< Back to IRS

Liam Murphy

Can I have a Self-Directed 401K at the S-Corp level when employees are paid through my LLC?

I've got a somewhat complex business structure that's making me question my CPA's advice about retirement plan options. Here's my situation - I own an LLC that's taxed as an S-Corp. I pay myself a W-2 with reasonable compensation from the S-Corp (with guaranteed payments flowing from the LLC to the S-Corp). However, all my employees (about 9 full-time staff) are paid directly through the LLC, not the S-Corp. My CPA is telling me I can set up a Self-Directed 401K at the S-Corp level, which sounds great because I'd love the investment flexibility. But I'm second-guessing this advice - wouldn't Affiliated Service Group rules prevent this arrangement? It seems like the 401K would need to be established at the LLC level instead, with monthly contributions made from the guaranteed payments. I'm completely out of my depth here (I have zero tax prep experience while my CPA has thousands of hours), but something just doesn't seem right about this setup. Has anyone dealt with a similar situation? I'm trying to fact-check this before moving forward because I don't want to mess up something this important.

Your instincts are good here - this is a tricky situation with Self-Directed 401K plans. When you have an LLC taxed as an S-Corporation with employees in the LLC structure, you're dealing with what the IRS considers "controlled group" rules. The key issue is that the IRS typically views the LLC and S-Corp as related businesses under common control. Since your employees are paid through the LLC, having a retirement plan just at the S-Corp level would likely violate the coverage requirements under IRC Section 410(b). You're correct about the Affiliated Service Group concerns. When related businesses share ownership and services, the IRS generally treats them as a single employer for retirement plan purposes. This means all eligible employees across both entities would need to be included in any qualified retirement plan. Your retirement plan should likely cover the entire organization structure, not just the S-Corp entity where you receive your W-2. The exact implementation depends on your specific business relationship between the entities.

0 coins

But if the S Corp only has one employee (the owner), isn't there a way to have a Solo 401k just for them? Does it absolutely have to include all LLC employees even though they're technically employed by a different entity?

0 coins

The key issue is that for retirement plan purposes, the IRS looks at the entire controlled group. Since you own both the S-Corp and the LLC, they're considered related under common control. When determining 401(k) eligibility, all employees in the controlled group must be considered. So even though the employees are technically employed by the LLC, they must be included in the eligibility determination for any plan established by the S-Corp. This is precisely why the Affiliated Service Group rules exist - to prevent employers from setting up multiple entities to avoid providing benefits to all employees.

0 coins

After struggling with a similar business structure issue, I found taxr.ai to be incredibly helpful. I was trying to figure out whether I could set up a retirement plan at just one entity level instead of across my entire business structure, and got conflicting advice from different professionals. I uploaded my business formation documents and ownership breakdowns to https://taxr.ai and they analyzed the controlled group implications for my retirement plan options. They clarified exactly how the Affiliated Service Group rules applied in my case and provided documentation I could share with my CPA. In my case, they confirmed I needed to include all employees across entities in any qualified retirement plan. They also provided options for different plan structures that would meet my goals while staying compliant.

0 coins

How long did it take them to analyze your business structure? My situation sounds similar but I need answers pretty quickly as I'm trying to set something up before year-end.

0 coins

Did they just tell you that you couldn't do what you wanted or did they actually provide alternative options? My CPA keeps shutting down my ideas without suggesting workable alternatives.

0 coins

I got my initial analysis back within about 48 hours, which was faster than I expected given the complexity of my question. They didn't just tell me what wouldn't work - they actually provided me with three different retirement plan structures that would achieve similar goals while remaining compliant with the controlled group rules. They explained why a Self-Directed 401(k) at just one entity level wasn't viable, but then outlined how I could still maximize my personal contributions while meeting minimum requirements for employees. The documentation they provided was extremely helpful in discussions with my financial advisor.

0 coins

I initially reached out to taxr.ai with serious doubts about my CPA's advice on setting up a Solo 401(k) for just one entity in my business structure. I was skeptical that any online service could handle the complexity of my situation, but I was running out of options and getting different answers from every professional I consulted. I've got to say I'm genuinely impressed by what they provided. They confirmed exactly what the first commenter said - that my businesses were considered a controlled group under IRS rules - but then went beyond that to outline a compliant retirement plan strategy that still allowed me to maximize my own contributions. They even provided specific regulatory citations I could reference. Best decision I made in sorting out this mess. Saved me from potentially setting up a non-compliant plan that could have resulted in significant penalties.

0 coins

If you're still not getting clear answers after consulting with taxr.ai, you might need to speak directly with an IRS agent who specializes in qualified retirement plans. The problem is actually getting through to someone who understands these complex controlled group rules. I was in a similar situation trying to get clarity on affiliated service group rules for my businesses, and spent WEEKS trying to reach someone at the IRS who could help. Eventually I found Claimyr https://claimyr.com which actually got me through to a real IRS agent in about 20 minutes. You can see how it works in their demo video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The agent I spoke with was able to confirm exactly how the controlled group rules applied to my business structure and gave me the specific section of the tax code I needed to reference with my CPA. It was surprising how helpful they were once I could actually reach a knowledgeable person.

0 coins

Wait, how does this actually work? The IRS phone system is notoriously impossible to navigate. How could a service possibly get you through faster?

0 coins

Sounds like a scam to me. Nobody gets through to the IRS that quickly. I've tried calling dozens of times and always give up after being on hold for hours. If this actually worked, everyone would be using it.

0 coins

The service actually calls the IRS for you and navigates through their phone tree, dealing with the hold times, and then calls you once they have an agent on the line. It's completely legitimate - they're just handling the painful waiting part. I was honestly confused about how it worked at first too, but it's pretty straightforward. You tell them what department you need to reach, they make the call and navigate the system, then connect you once they have someone. It's not that they have some special access to the IRS - they're just willing to sit on hold so you don't have to.

0 coins

I have to admit I was completely wrong about Claimyr. After my skeptical comment, I decided to try it myself because I was desperate to get an answer about controlled group retirement plan rules for my business structure. It worked exactly as described. I got a callback within about 25 minutes and was connected to someone in the IRS qualified plans department. The agent confirmed that my LLC and S-Corp were indeed considered a controlled group, and any qualified retirement plan would need to include eligible employees from both entities. She even emailed me documentation specifically addressing controlled groups and affiliated service entities that I could share with my CPA. Saved me from potentially setting up a non-compliant plan that could have triggered penalties. Definitely worth it just for the peace of mind.

0 coins

Just wanted to add another perspective here. I'm a financial advisor who works with small business owners, and I see this controlled group/affiliated service group confusion ALL THE TIME. The IRS is very strict about these rules to prevent exactly what you're considering - having a retirement plan that benefits owners but excludes rank-and-file employees. Even if your CPA thinks there's a loophole because the employees are technically employed by a different entity, if you have common ownership/control, the IRS will almost certainly view them as a single employer for retirement plan purposes. One alternative to consider: instead of a Self-Directed 401(k) just at the S-Corp level, you might look into a defined benefit plan alongside a 401(k). This arrangement can sometimes allow higher contributions for older, higher-compensated owners while still meeting the requirements for covering all eligible employees.

0 coins

Thanks for this insight! I've never heard of combining a defined benefit plan with a 401(k). Is that something most financial advisors would be familiar with, or would I need to find someone who specializes in small business retirement plans?

0 coins

You'd want to find someone who specializes in small business retirement plans, particularly someone experienced with what's called "combo plans" or "DB/DC arrangements." Not all advisors have experience with these more complex structures. A good third-party administrator (TPA) who specializes in qualified retirement plans is essential for this kind of setup. They can run projections showing how different plan designs would affect contributions for you versus your employees. The right plan design can sometimes allow significantly higher contributions for owners while still meeting minimum requirements for staff.

0 coins

Does anyone know if the Solo 401k contribution limits would apply in the OP's situation even if they could somehow qualify? I've been trying to understand if the $66,000 limit (for 2023) applies differently when you have an S-Corp vs just being self-employed.

0 coins

The contribution limits for 401(k) plans are the same regardless of business structure ($22,500 employee deferral + profit sharing up to a combined total of $66,000 for 2023, or $73,500 if you're over 50 with catch-up contributions). What's different with an S-Corp is HOW you contribute. With self-employment income, your profit sharing contribution is based on your net self-employment income. With an S-Corp, your profit sharing contribution is based on your W-2 wages from the S-Corp. This can sometimes be disadvantageous if you're keeping your W-2 wages intentionally low to minimize FICA taxes.

0 coins

Your situation is exactly why I always recommend getting a second opinion on complex retirement plan setups. The controlled group rules are incredibly strict, and I've seen too many business owners get burned by setting up non-compliant plans. From what you've described, your CPA's advice about a Self-Directed 401K at just the S-Corp level is almost certainly incorrect. The IRS doesn't care about the technical legal separation between your LLC and S-Corp - they look at the economic reality of common ownership and control. Since you own both entities and there's a clear business relationship (guaranteed payments flowing between them), they're going to be treated as a single employer for retirement plan purposes. This means any qualified retirement plan would need to include all eligible employees across both the LLC and S-Corp. You can't cherry-pick which employees to include just because they're paid by different entities. I'd strongly recommend getting this sorted out before moving forward. The penalties for maintaining a non-compliant qualified retirement plan can be severe, including plan disqualification and immediate taxation of all contributions. Better to get it right from the start than try to fix it later.

0 coins

This is exactly what I was worried about! As someone new to business ownership, the complexity of these rules is overwhelming. It sounds like multiple people here have confirmed that my CPA's advice is likely incorrect, which is concerning since I trusted their expertise. I'm definitely going to explore some of the resources mentioned here before making any decisions. The idea of severe penalties for a non-compliant plan is terrifying - I'd rather take the time to get it right than rush into something that could cause major problems down the road. Thank you everyone for sharing your experiences and knowledge. This discussion has been incredibly helpful in understanding why my instincts were telling me something wasn't right about the proposed setup.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today