Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.
Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
If I could give 10 stars I would
If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!
Really made a difference
Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.
Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.
Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.
An incredibly helpful service
An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls ā which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!
Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.
Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.
IT WORKS!! Not a scam!
I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Yuki Ito
Just a heads up - make sure you communicate clearly with your son about who's claiming who. My daughter and I had a huge mess last year because she filed her taxes first and claimed herself without telling me, then I tried to claim her as a dependent. We both got letters from the IRS and had to file amended returns. The IRS does check for this!
Carmen Lopez
ā¢This happened to my family too! What a nightmare to fix. Now we always have a "tax talk" in January before anyone files.
Yuki Ito
ā¢Exactly! The "tax talk" is so important. We now have a family policy that nobody files until we've discussed who's claiming who. My daughter was just trying to be independent and didn't realize how it would affect the family's overall tax situation. The amended returns were a hassle and delayed our refunds by months.
NebulaNomad
This is such a common situation with college graduates! Based on what you've described, it sounds like you should be able to claim your son as a dependent. The key factors working in your favor are: 1. He was a full-time student for nearly half the year (through May) 2. You likely provided more than half his total support for the year (tuition, housing, food through May vs. his earnings from June onward) 3. Dorm time counts as living with you for the residency test One important thing to keep in mind - since he earned $35,000 from his new job, definitely run the numbers both ways as someone mentioned. Sometimes the family comes out ahead when the child claims themselves, especially if there are education credits involved from his final semester. Also, make sure you coordinate with your son before either of you files! You don't want to both claim/not claim him and trigger IRS letters. Been there with my own kids and it's a headache to fix. The IRS has a helpful interactive tool called the "Interactive Tax Assistant" on their website that can walk you through the dependency tests if you want an official confirmation before filing.
Oscar Murphy
ā¢Thanks for mentioning the Interactive Tax Assistant! I had no idea the IRS had that tool on their website. That sounds like it could give us the official guidance we need without having to wait on hold or pay for third-party services. One question about running the numbers both ways - when you say sometimes the family comes out ahead when the child claims themselves, what specific situations make that more likely? Is it mainly about education credits, or are there other factors we should consider? With his $35k income for half the year, I'm wondering if there are income thresholds or credit phase-outs that might affect our decision.
Join the conversation
Liam McGuire
I'm dealing with a similar situation with my restaurant's ERC claim. Paid 28% to a firm that promised "specialized expertise" but it turned out they just had me fill out basic forms and submit payroll records. The whole process took them maybe 3 hours total for a $45,000 claim. What's really frustrating is that I later discovered my CPA could have handled the entire filing for a flat $2,500 fee, but the ERC company made it sound like it required some kind of specialized tax law knowledge that only they possessed. I'm definitely interested in exploring legal options, especially after reading about the class action mentioned here. Has anyone found success getting partial refunds from these companies outside of lawsuits? I'm wondering if it's worth trying to negotiate directly with them first before going the legal route.
Jayden Hill
ā¢I tried negotiating directly with the ERC firm that charged me 30% before considering legal action. They basically told me the contract was binding and refused to discuss any refund or fee reduction. Their position was that they "delivered the service as promised" even though that service was essentially just data entry. From what I've learned talking to others in similar situations, these companies rarely negotiate voluntarily because they know most small business owners don't have the time or resources to pursue legal action. They're betting on people just accepting the loss and moving on. That said, it might still be worth a formal written request documenting your concerns about the fee structure relative to services provided - it could strengthen your position if you do decide to join a class action later. Just don't expect them to be cooperative about it.
I'm in a very similar boat with my accounting practice - I've been helping several clients navigate the aftermath of working with these ERC mills. What I've seen consistently is that legitimate ERC claims typically require 8-15 hours of work when done properly, including eligibility analysis, documentation review, and form preparation. The problem is many of these contingency firms were essentially running claim factories, processing hundreds of applications with minimal individual attention. A 25% fee on a properly vetted claim might be reasonable, but not when they're just plugging numbers into software and hoping for the best. One thing I'd strongly recommend is getting a second opinion on your claim's legitimacy before your refund comes through. With the IRS crackdown, they're auditing a significant percentage of ERC claims now, and if your original firm cut corners on documentation, you could face penalties that far exceed any contingency fee dispute. I've been referring clients to services like taxr.ai for post-submission reviews to make sure everything is properly documented. Better to identify potential issues now than during an audit later.
This is really helpful perspective from someone who's seen this from the professional side. I'm definitely concerned about the audit risk now - my ERC firm seemed way too eager to submit without asking many questions about my specific situation. Quick question: when you mention 8-15 hours for proper ERC work, does that include the initial eligibility determination or just the filing process? I'm trying to figure out if the 2-3 hours my firm spent was as inadequate as it seemed, or if there's legitimate work that happens behind the scenes that I wasn't aware of. Also, have any of your clients who used these "claim factory" firms actually faced audits yet, or is this still mostly theoretical risk at this point?
Join the conversation
TommyKapitz
This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm dealing with a similar situation as a freelance graphic designer working from my home office. One thing I wanted to add that hasn't been mentioned yet - if you're using a personal vehicle for business travel, make sure you're also tracking your total annual mileage (both business and personal). The IRS can ask for this during an audit to verify that your business mileage percentage is reasonable. I keep a simple annual mileage log where I record my odometer reading on January 1st and December 31st, plus note my business miles throughout the year. This helps show that my business travel claims are legitimate relative to my total driving. Also, for those using mileage tracking apps, I'd recommend occasionally cross-checking the app's calculations with manual odometer readings on longer trips. Technology is great, but having some manual verification gives you extra confidence in your records. The peace of mind is worth the few extra minutes of documentation!
This is excellent advice about tracking total annual mileage! I never thought about the IRS wanting to see the business vs personal ratio, but it makes total sense that they'd want to verify your claims are reasonable. Your point about cross-checking apps with manual odometer readings is spot on too - I've noticed some GPS-based apps can be off by a few miles here and there, especially in areas with poor signal. Do you have a recommendation for how to handle it when you forget to record your January 1st odometer reading? I'm realizing I didn't write mine down this year and I'm worried about having that gap in my documentation. Would a reading from early January be acceptable, or should I try to reconstruct it somehow from service records? Also, when you mention keeping track of the business mileage percentage, is there a threshold that might trigger additional scrutiny? Like if someone claims 80% of their driving is business-related, would that raise red flags compared to someone claiming 30%?
If you missed your January 1st reading, don't stress too much about it! An early January reading is definitely acceptable - the IRS understands that people don't always think to check their odometer on New Year's Day. You could also try to reconstruct it from service records, oil change receipts, or even insurance documents that might have mileage noted. The key is showing you made a good faith effort to track your annual mileage. As for the business percentage, there's no official threshold, but extremely high percentages (like 80-90%) might get a second look, especially if your business type doesn't typically require that much travel. The IRS looks for reasonableness - a delivery driver claiming 80% business use makes sense, but a home-based consultant might raise questions at that level. Generally, anything under 50% business use is pretty safe, and up to 70% is reasonable for many business types if you can document it well. The most important thing is that your percentage is consistent with your actual business activities and you have good records to back it up. A well-documented 60% business use is much stronger than a poorly documented 30%.
This has been such an informative discussion! As someone who's been hesitant to claim mileage deductions because I wasn't sure about the rules, this thread has given me the confidence to start tracking properly. One question I haven't seen addressed - what about mileage for business errands that aren't client visits? For example, if I drive from my home office to the bank to make business deposits, or to Office Depot to buy supplies for my consulting work, or to meet my accountant - are those trips deductible too? I've been assuming only client-related travel counts, but it sounds like any legitimate business purpose might qualify. I'm just worried about being too aggressive with what I claim since the IRS seems to scrutinize mileage deductions pretty carefully. Also, thank you to everyone who shared their audit experiences - it's really helpful to hear what the IRS actually looks for rather than just worrying about worst-case scenarios!
Ethan Clark
ā¢Yes, absolutely! Business errands like bank deposits, supply runs, and meetings with your accountant are totally legitimate business mileage deductions. The key is that the trip has a clear business purpose. I track all of these - trips to the post office to mail client deliverables, driving to pick up business cards, even going to networking events. You're not being too aggressive at all by claiming these. The IRS rule is simple: if the driving is "ordinary and necessary" for your business, it's deductible. Banking, purchasing supplies, and professional consultations definitely qualify. Just keep the same good documentation habits - note the date, destination, business purpose, and mileage. For example: "3/15/24 - Home to First National Bank - Business deposit - 8 miles round trip." This shows clear business intent and helps justify the deduction if questions ever arise. Don't let fear of scrutiny stop you from claiming legitimate deductions! The IRS is looking for people who inflate or fabricate expenses, not those who properly document real business travel.
Join the conversation
I just wanted to add another perspective here since I've seen this situation from the employer side. I work in payroll for a mid-sized company and we actually generate split W2s intentionally in several situations: 1. When employees move between states during the tax year 2. When we switch payroll providers mid-year (like Hannah mentioned) 3. When there are different state tax requirements that need separate tracking 4. For employees who work remotely in different states than our headquarters The key thing to remember is that both W2s are completely legitimate and required for accurate filing. The IRS expects you to report both forms - the federal wages/taxes from the complete W2 and the state wages/taxes from the state-only W2. From a technical standpoint, your employer is required to issue separate forms when the payroll system can't consolidate the information properly due to timing or system constraints. It's not an error - it's actually the correct way to handle certain situations to ensure compliance with both federal and state tax requirements. So definitely don't worry that you're doing something wrong by entering both W2s. The split format is an accepted practice and tax software is designed to handle it, even if the interface isn't always intuitive about it.
This is such valuable insight from the employer perspective! As someone who just went through this exact situation, it's really reassuring to hear that split W2s are actually the *correct* way to handle these scenarios, not just a quirk or mistake. Your explanation about the different triggers for split W2s (state moves, payroll system changes, remote work situations) really helps make sense of why this happens. I was starting to worry that my employer had messed something up, but now I understand it's actually proper compliance procedure. It's also good to know that the IRS expects both forms to be reported - I was second-guessing whether I should somehow combine them or only use one. Your confirmation that both are legitimate and required gives me confidence that I'm handling this correctly by entering both W2s separately in my tax software. Thanks for taking the time to share the payroll industry perspective on this! It really helps demystify what can be a confusing situation for employees.
This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm dealing with this exact same issue right now - two W2s from my employer, one complete and one with only boxes 18-20 filled out. I was panicking thinking something was wrong with my tax documents. After reading through everyone's experiences, I feel much more confident about how to handle this. It sounds like the key steps are: 1. Confirm with employer that the split W2s are intentional (not a mistake) 2. Enter the complete W2 first, then the state-only W2 second in your tax software 3. Look for the "Special Situations" or "W-2 has limited information" option in TurboTax, or consider switching to FreeTaxUSA if the interface is clearer 4. Both forms are legitimate and need to be reported separately Miguel's explanation from the payroll perspective was especially reassuring - knowing that this is actually the correct compliance procedure rather than an error makes me feel much better about proceeding. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences and solutions. This community is amazing for navigating these confusing tax situations!
You've done a great job summarizing all the key points from this thread! I just wanted to add one more tip that helped me when I was in this exact situation last year - if you're using TurboTax and still can't find the special options everyone mentioned, try using the search function within the software. I typed "state only W2" in the help search and it took me directly to the right section with step-by-step instructions. Sometimes the navigation menus hide these features, but the search function can be a lifesaver. Your step-by-step summary is perfect - I'm bookmarking this thread for future reference in case any friends run into the same issue!
Aidan Percy
I'm completely new to this authentication nightmare and just stumbled across this thread while desperately searching for solutions! I've been trapped in the exact same ID.me/IRS verification loop for the past week - ID.me shows I'm fully verified on their end, but every time I try to access my IRS account, it kicks me right back to the verification screen. I was honestly starting to think I'd somehow broken my account or missed something obvious. Reading through everyone's experiences has been both incredibly validating and super helpful. The technical explanations about OAuth handshakes and orphaned authentication tokens finally make this whole mess understandable - no wonder regular customer service keeps saying they can't see any issues when they literally don't have access to the backend systems causing the problem! Like so many others here, I made the mistake of calling the general IRS line and got caught in that maddening ping-pong game where each side insists it's the other's responsibility. Three different representatives told me three different things, and none of them could actually help. Based on all the detailed success stories in this thread, I'm planning to skip any more attempts with regular customer service and go straight to the Taxpayer Advocate Service at 877-777-4778 tomorrow morning. I'll use the exact technical terminology that multiple people have confirmed works: "authentication token synchronization error" and request them to "reset the OAuth handshake." This thread has honestly become the most comprehensive resource I've found for this issue - way more helpful than anything on the official IRS website! Thank you to everyone who shared their experiences and solutions. It's transformed what felt like an impossible situation into a clear action plan. I'll definitely update once I try the Taxpayer Advocate approach. Fingers crossed I can finally escape this authentication purgatory! š¤
0 coins
Taylor To
I'm dealing with this exact same authentication loop nightmare right now and this thread has been an absolute lifesaver! Like so many others here, I've been stuck for over a week with ID.me showing "verified" while the IRS keeps asking me to verify again and again. The finger-pointing between the two systems has been incredibly frustrating - spent hours getting bounced around with each side saying it's the other's problem. The technical explanations about OAuth handshakes and orphaned authentication tokens finally make this whole mess make sense. It's clearly a backend integration issue that regular customer service simply cannot access or fix, which explains all the "we can't see any issues on our end" responses. I'm definitely going to follow the proven approach that so many people have confirmed works: calling the Taxpayer Advocate Service at 877-777-4778 and using the specific terminology "authentication token synchronization error" and requesting them to "reset the OAuth handshake." Having these exact phrases feels like finally having the right key to unlock actual technical support instead of just getting transferred endlessly. This thread should honestly be featured as the official troubleshooting guide for this widespread but poorly documented issue. Thank you to everyone who shared their solutions and experiences - you've created an invaluable community resource that's far more helpful than anything on the actual IRS website! I'll report back once I try the Taxpayer Advocate approach.
0 coins