immediately pushed back. She said that since the bank reports me personally as a board member to federal regulators (the Fed and FDIC) and because they're compensating me for personal service, they cannot legally pay my fees to my S Corp, even though I'd be the sole owner. She insists the payments must go directly to me as an individual. But here's where I'm confused - my CPA is equally adamant that there should be no issue having my board fees paid to my S Corporation instead of directly to me. I'm getting completely opposite advice from two professionals I trust. Has anyone dealt with this specific situation before? Can an S Corporation receive bank board member compensation, or am I stuck with the 1099-NEC direct payments?
18 comments


GalacticGladiator
This is a common area of confusion, but your bank CEO is partially right while your CPA is also correct from a different angle. Banking regulations do require board members to be reported individually to regulators like the Fed and FDIC. The bank needs to maintain records of who specifically serves on their board for regulatory compliance. However, this reporting requirement doesn't necessarily dictate how your compensation must be structured. Many professionals who serve on boards (including bank boards) do have their compensation paid to their business entities rather than personally. The key is maintaining a clear line between your regulatory role as an individual board member and the payment arrangement. What you might consider is having your S Corporation enter into a contract with the bank that specifically states that you, personally, are providing the board service as the representative of your S Corp. The bank would still report you individually as the board member to regulators, but the compensation would go to your entity.
0 coins
Omar Zaki
•This is really interesting. I'm curious though - would the bank be able to issue a 1099-NEC to the S Corp instead of to the individual in this case? And wouldn't the regulatory agencies potentially have an issue with this arrangement since they expect board members to have personal liability?
0 coins
GalacticGladiator
•Yes, the bank would issue the 1099-NEC to your S Corporation instead of to you personally. The IRS recognizes this type of arrangement, provided it's properly documented with a service agreement. Regarding regulatory concerns, your personal liability as a board member remains unchanged regardless of how you're compensated. Board member liability is based on your role and actions, not on how you receive payment. The regulatory reporting requirements are focused on identifying who is making governance decisions, not on tracking compensation methods. You would still be personally named in all regulatory filings and would maintain all the same fiduciary responsibilities.
0 coins
Chloe Taylor
Just wanted to share my experience with taxr.ai when I faced almost this exact situation last year. I was serving on multiple boards (one being a credit union) and getting conflicting advice about how to handle the income through my consulting firm. I used https://taxr.ai to analyze my service agreements and tax documents, and they helped clarify what was allowable. Their system flagged specific language in my board service agreement that was actually preventing me from having the payments directed to my S Corp. Once I knew what needed to be changed, I was able to negotiate a revised agreement that satisfied both the regulatory requirements and my tax optimization goals.
0 coins
Diego Flores
•How exactly does taxr.ai work? Is it just software or do they have actual tax professionals reviewing your documents? I'm trying to figure out if it would help with my situation where I'm on a hospital board but also receive consulting income through my LLC.
0 coins
Anastasia Ivanova
•I'm a bit skeptical about using AI for specific tax and regulatory questions like this. Banking regulations are super complex and constantly changing. Did you verify the information with a human expert who specializes in banking regulations? I'd be nervous about relying on software for something with potential regulatory implications.
0 coins
Chloe Taylor
•The service uses AI to analyze your tax documents, contracts, and financial statements, but they also have tax professionals who review complex situations. It's this combination that made it valuable for me - the AI spotted patterns and inconsistencies that might have been missed in manual review. For your hospital board situation, it would likely be helpful since they can analyze both your board service agreement and your LLC structure to identify potential issues or opportunities. Their platform is especially good at comparing documents against current regulations.
0 coins
Anastasia Ivanova
I was initially skeptical about using an AI service for complex tax planning related to my board positions, but I decided to try taxr.ai after getting nowhere with contradictory advice from multiple advisors. Their analysis was eye-opening. They identified specific language in my directorship agreements that was creating unnecessary tax exposure. What impressed me was how they pointed out exactly which clauses in my agreements were problematic from a tax perspective. The platform showed me multiple past IRS letter rulings on similar situations that I was able to share with both my bank's legal team and my CPA. This documentation helped everyone get on the same page. Ended up saving over $12,000 in self-employment taxes just in the first year!
0 coins
Sean Murphy
If you're trying to get resolution on this, you might want to consider using Claimyr to get through to the IRS directly. I had a similar situation with board compensation and couldn't get a straight answer from anyone, so I tried calling the IRS Business Tax Line. After waiting on hold for hours with no luck, I used https://claimyr.com to get a callback from the IRS. You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c. I was honestly shocked when my phone rang about 45 minutes later with an actual IRS agent on the line. They were able to confirm that there's no IRS rule prohibiting board compensation being paid to an S-Corp as long as it's properly documented. The bank might have other regulatory concerns, but at least from the tax side, I got a definitive answer straight from the IRS. That helped me make my case to the organization I serve.
0 coins
StarStrider
•How does this service actually work? Like, does the IRS know you're using a third party to get a callback or is it some kind of work-around? I've been trying to get someone on the phone at the IRS for weeks about a similar issue.
0 coins
Zara Malik
•This sounds like total BS. There's no way to "skip the line" with the IRS. They're notoriously understaffed and don't prioritize calls just because some service asks them to. I've worked with tax issues for years and I'm extremely doubtful this actually works as described.
0 coins
Sean Murphy
•It's not a line-skipping service but a callback system. The IRS already has a callback feature, but it's often unavailable due to high call volumes. Claimyr basically automates the process of calling, navigating the phone tree, and securing a callback slot when one becomes available. The IRS doesn't know you're using a third party - they just see a request for callback. They don't prioritize your call - you still wait your turn, but you don't have to physically stay on the phone for hours. The system keeps trying until it secures a callback slot, then alerts you when the IRS is going to call. It's completely legitimate and works with the IRS's existing systems.
0 coins
Zara Malik
I need to admit I was wrong about Claimyr. After my skeptical comment, I decided to try it myself since I had a complex S-Corp issue I'd been avoiding dealing with. I was genuinely shocked when I got a call from an IRS representative about 2 hours after using the service. The agent walked me through the exact requirements for having board compensation paid to an S-Corp, including the documentation needed to satisfy both tax requirements and banking regulations. She explained that while the bank reports you individually as a board member for regulatory purposes, that doesn't prevent them from paying your S-Corp for your services - they're separate issues. She even emailed me the relevant IRS guidance that I could share with the bank. Saved me days of research and contradictory advice. Sometimes being proven wrong is actually a good thing!
0 coins
Luca Marino
I'm a banking compliance officer (not tax advice!) and can shed some light on this from the bank's perspective. The confusion often stems from mixing up two separate requirements: 1) Regulatory reporting - Yes, you personally must be listed as the board member for Fed/FDIC reporting. This is about governance and responsibility. 2) Payment structure - This is separate from regulatory reporting. Many banks do pay board fees to professional entities rather than individuals. The key is proper documentation. The bank needs a service agreement between them and your S-Corp that specifically states you are the individual performing the services. Your bank's CEO might be confused because some banks have policies against this (not because of regulations, but internal policy).
0 coins
Freya Larsen
•Thank you for this insight! Do you have any suggestions for how I might approach the conversation with the CEO again? Is there specific regulatory guidance I could reference to help clarify the distinction between reporting requirements and payment structure?
0 coins
Luca Marino
•I'd suggest approaching the conversation by acknowledging their regulatory concerns first, which shows you understand the importance of compliance. Then, bring up that many financial institutions separate personal board service from compensation arrangements. Ask if their concern is based on a specific regulation or internal policy. For reference materials, the FDIC's "Pocket Guide for Directors" and the OCC's "Director's Book" both discuss board responsibilities but don't prohibit compensation to business entities. You might also want to have your CPA prepare a short memo explaining the tax structure and confirming your personal liability remains unchanged. Having something in writing from a professional often helps overcome institutional resistance.
0 coins
Nia Davis
Has anyone considered the reasonable compensation rules for S-Corps in this scenario? The IRS scrutinizes S-Corps where owners avoid payroll taxes, especially when the income is clearly tied to personal services.
0 coins
Mateo Perez
•Good point! From my experience as a board member who uses an S-Corp, you'll still need to pay yourself a reasonable salary from the S-Corp for your board service. The tax advantage comes from only a portion of the income being subject to employment taxes, not eliminating them entirely.
0 coins