Does anyone know if you can still do a backdoor Roth for 2024? I thought I heard something about the government closing this "loophole" but I'm not sure if that actually happened or was just proposed.

This is exactly what happened to me last year! The 1099-R showing the full amount as taxable is completely normal and expected for backdoor Roth conversions. Don't panic - you're not doing anything wrong. The key thing to remember is that the 1099-R is just the brokerage firm's way of reporting the distribution to the IRS. They have no way of knowing whether your original contribution was deductible or non-deductible, so they default to showing the entire amount as potentially taxable. When you file Form 8606, you're essentially telling the IRS "Hey, I already paid taxes on this money when I earned it, so the conversion shouldn't be taxed again." The form calculates your basis (the after-tax money you put in) and shows that the taxable portion of the conversion is $0. Make sure you keep good records of your Form 8606 - I learned the hard way that the IRS doesn't always automatically match everything up in their system. But as long as you file it correctly with your return, you'll be fine!

I've been dealing with this exact same TaxAct saving issue and wanted to share what finally worked for me after trying everything mentioned in this thread. After reading all the technical suggestions here, I realized I needed to approach this systematically. What solved it was combining multiple fixes: I switched from Chrome to Firefox, disabled my ad blocker completely, added TaxAct to my trusted sites, and most importantly - worked during early morning hours (around 6am) when server load is lighter. The difference was incredible! I also discovered that my Kaspersky antivirus was blocking some of the save requests - once I temporarily disabled the web protection feature, the perpetual "saving" message finally disappeared. It's frustrating that it took so many steps, but at least I was able to finish my return without starting over. For anyone still struggling, don't lose hope! The data really is being saved in the background even when the interface freezes. I was terrified of losing my 1099 entries and W-2 information, but everything was still there when I finally got it working. The deadline stress is real, but there are definitely solutions that work if you're willing to troubleshoot systematically.

I've been lurking on this thread because I'm having the exact same TaxAct saving nightmare! After reading through all these incredibly helpful suggestions, I wanted to contribute something that might help others who are still stuck. I work in customer service for a different software company, and we see similar issues during high-traffic periods. One thing that hasn't been mentioned yet is clearing your browser's local storage specifically for TaxAct (not just cache and cookies). Sometimes corrupted local storage data can cause these infinite saving loops. To do this: Go to your browser's Developer Tools (F12), find the Application/Storage tab, locate TaxAct's local storage, and clear it completely. Then log back in fresh. Also, if you're using any browser password managers or auto-fill extensions, try disabling them temporarily. Sometimes they can interfere with form submissions in tax software. I'm planning to try the early morning + wired connection approach this weekend based on all the success stories here. This thread has been a lifesaver - it's so reassuring to know I'm not the only one dealing with this and that there are actual solutions that work!

Make sure you've got the right version of W-8BEN! There's W-8BEN for individuals and W-8BEN-E for entities. I screwed this up my first year and had my foreign contractors fill out the wrong form which caused headaches later.

Great thread - I'm dealing with this exact situation! I have contractors in Canada, UK, and Australia who help with my digital marketing business. One additional tip I learned the hard way: make sure to keep detailed records of exactly what services each foreign contractor provides and where they perform the work. During an audit a few years back, the IRS wanted to see clear documentation that the work was genuinely performed outside the US to justify not issuing 1099s. I now maintain a simple spreadsheet with contractor name, country, service description, payment dates/amounts, and W-8BEN expiration dates. Takes maybe 10 minutes a month to update but gives me peace of mind that I have everything properly documented. Also worth noting - if any of your foreign contractors ever come to the US to perform work (even temporarily), that portion might need to be treated differently for tax purposes. Just something to keep in mind as your business grows.

I'm kinda confused by some of the comments here. I've been using Section 179 for years in my consulting business to offset my regular W-2 income. My accountant has never mentioned this limitation. Is this something new for 2025??

I think there's some confusion in this thread that needs clearing up. Emma, your TurboTax software is absolutely correct - Section 179 deductions cannot be used to create or increase a business loss that offsets other income like your W-2 wages. However, I want to clarify something important: if your photography business shows a net loss AFTER regular business expenses (not including Section 179), that loss CAN potentially offset your W-2 income. The key is that Section 179 specifically has this limitation, but other business deductions don't. For your situation with $4,200 in business income and $8,500 in equipment, here's what I'd suggest: Use Section 179 for up to $4,200 worth of equipment, then either use bonus depreciation (as Diego mentioned) or regular depreciation for the remaining $4,300. This way you get the immediate write-off for part of it while staying compliant with the rules. Also, don't forget that any unused Section 179 deduction carries forward to future years when your business hopefully generates more income. It's not lost forever!

This thread has been absolutely fascinating to follow! As someone who's always found tax policy intimidating but important, seeing everyone share real experiences and run actual numbers has been incredibly eye-opening. What really stands out to me is how this discussion evolved from a straightforward question about flat taxes into a much deeper exploration of tax fairness and practical policy design. The examples shared here - from the tax professional explaining regressive effects, to people using analysis tools to see real impacts on their situations, to international comparisons - really show how nuanced these issues are. I'm particularly struck by the point several people made about how serious flat tax proposals end up including exemptions anyway, essentially creating simplified progressive systems. It makes me wonder if the real debate isn't about flat vs. progressive taxation, but about how to achieve the right balance of simplicity, fairness, and adequate revenue. The personal stories really drove this home for me - hearing from recent graduates worried about losing even a few hundred dollars, small business owners concerned about losing deductions, and people across different income levels sharing how various tax structures would actually affect their families. It's a good reminder that behind all the policy abstractions are real people trying to make ends meet. Thanks to everyone who shared their expertise and experiences - this is exactly the kind of informed, evidence-based discussion we need more of in tax policy debates!

This discussion has been absolutely brilliant! As someone who's always been intimidated by tax policy, seeing everyone share real experiences and actual calculations has made these concepts so much clearer. What really strikes me is how this evolved from "wouldn't a flat tax be simpler?" to a nuanced exploration of what tax fairness actually means in practice. The personal examples - from recent grads worried about losing hundreds of dollars, to small business owners realizing they'd lose crucial deductions, to people discovering through analysis tools that they'd actually pay more under a flat system - these real stories make the policy impacts so much more tangible than abstract arguments. I'm particularly fascinated by the point about how even "flat tax" countries like Estonia still need exemptions to work fairly. It seems like pure flat taxation is more of a theoretical concept than a practical policy option, since any workable version ends up incorporating some progressivity to avoid crushing working families. The international comparisons mentioned here - New Zealand, Australia - sound really interesting as examples of countries that achieved simplification while maintaining fairness. That targeted approach of eliminating complex deductions that mainly benefit high earners while keeping protections for working families seems much more realistic than wholesale system replacement. Thanks to everyone who shared their expertise, tools, and real experiences. This is exactly the kind of evidence-based discussion that helps us move beyond political slogans to understand what policies actually mean for real people!