IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Carmen Vega

β€’

Is anyone actually getting good service from them this year? I submitted on March 15th and didn't hear back until March 21st - that's 6 days not 2! With April 15th just around the corner, I'm skeptical they're managing their workload properly. Seems like they've oversold their capacity.

0 coins

QuantumQuester

β€’

I've used H&R Block's virtual tax pro service for three consecutive tax years and can confirm their current processing delays. Here's what you need to do to expedite your return: 1. Login to your H&R Block account 2. Navigate to the Message Center (not the general status page) 3. Send a direct message to your assigned preparer requesting status 4. If no response within 24 hours, call the Priority Support line at their main number 5. Reference your specific submission ID when speaking with representatives Their system prioritizes returns based on both submission date and client follow-up frequency. I've consistently found that a single follow-up message moves your return higher in their queue.

0 coins

Zoe Stavros

β€’

This advice is gold! Just followed your steps and got a response within an hour saying they're expediting my return. Thank you so much for sharing your insider knowledge!

0 coins

Dmitry Popov

β€’

I can't find any "Priority Support line" when I call their main number - just the regular customer service queue that everyone else mentioned takes forever. Are you referring to a specific extension or menu option? Also, how do you get assigned a specific preparer? My dashboard just shows "awaiting professional review" with no individual contact information.

0 coins

GalacticGuru

β€’

Has anyone actually done the ITIN application themselves without an acceptance agent? I'm in a similar situation but don't want to pay the agent fees.

0 coins

I did it myself from Canada last year. You CAN do it on your own, but you'll need to send original documents (like your passport) or get certified copies from your issuing agency. I wasn't comfortable sending my passport, so I got certified copies which was a whole process with my local government. It took about 3 months total to get my ITIN, and there was a lot of anxiety waiting to make sure everything was processed correctly. If I had to do it again, I'd probably just pay an acceptance agent for the convenience and peace of mind.

0 coins

I've been through this exact process twice - once as someone who was overly cautious like you, and once after learning how the system actually works. Your acceptance agent is absolutely following proper procedure. The key thing to understand is that CAAs aren't just random third parties - they're specifically authorized by the IRS and bound by strict regulations. When they submit your package, they're essentially vouching for the authenticity of your documents with their certification credentials on the line. Here's what helped me feel more comfortable: ask your agent to walk you through their submission process step by step. A legitimate CAA should be happy to explain exactly where your documents go, what tracking methods they use, and when you can expect updates. They should also provide you with a receipt showing exactly what was submitted and when. Also, keep copies of everything before handing it over. While the agent handles the mailing, you should still have complete documentation of what was sent. Most reputable agents will actually insist on this as part of their process. The acceptance agent route really is designed to make the process smoother and faster for international applicants. Fighting the system usually just creates more delays and complications.

0 coins

Liam Mendez

β€’

This is really helpful advice! I'm new to this whole process and honestly feeling overwhelmed by all the different opinions and services being mentioned. Your point about asking the agent to walk through their process makes a lot of sense - a legitimate agent should be transparent about their procedures. I'm curious though - when you went through it the second time, did you use any of the online services like taxr.ai or Claimyr that others have mentioned? Or did you just work directly with the CAA? I'm trying to figure out if these additional services are worth it or if they're just adding unnecessary complexity to what should be a straightforward process. Also, how long did it take from submission to receiving your ITIN the second time around? I'm trying to plan my tax filing timeline and want to make sure I'm being realistic about the wait times.

0 coins

Joshua Wood

β€’

Great question! For my second ITIN application (I moved to a different country and needed to update my information), I worked directly with the CAA without using any third-party services. By that point, I understood the process well enough that I didn't feel I needed the extra layer of review services. However, I can see how services like taxr.ai could be valuable for first-timers - especially for document review and verification. The peace of mind factor is real when you're dealing with important tax documents from overseas. As for Claimyr, I didn't need to contact the IRS during my second application since everything went smoothly, but I wish I had known about it during my first attempt when I had questions and couldn't get through to anyone. Timeline-wise, my second application took exactly 7 weeks from when my CAA submitted it to receiving my ITIN letter. This was much faster than my first self-submitted application which took about 12 weeks. The CAA route definitely seems to have priority processing. My advice: if you're comfortable with your CAA and they're being transparent about their process, you probably don't need additional services. But if you're feeling uncertain or want that extra validation, the document review services might be worth the peace of mind for your first time through the process.

0 coins

Deferred Compensation W2 Reporting - How to Handle Vesting and Earnings on 401(k)

I'm trying to figure out the correct W2 reporting for my deferred compensation plan. Specifically about the vesting schedule and how to report earnings on vested portions. Here's my situation: My employer contributed $75,000 that vests 1/3 each year from when it was awarded. It's an account balance plan where I basically have my own individual account. My account earns returns based on market performance - roughly 70% S&P 500 ETF and 30% dividend ETF mix. Year 1: $25,000 of the $75,000 award vests (1/3), plus I earned about $8,100 based on the performance of the whole amount. Total account value: $83,100. Year 2: Another $25,000 vests (now 2/3 vested), plus the account earned about $10,000. Total account value: $93,100. Year 3: The final $25,000 vests (fully vested), plus the account earned about $11,200. Total account value around $104,300. I understand that as the account vests, the amounts need to be included in FICA earnings under the special timing rule. What I'm confused about is WHEN the earnings on the account need to be reported. Question 1: For Year 1, do I include $25,000 plus ALL the $8,100 in earnings, or only 1/3 ($2,700) of the earnings since the account was only 1/3 vested? Question 2: For Year 2, I know I include the newly vested $25,000, but what about the $10,000 in earnings? Some portion of these earnings must be from already vested and reported amounts. Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Zara Malik

β€’

Has anyone else noticed that the W2 Box 12 code for deferred compensation seems to vary? My previous employer used code Y but my current one is using code D. Does the code matter for reporting purposes?

0 coins

Luca Marino

β€’

Those are different types of deferred compensation! Code D is for 401(k) contributions while Code Y is for non-qualified deferred compensation plans under Section 409A. The reporting requirements we're discussing mainly apply to the Section 409A plans (Code Y), which have different rules than qualified retirement plans like 401(k)s.

0 coins

Carmen Ortiz

β€’

This is a great breakdown of a complex topic! One thing I'd add is that you should also verify that your employer is correctly handling the Social Security wage base limit. For 2025, once your cumulative FICA wages hit the Social Security wage base ($176,100), you stop paying Social Security tax but continue paying Medicare tax. With deferred compensation, this can get tricky because the vesting and earnings might push you over the limit in ways that aren't immediately obvious from your regular salary. I've seen cases where employees ended up overpaying Social Security tax because their payroll department didn't properly coordinate the deferred comp reporting with their regular wages. Also, make sure your employer isn't double-counting any amounts. Sometimes when corrections are made to prior year reporting, there can be overlap that results in the same earnings being subject to FICA multiple times. If you're getting conflicting information from your plan administrator, consider requesting a meeting with both HR and payroll to walk through a specific example year. Having everyone in the same room often helps identify where the confusion is coming from.

0 coins

This is such an important point about the Social Security wage base limit! I never considered how deferred comp vesting could push someone over the limit unexpectedly. Carmen, when you mention requesting a meeting with both HR and payroll, what specific documentation should someone bring to that meeting? I'm thinking about doing this for my own situation since I'm getting different answers from different departments about how my earnings are being allocated. Also, has anyone dealt with a situation where the deferred comp vesting happens late in the year? I'm wondering if that creates additional complications with the wage base calculations since most of your regular salary would have already been processed by then.

0 coins

Mei Liu

β€’

I'm so sorry you're dealing with this recurring nightmare - four different W2 versions last year followed by this mess is completely unacceptable. Your employer's refusal to provide W2C forms to employees while claiming they'll "only send to the IRS" shows a fundamental misunderstanding (or deliberate misrepresentation) of their legal obligations. Here's my take after reading everyone's excellent advice: You're absolutely in the right to demand proper W2C forms. The IRS requires employers to provide corrected forms to employees, period. Their excuse about "avoiding confusion" is nonsense - the W2C form is specifically designed to show corrections clearly. Given their terrible track record, I'd recommend this approach: **Immediate steps:** - Request your wage and income transcript (Form 4506-T) to see what they've actually filed with the IRS - Send a formal written demand for your W2C forms, citing IRS Publication 15 - File Form 4868 for an extension to buy yourself time **If they continue to stonewall:** - File Form 3949-A to report them to the IRS - Consider the services others mentioned (Claimyr) to get direct IRS assistance Don't let them gaslight you into thinking this is normal or acceptable. After years of incompetence, they've lost any right to your patience. You deserve accurate tax documents, and you have every legal right to demand them. Stay strong - employers like this count on people just giving up!

0 coins

This is such a comprehensive action plan! I'm in a similar boat with my employer and feeling overwhelmed by all the bureaucratic steps, but you've broken it down really clearly. The part about not letting them gaslight you really resonates - my company keeps saying things like "this is just how payroll corrections work" and "you'll get your forms eventually," but reading all these responses makes it clear that's complete BS. They're legally required to provide W2Cs to employees, not just file them with the IRS. I'm definitely going to start with requesting that wage and income transcript. It sounds like having concrete evidence of what they've actually submitted (or haven't submitted) completely changes the power dynamic when you're trying to get them to comply with their obligations. Thanks for emphasizing the extension option too - I was feeling pressured to just file with incorrect info to meet the deadline, but you're right that it's better to do it right the first time rather than deal with amended returns later.

0 coins

This is absolutely maddening, and I completely understand your frustration after dealing with this level of incompetence for multiple years. Your employer's stance is not just wrong - it's potentially illegal. Let me be crystal clear: **Employers are legally required to provide W2C forms to employees when corrections are made.** They cannot just send corrections to the IRS and leave you hanging. The W2C form exists specifically so employees have the corrected information they need to file accurate tax returns. Here's what I'd do immediately: 1. **Document everything in writing** - Send an email requesting your W2C forms and explicitly state that IRS regulations require employers to furnish corrected forms to employees, not just the IRS (cite IRS Publication 15, Circular E). 2. **Get proof of what they've actually filed** - Request Form 4506-T (wage and income transcript) from the IRS to see what your employer has really submitted. This often reveals that companies making these excuses haven't filed anything at all. 3. **File for an extension** - Use Form 4868 to extend your deadline to October 15th. Don't let their dysfunction force you into filing with incorrect information. 4. **Set consequences** - Give them a specific deadline (10 business days) and mention that you'll file Form 3949-A with the IRS if they don't comply. After four different W2 versions last year and now this refusal, your employer has proven they can't be trusted. Stop being patient with their incompetence - you have legal rights here, and it's time to use them. They're counting on you just accepting their excuses and dealing with the mess yourself. Stand your ground. You deserve accurate tax documents, and you have every right to demand them.

0 coins

Paolo Rizzo

β€’

This thread has been incredibly educational! I had no idea about the suspension of unreimbursed employee business expenses through 2025. As someone who frequently travels for work (though my employer reimburses most expenses), I've been assuming the old rules were still in place. @fd802658100b, I'm sorry your upgrade isn't deductible, but at least you found out before filing! This is a great reminder for all of us to stay current on tax law changes. The TCJA really did reshape a lot of common deductions that people took for granted. One follow-up question for the group: if someone is self-employed or an independent contractor rather than a W-2 employee, would the upgrade fee potentially be deductible as a business expense on Schedule C? I'm thinking the rules might be different for business owners versus employees when it comes to mixed personal/business travel expenses.

0 coins

Ezra Bates

β€’

That's a great question about self-employed individuals! Yes, the rules are quite different for Schedule C filers. Self-employed people and independent contractors can still deduct ordinary and necessary business expenses, including travel expenses, because these weren't affected by the TCJA suspension that eliminated unreimbursed employee business expense deductions. For a self-employed person in @fd802658100b's exact situation, the upgrade fee could potentially be deductible if they could demonstrate it was necessary for conducting business during the flight. They'd still need to allocate between personal and business use (so likely only their portion, not their spouse's), but the path to deductibility exists. The key difference is that W-2 employees lost the ability to deduct unreimbursed expenses, while business owners retained their ability to deduct legitimate business expenses on Schedule C. It's one of the often-overlooked distinctions in how the tax law changes affected different types of workers.

0 coins

This has been such an enlightening discussion! I came in thinking about tax strategy and learned I was operating on completely outdated information. @139d9cb77778 thank you for that crucial clarification about the TCJA suspension - you probably saved me from making a filing error. And @618db9ad3f82, that list of other suspended deductions is eye-opening. I definitely need to recalculate whether itemizing even makes sense anymore. It's fascinating how @c4bc2da0165f pointed out the difference between W-2 employees and self-employed individuals. Makes me wonder if there are other scenarios where the old rules still apply that most people don't know about. For anyone else reading this thread: definitely double-check your assumptions about what's deductible under current law! I was completely wrong about unreimbursed employee expenses, and apparently so were several other people here. Better to learn this now than during an audit. Thanks everyone for turning what I thought was a simple question into a comprehensive tax education!

0 coins

Prev1...717718719720721...5643Next