I'm dealing with the same exact situation! Filed my return on February 9th - simple W-2, standard deduction, nothing complicated - and my transcript has been completely blank for over 7 weeks now. This is my 12th year filing and I've never experienced anything like this before. What's really frustrating is that I actually need my refund to help cover some unexpected medical bills, so every week of delay is causing real financial stress. I've tried calling the IRS multiple times but like everyone else, I just get the "high call volume" disconnect. At this point I'm convinced there's a major systematic processing issue they're not being transparent about. The fact that so many people with straightforward returns are experiencing identical delays suggests this isn't about individual return complexity - it's clearly something on their end. I really wish they would just acknowledge the backlog publicly instead of maintaining the fiction that everything is processing normally in 21 days!

I'm in the same boat as everyone else here! Filed my return on February 16th with just W-2 income and standard deduction - about as straightforward as it gets - and my transcript has been completely blank for 6+ weeks now. This is my 15th year filing taxes and I've never seen anything like this before. What really struck me reading through all these comments is how many of us have simple returns that should process quickly, yet we're all stuck in the same limbo. It's clear this isn't about return complexity but rather some kind of systematic processing issue the IRS isn't acknowledging. The most frustrating part is their website still claims 21-day processing times when the reality is clearly very different this year. At least this thread has given me peace of mind that it's not something I did wrong - misery loves company, I guess! Really hoping we all see some movement soon. The lack of transparency from the IRS is honestly the worst part of this whole experience. 😤

This is such a common confusion with RSUs! I went through the exact same thing last year. Here's what I learned: When your RSUs vest, your company is required to withhold taxes at the supplemental wage rate (usually 22% or 37% depending on the amount). However, this withholding is often not enough to cover your full tax obligation, especially if you're in a higher tax bracket. The key thing to understand is that the FULL fair market value of all vested shares gets added to your W-2 income - not just the ones you kept after withholding. So if 100 shares vested at $50 each ($5,000 total value), that entire $5,000 goes on your W-2 even if they only gave you 78 shares after withholding 22 shares for taxes. If you sell immediately after vesting at roughly the same price, you'll have minimal capital gains impact. But you might still owe additional ordinary income tax when you file if the withholding wasn't sufficient for your tax bracket. I'd recommend calculating what your effective tax rate will be with the additional RSU income and compare it to the 22% they withheld. If there's a gap, consider setting aside some of your sale proceeds for taxes or make an estimated payment to avoid underpayment penalties.

Just want to add another perspective on the timing aspect that might help with your decision. Since you mentioned the stock has been volatile and you have more shares vesting in coming months, you might want to consider your overall tax strategy for the year. If you sell now, you'll realize any small capital gains/losses immediately. But if you hold and the stock drops significantly before your next vesting dates, those future vests will be taxed at the lower market value (which could actually be beneficial from a tax perspective, even though it's bad for your portfolio value). On the flip side, if you're already in a high tax bracket this year due to the current vesting, spreading out the tax impact might not matter much. In that case, taking the guaranteed proceeds now (as you mentioned wanting to do) is probably the safer play. One more thing - if you do decide to sell, make sure you understand which specific shares you're selling if you have multiple vesting dates. Most brokers default to FIFO (first in, first out), but you can sometimes specify which tax lots to sell to optimize your capital gains treatment. This becomes more important as you accumulate more shares over time.

Just wanted to chime in as someone who completed this process recently from Germany for YouTube monetization. The advice here is excellent - especially about using a Certified Acceptance Agent instead of mailing your original passport! One thing I'd add: when you contact TikTok for the required letter, be specific about what you need. I initially got a generic response, but when I mentioned "I need a letter for IRS Form W-7 stating that TikTok requires my US TIN for tax withholding and reporting purposes," they immediately knew what I needed and had it to me within 3 business days. Also, start the process sooner rather than later! I wish I had applied for my ITIN before I was actually ready to monetize. The waiting period felt endless when I had content ready to go but couldn't access the creator fund yet. The whole process is definitely worth it though - having that ITIN opens up so many monetization opportunities across different US platforms. Good luck with your application, Diego!

Hey Diego! Just wanted to add my experience as someone who went through this process last year from Canada for multiple platforms including TikTok. The advice everyone's given here is spot-on, but I'll add a few practical tips that helped me: 1. **Document preparation**: Before starting your W-7 application, scan/photocopy EVERYTHING. Even though you'll use a Certified Acceptance Agent, having digital copies helped me double-check all the information was consistent across documents. 2. **TikTok letter timing**: Request the letter from TikTok BEFORE you start your W-7 application. When I contacted creator support, I said exactly: "I need a letter for my IRS Form W-7 ITIN application confirming that TikTok requires my US TIN for tax withholding and reporting compliance." Got it in 4 days. 3. **CAA selection**: Not all Certified Acceptance Agents are equal! I called a few in my area and found one who specifically mentioned experience with content creators. They knew exactly what documents were needed and helped me avoid potential issues. 4. **Timeline planning**: I applied in September (off-peak season) and got my ITIN in exactly 9 weeks. If you're planning to monetize soon, start this process immediately - don't wait until you're approved for monetization. The process seems daunting but it's absolutely worth it. Once you have your ITIN, you're set for TikTok, YouTube, Instagram, and any future US platforms. Best investment I made in my creator journey!

I'm a tax preparer here in Michigan and can confirm what others have said - your brother can absolutely file his taxes without any issues from the suspended license. These are completely separate systems. However, since he's in Michigan, I want to give you specific info: Michigan does participate in the Treasury Offset Program for state tax refunds. The Michigan Department of Treasury can intercept state refunds to pay debts owed to state agencies, including Secretary of State fees for license reinstatement. But here's the key - not all debts are automatically enrolled in this program. The debt typically needs to be referred by the agency (in this case, the Secretary of State) and meet certain criteria. Since your brother's suspension is relatively recent and he's been working on resolving it, there's a good chance his fees haven't been referred to the offset program yet. My recommendation: have him call the Michigan Department of Treasury at (517) 636-4486 and ask if there are any offsets registered against his Social Security number. They can tell him definitively whether his state refund would be affected. He should also still call the Secretary of State to ask about payment plan options for the reinstatement fees. Either way, he absolutely needs to file his taxes on time. The federal refund will be unaffected, and even if the state takes part of his refund, he'll still likely get something back.

I've been following this thread and wanted to add one more resource that might help your brother. Since he's short on cash for the reinstatement fees, he should know that Michigan offers payment plans for license reinstatement fees in certain circumstances. He can contact the Secretary of State's Driver License Appeal Division at (517) 322-1624 to ask about hardship payment plans. They sometimes allow people to pay the reinstatement fees in installments, especially if they can demonstrate financial hardship. Also, some counties in Michigan have "amnesty" programs periodically where they reduce or waive certain fees for suspended licenses. It's worth calling his local Secretary of State office to ask if any such programs are currently available. The key thing is to be proactive about communicating with them rather than just avoiding the issue. They're often willing to work with people who are making an effort to resolve their suspension, and having a payment plan in place might also prevent his case from being referred to the Treasury offset program. Good luck to your brother - it sounds like he's got a clear path forward now between filing his taxes normally and getting his license situation sorted out!

This is such a frustrating situation that so many remote workers are dealing with! I went through the same thing last year when my company suddenly decided that working from home 3 days a week meant I couldn't claim mileage for client visits anymore. What really helped me was putting together a clear timeline showing that my home office arrangement was officially established by my employer, not just something I decided on my own. I included emails where my manager confirmed my hybrid schedule, any home office equipment they provided, and documentation of the regular work I do from home. The IRS is pretty clear that if your employer has established your home as a regular work location (which yours has by officially allowing you to work remotely 3 days a week), then travel from there to temporary work locations like client sites is business mileage, not commuting. The key word is "temporary" - if you're visiting different client sites rather than going to the same location every day, that strengthens your case. I'd suggest creating a simple presentation for your boss showing: 1) Your official remote work arrangement, 2) The varying client locations you visit, 3) The relevant IRS guidance on home-based workplaces. Sometimes employers just need to see it laid out clearly to understand they're interpreting the rules incorrectly.

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm dealing with the exact same issue where my employer is claiming that since I work from home, any travel to client sites is considered "commuting" and not reimbursable. One thing I wanted to add that might help others - I found that documenting the *business necessity* of each client visit really strengthened my case. I started keeping a log that included not just the mileage and destination, but also the specific business purpose (client meeting, project site visit, equipment delivery, etc.) and who requested/approved each visit. When I presented this to HR along with the IRS guidance that others have mentioned, it became much harder for them to argue that these were personal commuting expenses. The documentation showed that these weren't routine trips to a fixed workplace, but legitimate business travel to serve different clients at varying locations. I think the key is showing that your situation fits the IRS definition of travel between work locations rather than home-to-office commuting. The more specific you can be about the business nature of each trip, the stronger your case becomes.