


Ask the community...
I think you're underestimating the IRS's ability to track related transactions, especially with larger amounts like $22,000. The IRS has sophisticated data matching systems that can connect 1099-B forms (showing your stock sale) with gift tax returns (if you file Form 709) and your children's brokerage accounts. Even if you stay under the annual gift tax exclusion and don't file Form 709, brokerage firms report all transactions. If your kids buy the same stock shortly after you sell it, especially if they're using accounts at the same brokerage, that creates a clear paper trail. The audit risk might be low, but the consequences of having your loss deduction disallowed plus potential penalties make it worth being careful. A safer approach might be to wait the full 30 days before gifting the money, or have your kids invest in genuinely different securities that aren't substantially identical to what you sold.
This is really eye-opening about the IRS's tracking capabilities. I had no idea they could match up transactions across different accounts like that. The 30-day waiting period before gifting sounds like a smart safeguard - it would help establish that the gift and any subsequent purchases by the kids were separate decisions rather than part of a coordinated plan. Do you know if there's any official guidance on what constitutes a "safe" time gap between the sale and gift to avoid step transaction issues?
There isn't specific official guidance on a "safe" time gap for step transaction issues, but tax attorneys I've consulted generally recommend at least 30-60 days between related transactions to help establish independence. The key is that each transaction should have its own legitimate business purpose. For gifts specifically, you want to document that the gift was made for normal family reasons (birthday, holiday, general financial support) rather than as part of a tax avoidance scheme. Keep records showing the gift was unconditional - your kids can do whatever they want with the money, including not investing it at all. The step transaction doctrine isn't just about timing though. The IRS looks at factors like whether the transactions were legally interdependent, whether intermediate steps had economic substance, and whether the taxpayer was committed to completing the entire series of steps from the beginning. Good documentation of independent decision-making at each step is crucial.
One important consideration that hasn't been mentioned yet is the gift tax implications. While you mentioned the $22,000 gift, remember that the 2024 annual gift tax exclusion is $18,000 per recipient. If you're gifting $22,000 to each of your three children ($66,000 total), you'll exceed the annual exclusion limits and need to file Form 709. This actually creates additional documentation that could make it easier for the IRS to connect your stock sale to your children's subsequent purchases. The gift tax return would show the timing and amounts of your gifts, which could be cross-referenced with their brokerage activity. Consider splitting the gifts between you and your spouse (if married) to stay within the annual exclusion limits, or spacing the gifts across tax years. This reduces both the gift tax filing requirements and the paper trail that might trigger IRS scrutiny of the overall transaction sequence. Also, make sure your children understand they should make their own independent investment decisions with the gifted funds, and document that the gifts are unconditional with no expectation about how the money will be used.
This is a really important point about the gift tax reporting! I hadn't considered how filing Form 709 would create that direct paper trail linking the stock sale to the gifts. The timing suggestion about splitting gifts across tax years is smart too - it not only avoids the reporting requirement but also creates more separation between the sale and any subsequent purchases by the kids. One question though - if you're married filing jointly, can both spouses use their $18,000 annual exclusion for the same recipients even if only one spouse actually makes the gift? Or does the money need to actually come from both spouses' accounts to qualify for the combined $36,000 exclusion per child?
Has anyone used the IRS withholding calculator for this? I tried but it seems more designed for W-2 income than retirement accounts. Is there a better calculator specifically for retirees with IRA distributions?
The IRS Withholding Estimator isn't great for retirees. I've had better luck with some of the retirement-specific calculators from Schwab or Fidelity. They have options specifically for pension and IRA income that the IRS calculator doesn't handle well.
Brady, congratulations on reaching retirement! This is such an important question and you're smart to think about it upfront. I went through this exact same situation about 2 years ago when I started my IRA withdrawals. The 10% default is rarely the right amount for most people. What really matters is your total tax picture - not just the IRA withdrawal itself. You'll want to consider: 1. Your other retirement income (Social Security, pensions, part-time work) 2. Your filing status and standard deduction 3. Any other taxable income or capital gains 4. Your state's tax treatment of retirement income I ended up needing to withhold 20% because I had Social Security and some rental income that pushed me into a higher bracket than I expected. The key is to think about your total annual income, not just the IRA portion. One practical tip: Start conservative your first year. You can always adjust the withholding percentage for future distributions based on how your first tax season goes. It's better to get a refund than owe penalties for underpayment. Have you calculated what your total retirement income will be for the year? That's really the starting point for figuring out the right withholding rate.
This is really helpful advice, Ryan! I'm actually in a similar situation to Brady - just starting to think about retirement withdrawals. Your point about calculating total retirement income first makes a lot of sense. Quick question: when you mention starting conservative and adjusting later, how often can you actually change the withholding percentage? Can you do it monthly, quarterly, or is there a limit on how frequently you can adjust it? I'm worried about either over-withholding early in the year or under-withholding if my income changes mid-year. Also, did you find any good resources for estimating what your Social Security and other income will actually be? I'm having trouble getting accurate projections for planning purposes.
This thread has been incredibly educational! As someone who just went through a similar vehicle acquisition process, I wanted to share a few additional considerations that might help others avoid some pitfalls I encountered. First, regarding the Section 179 and bonus depreciation combination - make sure you understand the ordering rules. You typically apply Section 179 first (up to the limits), then bonus depreciation applies to the remaining basis. For a heavy vehicle over 6,000 lbs GVWR, you might be able to expense $28,900 under Section 179, then take 80% bonus depreciation on the remaining amount (for 2025). Second, I learned the hard way that some lease companies have standard contract language that can accidentally disqualify you from capital lease treatment. Specifically, watch out for clauses that give the lessor the right to require you to return the vehicle instead of exercising a purchase option. This can make the "bargain purchase option" not truly guaranteed, which the IRS might view unfavorably. Third, if you're considering multiple vehicles or have other equipment purchases planned, be aware of the overall Section 179 annual limit ($1,160,000 for 2025). While most small businesses won't hit this limit, it's worth keeping in mind for planning purposes. Finally, consider the cash flow impact. While the tax savings are significant, you'll still need to make the lease payments throughout the term. Make sure the payment structure works with your business cash flow, especially if you're counting on the tax savings to help fund the payments. The advice about proper documentation and GVWR verification that others have shared is spot-on. Getting these details right upfront will save you headaches later!
Brielle, thank you for sharing those additional insights! The ordering rules you mentioned are particularly important - I hadn't fully understood that Section 179 gets applied first, then bonus depreciation on the remaining basis. That actually makes the math work out even better than I initially thought. Your point about lease contract language is especially valuable. I definitely need to review any purchase option clauses carefully to ensure the lessor can't force me to return the vehicle instead of buying it. That's exactly the kind of technical detail that could derail the whole tax strategy. The cash flow consideration is also well taken. While I'm focused on the tax benefits, I need to make sure the monthly payments fit comfortably in my business budget throughout the lease term. The tax savings will help, but they come as a lump sum while the payments are ongoing. One question on the ordering rules - if I have a $65,000 SUV over 6,000 lbs and use it 80% for business, would the calculation be: $65,000 Ć 0.8 = $52,000 business basis, then $28,900 Section 179 deduction, leaving $23,100 Ć 0.8 = $18,480 bonus depreciation? Or does the 80% business use apply differently in the ordering? Thanks again for all the practical advice - this thread has been incredibly helpful!
Sofia, you're close but the calculation works a bit differently! The business use percentage applies to the total allowable deductions, not separately to each component. Here's the correct calculation for your $65,000 SUV scenario: - Business basis: $65,000 Ć 80% = $52,000 - Section 179 limit for heavy SUV: $28,900 (but limited to business basis) - So Section 179 deduction: $28,900 - Remaining basis for bonus depreciation: $52,000 - $28,900 = $23,100 - 2025 bonus depreciation (80%): $23,100 Ć 0.80 = $18,480 - Total first-year deduction: $28,900 + $18,480 = $47,380 The key is that once you establish the business basis ($52,000), both Section 179 and bonus depreciation work off that adjusted amount. You don't apply the business use percentage twice. This is actually quite favorable since you can essentially write off almost your entire business portion in the first year! Just make sure your SUV actually qualifies as a heavy vehicle and that your lease meets the capital lease tests everyone has discussed.
This has been such a thorough discussion! As a newcomer to this community but someone dealing with a similar vehicle lease situation, I wanted to add one more perspective that might be helpful. I recently went through this exact process with a Ford Transit van for my delivery business, and one thing that really helped was creating a simple checklist based on all the requirements discussed here: **Pre-Purchase Checklist:** 1. ā Verify GVWR > 6,000 lbs (check manufacturer specs, not just dealer claims) 2. ā Ensure lease includes bargain purchase option (⤠$500 is what my accountant recommended) 3. ā Document business use percentage with GPS tracking app 4. ā Calculate total first-year deduction potential using the ordering rules 5. ā Verify business has sufficient income to absorb Section 179 deduction 6. ā Review lease contract for any language that might disqualify capital lease treatment The Transit worked out perfectly - 6,400 lbs GVWR, 90% business use, and I was able to take about $42K in combined deductions. The key was having my accountant review the lease terms BEFORE signing and making sure the finance manager understood exactly what we needed. One additional tip: if your dealer's finance office pushes back on modifying lease terms, remind them that you're essentially paying for the vehicle anyway through the lease payments, so the buyout option is really just a formality. Most will work with you once they understand it doesn't change their financial position. Paolo and others considering this route - you're asking all the right questions. Take the time to get the structure right upfront, and the tax benefits can be substantial!
Has anyone actually successfully contributed to two mega backdoor 401ks in the same year? My tax preparer said it would trigger an automatic audit, but I can't find any info confirming this.
I did it last year with no issues. Had a full-time job and a side business with a solo 401k. Made sure both employers were completely unrelated. Did full 415(c) contributions to both. No audit yet!
This is such a valuable discussion! I've been navigating this exact scenario myself. One thing I want to emphasize is the importance of keeping detailed records when you're contributing to multiple unrelated employer plans. The IRS may not automatically flag high retirement contributions, but if you ever get audited, you'll need to prove that your employers are truly unrelated (not part of a controlled group or affiliated service group). I keep documentation showing the separate ownership structures, different EINs, and completely independent operations. Also, don't forget about the timing - make sure you're not exceeding the annual limits within the same calendar year. I use a spreadsheet to track contributions across both plans monthly to avoid any accidental over-contributions that would need to be corrected. Has anyone dealt with the situation where one employer gets acquired mid-year? I'm wondering if that would affect the separate 415(c) limits for the remainder of the year.
Great point about the acquisition scenario! I actually went through this exact situation two years ago. My startup got acquired by a larger company in July, and it immediately created a controlled group situation since both companies were now under the same parent. From what my tax attorney explained, the 415(c) limits become shared from the moment the acquisition closes, not just for the remainder of the year. So if I had already contributed $40k to my startup's 401k by July, I could only contribute an additional $29k to the acquiring company's plan for the rest of the year. The tricky part was that the acquiring company's HR didn't initially understand this limitation and almost let me contribute the full amount to their plan too. I had to provide documentation of the acquisition and my prior contributions to get it sorted out properly. Joshua, your spreadsheet tracking idea is genius - I wish I had thought of that earlier! Do you happen to track employer match contributions separately? I'm trying to figure out if those count toward the combined limit in a controlled group situation.
Miles Hammonds
Has anyone had success deducting UPF sun protective clothing for outdoor work? My dermatologist actually wrote me a note recommending specialty sun protective gear including hats and shirts since I work on boats all day. Wondering if the same "specialized equipment" rule might apply?
0 coins
Ruby Blake
ā¢I successfully deducted UPF clothing for my landscaping business last year. The key was having my dermatologist write a letter specifically stating these were medically recommended for my occupation, not general use. Also made sure to buy styles/colors that were clearly work clothes (company logo, not fashionable). Documentation is everything!
0 coins
Miles Hammonds
ā¢Thanks so much for sharing your experience! I already have the doctor's note, so I'll definitely look into getting some work-specific UPF gear with my company logo. That's a really smart way to clearly designate them as work clothes versus regular attire. Did you happen to take photos of the clothing for your records too?
0 coins
Connor O'Brien
As someone who's been through multiple IRS audits for my marine equipment rental business, I can tell you that documentation is absolutely critical for these types of deductions. For your polarized sunglasses, I'd recommend creating a simple business use log - just date, hours worked, and brief description of conditions (like "8-hour charter, bright sun, open water"). The fact that you have separate personal sunglasses is huge in your favor. I also keep photos of my business-specific gear alongside receipts to show the difference between work and personal items. For sunglasses specifically, polarized lenses for water work have a much stronger case than regular tinted glasses since they serve a specific anti-glare function that's directly tied to safety and job performance. One thing that helped me was getting a brief letter from my insurance company acknowledging that proper eye protection is recommended for marine work - it adds another layer of documentation showing these aren't just personal preferences but legitimate business necessities.
0 coins
Ravi Patel
ā¢That's really smart thinking about getting documentation from your insurance company! I never would have thought of that angle. Do you think a similar letter from my boat charter insurance provider acknowledging that proper eye protection reduces liability risk would carry the same weight? I'm definitely going to start that business use log you mentioned - it seems like having contemporaneous records rather than trying to recreate everything later would be much more credible if I ever get audited. The photo documentation idea is brilliant too, especially showing the difference between my work polarized glasses and regular personal sunglasses.
0 coins